Related
I have a bunch of elements with a class name red, but I can't seem to select the first element with the class="red" using the following CSS rule:
.home .red:first-child {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
What is wrong in this selector and how do I correct it to target the first child with class red?
This is one of the most well-known examples of authors misunderstanding how :first-child works. Introduced in CSS2, the :first-child pseudo-class represents the very first child of its parent. That's it. There's a very common misconception that it picks up whichever child element is the first to match the conditions specified by the rest of the compound selector. Due to the way selectors work (see here for an explanation), that is simply not true.
Selectors level 3 introduces a :first-of-type pseudo-class, which represents the first element among siblings of its element type. This answer explains, with illustrations, the difference between :first-child and :first-of-type. However, as with :first-child, it does not look at any other conditions or attributes. In HTML, the element type is represented by the tag name. In the question, that type is p.
Unfortunately, there is no similar :first-of-class pseudo-class for matching the first child element of a given class. At the time this answer was first posted, the newly published FPWD of Selectors level 4 introduced an :nth-match() pseudo-class, designed around existing selector mechanics as I mentioned in the first paragraph by adding a selector-list argument, through which you can supply the rest of the compound selector to get the desired filtering behavior. In recent years this functionality was subsumed into :nth-child() itself, with the selector list appearing as an optional second argument, to simplify things as well as averting the false impression that :nth-match() matched across the entire document (see the final note below).
While we await cross-browser support (seriously, it's been nearly 10 years, and there has only been a single implementation for the last 5 of those years), one workaround that Lea Verou and I developed independently (she did it first!) is to first apply your desired styles to all your elements with that class:
/*
* Select all .red children of .home, including the first one,
* and give them a border.
*/
.home > .red {
border: 1px solid red;
}
... then "undo" the styles for elements with the class that come after the first one, using the general sibling combinator ~ in an overriding rule:
/*
* Select all but the first .red child of .home,
* and remove the border from the previous rule.
*/
.home > .red ~ .red {
border: none;
}
Now only the first element with class="red" will have a border.
Here's an illustration of how the rules are applied:
.home > .red {
border: 1px solid red;
}
.home > .red ~ .red {
border: none;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span> <!-- [1] -->
<p class="red">first</p> <!-- [2] -->
<p class="red">second</p> <!-- [3] -->
<p class="red">third</p> <!-- [3] -->
<p class="red">fourth</p> <!-- [3] -->
</div>
No rules are applied; no border is rendered.
This element does not have the class red, so it's skipped.
Only the first rule is applied; a red border is rendered.
This element has the class red, but it's not preceded by any elements with the class red in its parent. Thus the second rule is not applied, only the first, and the element keeps its border.
Both rules are applied; no border is rendered.
This element has the class red. It is also preceded by at least one other element with the class red. Thus both rules are applied, and the second border declaration overrides the first, thereby "undoing" it, so to speak.
As a bonus, although it was introduced in Selectors 3, the general sibling combinator is actually pretty well-supported by IE7 and newer, unlike :first-of-type and :nth-of-type() which are only supported by IE9 onward. If you need good browser support, you're in luck.
In fact, the fact that the sibling combinator is the only important component in this technique, and it has such amazing browser support, makes this technique very versatile — you can adapt it for filtering elements by other things, besides class selectors:
You can use this to work around :first-of-type in IE7 and IE8, by simply supplying a type selector instead of a class selector (again, more on its incorrect usage in the question in a later section):
article > p {
/* Apply styles to article > p:first-of-type, which may or may not be :first-child */
}
article > p ~ p {
/* Undo the above styles for every subsequent article > p */
}
You can filter by attribute selectors or any other simple selectors instead of classes.
You can also combine this overriding technique with pseudo-elements even though pseudo-elements technically aren't simple selectors.
Note that in order for this to work, you will need to know in advance what the default styles will be for your other sibling elements so you can override the first rule. Additionally, since this involves overriding rules in CSS, you can't achieve the same thing with a single selector for use with the Selectors API, or Selenium's CSS locators.
