I have a list of thumbnails with a title on top of them. The background of the title should be multiplied on the image behind, but not the text.
HTML:
<a href="#" class="thumbslink">
<figure>
<img src="imagelink" />
</figure>
<div class="title-wrapper">
<div class="title">
<span class="background"></span>
<p> Title </p>
</div>
</div>
</a>
CSS:
a.thumbslink {
position: relative;
}
a.thumbslink figure {
aspect-ratio: 3/2;
position: relative;
}
img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
div.title-wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
div.title {
position: relative;
}
div.title p {
color: white;
font-size: 3em;
line-height: 1;
width: auto;
z-index: 1;
padding: 1rem;
}
div.title span.background {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 2rem;
background-color: red;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
z-index: 0;
}
But the <span class="background"> element keeps sitting on top of everything, multiplying red color over the image and the title, even if its z-index says it should be behind the title and the title element is rendered after the background span.
Working with :before and :after pseudo-elements didn't solve the problem.
What can I do?
Thank you.
This isn't quite a full explanation as I don't know enough about the relationship between z-index and parent/child elements.
So one simple fix to deal with annoying z-index issues is to assign a value of -1 to an element to force it to a lower priority. However, doing that by itself would cause your red background element to go behind all other elements on the page. So in order to keep it above the image, we need the parent element of our red background to also have its z-index set to a value that would keep it above the image.
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
figure { margin: 0; }
img {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
object-fit: cover;
}
div.title-wrapper {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
}
div.title {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
div.title p {
color: white;
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 3em;
line-height: 1;
width: auto;
font-weight: bold;
z-index: 1;
padding: 1rem;
}
div.title span.background {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 2rem;
background-color: red;
z-index: -1;
}
<a href="#" class="thumbslink">
<figure>
<img src="https://picsum.photos/seed/picsum/200/300" />
</figure>
<div class="title-wrapper">
<div class="title">
<span class="background"></span>
<p> Title </p>
</div>
</div>
</a>
Related
I have an image and i want to put 2 circles on top of it, instead of the eyes.
body {
background-color: lightgrey;
color: #fff;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
main {
display: grid;
place-items: center;
position: relative;
}
#container {
min-height: 100vw;
min-width: 100vw;
background: none;
aspect-ratio: 1 / 1;
}
.eye-container {
position: relative;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: red;
width: 12vw;
height: 12vw;
}
.eye-container.left {
top: -84%;
left: 36%;
}
.eye-container.right {
top: -96%;
left: 51%;
}
.eye {
position: absolute;
bottom: 3px;
right: 2px;
display: block;
width: 3vw;
height: 3vw;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: #000;
}
img {
max-width: 100%;
min-width: 100%;
}
<main>
<div id="container">
<img id="sponge" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3b/SpongeBob_SquarePants_character.svg/220px-SpongeBob_SquarePants_character.svg.png">
<div class="eye-container left">
<div class="eye"></div>
</div>
<div class="eye-container right">
<div class="eye"></div>
</div>
</div>
</main>
The current issue is the image is too big, it is stretched.
The initial problem was that the layout was not responsive on mobile, and i've did some changes and now the image is this big.
I've used aspect-ratio: 1 / 1; because top was not working with negative percentage, and with pixels the eyes location is changing if is shrink the window.
Do you have another suggestion, maybe a simplified code will be better.
Thank you.
I'm a noob developer and I felt like, this was a tiny engineering job "LOL" but I did it for you.
So the most important point in this is to keep the image and the eyes in the same position. and to do that, you should position them in a parent container for image and eyes considering four important factors:
1- Parent position: relative; All children position: absolute;
2- All children's width: %; so it can stay in the same spot in its parent whatever the width of the parent is.
3- Eyes and eyeballs positioning top, left, right must be % too for the same purpose.
4- To change the image size, use the parent width. do not change the image size.
If you follow these steps, you can position any element with any image or other element.
* {
border: 1px solid blue;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.container {
width: 200px; /* use this to change the picture size. do not change it somewhere else */
position: relative;
}
.image {
width: 100%;
}
.eye-container{
position: absolute;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: red;
width: 12%;
height: 12%;
}
.left-eye {
top: 17%;
left: 36%;
}
.right-eye {
top: 17%;
left: 51%;
}
.eyeball {
position: absolute;
bottom: 3px;
right: 2px;
display: block;
width: 30%;
height: 30%;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: #000;
}
<div class="container">
<img class="image" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/3b/SpongeBob_SquarePants_character.svg/220px-SpongeBob_SquarePants_character.svg.png">
<div class="left-eye eye-container">
<div class="eyeball"></div>
</div>
<div class="right-eye eye-container">
<div class="eyeball"></div>
</div>
</div>
I am using mix-blend-mode on css-generated content to create a multiplied background effect.
