I usually always find a solution on google (80% here), but this time this is unfortunately not the case. That's why I decided to create an account.
I have written an OpenCL code which runs on different Intel and AMD CPU. It runs on an AMD RADEON HD7970 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M too. However when I try to launch the code on an NVIDIA K20m I get the error -9999 with "clEnqueueNDRangeKernel".
The most troubling is that the error occurs after 512 iterations (I guess 512 is a coincidence).
I believe (but maybe it was just error -11) I have already seen this error but it was an error during building program and due to "clGetEventProfilingInfo". This time all profiling is comment.
I'm looking for information about this error.
Thank you in advance for your answers.
Platform info:
OpenCL version: 1.1
CUDA version: 7.0.18
P.S.: It may be useful to precise that I'm not an administrator of this system.
For the sake of future visitors from Google (on which this now has a very high ranking for this error code,) this is a vendor-specific error code from NVidia.
On Stream HPC's list of OpenCL error codes, code -9999 is listed for function clEnqueueNDRangeKernel with the description:
Illegal read or write to a buffer
I have solved the problem.
Generally, in a kernel we can READ at a non allocated place. In my case I have used this property in order to avoid a useless test which is bad in a kernel. This reading out of memory was the problem on the NVIDIA K20.
Thanks.
Related
This is a very strange situation. Why do I get error
CL_PLATFORM_NOT_FOUND_KHR
when I'm calling this function:
clGetPlatformIDs(0, NULL, &platformCount);
Earlier this error was not. I have installed the driver and SDK from Intel and Nvidia. Are there any suggestions?
Here is explained why such error can occur. clGetPlatformIDs returns CL_SUCCESS if the function is executed successfully and there are a non-zero number of platforms available. Otherwise it can return CL_PLATFORM_NOT_FOUND_KHR if the cl_khr_icd extension is enabled and no platforms are found.
You are in luck. Well sort of... Seeing this is 3 years later.
Disclaimer: I HAVE NO CLUE WHY THIS WORKS:
Machine: x64 windows 10.
Graphics Card: Geforce GTX 960
Total Failure To Load Library : LoadLibraryA( "OpenCL64.dll" )
WRONG (but loads) : LoadLibraryA( "C:/Program Files/NVIDIA Corporation/OpenCL/OpenCL64.dll" )
WRONG (but loads) : LoadLibraryA( "C:/Program Files/NVIDIA Corporation/OpenCL/OpenCL.dll" )
CORRECT: LoadLibraryA( "OpenCL.dll" )
Here is the really insideous thing: Both of my "WRONG" answers will let you
grab function pointers, but when you call clGetPlatformIDs the return status
will be 0xFFFFFC17 ( CL_PLATFORM_NOT_FOUND_KHR ).
Then you'll be examining your function call correctness.
Maybe you'll even look at the calling convention. Maybe you'll check
the header files and make sure there are not any typos there. And yet,
you are looking in all the wrong places because the original problem happened
more steps back than you think.
Because of this problem, I build into my programs code that reads a file:
"OPEN_CL_SEARCH_PATHS.TXT" so the user of the software can change what DLL file
the program attempts to load.
While I am here, I would also like to add that there seems to be a bug with the
driver that makes it so OpenCL <==> OpenGL sharing is NOT a zero-copy share and
is incredibly laggy. Now I've got to go figure out Vulkan to make my fractal
rendering engine even though OpenCL's abstraction better suits the problem.
It is probably important to note that I am NOT using an SDK or any
validation layers. In fact, I am not even using
windows.h.
I wrote assembly code to grab the address of GetProcAddress and LoadLibrary by navigating the PEB file. I am also not using cl.h or cl_platform.h.
I reconstruct the structs I need from the documentation. I am also not
bothering with prototypes for function signatures either. For example,
I call "clGetPlatformIDs" by casting it to type "F_03" and then
calling it that way.
typedef void* (F_03)( void, void*, void* );
My machine doesn't have GPU and so had to use hashcat with OpenCL for CPU alone. My machine was Intel core i3, so I have downloaded the OpenCL softwares from Intel website and installed manually and the error gone.
Source: https://youtu.be/AieYqNQ6ADM
During the last days I observed a behaviour of my new workstation I couldn't explain. Doing some research on this problem, there might be a possible bug in the INTEL Haswell architecture as well as in the current Skylake Generation.
Before writing about the possible bug, let me give you an overview of the hardware used, the program code and the problem itself.
Workstation hardware specification
INTEL Xeon E5-2680 V3 2500MHz 30M Cache 12Core
Supermicro SC745 BTQ -R1K28B-SQ
4 x 32GB ECC Registered DDR4-2133 Ram
INTEL SSD 730 Series 480 GB
NVIDIA Tesla C2075
NVIDIA TITAN
Operating system & program code in question
I'm currently running Ubuntu 15.04 64bit Desktop version, latest updates and kernel stuff installed. Besides using this machine to develop CUDA Kernels and stuff, I recently tested a pure C program.