On a final note, keep in mind that this answer assumes that the question is looking for any number of first child elements having a given class. There is neither a pseudo-class nor even a generic CSS solution for the nth match of a complex selector across the entire document — whether a solution exists depends heavily on the document structure. jQuery provides :eq(), :first, :last and more for this purpose, but note again that they function very differently from :nth-child() et al. Using the Selectors API, you can either use document.querySelector() to obtain the very first match:
var first = document.querySelector('.home > .red');
Or use document.querySelectorAll() with an indexer to pick any specific match:
var redElements = document.querySelectorAll('.home > .red');
var first = redElements[0];
var second = redElements[1];
// etc
Although the .red:nth-of-type(1) solution in the original accepted answer by Philip Daubmeier works (which was originally written by Martyn but deleted since), it does not behave the way you'd expect it to.
For example, if you only wanted to select the p here:
<p class="red"></p>
<div class="red"></div>
... then you can't use .red:first-of-type (equivalent to .red:nth-of-type(1)), because each element is the first (and only) one of its type (p and div respectively), so both will be matched by the selector.
When the first element of a certain class is also the first of its type, the pseudo-class will work, but this happens only by coincidence. This behavior is demonstrated in Philip's answer. The moment you stick in an element of the same type before this element, the selector will fail. Taking the markup from the question:
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
Applying a rule with .red:first-of-type will work, but once you add another p without the class:
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p>dummy</p>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
... the selector will immediately fail, because the first .red element is now the second p element.
The :first-child selector is intended, like the name says, to select the first child of a parent tag. So this example will work (Just tried it here):
<body>
<p class="red">first</p>
<div class="red">second</div>
</body>
This won't work, though, if you've nested your tags under different parent tags, or if your tags of class red aren't the first tags under the parent.
Notice also that this doesn't only apply to the first such tag in the whole document, but every time a new parent is wrapped around it, like:
<div>
<p class="red">first</p>
<div class="red">second</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="red">third</p>
<div class="red">fourth</div>
</div>
first and third will be red then.
For your case, you can use the :nth-of-type selector:
.red:nth-of-type(1)
{
border:5px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
Credits to Martyn, who deleted his answer containing this approach.
More information about :nth-child() and :nth-of-type() is available at http://www.quirksmode.org/css/nthchild.html.
Be aware that this is a CSS3 selector, therefore some now outdated browser versions may not behave as expected (e.g. IE8 or older). Visit https://caniuse.com/?search=nth-of-type for more details.
The correct answer is:
.red:first-child, :not(.red) + .red { border:5px solid red }
Part I: If element is first to its parent and has class "red", it shall get border.
Part II: If ".red" element is not first to its parent, but is immediately following an element without class ".red", it shall also deserve the honor of said border.
Fiddle or it didn't happen.
Philip Daubmeier's answer, while accepted, is not correct - see attached fiddle.
BoltClock's answer would work, but unnecessarily defines and overwrites styles
(particularly an issue where it otherwise would inherit a different border - you don't want to declare other to border:none)
EDIT:
In the event that you have "red" following non-red several times, each "first" red will get the border. To prevent that, one would need to use BoltClock's answer. See fiddle
The above answers are too complex.
.class:first-of-type { }
This will select the first-type of class. MDN Source
Note: Tested with Chrome 91 and Firefox 89, June 2021.
I am surprised no one mentioned the cleanest solution:
.red:not(.red ~ .red) {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
you could use first-of-type or nth-of-type(1)
.red {
color: green;
}
/* .red:nth-of-type(1) */
.red:first-of-type {
color: red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
To match your selector, the element must have a class name of red and must be the first child of its parent.
<div>
<span class="red"></span> <!-- MATCH -->
</div>
<div>
<span>Blah</span>
<p class="red"></p> <!-- NO MATCH -->
</div>
<div>
<span>Blah</span>
<div><p class="red"></p></div> <!-- MATCH -->
</div>
Since the other answers cover what's wrong with it, I'll try the other half, how to fix it. Unfortunately, I don't know that you have a CSS only solution here, at least not that I can think of. There are some other options though....
