After css transform:rotateY of a div I have space covering the area of the original div (not rotated).
I have read that layout cannot adapt after transform but was wondering about another possible solutions.
I read a couple of entries in stackoverflow but was not able to solve my issue.
(I tried display: block or inline-block or float).
Here is a fiddle what I have achieved: white space after image rotateY
The center slide should stretch to fill the space between right side of previous slide and right side of next slide. And it should be responsive (no fixed width in px).
And here is my code:
#wrapper {
width: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
}
.slide {
height: 200px;
background-image: url(http://placehold.it/600x300);
background-position: center;
background-size: cover;
color: #fff;
font-size: 20px;
font-family: sans-serif;
text-align: center;
}
.prev {
width: 50%;
transform: rotateY(-65deg);
transform-origin: left;
}
.next {
width: 50%;
transform: rotateY(65deg);
transform-origin: right;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="slide prev">previous slide</div>
<div class="slide center">active slide</div>
<div class="slide next">next slide</div>
</div>
If relevant for an answer: Later I would also like to add more divs, have only three visible and animate the carousel with swipe motion.
You've understood the behaviour right.
If you touch transform property, other parts will not adapt. The initial occupied space (prior to applying transform) is quite dedicated and further changes will not affect that space and same goes for neighbouring elements.
To fill the gap, your best bet is to reverse the left and right values for transform-origins and respect the wrapper workspace as a whole like the code in below and continue developing from there. Keeping transform-origins as their original values will force you to manipulate the .center div dimensions.
.prev {
width: 50%;
transform: rotateY(-65deg);
transform-origin: right;
}
.next {
width: 50%;
transform: rotateY(65deg);
transform-origin: left;
}
.center {
width: 100%;
}
It's very hard to describe animations by words, try to provide samples.
If you're trying to squeeze other divs to a smaller fixed width 50%, then change your approach and modify your code accordingly. Avoid transform property, use only width.
.slide {
height: 200px;
width: 25%;
background-image: url(http://placehold.it/600x300);
background-position: center;
background-size: 100% 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
color: #fff;
font-size: 20px;
font-family: sans-serif;
text-align: center;
}
.slide.active {
width: 100%;
}
And if you want the widths property to be more flexible, like
1st div 9%
2nd div 12%
3rd div 20%
4th div 100% # .active slide
3rd div 20%
2nd div 12%
1st div 9%
then you can achieve this by JavaScript. Calculate the non-active slides around the active one, and distribute the width values by their distance from the active one.
Related
I need help understanding clip-path CSS property in order to make my version of a clipped circle below...
More like the design version:
If you can see on the grey background, my circle appears a lot larger and less round when it's clipped.
What can I do to make a more round circle? My ideas were:
Use clip-path as in the snippet below
Use a pseudo :after element or a right border with radius
Cut a circle image from photoshop and use it as a background image.
Preferably, I'd like to avoid using a background image. However, I need to keep responsiveness in mind as the circle cannot change shapes drastically as we resize the window.
Is clip-path the right way to go? Can someone suggest a simpler and elegant solution with another way using CSS?
Thank you in advance, here's a snippet I wrote that illustrates how I clipped the "green/blue" background:
.page-banner {
background: grey;
width: 100%;
height: 300px;
background-position: top;
overflow: hidden;
}
.page-banner-text {
position: absolute;
background: #00525d8a;
padding-left: 100px;
width: 60%;
/* adjustments to snippet */
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
height: 300px;
/* this is the code for circle */
clip-path: circle(560px at left);
padding-right: 250px;
}
<div class="page-banner">
<div class="container">
<div class="page-banner-text">
<h1 class="block-title">Programs For Adults</h1>
<p>Programs to help children with disabilities in Western MA at all ages and levels of need.</p>
<div id="banner-donate-button">DONATE</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Per my comment, instead of using clip path to create your D (which is not supported very well), why not use border radius on your div.