The program is doing sort of modified ART on quite large input sets of data. So the code executes some FFTs and consumes quite some time to finish calculation. I can't currently post / link to any source
code as this is ongoing research that cannot be published. If you're not familiar with ART, just a simple explanation what it does. ART is a technique used to reconstruct the data received from a computer tomograph machine to get
visible images for diagnosis. So our version of the code reconstructs data sets of sizes like 2048x2048x512. Up until now, nothing too special nor rocket science involved. After some hours of debugging and fixing errors, the code was tested
on reference results and we can confirm the code works as it is supposed to. The only library the code is using is standard math.h . No special compile parameters, no additional library stuff that might bring in additional problems.
Observing the problem
The code implements ART using a technique to minimize the projections needed for reconstructing the data. So let's assume we can reconstruct one slice of data involving 25 projections. The code is started with exactly the same input data on 12 cores. Please note that the
implementation is not based on multithreading, currently 12 instances of the program are launched. I know this isn't the best way to do it, involving proper thread management is heavily advised and this is already on the list of improvements :)
So when we run at least two instances of the program (every instance working on a separate data slice), the results are of some projections are wrong in a random fashion. To give you an idea of the results, please see Table1. Please note that the input data is always the same.
Running only one instance of the code involving one core of the CPU, the results are all correct. Even performing some runs involving one CPU core, the results remain correct. Only involving at least two or more cores generates a result pattern as seen in Table1.
Identifying the problem
Okay this took quite some hours to get an idea of what is actually going wrong. So we went through the whole code, most of those problems begin with a minor implementation mistake. But, well, no (of course we cannot proof the absence of bugs nor guarantee it). To verify our code, we used two different machines:
(Machine1) Intel Core i5 Quad-Core (Model from late 2009)
(Machine2) Virtual Machine running on Intel XEON 6core SandyBridge CPU
surprisingly, both Machine1 & Machine2 produce always correct results. Even using all CPU-cores, the results remain correct. Not even one wrong result in over 50 runs on every machine. Code was compiled on every target machine without optimization options or any specific compiler settings.
So, reading the news led to the following findings:
ArsTechnika - Skylake CPU freezes during complex workload
PcWorld - how to test your PC for the skylake bug
Intel Community - Simple instruction for freezing a Skylake Processor
So the folks over at Prime95 and the Mersenne Community seem to be the first ones to discover and identify this nasty bug. The referenced postings and news support the suspicion, that the problem only exists under heavy workload. Following my observation, I can confirm this behavior.
The question(s)
Have you / the community observed this problem on Haswell CPUs as well as on Skylake CPUs?
As gcc does per default AVX(2) optimization (whenever possible), turning off this optimization would help?
How can I compile my code and ensure, that any optimization that might be affected by this bug is turned off? So far I read only about a problem using the AVX2 command set in Haswell / Skylake architectures.
Solutions?
Okay I can turn off all AVX2 optimizations. But this slows down my code. Intel might release a BIOS update to mainboard manufactures that would modify the microcode in Intel CPUs. As it seems to be a hardware bug, this might become interesting even by updating the CPUs microcode. I think it might be a valid option, as Intel CPUs use some RISC to CISC translation mechanisms controlled by Microcode.
EDIT: Techreport.com - Errata prompts Intel to disable TSX in Haswell, early Broadwell CPUs Will check the microcode version in my CPU.
EDIT2: As of now (19.01.2016 15:39 CET) Memtest86+ v4.20 is running and testing the memory. As this seems to take quite some time to finish, I'll update the post tomorrow with results.
EDIT3: As of now (21.01.2016 09:35 CET) Memtest86+ finished two runs and passed. Not even one memory error. Updated the microcode of the CPU from revision=0x2d to revision=0x36. Currently preparing source code for releasing here. Problem with the wrong results consists. As I'm not the author of the code in question, I have to double check not to post code I'm not allowed to. I'm also using the workstation and maintaining it.