Assign a first class to the element when you generate it, like this:
<p class="red first"></p>
<div class="red"></div>
CSS:
.first.red {
border:5px solid red;
}
This CSS only matches elements with both first and red classes.
Alternatively, do the same in JavaScript, for example here's what jQuery you would use to do this, using the same CSS as above:
$(".red:first").addClass("first");
I got this one in my project.
div > .b ~ .b:not(:first-child) {
background: none;
}
div > .b {
background: red;
}
<div>
<p class="a">The first paragraph.</p>
<p class="a">The second paragraph.</p>
<p class="b">The third paragraph.</p>
<p class="b">The fourth paragraph.</p>
</div>
I am using below CSS to have a background image for the list ul li
#footer .module:nth-of-type(1)>.menu>li:nth-of-type(1){
background-position: center;
background-image: url(http://monagentvoyagessuperprix.j3.voyagesendirect.com/images/stories/images_monagentvoyagessuperprix/layout/icon-home.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
<footer id="footer">
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu ">
<li class="level1 item308 active current"></li>
<li> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu "><li></li>
<li></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu ">
<li></li>
<li></li>
</ul>
</div>
</footer>
According to your updated problem
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
how about
.home span + .red{
border:1px solid red;
}
This will select class home, then the element span and finally all .red elements that are placed immediately after span elements.
Reference: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_selectors.asp
For some reason none of the above answers seemed to be addressing the case of the real first and only first child of the parent.
#element_id > .class_name:first-child
All the above answers will fail if you want to apply the style to only the first class child within this code.
<aside id="element_id">
Content
<div class="class_name">First content that need to be styled</div>
<div class="class_name">
Second content that don't need to be styled
<div>
<div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
<div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</aside>
The following code will definitely work well everywhere.
it is simple and short.
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="blue"> first-blue </p>
<p class="blue"> second-blue </p>
<p class="blue"> third-blue </p>
<p class="red"> first-red </p>
<p class="red"> second-red </p>
<p class="red"> third-red </p>
<p class="red"> fourth-red </p>
<p class="pink"> first-pink </p>
<p class="pink"> second-pink </p>
<p class="red"> new-first-red </p>
<p class="red"> new-second-red </p>
</div>
we can select the first-red with:
.home .red:not(.home .red ~ .red) {
background-color: blue;
}
if you want to select new-first-red too you should use + instead of ~.
You could use nth-of-type(1) but be sure that site doesn't need to support IE7 etc, if this is the case use jQuery to add body class then find element via IE7 body class then the element name, then add in the nth-child styling to it.
You can change your code to something like this to get it work
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
This does the job for you
.home span + .red{
border:3px solid green;
}
Here is a CSS reference from SnoopCode about that.
All in All, after reading this all page and other ones and a lot of documentation. Here's the summary:
For first/last child: Safe to use now (Supported by all modern browsers)
:nth-child() Also safe to use now (Supported by all modern browsers). But be careful it even counts siblings! So, the following won't work properly:
/* This should select the first 2 element with class display_class
* but it will NOT WORK Because the nth-child count even siblings
* including the first div skip_class
*/
.display_class:nth-child(-n+2){
background-color:green;
}
<ul>
<li class="skip_class">test 1</li>
<li class="display_class">test 2 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 3 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 4</li>
</ul>
Currently, there is a selector :nth-child(-n+2 of .foo) that supports selection by class but not supported by modern browsers so not useful.
So, that leaves us with Javascript solution (we'll fix the example above):
// Here we'll go through the elements with the targeted class
// and add our classmodifer to only the first 2 elements!