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.page-banner {
position: relative;
background: url(https://www.fillmurray.com/300/900) center center no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden; /* hide overflowing bits of circle */
min-height: 300px; /* just give enough height to fit text at smallest screen width size */
}
.circle {
background-color: rgba(50, 108, 116, 0.9); /* use rgba for transparent effect */
color: white;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* move the circle left 50% of it's own width and up 50% of it's own height */
border-radius: 50%;
padding-top: 100%; /* this gives us a responsive square */
position: absolute;
top:50%; /* this vertically centers the circle */
left:0;
width:100%;
min-width:600px; /* this is the miniimum dimensions to allow circle to fill smaller screens */
min-height:600px;
}
.page-banner-text {
position: absolute; /* just positions the text on the right of the cirecle */
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%);
padding:2em;
width:40%;
}
<div class="page-banner">
<div class="circle">
<div class="page-banner-text">
<h1 class="block-title">Programs For Adults</h1>
<p>Programs to help children with disabilities in Western MA at all ages and levels of need.</p>
<div id="banner-donate-button">DONATE</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The only problem with it being responsive though is that as the screen gets wider, the D gets flatter (as the radius extends), but you can combat this by adding a max width and height to the circle div
To anyone looking to solve this with the clip-path property, you have a bit more control with the ellipse clip path. Using the code provided by the OP, I replaced circle with ellipse, and switched to percentages to allow for a slightly better responsive feel.
clip-path:ellipse(67% 100% at 8% 50%);
The first two numbers represent the height and width of the ellipse. The larger the first number, the wider the visible area is. The larger the second number, the wider the height. We're aiming for a D shape, so by adjusting the first number, we can make the D more or less prominent.
This is where the second two numbers, the positioning, comes into play. at 50% 50% centers it. By adjusting the first number, the X positioning, we can move it over where need fit . After playing around with the numbers, you should be able to get the D exactly how you'd like.
.page-banner {
background: grey;
width: 100%;
height: 300px;
background-position: top;
overflow: hidden;
}
.page-banner-text {
position: absolute;
background: #00525d8a;
padding-left: 100px;
width: 60%;
/* adjustments to snippet */
top: 10px;
left: 10px;
height: 300px;
/* this is the code for circle */
clip-path: ellipse(67% 100% at 8% 50%);
padding-right: 250px;
}
<div class="page-banner">
<div class="container">
<div class="page-banner-text">
<h1 class="block-title">Programs For Adults</h1>
<p>Programs to help children with disabilities in Western MA at all ages and levels of need.</p>
<div id="banner-donate-button">DONATE</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
You could simply use
an inner circle element, which you can achieve with a border-radius equal to half the element's height and width
positioned via position: relative with negative top and left values
inside of an outer bounding box, clipped via overflow: hidden
A simple implementation:
#container {
height: 300px;
width: 100%;
background-color: gray;
overflow: hidden;
}
#circle {
height: 600px;
width: 600px;
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 255, 0.5);
position: relative;
top: -150px;
left: -375px;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="circle"></div>
</div>
I have been researching this issue for the last few days, and while have found several solutions that work well in static layouts, I am having a problem resolving in responsive design.
We have a series of banner images that we use on our home page, and are trying to get them to appear centered on the image behind text on smaller mobile screens. I can solve this for fixed widths, but we need to make this responsive.
Here is what the current rendition of my CSS code looks like:
#mainSlideshow .item img {
display: block;
width: auto !important;
max-width: none !important;
height: 350px !important;
overflow: hidden;
left: 50%;
-webkit-transform: translateX(-50%);
-moz-transform: translateX(-50%);
-ms-transform: translateX(-50%);
-o-transform: translateX(-50%);
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
#mainSlideshow .item .carouselImgHold {position: relative; }
The challenge appears to be the movement left - right now, the image just shifts to the left 50% of the img width (no surprise). How do I program the CSS to drift the image only the amount necessary to center the image in the nested div tag?