When I apply this generated element to an outer wrapper it has the intended effect:
.standard-cover {
background: blue;
color: #fff;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
display: flex;
}
.standard-cover:after {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 20;
content: "";
background: blue;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.image-wrap {
line-height: 0;
}
img {
object-fit: cover;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 10;
}
.content-wrap {
position: relative;
text-align:center;
z-index: 30;
min-height: 1em;
margin: auto;
padding: 3.33%;
}
<div class="standard-cover">
<div class="image-wrap">
<img src="http://placeimg.com/480/480/nature" alt="Nature">
</div>
<div class="content-wrap">
<div class="content">
<h2>A title</h2>
<p>A pagragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
When I apply it to an inner wrapper it does not:
.standard-cover {
position: absolute;
background: blue;
color: #fff;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
display: flex;
}
.image-wrap {
line-height: 0;
}
img {
object-fit: cover;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 10;
}
.content-wrap {
position: relative;
text-align:center;
z-index: 30;
min-height: 1em;
margin: auto;
padding: 3.33%;
}
.content-wrap:after {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 20;
content: "";
background: blue;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 30;
}
<div class="standard-cover">
<div class="image-wrap">
<img src="http://placeimg.com/480/480/nature" alt="Nature">
</div>
<div class="content-wrap">
<div class="content">
<h2>A title</h2>
<p>A pagragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
In both cases the actual css that applies the faux background color is identical:
.class:after {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 20;
content: "";
background: blue;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
But in the first example it in fact applies the mix-blend-mode effect properly. In the second example it does not (despite inspectors confirming that the mix-blend-mode attribute is present and set to multiply).
Is there some nuance to the mix-blend-mode spec that I'm not understanding? Or am I missing some crucial something in my code?
It's all about stacking context. In the first case, the pseudo element is applied to .standard-cover where there is the background so its a child element of it and mix-blend-mode will work correctly because both belong to the same stacking context. In the second case, you moved the pseudo element to .content-wrap and there is a z-index specified so now it belong to another stacking context and mix-blend-mode will no more have effect outside.
An easy solution is to remove the z-index from .content-wrap to avoid creating a stacking context and mix-blend-mode will work like intended:
.standard-cover {
position: absolute;
background: blue;
color: #fff;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
display: flex;
}
.image-wrap {
line-height: 0;
}
img {
object-fit: cover;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 10;
}
.content-wrap {
position: relative;
text-align:center;
min-height: 1em;
margin: auto;
padding: 3.33%;
}
.content-wrap:after {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 20;
content: "";
background: blue;
mix-blend-mode: multiply;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 30;
}
<div class="standard-cover">
<div class="image-wrap">
<img src="http://placeimg.com/480/480/nature" alt="Nature">
</div>
<div class="content-wrap">
<div class="content">
<h2>A title</h2>
<p>A pagragraph</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Note: Applying a blendmode other than normal to the element must establish a new stacking context [CSS21]. This group must then be blended and composited with the stacking context that contains the element. ref
I achieved the same effect by applying the mix-blend-mode: difference !important; and filter: invert(1) !important; styles to the header element of my nav-bar, the nav-bar itself has a transparent background so it only finds of the difference of the child elements against the background.
I was building a meme with top and bottom text.
I am in need of rotating an image so I did it with transform: rotate(90deg);, but it's overlapped parent's div like the following example.
h1 {
margin-top: 100px;
}
.parent {
border: 1px solid black;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
background: #777;
}
.parent .rotate {
transform: rotate(90deg);
width: 100px;
}
.parent h4 {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
text-align: center;
color: white;
z-index: 1;
}
.parent .top {
top: 10px;
}
.parent .bottom {
bottom: 10px;
}
<div class="parent">
<h4 class="top">Top Text</h4>
<img class="rotate" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7uOyzdXhG2Y/UVpJUbwqGzI/AAAAAAAAAo0/35w5N8tPvHE/s640/iphone-5-hd-wallpapers-hd-41664-tpmw7.jpg" />
<h4 class="bottom">Bottom Text</h4>
</div>
How can I change the style of the parent div to match the position and size of the rotated image?
First, we need to change the height of the div to be same as width.
We can do it by
.parent{
background-color: red;
width: 100%;
padding-top: 100%; /* 1:1 Aspect Ratio */
position: relative; /* If you want text inside of it */
}
Second, we need an additional div inside it that has absolute position with full width and height of it.
We can use flex to center the image inside that absolute div.