[...document.querySelectorAll('.display_class')].forEach((element,index) => {
if (index < 2) element.classList.add('display_class--green');
});
.display_class--green {
background-color:green;
}
<ul>
<li class="skip_class">test 1</li>
<li class="display_class">test 2 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 3 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 4</li>
</ul>
A quick 'n dirty jQuery solution for marking first and last element within a group of elements with the same classnames:
$('.my-selector').each(function(index, item) {
if (!$(item).next().hasClass('my-selector')) {
$(item).addClass('last');
}
if (!$(item).prev().hasClass('my-selector')) {
$(item).addClass('first');
}
});
.my-selector {
padding: 5px;
background: #ccc;
}
.my-selector.first {
background: #fcc;
}
.my-selector.last {
background: #cfc;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div>
<span>first element...</span>
<div class="my-selector">Row 1</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 2</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 3</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 4</div>
<span>other elements...</span>
<div class="my-selector">Row 3</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 4</div>
</div>
Try This Simple and Effective
.home > span + .red{
border:1px solid red;
}
just use
.home > .red ~ .red{
border: 1px solid red;
}
it will work.
I believe that using relative selector + for selecting elements placed immediately after, works here the best (as few suggested before).
It is also possible for this case to use this selector
.home p:first-of-type
but this is element selector not the class one.
Here you have nice list of CSS selectors: https://kolosek.com/css-selectors/
Could you try something like this:
.red:first-of-type {
border: 5px solid red;
}
you also can use this for last element (if you need it):
.red:last-of-type {
border: 5px solid red;
}
Try this solution:
.home p:first-of-type {
border:5px solid red;
width:100%;
display:block;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
CodePen link
I think a lot of people have explained already. your code is selecting only first child of the first instance. If you want to select all the first children of red class, you need to use
.home > .red:first-child {
/* put your styling here */
}
Essentially what I am trying to do is have one element react as the hover state of a different element.
.page-template-page-services-new .imgBlock:hover { .page-template-page-services-new .ButtonService {color: #6395ce; background-color: #fff; } }
Not currently working - is this a thing? If not, how might I accomplish it. I know the selectors are correct, they work independently.
What I think you are referring to is that you've seen something akin to
.selector-one{
//style definitions
.selector-two{
//other style definitions
}
}
This comes from pre-processors such as SCSS (Sass) or LESS, I'll assume you can do a quick google on those.
For the other part of your question, yes, you can style an element differently if it's parent container or even a sibling is hovered.
Example
.container-hover:hover .red-on-hover{
background-color:red;
}
.sibling-hover:hover + .sibling-hover{
background-color:blue;
}
<div class="container-hover">
<h3>Other Text</h3>
<div class="red-on-hover">Background will turn red on hover</div>
</div>
<p class="sibling-hover"> When I am hovered, my sibling will be blue</p>
<p class="sibling-hover"> Blue? Blue</p>
For the sibling hover, please note that if you added more .sibling-hover elements that all but the first one would be able to turn blue if you hovered over it's immediately prior sibling.
It can work if they have a parent child relationship.
.page-template-page-services-new {
background: #ccc;
}
.page-template-page-services-new .imgBlock:hover .ButtonService {
color: #6395ce;
background-color: #fff;
}
<div class="page-template-page-services-new">
<div class="imgBlock">
<img src="http://placehold.it/100/100" alt="">
<div class="ButtonService">
<p>
This is a test
</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
So I'm trying to apply a specific style to only the first class that occurs on the page with the class name of .one_third. I have three columns and three rows with this class, therefore having 9 of these classes altogether. I am trying to make only the first one, being the top left, black in background.
I was attempting to create it myself with Pseudo-classes, and I came up with this:
.one_third:first-child
Although that made all the classes on the far left black, instead of just the top left one.
I then tried this, to apply it against my content div that holds all the classes, yet that failed to do anything.
#content > .one_third:first-child
How could I achieve this?
EDIT:
This is my exact HTML markup:
For example,
<div class="jey">
<p>Number 1</p>
<p>Number 2</p>
<p>Number 3</p>
</div>
<div class="jey">
<p>Number 1</p>
<p>Number 2</p>
<p>Number 3</p>
</div>
Apply style
.jey:first-of-type{
background-color:Red;
}
See this http://jsfiddle.net/jeyashri_shri/Td8bx/
and this one also worked in your code
#content .one_third:first-child {
color:red;
}
But first-child to work in IE, a '<!DOCTYPE>' must be declared.
it work on IE7+ but not on IE6 or lower
Change:
<div class="one_third> //you forgot to add closing quote
to
<div class="one_third">
and
.one-third:first-child //class name is incorrect
to
.one_third:first-child
Fiddle here.
