I thought I had escaped/ solved this error. But now am stuck. My db.py code:
Post = db.define_table('post',
Field('message', 'text', requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY(), notnull=False),
Field('answers', 'text', requires=IS_NOT_EMPTY(), notnull=False),
auth.signature
)
Post.is_active.readable=False
Post.is_active.writeable=False
controller:
#auth.requires_login()
def index():
db.post.answers.writable=False
db.post.answers.readable=False
form = SQLFORM(post, formstyle='divs')
if form.process().accepted:
pass
messages = db(post).select(orderby=~post.created_on)
.......code
#after several codes in now need to post a message to answers field, WITHOUT using a form in the view page
db.post.insert(answers=report)
In my view:
{{for msg in messages:}}
code
{{=msg.message}}
{{report from answers field}}
My issue is that i keep getting the error: IntegrityError('NOT NULL constraint failed:post.message
How do I solve this error?
Kind regards
If the database table was originally created with notnull=True, later changing the model to notnull=False will have no effect, as removing the NOT NULL constraint requires an external tool (the DAL cannot remove such constraints).
As you suggest in your comment, you can instead set the default value for the field to something like an empty string, but if you do in fact want to allow null values, you should instead use a database administration tool to remove the constraint from the database schema.
Related
See Datasource Paging Issue (Revised)
for the original question.
Markus, you were kind enough to help with out with the issue of incorporating a record count into a query using a calculated datasource. I have a search form with 15 widgets - a mix of date ranges, dropdowns, text values and ._contains, ._equals, ._greaterThanOrEquals, ._lessThanOrEquals, etc.
I have tested this extensively against mySQL SQL code and it works fine.
I have now added a 16th parameter PropertyNames, which is a list with binding #datasource.query.filters.Property.PropertyName._in and Options blank. The widget on the form is hidden because it is only used for additional filtering.
Logic such as the following is used, such that a particular logged-in user can only view their own properties. So if they perform a search and the Property is not specified we do:-
if (params.param_Property === null && canViewAllRecords === false) {
console.log(params.param_PropertyNames); // correct output
ds.filters.Property.PropertyName._in = params.param_PropertyNames;
}
The record count (records.length) is correct, and if I for loop through the array of records the record set is correct.
However, on the results page the table displays a larger resultset which omits the PropertyNames filter. So if I was to search on Status 'Open' (mySQL results 50) and then I add a single value ['Property Name London SW45'] for params.param_PropertyNames the record count is 6, the records array is 6 but the datasource display is 50. So the datasource is not filtering on the property array.
Initially I tried without adding the additional parameter and form widget and just using code such as
if (params.param_Property === null && canViewAllRecords === false) {
console.log(params.param_PropertyNames); // correct output
ds.filters.Property.PropertyName._in = properties; // an array of
properties to filter out
}
But this didn't work, hence the idea of adding a form widget and an additional parameter to the calculated recordcount datasource.
If I inspect at query.parameters then I see:-
"param_Status": "Open",
"param_PropertyNames": ["Property Name London SW45"],
If I inspect query.filters:-
name=param_Status, value=Open
name=param_PropertyNames, value=[]}]}
It looks as though the filter isn't set. Even hard coding
ds.filters.Property.PropertyName._in = ['Property Name London SW45'],
I get the same reuslt.
Have you got any idea what would be causing this issue and what I can do for a workaround ?
Using a server side solution I would suggest editing both your SQL datasource query script (server side) that is supposed to filter by this property list and including the same code in your server side script for your calculated Count datasource. The code would look something like this, not knowing your exact details:
var subquery = app.models.Directory.newQuery();
subquery.filters.PrimaryEmail._equals = Session.getActiveUser().getEmail();
subquery.prefetch.Property._add();
var results = subquery.run();
if(!results[0].CanViewAllRecords) {
query.filters.Property.PropertyName._in = results[0].Property.map(function(i) {return i.PropertyName;});
}
By adding this code you are filtering your directory by your current user and prefetching the Property relation table, then you set the filter only if your user canviewallRecords is false and use JS map function to create an array of the PropertyName field in the Property table. As I stated, your code may not be exactly the same depending on how you have to retrieve your user canviewallrecords property and then of course I don't know your relation between user and Property table either, is it one-to-many or other. But this should give you an idea how to implement this on server side.