Many thanks in advance.
It would be nice if you could give us an example but lets try. :)
My suggestion is to set image as background-image instead of linking it. So that would look like:
#mainSlideshow .item{
background-image:url("path-to-image/image.jpg");
background-size:cover;
background-position:center center;
background-repeat:no-repeat;
}
That way you will have not stretched image covering the #mainSlideshow .item .Read more about that here
You may use text-align and negative margins if IMG stands alone on its line.
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/PPpYzM
.oversizedImage {
text-align: center;
}
.oversizedImage img {
margin: 0 -100%;
}
/* demo purpose */
.oversizedImage {
width: 50%;
margin: auto;
border: solid;
box-shadow: 0 0 150px 100px white;/* you should use overflow:hidden; here it only shows how much is outside :) */
}
.oversizedImage img {
vertical-align: top;
/* instead default baseline to avoid gap under */
position: relative;
z-index: -1;
}
<div class="oversizedImage">
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/1200/200"/>
</div>
It is only a guess since we miss your HTML
I think you can achieve this to ways.
img {
display: block;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto
}
Or
img {
width: 50%
left: 50%
}
I would like to make a transparent arrow over an image. This triangle should be indented in a block and show the background image.
Desired output:
I used skewX() property that #web-tiki had explained here but I want it to display on the top of the border rather than on the bottom of image and have this issue:
A fiddle demo of my code is available here
Can anyone tell me why it's not working in my case?
As stated in the question, your case is a bit different from the example that was provided by web-tiki. In the example that you were referring to, the border with the transparent cut was included as the bottom border for the image whereas you need it as the top border of the plain text area.
The expected output can be achieved with the same skew technique described in that answer. However, it needs to be tweaked a bit to match your case.
First thing is, the skewed pseudo-elements (that produce the border) should be added to the container of plain text area and not the top section which holds the image. This part you have already done correctly.
Next, you need to position the border such that even with the border the height of your text container will be equal to the other two images placed by its side. For this, you need to position the elements that form the border within the plain text container (top: 0%) instead of above it (bottom: 100% in your code).
Then, if the text container has a non-transparent background, you need to clip it such that it is not present behind the elements that is creating the border effect. This can be achieved by adding a padding-top on the text container equal to the height of the border pseudo-elements and then setting background-clip: content-box to it.
Finally, you need to move the entire bottom part up by the same number of pixels as the height of the border in order for the top image to be seen through the transparent cut out area. This can be done by adding a negative margin-top to the bottom container.
Putting it altogether your code should be similar to the below snippet to achieve the effect that you need. (Note: Your fiddle has way too much code and so I have created a simpler sample for the demo).
.section {
height: 200px;
width: 500px;
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/500/200/nature/3);
}
.bottom-container {
margin-top: -15px;
height: 100px;
width: 500px;
}
.text,
.middle-image,
.right-image {
float: left;
height: 100%;
width: calc(100% / 3);
}
.middle-image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/200/100/nature/2);
}
.right-image {
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/250/100/nature/1);
}
.text {
position: relative;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 100%;
padding-top: 15px;
text-align: center;
line-height: 85px;
background: #F7F7F7; /* Just for demo */
background-clip: content-box; /* needed only if your background is not transparent */
overflow: hidden;
}
.text:after,
.text:before {
position: absolute;
content: '';
top: 0px;
height: 15px;
background: rgb(215,182,115);
}
.text:before {
left: 0px;
width: 25%;
transform-origin: left bottom;
transform: skew(45deg);
}
.text:after {
right: 0px;
width: 75%;
transform-origin: right bottom;
transform: skew(-45deg);
}
<!-- prefix free library to avoid browser prefixes in CSS -->
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/prefixfree/1.0.7/prefixfree.min.js"></script>
<section class="section">
</section>
<div class="bottom-container">
<div class="text">Some text</div>
<div class="middle-image"></div>
<div class="right-image"></div>
</div>
Screenshot:
Note: The images that are displayed when the snippet is executed could be different from those in the screenshot because they are random placeholder images
I have this fiddle which generates single country flags from a image sprite. I want to squeeze each flag because the width of flag seems to be too wide.