You can check any of the following, if one of them works for you:
.clear div.one_third:first-child{
color:red;
}
.columns div.one_third:first-child{
color:red;
}
As you have already used this: #content div.one_third:first-child{color:red;} that's why I put those. Check and let me know.
I have a bunch of elements with a class name red, but I can't seem to select the first element with the class="red" using the following CSS rule:
.home .red:first-child {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
What is wrong in this selector and how do I correct it to target the first child with class red?
This is one of the most well-known examples of authors misunderstanding how :first-child works. Introduced in CSS2, the :first-child pseudo-class represents the very first child of its parent. That's it. There's a very common misconception that it picks up whichever child element is the first to match the conditions specified by the rest of the compound selector. Due to the way selectors work (see here for an explanation), that is simply not true.
Selectors level 3 introduces a :first-of-type pseudo-class, which represents the first element among siblings of its element type. This answer explains, with illustrations, the difference between :first-child and :first-of-type. However, as with :first-child, it does not look at any other conditions or attributes. In HTML, the element type is represented by the tag name. In the question, that type is p.
Unfortunately, there is no similar :first-of-class pseudo-class for matching the first child element of a given class. At the time this answer was first posted, the newly published FPWD of Selectors level 4 introduced an :nth-match() pseudo-class, designed around existing selector mechanics as I mentioned in the first paragraph by adding a selector-list argument, through which you can supply the rest of the compound selector to get the desired filtering behavior. In recent years this functionality was subsumed into :nth-child() itself, with the selector list appearing as an optional second argument, to simplify things as well as averting the false impression that :nth-match() matched across the entire document (see the final note below).
While we await cross-browser support (seriously, it's been nearly 10 years, and there has only been a single implementation for the last 5 of those years), one workaround that Lea Verou and I developed independently (she did it first!) is to first apply your desired styles to all your elements with that class:
/*
* Select all .red children of .home, including the first one,
* and give them a border.
*/
.home > .red {
border: 1px solid red;
}
... then "undo" the styles for elements with the class that come after the first one, using the general sibling combinator ~ in an overriding rule:
/*
* Select all but the first .red child of .home,
* and remove the border from the previous rule.
*/
.home > .red ~ .red {
border: none;
}
Now only the first element with class="red" will have a border.
Here's an illustration of how the rules are applied:
.home > .red {
border: 1px solid red;
}
.home > .red ~ .red {
border: none;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span> <!-- [1] -->
<p class="red">first</p> <!-- [2] -->
<p class="red">second</p> <!-- [3] -->
<p class="red">third</p> <!-- [3] -->
<p class="red">fourth</p> <!-- [3] -->
</div>
No rules are applied; no border is rendered.
This element does not have the class red, so it's skipped.
Only the first rule is applied; a red border is rendered.
This element has the class red, but it's not preceded by any elements with the class red in its parent. Thus the second rule is not applied, only the first, and the element keeps its border.
Both rules are applied; no border is rendered.
This element has the class red. It is also preceded by at least one other element with the class red. Thus both rules are applied, and the second border declaration overrides the first, thereby "undoing" it, so to speak.
As a bonus, although it was introduced in Selectors 3, the general sibling combinator is actually pretty well-supported by IE7 and newer, unlike :first-of-type and :nth-of-type() which are only supported by IE9 onward. If you need good browser support, you're in luck.
In fact, the fact that the sibling combinator is the only important component in this technique, and it has such amazing browser support, makes this technique very versatile — you can adapt it for filtering elements by other things, besides class selectors:
You can use this to work around :first-of-type in IE7 and IE8, by simply supplying a type selector instead of a class selector (again, more on its incorrect usage in the question in a later section):
article > p {
/* Apply styles to article > p:first-of-type, which may or may not be :first-child */
}
article > p ~ p {
/* Undo the above styles for every subsequent article > p */
}
You can filter by attribute selectors or any other simple selectors instead of classes.
