width and max-width attributes of image - css

Could anyone tell me the relationship between width and max-width (such as which override which in terms of pixel, percentage, etc)?
How can I use them if I want to:
Auto scale an image when I resize the window and stop scaling when the image reach its original size?
Keep a fixed size until I resize window to certain small size and then start to auto resize

Width is the actual width of the element whereas max-width is the highest the width attribute can be. Max-width is just the limit for the width attribute.
If you want to have an image resize based on the size of the window, you can simply use a percentage for the width of the image. So 100% width would make the image as wide as the container it is within. You can then set the max-width to the width of the file so that it will never distort or stretch.
If you want to keep a fixed size until you resize the window to a certain size, you can use a media query to set the width of the element at a certain size.

From the spec:
10.4 Minimum and maximum widths: 'min-width' and 'max-width'
These two properties allow authors to constrain content widths to a
certain range.
The following algorithm describes how the two properties influence the
used value of the 'width' property:
The tentative used width is calculated (without 'min-width' and 'max-width') following the rules under "Calculating widths
and margins" above.
If the tentative used width is greater than 'max-width', the rules above are applied again, but this time using the computed
value of 'max-width' as the computed value for 'width'.
If the resulting width is smaller than 'min-width', the rules above are applied again, but this time using the value of
'min-width' as the computed value for 'width'.
However, for replaced elements with an intrinsic ratio and both
'width' and 'height' specified as 'auto', the algorithm is
as follows:
Select from the table the resolved height and width values for the
appropriate constraint violation. Take the max-width and max-height as
max(min, max) so that min ≤ max holds true. In this table w and h
stand for the results of the width and height computations ignoring
the 'min-width', 'min-height', 'max-width' and
'max-height' properties. Normally these are the intrinsic width
and height, but they may not be in the case of replaced elements with
intrinsic ratios.
Constraint Violation | Resolved Width | Resolved Height
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
none | w | h
w > max-width | max-width | max(max-width * h/w, min-height)
w < min-width | min-width | min(min-width * h/w, max-height)
h > max-height | max(max-height * w/h, min-width) | max-height
h < min-height | min(min-height * w/h, max-width) | min-height
(w > max-width) and (h > max-height), | max-width | max(min-height, max-width * h/w)
where (max-width/w ≤ max-height/h) | |
(w > max-width) and (h > max-height), | max(min-width, max-height * w/h) | max-height
where (max-width/w > max-height/h) | |
(w < min-width) and (h < min-height), | min(max-width, min-height * w/h) | min-height
where (min-width/w ≤ min-height/h) | |
(w < min-width) and (h < min-height), | min-width | min(max-height, min-width * h/w)
where (min-width/w > min-height/h) | |
(w < min-width) and (h > max-height) | min-width | max-height
(w > max-width) and (h < min-height) | max-width | min-height

This is the definition from mozilla:
The max-width CSS property is used to set the maximum width of a given element. It prevents the used value of the width property from becoming larger than the value specified for max-width.
With max-width you set the max size to width.
When you resize a image, the width will that was set with "width" or "max-width".
See this example below:
/* image width will be always 500px */
img{
max-width:500px;
}
/* image width will be 100% of parent*/
img{
width:100%;
height:200px;
float:left;
display:block;
background: #00f;
}
here is my jsfiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/jmxw7j4p/
You can use media queries either: How to write a media query in CSS?

Auto scale an image when I resize the window and stop scaling when the
image reach its original size?
var w = 100;
$('#bigger').click(function() {
w+=25;
if (w>100)
w= 100;
$('div').css('width', w+'%');
});
$('#smaller').click(function() {
w-=25;
if(w<0)
w=0;
$('div').css('width', w+'%');
});
div {
width: 100%;
border: 1px red solid;
transition: 2s;
}
img {
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
max-width: 300px;
border: 1px green solid;
background-color: green;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<button id="smaller">reduce container width</button>
<button id="bigger">enlarge container width</button>
<div>
<img alt="This is an image!" />
</div>
Keep a fixed size until I resize window to certain small size and then
start to auto resize
img {
width: 300px;
}
#media (max-width:768px) {
img {
width: 100%;
}
}
<img alt="That's another image!" />