I have inherited an ASP.NET website built on NHibernate, with which I have no experience. I need to add a calculated field based on a column in a related table to an existing query. In SQL, this would be done easily enough using a correlated subquery:
select
field1,
field2,
(select count(field3) from table2 where table2.table1ID = table1.ID) calc_field
from
table1
where
[criteria...]
Unfortunately, of course, I can't use SQL for this. So in reality, I have three related questions:
What is the best way to trace through the web of interfaces, base classes, etc used by NHibernate in order to pinpoint the object where I need to add the field?
Having located that object, what, if anything, has to be done besides adding a public property to the object corresponding to the new field?
Are there any NHibernate-specific considerations with regard to referencing a related object in a query?
Here is the existing code that performs the search:
public INHibernateQueryable<C> Search(ISearchQuery query, string sortField)
{
_session = GetSession();
var c = _session.Linq<C>();
c.Expand("IP");
c.Expand("LL");
c.Expand("LL.Address");
c.Expand("LL.Address.City");
c.Expand("LL.Address.City.State");
c.Expand("LL.Address.City.County");
c.Expand("CE");
c.Expand("IC");
c.Expand("AR");
c.Expand("ER");
c.Expand("Status");
var res = _SearchFilters
.Where(x => x.ShouldApply(query))
.Aggregate(c, (candidates, filter) => (INHibernateQueryable<C>) filter.Filter(candidates, query));
res = SortSearch(res, sortField);
return res;
}
I appreciate any advice from experienced Hibernators.
Thanks,
Mike
If you are only interested in returning a query containing a computed value, you can still call a stored procedure in NHibernate and map the results to a POCO in the same way as you map a table for CRUD operations; obviously read-only instead of updatable.
Have a look at the ISession.CreateSQLQuery method; I can post an example from one of my projects if you need one.
I used ado.net entity framework to connect database and have an .edmx file in project.. When I tried to reach objects in code side with object initializer I can see the object names but when I tried to enter a value into textarea in throws this error.Title is a table in database and entries is another tables data but because of both tables has relationship I can see Entries down of Title. What do I have to do? I do not understand anything.. thanks for helps here is the situation
Title a = new Title
{
Entries=textarea.InnerText,
};
Try below, you need to inititialize entry collection with your item by giving correct property value
Title a = new Title
{
Entries= new List<Entry>()
{
new Entry() {PropertyName =textarea.InnerText}
};
};
It's because your Entrires are of type ICollection<Entry> and you trying to store there string variable.
Afternoon,
I am getting the following error, and cant work out why... Can some one please take a look and let me know where i am going wrong.
Cannot implicitly convert type 'System.Collections.Generic.List' to 'System.Collections.Generic.List'
below is what i am trying to use, to get a list back so i can use it with Amazon. I have tried to remove the .ToList() bit but nothing seems to work. I am calling an MS SQL view "GetASINForUpdateLowPrices" which returns a list back of product ASIN's
List<string> prodASINs = dc.GetASINForUpdateLowPrices.ToList();
SQL for the view i am using, this may help a little bit more.
SELECT asin
FROM dbo.aboProducts
WHERE (asin NOT IN
(SELECT aboProducts_1.asin
FROM dbo.aboProducts AS aboProducts_1 INNER JOIN
dbo.LowestPrices ON aboProducts_1.asin = dbo.LowestPrices.productAsin
WHERE (dbo.LowestPrices.priceDate >= DATEADD(day, - 1, GETDATE()))))
What data type is a single ASIN?