You can also combine this overriding technique with pseudo-elements even though pseudo-elements technically aren't simple selectors.
Note that in order for this to work, you will need to know in advance what the default styles will be for your other sibling elements so you can override the first rule. Additionally, since this involves overriding rules in CSS, you can't achieve the same thing with a single selector for use with the Selectors API, or Selenium's CSS locators.
On a final note, keep in mind that this answer assumes that the question is looking for any number of first child elements having a given class. There is neither a pseudo-class nor even a generic CSS solution for the nth match of a complex selector across the entire document — whether a solution exists depends heavily on the document structure. jQuery provides :eq(), :first, :last and more for this purpose, but note again that they function very differently from :nth-child() et al. Using the Selectors API, you can either use document.querySelector() to obtain the very first match:
var first = document.querySelector('.home > .red');
Or use document.querySelectorAll() with an indexer to pick any specific match:
var redElements = document.querySelectorAll('.home > .red');
var first = redElements[0];
var second = redElements[1];
// etc
Although the .red:nth-of-type(1) solution in the original accepted answer by Philip Daubmeier works (which was originally written by Martyn but deleted since), it does not behave the way you'd expect it to.
For example, if you only wanted to select the p here:
<p class="red"></p>
<div class="red"></div>
... then you can't use .red:first-of-type (equivalent to .red:nth-of-type(1)), because each element is the first (and only) one of its type (p and div respectively), so both will be matched by the selector.
When the first element of a certain class is also the first of its type, the pseudo-class will work, but this happens only by coincidence. This behavior is demonstrated in Philip's answer. The moment you stick in an element of the same type before this element, the selector will fail. Taking the markup from the question:
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
Applying a rule with .red:first-of-type will work, but once you add another p without the class:
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p>dummy</p>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
... the selector will immediately fail, because the first .red element is now the second p element.
The :first-child selector is intended, like the name says, to select the first child of a parent tag. So this example will work (Just tried it here):
<body>
<p class="red">first</p>
<div class="red">second</div>
</body>
This won't work, though, if you've nested your tags under different parent tags, or if your tags of class red aren't the first tags under the parent.
Notice also that this doesn't only apply to the first such tag in the whole document, but every time a new parent is wrapped around it, like:
<div>
<p class="red">first</p>
<div class="red">second</div>
</div>
<div>
<p class="red">third</p>
<div class="red">fourth</div>
</div>
first and third will be red then.
For your case, you can use the :nth-of-type selector:
.red:nth-of-type(1)
{
border:5px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
Credits to Martyn, who deleted his answer containing this approach.
More information about :nth-child() and :nth-of-type() is available at http://www.quirksmode.org/css/nthchild.html.
Be aware that this is a CSS3 selector, therefore some now outdated browser versions may not behave as expected (e.g. IE8 or older). Visit https://caniuse.com/?search=nth-of-type for more details.
The correct answer is:
.red:first-child, :not(.red) + .red { border:5px solid red }
Part I: If element is first to its parent and has class "red", it shall get border.
Part II: If ".red" element is not first to its parent, but is immediately following an element without class ".red", it shall also deserve the honor of said border.
Fiddle or it didn't happen.
Philip Daubmeier's answer, while accepted, is not correct - see attached fiddle.
BoltClock's answer would work, but unnecessarily defines and overwrites styles
(particularly an issue where it otherwise would inherit a different border - you don't want to declare other to border:none)
EDIT:
In the event that you have "red" following non-red several times, each "first" red will get the border. To prevent that, one would need to use BoltClock's answer. See fiddle
The above answers are too complex.
.class:first-of-type { }
This will select the first-type of class. MDN Source
Note: Tested with Chrome 91 and Firefox 89, June 2021.
I am surprised no one mentioned the cleanest solution:
.red:not(.red ~ .red) {
border: 1px solid red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
you could use first-of-type or nth-of-type(1)
.red {
color: green;
}
/* .red:nth-of-type(1) */
.red:first-of-type {
color: red;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
To match your selector, the element must have a class name of red and must be the first child of its parent.