EDIT4: (22.01.2016) (12:15 CET) Here ist the Makefile used to compile the sourcecode:
# VARIABLES ==================================================================
CC = gcc
CFLAGS = --std=c99 -Wall
#LDFLAGS = -lm -lgomp -fast -s -m64
LDFLAGS = -lm
OBJ = ArtReconstruction2Min.o
# RULES AND DEPENDENCIES ====================================================
# linking all object files
all: $(OBJ)
$(CC) -o ART2Min $(OBJ) $(LDFLAGS)
# every o-file depends on the corresonding c-file, -g Option bedeutet Debugging Informationene setzen
%.o: %.c
$(CC) -c -g $< $(CFLAGS)
# MAKE CLEAN =================================================================
clean:
rm -f *.o
rm -f main
and the gcc -v output:
gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.9/README.Bugs --enable-languages=c,c++,java,go,d,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr --program-suffix=-4.9 --enable-shared --enable-linker-build-id --libexecdir=/usr/lib --without-included-gettext --enable-threads=posix --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/4.9 --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --with-sysroot=/ --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-libstdcxx-debug --enable-libstdcxx-time=yes --enable-gnu-unique-object --disable-vtable-verify --enable-plugin --with-system-zlib --disable-browser-plugin --enable-java-awt=gtk --enable-gtk-cairo --with-java-home=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64/jre --enable-java-home --with-jvm-root-dir=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64 --with-jvm-jar-dir=/usr/lib/jvm-exports/java-1.5.0-gcj-4.9-amd64 --with-arch-directory=amd64 --with-ecj-jar=/usr/share/java/eclipse-ecj.jar --enable-objc-gc --enable-multiarch --disable-werror --with-arch-32=i686 --with-abi=m64 --with-multilib-list=m32,m64,mx32 --enable-multilib --with-tune=generic --enable-checking=release --build=x86_64-linux-gnu --host=x86_64-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-linux-gnu
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.2 (Ubuntu 4.9.2-10ubuntu13)
EDIT: Problem solved. I have to shout out a huge Sorry to the community and a big thank you for your hints. Sorry to user anonymous, who seems to be involved into kernel development. What happened? We spent another 2 days debugging and fiddling around with the program code. No implementation problems were found. BUT: the main code involves another helper program. This helper program calculates weights for the ART algorithm on demand. So after debugging and testing, this helper program messed up, when running at least 4 processes. So this was NOT a Kernel / hardware problem, but a software (memory access) problem.
Lessons learned:
Debug every tool that is involved into the calculation process.
Microcode was outdated. SuperMicro is informed about this.
Ubuntu 15.04 possibly needs additional tools, so that all Cores of the CPU run at full speed. Achieved this by installing Ubuntu 14.04 - all cores running at 2,5GHz.
I need to spent some beer if we ever meet up at a conference.
So after three days of thinking, testing and fiddling around with the machine, I discovered the following observations today:
Ubuntu 15.04 runs the CPU with 420 - 650 MHz per Core. Okay I thought this is an Energy-saving option, so I followed various guides to set the speed to the maximum (2.50 GHz). It didn't work. Checked with cpufreq-utils.
Results still remained wrong after several tests on this machine. Other (i5, i7, XEON) machines produced correct results.
I read that other users experienced issues with Ubuntu 15.04 and the CPU frequency. So I decided to plug in a SSD and install Ubuntu 14.04. Checked again what the CPU frequency is now.. and it showed 2.50 GHz as I expected it.
Again started the reconstruction algorithm (which was now like 4-5 times faster than on Ubuntu 15.04) and waited for the results. Okay. Results are correct now! I double checked, started 9 processes and compared results. Still correct.
So I can only assume that there might be a problem in Ubuntu 15.04 / kernel using Speedstep in this CPU. CPU in 15.04 ran all the time between 420 - 650 MHz, while the min CPU speed is expected to be 1,20 GHz and the max CPU speed is 3,30 GHz. If somebody wants the check, I can offer the source code and example data leading to this problem.
Sorry for suspecting this be a CPU bug.
EDIT: after some more testing, the problem is only solved for some scenarios but not yet for all. I'll do more testing.
The Skylake-S/U prime95 erratum is in the AVX (not AVX2) unit. It is fixed on microcodes 0x56 (probably) and 0x6a (for sure). Such erratum in Haswell is unlikely, but possible (especially on post-2014 Intel, where "validation" became an unwelcome cost instead of a tenant for quality).
Haswell has errata linked to the AVX unit, although HSE58 is rather unlikely to be at play (it only slows down the AVX unit). However, do try to place a few MFENCE instructions before the AVX2 computations. If this fixes it, report back immediately, it means we need to MFENCE all IRET in the kernel (HSE105).
Your processor has signature 0x306f2. Ensure you have microcode revision 0x36 or later, this microcode is in Intel's "Linux microcode update pack" from 2015-11-06.
EDIT: this wasn't really an answer, so I should have made it a comment, instead. I apologise. Since the microcode update was not sufficient to fix the issue, it could still be a new errata, an old, but unworked-around errata, or something else entirely (such as code bug or gcc code generation bug).
I have an OpenCL application that runs fine when using an AMD GPU.