Probably your GetASINForUpdateLowPrices is not an IEnumerable<string>. Try this to confirm:
List<string> prodASINs = dc.GetASINForUpdateLowPrices
.Select(e => e.ToString())
.ToList();
When you call your GetASINForUpdateLowPrices, it wont directly return List<string> even if there is only one field in your view. Try the following approach:
List<string> prodASINs = dc.GetASINForUpdateLowPrices
.Select(item => item.AsinFieldName)
.ToList();
Visual Studio IntelliSense should suggest you the property name after typing item.. If the property is not string try to add .ToString() at the end of the property name.
Edit: After your comment, it seems like you need to use it as .Select(item => item.asin.ToString()).
Just use var.
var prodASINs = dc.GetASINForUpdateLowPrices.ToList();
Are you sure that GetASINForUpdateLowPrices.ToList() creates a List of Strings? My best estimation is that it is a generic list of a different type.
To figure out what is going on - Change List<string> prodASINS to be Object obj. Then set a breakpoint to see what List type is actually generated by your ToList() code by checking out the object using the debugger. You can then update your code to move the values into a list of the appropriate type.
You might have to cast the right side of the assignor like this to ultimately get the job done (replacing string with another type if necessary) - List<string> prodASINs =(List<string>)dc.GetASINForUpdateLowPrices.ToList()
Following on from my earlier question about creating Address Books (many thanks Peter!), I have a small throw-away console application doing just that and working great - but in addition I'm trying to update the metadata of a Keyword with the Item Id of the created Address Book.
Slightly shortened snippet ...
StaticAddressBook ab = new StaticAddressBook();
ab.Title = title;
ab.Key = key;
ab.Save();
// id is a correct Keyword TCM ID
Keyword k = tdse.GetObject(id, EnumOpenMode.OpenModeEdit);
if (k != null)
{
k.MetadataFields["addressbookid"].value[0] = ab.Id.ItemId;
k.Save(true);
}
I keep getting the following error on Save():
XML validation error. Reason: The element 'Metadata' in namespace
'uuid:2065d525-a365-4b45-b68e-bf45f0fba188' has invalid child element
'addressbookid' in namespace
'uuid:2065d525-a365-4b45-b68e-bf45f0fba188'. List of possible elements
expected: 'contact_us_email' in namespace
'uuid:2065d525-a365-4b45-b68e-bf45f0fba188'
But I know the Keyword has the correct Metadata assigned, (thats why I don't bother checking!). Shortened Tridion XML from a current keyword in question:
<tcm:Keyword>
<tcm:Data>
<tcm:MetadataSchemaxlink:type="simple"xlink:title="IP.Location.Metadata" xlink:href="tcm:49-2142-8" />
<tcm:Metadata>
<Metadata xmlns="uuid:2065d525-a365-4b45-b68e-bf45f0fba188">
<email>...</email>
<addressbookid>3</addressbookid>
<contact_us_email>...</contact_us_email>
<request_a_sample_email>...</request_a_sample_email>
<webinar_feedback_email>....</webinar_feedback_email>
</Metadata>
</tcm:Metadata>
<tcm:IsRoot>true</tcm:IsRoot>
</tcm:Data>
</tcm:Keyword>
Have I missed something can Keyword metadata not be updated in this way?
I guess I could look at the Core Service to update Keywords, but it seemed to to make sense to do everything within this application.
UPDATE
Order was key here, strangely!
The following code works:
ItemFields fields = k.MetadataFields;
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine(fields.Count);
string email = fields[1].value[1];
string contact = fields[3].value[1];
string request = fields[4].value[1];
string webinar = fields[5].value[1];
fields[1].value[1] = email;
fields[2].value[1] = ab.Id.ItemId;
fields[3].value[1] = contact;
fields[4].value[1] = request;
fields[5].value[1] = webinar;
k.Save(true);
Got caught out by the non-0-based index when getting/setting values and had to reassign existing fields back, in order.
Cheers
It seems that the order of the fields has changed in the Schema since that Component was created. At least the Schema expects contact_us_email in the position where you current have addressbookid.
There may be other changes, so I'd verify the order of fields in the Schema and make sure the Component(s) match, before you run your tool.