JSFiddle Demo
For instance the Norwegian flag is too wide in the jsfiddle sample.
How can I do this? Thank you.
#flag1 {
width: 120px;
height: 60px;
background-image: url(http://i.hizliresim.com/e7Y5dm.png);
background-position: -120px 0;
}
#flag2 {
width: 120px;
height: 60px;
background-image: url(http://i.hizliresim.com/e7Y5dm.png);
background-position: -480px 13800px;
}
#flag3 {
width: 120px;
height: 60px;
background-image: url(http://i.hizliresim.com/e7Y5dm.png);
background-position: -1200px 19020px;
}
To get exactly what you wanted I used background-size just to reduce the width of your sprite.
So I reduced the width of the sprite about one sixth and adjusted the width of the element in accordance.
#flag3
{
width: 100px;
height: 60px;
background: url(http://i.hizliresim.com/e7Y5dm.png) 0 0 no-repeat;
background-position: -1000px -480px;
background-size: 1500px 780px;
}
Demo
One solution is to scale (transform:scale(x);) the whole element (the div in this case)
For example transform:scale(0.5); will scale the element to half its size, but keep in mind that it retains the initial space in the DOM flow.
Another way is to use the background-size property to resize your image, but you will have to recalculate the positioning as well..
demo at http://jsfiddle.net/JA97b/5/
Additionally, in your CSS you should group common properties to a single class and apply that instead of repeating tem for each flag..
.flag{
width: 120px;
height: 60px;
background-image: url(http://i.hizliresim.com/e7Y5dm.png);
}
#flag1{background-position: -120px 0;}
#flag2{background-position: -480px 13800px;}
#flag3{background-position: -1200px 19020px;}
and use
<div class="flag" id="flag1"></div>
<div class="flag" id="flag2"></div>
<div class="flag" id="flag3"></div>
Hi I am having problems positioning several images. It is very important that max height of the site stays at approximately 580 pixels as I want to give the impression of a picture frame around the site. I have attached a picture to show how exactly the site is laid out and where I want to position my images in the top, middle and bottom divs. I do not want to have them as background images because I want to have some as links and I want to have some jquery animations (i.e. fadeIn and toggle) with the other images. This is a fluid layout but I do not want the vertical width to expand when the browser is at the min width of 780px, I also would like that the images are some what centred on the page.
I am still learning CSS so I have done the best I can but it is still out of position.
Thanks for your help
Site Layout Picture
.container {
width: 100%;
max-width: 1096px;
min-width: 780px;
margin: 0 auto;}
.header {
background:#231f20;
height: 65px;
}
.sidebar1 {
padding: 0px;
float: left;
width: 65px;
background: #231f20;
margin: 0;
min-height: 450px;}
.sidebar2 {
float: right;
width: 65px;
background:#231f20;
margin: 0;
min-height: 450px;}
.main_content{
padding: 0px;
width: 80%;
float: left;
}
.footer {
height: 65px;
background:#231f20;
position: relative;
}
HTML
<body>
<div class="container">
<div class="header"></div>
<div class="sidebar1"></div>
<div class="main_content">
<div class="top"></div>
<div class=”middle"></div>
<div class=”bottom"></div>
</div>
<div class="sidebar2"></div>
</div>
</body>
Add position: relative to all the containing div's (you may have to set the height of them to the height of the tallest image also). Then position all the images something like:
.img1 { /* or whatever class name works for you */
position: absolute;
left: 50%; /* this centers it, if you want thirds, us 33%, 66%, etc. */
margin-right: -50px; /* note: 50px is an example, it needs to be half the width of your image width */
}
Try adding clear: both; to the CSS for the .footer. This will force it to the bottom of the "picture frame".