Here is a working code.
h1 {
margin-top: 100px;
}
.container {
display: inline-block;
width: 300px;
}
.parent {
border: 1px solid black;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
background: #777;
width: 100%;
padding-top: 100%;
position: relative;
}
.p-absolute {
bottom: 0;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
margin-top: auto;
margin-bottom: 0;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.parent .rotate {
transform: rotate(90deg);
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
.parent h4 {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
text-align: center;
color: white;
z-index: 1;
}
.parent .top {
top: 10px;
}
.parent .bottom {
bottom: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="parent">
<h4 class="top">Top Text</h4>
<div class="p-absolute">
<img class="rotate" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-7uOyzdXhG2Y/UVpJUbwqGzI/AAAAAAAAAo0/35w5N8tPvHE/s640/iphone-5-hd-wallpapers-hd-41664-tpmw7.jpg" />
</div>
<h4 class="bottom">Bottom Text</h4>
</div>
</div>
I want to align the bottom of my mat icon and that of the img next to it. I've tried multiple things, and this is what it currently looks like:
Here's my HTML:
<div class="container">
<p class="triage"><mat-icon>assignment_ind</mat-icon></p>
<p class="O2"><img src="../../assets/med_O2.png"></p>
</div>
CSS:
.O2, .triage{
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.container img {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
}
.container mat-icon{
font-size: 60px;
width: 60px;
}
Use line-height:
.container
{
line-height: 60px; //or what ever height your container is
}
Can you push mat-icon down with a little bit of margin or padding?
.container mat-icon{
font-size: 60px;
width: 60px;
margin-top: 5px;
}
What about something like this?
<style>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 65px;
height: 100px;
}
p.triage {
background: blue;
width: 30px;
height: 40px;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
}
p.O2 {
width: 30px;
height: 20px;
background: red;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
}
</style>
<div class="container">
<p class="triage"></p>
<p class="O2"></p>
</div>
My problem is that I wanted to have split page by two divs side by side (50% width). Inside of them I wanted to place another divs and make them aligned vertically and horizontally at the same time.
I think that it is possible to make it without JS, but I'm not able to do that.
Can anybody make my two circles placed in the center (V,H) of their parent DIV, which are 50% of width and 100% of height so that when I will resize my window the circles will always be in center (and side by side as is now)?
Here is my code:
<div id="container">
<div class="left">
<div class="kolo1">
sometext1
</div>
</div>
<div class="right">
<div class="kolo2">
sometext 2
</div>
</div>
</div>
And a JSFiddle for that: http://jsfiddle.net/m5LCx/
Thanks in advance in solving my quest :)
It's actually quite simple, all you need to do is to simulate a table-like behaviour:
HTML markup:
<div id="container">
<div>
<div class="half left">
<div class="circle">hello</div>
</div>
<div class="half right">
<div class="circle">world</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS styles:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
#container {
display: table;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
#container > div {
display: table-row;
}
.half {
display: table-cell;
width: 50%;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.half.left {
background: red;
}
.half.right {
background: blue;
}
.circle {
display: inline-block;
padding: 50px;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.half.left .circle {
background: blue;
}
.half.right .circle {
background: red;
}
Final result http://jsfiddle.net/m5LCx/11/:
Working here http://jsfiddle.net/3KmbV/
add position: relative in .left and .right class and than add margin: auto; position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; in .kolo1 and .kolo2 class. and remove top position from .left class
try it
body {
background-color: #006666;
margin: 0 auto;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
font-size: 62.5%;
}
#container {
width: 100%;
min-height: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
.left {
width: 50%;
min-height: 100%;
float: left;
top: 0;
background-color: #660066;
position: relative;
}
.right {
width: 50%;
min-height: 100%;
float: right;
min-height: 100%;
background-color: #003366;
position: relative;
}
.kolo1 {
background-color: #0f0;
width: 10em;
height: 10em;
border-radius: 5em;
line-height: 10em;
text-align: center;
margin: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
.kolo2 {
background-color: #00f;
width: 10em;
height: 10em;
border-radius: 5em;
line-height: 10em;
text-align: center;
margin: auto;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
you can give postion: relative to .left and .right.
and give below CSS for to .kolo1 and .kolo2
margin: -5em 0 0 -5em;
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
Updated demo
Another fiddle. This one uses absolute positioning with negative margins to ensure the circles are always in the centre. CSS looks like this
.kolo1 {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin-left: -5em; /* this must be half of the width */
margin-top: -5em; /* this must be half of the height */
}
As #Tushar points out, you need to set the position of the parent element to relative also.
Working Fiddle
.kolo1 {
background-color: #0f0;
width: 10em;
height: 10em;
border-radius: 5em;
line-height: 10em;
text-align: center;
margin: 50% auto 0 auto;
}
.kolo2 {
background-color: #00f;
width: 10em;
height: 10em;
border-radius: 5em;
line-height: 10em;
text-align: center;
margin: 50% auto 0 auto;
}
Try adding padding-top:50% for parent divs (having class left and right)