<div>
<span class="red"></span> <!-- MATCH -->
</div>
<div>
<span>Blah</span>
<p class="red"></p> <!-- NO MATCH -->
</div>
<div>
<span>Blah</span>
<div><p class="red"></p></div> <!-- MATCH -->
</div>
Since the other answers cover what's wrong with it, I'll try the other half, how to fix it. Unfortunately, I don't know that you have a CSS only solution here, at least not that I can think of. There are some other options though....
Assign a first class to the element when you generate it, like this:
<p class="red first"></p>
<div class="red"></div>
CSS:
.first.red {
border:5px solid red;
}
This CSS only matches elements with both first and red classes.
Alternatively, do the same in JavaScript, for example here's what jQuery you would use to do this, using the same CSS as above:
$(".red:first").addClass("first");
I got this one in my project.
div > .b ~ .b:not(:first-child) {
background: none;
}
div > .b {
background: red;
}
<div>
<p class="a">The first paragraph.</p>
<p class="a">The second paragraph.</p>
<p class="b">The third paragraph.</p>
<p class="b">The fourth paragraph.</p>
</div>
I am using below CSS to have a background image for the list ul li
#footer .module:nth-of-type(1)>.menu>li:nth-of-type(1){
background-position: center;
background-image: url(http://monagentvoyagessuperprix.j3.voyagesendirect.com/images/stories/images_monagentvoyagessuperprix/layout/icon-home.png);
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
<footer id="footer">
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu ">
<li class="level1 item308 active current"></li>
<li> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu "><li></li>
<li></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div class="module">
<ul class="menu ">
<li></li>
<li></li>
</ul>
</div>
</footer>
According to your updated problem
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
how about
.home span + .red{
border:1px solid red;
}
This will select class home, then the element span and finally all .red elements that are placed immediately after span elements.
Reference: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css_selectors.asp
For some reason none of the above answers seemed to be addressing the case of the real first and only first child of the parent.
#element_id > .class_name:first-child
All the above answers will fail if you want to apply the style to only the first class child within this code.
<aside id="element_id">
Content
<div class="class_name">First content that need to be styled</div>
<div class="class_name">
Second content that don't need to be styled
<div>
<div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
<div>
<div class="class_name">deep content - no style</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</aside>
The following code will definitely work well everywhere.
it is simple and short.
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="blue"> first-blue </p>
<p class="blue"> second-blue </p>
<p class="blue"> third-blue </p>
<p class="red"> first-red </p>
<p class="red"> second-red </p>
<p class="red"> third-red </p>
<p class="red"> fourth-red </p>
<p class="pink"> first-pink </p>
<p class="pink"> second-pink </p>
<p class="red"> new-first-red </p>
<p class="red"> new-second-red </p>
</div>
we can select the first-red with:
.home .red:not(.home .red ~ .red) {
background-color: blue;
}
if you want to select new-first-red too you should use + instead of ~.
You could use nth-of-type(1) but be sure that site doesn't need to support IE7 etc, if this is the case use jQuery to add body class then find element via IE7 body class then the element name, then add in the nth-child styling to it.
You can change your code to something like this to get it work
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
This does the job for you
.home span + .red{
border:3px solid green;
}
Here is a CSS reference from SnoopCode about that.
All in All, after reading this all page and other ones and a lot of documentation. Here's the summary:
For first/last child: Safe to use now (Supported by all modern browsers)
:nth-child() Also safe to use now (Supported by all modern browsers). But be careful it even counts siblings! So, the following won't work properly:
/* This should select the first 2 element with class display_class
* but it will NOT WORK Because the nth-child count even siblings
* including the first div skip_class
*/
.display_class:nth-child(-n+2){
background-color:green;
}
<ul>
<li class="skip_class">test 1</li>
<li class="display_class">test 2 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 3 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 4</li>
</ul>
Currently, there is a selector :nth-child(-n+2 of .foo) that supports selection by class but not supported by modern browsers so not useful.