When using an NVidia card, the clBuildProgram call crashes the application (does not even return a failure value, just a crash). When debugging, the crash yields:
read access violation in the nvopencl.dll module. code 0xc0000005. The debugger indicates the clGetExportTable function (inside nvopencl.dll) as source of the violation.
By commenting random parts of the kernels, I have reached this point:
In the code fragment:
if (something){
//some stuff
float3 gradient = (float3)(0,1,0);
gradient = normalize(gradient);
return;
}
By deleting the "gradient = normalize(gradient);" line, the clBuildProgram does not crash, but letting it there, crashed the program. the gradient variable is not even used inside the kernel, so it is not related to any other part of it. And the normalize funcion by itself should not be the source of the problem, because it is used in other parts of the code.
I think it may be related to some driver bug. Because installing the latest CUDA version (6.5) makes the OpenCL Volume Rendering sample binaries distributed by NVidia to misbehave, while using a CUDA 6 installation make the Volume Rendering sample to work properly.
My code is related to volume rendering techniques, that is why I think that it may be related, but my problem appears with both CUDA 6.5 and CUDA 6 installations.
Have you experienced something similar? What could be the cause of the problem, and how can I handle it?
Thank you.
After further analysis, the problem seems to be a bug in the drivers, as Xapa mentioned.
I have an openmp code written in C. I executed the code on Intel MIC on Stampede. I want to profile the code to find the hotspots in the code so that it will be helpful for me to optimize the code further. I tried to use the profiler gprof but I read somewhere that gprof cannot be used on MIC directly. I tried to use perf by going through tutorial. I could go till a certain step after which when the perf annotate step comes and I execute the code, it gives me the error ")" unexpected. So I am not knowing how to proceed to profile my code. Can anybody please help ??
This is the site where I referred to the perf tutorial : sandsoftwaresound.net/perf/perf-tutorial-hot-spots/ .
80% of optimization for the Xeon Phi is the same as for the host (Xeon). Use gprof, printf, compiler options, and the rest of your toolkit and carry your optimization as far as you can executing your code on the host only. After you can do no more, then focus on specific Xeon Phi optimizations.
As you are on Stampede, I assume you are using the Intel compiler. The compiler has a lot of diagnostic capabilities to profile your code and even provide suggestions. I'd provide you with more specific URLs but am on vacation with limited bandwidth.
Though this isn't specific to your question, here are some other suggestions. If you aren't, you'll most likely get a substantial boost using it. Intel compilers are danged good at optimizations, especially on Intel architectures. Also, you should use Intel MKL where possible. All of MKL's routines are optimized for the different IA architectures, and the most relevant to HPC are optimized specifically for MIC.
You have a few options.
The heavyweight approach is to use Intel Vtune. Firstly add -g to your compiler flags.
I use Vtune from the host command line quite a bit, here is the command I use to profile an application on the MIC. (This is executed on the host machine, Vtune on the host uses ssh
to launch the application on the MIC.)
amplxe-cl -collect knc-hotspots -source-search-dir=/mysrc/dir -search-dir=/mybin/dir -- ssh mic0 /home/me/myapp
Assume the app on the MIC is at /home/me/myapp, and the source dir and source search dir on the host. (With Vtune update 15 at least, I need to specify both of these separately in order to get the Vtune GUI to show me symbol info)
Once your app has finished, run the Vtune GUI on the host with amplxe-gui and open your result set.
There are also some simplified open source profiling tools developed by Intel that support the MIC, Speedometer and Overhead, you can find information about them here
Hopefully this is enough info to get you started.
I'm developing an application with openCL on an imx6q (freescale - Vivante gc200 with openCL EP) with a Linux suse 13.1 distribution adapted for armv7.
I'm based on the following tutorial : https://community.freescale.com/docs/DOC-93984#comment-12585. I installed the following package : gpu-viv-bin-mx6q.
When I try the example code, it works on a laptop version, but on the imx6, it gives me a segmentation fault when calling the function clGetDeviceIds.
The program is compiled correctly but not work when running;
I tried by passing different null variables in the function. I'm not sure if it's due to memory allocation (as the same code work on my laptop, i can suppose this is not the problem). When I launch it in debug mode, the program seems not to find the file : "gc_hal_user_query.c" (hal is for Hardware Abstraction Layer).
I can't find sufficient documentation on the web, and i'm quite newbie on linux and openCL, so if anybody could help me. Thanks in advance.
I guess the issue is that, when you call
clGetPlatformIDs(1, &cpPlatform, NULL);
cpPlatform receives 0 if no platform is detected. This leads to a segmentation fault during the next call to
clGetDeviceIDs(cpPlatform, CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU, 1, &cdDevice, NULL);
I unfortunately can't help further, I have the same problem.
You are running with insufficient permissions. Try running as root.