So, that leaves us with Javascript solution (we'll fix the example above):
// Here we'll go through the elements with the targeted class
// and add our classmodifer to only the first 2 elements!
[...document.querySelectorAll('.display_class')].forEach((element,index) => {
if (index < 2) element.classList.add('display_class--green');
});
.display_class--green {
background-color:green;
}
<ul>
<li class="skip_class">test 1</li>
<li class="display_class">test 2 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 3 should be in green</li>
<li class="display_class">test 4</li>
</ul>
A quick 'n dirty jQuery solution for marking first and last element within a group of elements with the same classnames:
$('.my-selector').each(function(index, item) {
if (!$(item).next().hasClass('my-selector')) {
$(item).addClass('last');
}
if (!$(item).prev().hasClass('my-selector')) {
$(item).addClass('first');
}
});
.my-selector {
padding: 5px;
background: #ccc;
}
.my-selector.first {
background: #fcc;
}
.my-selector.last {
background: #cfc;
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<div>
<span>first element...</span>
<div class="my-selector">Row 1</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 2</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 3</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 4</div>
<span>other elements...</span>
<div class="my-selector">Row 3</div>
<div class="my-selector">Row 4</div>
</div>
Try This Simple and Effective
.home > span + .red{
border:1px solid red;
}
just use
.home > .red ~ .red{
border: 1px solid red;
}
it will work.
I believe that using relative selector + for selecting elements placed immediately after, works here the best (as few suggested before).
It is also possible for this case to use this selector
.home p:first-of-type
but this is element selector not the class one.
Here you have nice list of CSS selectors: https://kolosek.com/css-selectors/
Could you try something like this:
.red:first-of-type {
border: 5px solid red;
}
you also can use this for last element (if you need it):
.red:last-of-type {
border: 5px solid red;
}
Try this solution:
.home p:first-of-type {
border:5px solid red;
width:100%;
display:block;
}
<div class="home">
<span>blah</span>
<p class="red">first</p>
<p class="red">second</p>
<p class="red">third</p>
<p class="red">fourth</p>
</div>
CodePen link
I think a lot of people have explained already. your code is selecting only first child of the first instance. If you want to select all the first children of red class, you need to use
.home > .red:first-child {
/* put your styling here */
}
i've searched around and seen some examples of how this is done, but i don't really get it and tried all methods but none worked, so i would like to ask if anyone can show me, for my code below, how can i affect the tournytitle when the img is hovered?
<div id="upevents" class="righty">
<div>
<div class="tournytitle">
<div style="font-weight: bold;">Test 2 Hat</div>
<div style="color: #888888; font-size: 10px;">17 . 12 . 2011</div>
</div>
<img src="/images/tourny/jomjom2.jpg" />
</div>
<div>
<div class="tournytitle">
<div style="font-weight: bold;">Test 1 Hat</div>
<div style="color: #888888; font-size: 10px;">12 . 12 . 2011</div>
</div>
<img src="/images/tourny/bane5.jpg" />
</div>
</div>
how should i write my css code for this?
i tried something like
.upevents img:hover + #tournytitle { background-color: yellow; }
but doesn't seem to work.
help much apperciated
As mentioned, your .tournytitle class must be a child of the img your trying to roll over. Your code .upevents img:hover + #tournytitle { background-color: yellow; } is certainly close, you just need to figure out how to comply to the above rule. With this your saying that .tournytitle is an adjacent-child of img, which is not the case in your given code. Also, your class and id symbols are incorrect, watch out for that.
I managed to get your code working by switching .tournytitle and img so that the class is now the adjacent-sibling - http://jsfiddle.net/gmwjw/1/ - I realize this may not be the design your looking for, but its a start.
This may be helpful to you - http://meyerweb.com/eric/articles/webrev/200007a.html
The .tourneytitle must be a child of the img element for you to achieve this. This fiddle shows the way you can reveal your image by hovering over your .tournytitle: http://jsfiddle.net/fWxH3/203/
To get what you want, you would need to change your HTML so that somehow your tournytitle div is a child of your img tag. Maybe you can use span's inside of your image tag instead of using div's for everything.