Related

Image width and height

Why does the height of an image also change in CSS when I only change the width. I changed the width of an image using the following code:
img{
width: 25%;
}
And it not only made the width change but also the height of the image.
the object size is calculated on its given values. when you only define the width, then the missing height value is determined by its given aspect ratio.
further read:
If the specified size defines only the width or only the height, the
missing value is determined using the intrinsic ratio, if there is
any, the intrinsic dimensions if the specified value matches, or the
default object size for that missing value
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/image
This is done to preserve the aspect ratio while resizing images.
when you are specifying the width to 25% the height is set to auto.
img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
You can specify both the height and width explicitly but that sometime causes it to lose its aspect ratio and responsiveness for different available widths. Therefore the image won't look as it was intended to be.
Note: You can do the opposite set width as auto, but most layouts are generally width constrained and not height.
If you want avoid this behavior you must apply a fix height to the image. like that:
const bt = document.querySelector('button');
let i = 10;
bt.addEventListener('click', function() {
const img = document.querySelector('img');
img.style.width = i + "%";
i++;
});
img {
height:200px;
}
<button>increase by 1%</button>
<div>
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/200">
</div>

Font Scale according to parent div [duplicate]

I'm having a hard time getting my head around font scaling.
I currently have a website with a body font-size of 100%. 100% of what though? This seems to compute out at 16 pixels.
I was under the impression that 100% would somehow refer to the size of the browser window, but apparently not because it's always 16 pixels whether the window is resized down to a mobile width or full-blown widescreen desktop.
How can I make the text on my site scale in relation to its container? I tried using em, but this doesn't scale either.
My reasoning is that things like my menu become squished when you resize, so I need to reduce the px font-size of .menuItem among other elements in relation to the width of the container. (For example, in the menu on a large desktop, 22px works perfectly. Move down to tablet width and 16px is more appropriate.)
I'm aware I can add breakpoints, but I really want the text to scale as well as having extra breakpoints, otherwise, I'll end up with hundreds of breakpoints for every 100pixels decrease in width to control the text.
If the container is not the body, CSS Tricks covers all of your options in Fitting Text to a Container.
If the container is the body, what you are looking for is Viewport-percentage lengths:
The viewport-percentage lengths are relative to the size of the initial containing block. When the height or width of the initial containing block is changed, they are scaled accordingly. However, when the value of overflow on the root element is auto, any scroll bars are assumed not to exist.
The values are:
vw (% of the viewport width)
vh (% of the viewport height)
vi (1% of the viewport size in the direction of the root element's inline axis)
vb (1% of the viewport size in the direction of the root element's block axis)
vmin (the smaller of vw or vh)
vmax (the larger or vw or vh)
1 v* is equal to 1% of the initial containing block.
Using it looks like this:
p {
font-size: 4vw;
}
As you can see, when the viewport width increases, so do the font-size, without needing to use media queries.
These values are a sizing unit, just like px or em, so they can be used to size other elements as well, such as width, margin, or padding.
Browser support is pretty good, but you'll likely need a fallback, such as:
p {
font-size: 16px;
font-size: 4vw;
}
Check out the support statistics: http://caniuse.com/#feat=viewport-units.
Also, check out CSS-Tricks for a broader look: Viewport Sized Typography
Here's a nice article about setting minimum/maximum sizes and exercising a bit more control over the sizes: Precise control over responsive typography
And here's an article about setting your size using calc() so that the text fills the viewport: http://codepen.io/CrocoDillon/pen/fBJxu
Also, please view this article, which uses a technique dubbed 'molten leading' to adjust the line-height as well. Molten Leading in CSS
But what if the container is not the viewport (body)?
This question is asked in a comment by Alex under 2507rkt3's answer.
That fact does not mean vw cannot be used to some extent to size for that container. Now to see any variation at all one has to be assuming that the container in some way is flexible in size. Whether through a direct percentage width or through being 100% minus margins. The point becomes "moot" if the container is always set to, let's say, 200px wide--then just set a font-size that works for that width.
Example 1
With a flexible width container, however, it must be realized that in some way the container is still being sized off the viewport. As such, it is a matter of adjusting a vw setting based off that percentage size difference to the viewport, which means taking into account the sizing of parent wrappers. Take this example:
div {
width: 50%;
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
font-size: 16px;
/* 100 = viewport width, as 1vw = 1/100th of that
So if the container is 50% of viewport (as here)
then factor that into how you want it to size.
Let's say you like 5vw if it were the whole width,
then for this container, size it at 2.5vw (5 * .5 [i.e. 50%])
*/
font-size: 2.5vw;
}
Assuming here the div is a child of the body, it is 50% of that 100% width, which is the viewport size in this basic case. Basically, you want to set a vw that is going to look good to you. As you can see in my comment in the above CSS content, you can "think" through that mathematically with respect to the full viewport size, but you don't need to do that. The text is going to "flex" with the container because the container is flexing with the viewport resizing. Here's an example of two differently sized containers.
Example 2
You can help ensure viewport sizing by forcing the calculation based off that. Consider this example:
html {width: 100%;} /* Force 'html' to be viewport width */
body {width: 150%; } /* Overflow the body */
div {
width: 50%;
border: 1px solid black;
margin: 20px;
font-size: 16px;
/* 100 = viewport width, as 1vw = 1/100th of that
Here, the body is 150% of viewport, but the container is 50%
of viewport, so both parents factor into how you want it to size.
Let's say you like 5vw if it were the whole width,
then for this container, size it at 3.75vw
(5 * 1.5 [i.e. 150%]) * .5 [i.e. 50%]
*/
font-size: 3.75vw;
}
The sizing is still based off viewport, but is in essence set up based off the container size itself.
Should the Size of the Container Change Dynamically...
If the sizing of the container element ended up changing dynamically its percentage relationship either via #media breakpoints or via JavaScript, then whatever the base "target" was would need recalculation to maintain the same "relationship" for text sizing.
Take example #1 above. If the div was switched to 25% width by either #media or JavaScript, then at the same time, the font-size would need to adjust in either the media query or by JavaScript to the new calculation of 5vw * .25 = 1.25. This would put the text size at the same size it would have been had the "width" of the original 50% container been reduced by half from viewport sizing, but has now been reduced due to a change in its own percentage calculation.
A Challenge
With the CSS calc() function in use, it would become difficult to adjust dynamically, as that function does not work for font-size purposes at this time. So you could not do a pure CSS adjustment if your width is changing on calc(). Of course, a minor adjustment of width for margins may not be enough to warrant any change in font-size, so it may not matter.
Solution with SVG:
.resizeme {
resize: both;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 75px;
width: 500px;
background-color: lightblue;
overflow: hidden;
}
<div class="resizeme">
<svg
width="100%"
height="100%"
viewBox="0 0 500 75"
preserveAspectRatio="xMinYMid meet"
style="background-color:green"
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"
>
<text
x="0"
y="75"
font-size="75"
fill="black"
>█Resize This█</text>
</svg>
</div>
Solution with SVG and text-wrapping using foreignObject:
.resizeme {
resize: both;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
height: 200px;
width: 500px;
background-color: lightblue;
overflow: hidden;
}
<div class="resizeme">
<svg
width="100%"
height="100%"
viewBox="0 0 500 200"
preserveAspectRatio="xMinYMin meet"
>
<foreignObject width="100%" height="100%" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="background-color:lightgreen;">
<h1>heading</h1>
<p>Resize the blue box.</p>
</div>
</foreignObject>
</svg>
</div>
In one of my projects I use a "mixture" between vw and vh to adjust the font size to my needs, for example:
font-size: calc(3vw + 3vh);
I know this doesn't answer the OP's question, but maybe it can be a solution to anyone else.
Pure-CSS solution with calc(), CSS units and math
This is precisely not what OP asks, but may make someone's day. This answer is not spoon-feedingly easy and needs some researching on the developer end.
I came finally to get a pure-CSS solution for this using calc() with different units. You will need some basic mathematical understanding of formulas to work out your expression for calc().
When I worked this out, I had to get a full-page-width responsive header with some padding few parents up in DOM. I'll use my values here, replace them with your own.
To mathematics
You will need:
Nicely adjusted ratio in some viewport. I used 320 pixels, thus I got 24 pixels high and 224 pixels wide, so the ratio is 9.333... or 28 / 3
The container width, I had padding: 3em and full width so this got to 100wv - 2 * 3em
X is the width of container, so replace it with your own expression or adjust the value to get full-page text. R is the ratio you will have. You can get it by adjusting the values in some viewport, inspecting element width and height and replacing them with your own values. Also, it is width / heigth ;)
x = 100vw - 2 * 3em = 100vw - 6em
r = 224px/24px = 9.333... = 28 / 3
y = x / r
= (100vw - 6em) / (28 / 3)
= (100vw - 6em) * 3 / 28
= (300vw - 18em) / 28
= (75vw - 4.5rem) / 7
And bang! It worked! I wrote
font-size: calc((75vw - 4.5rem) / 7)
to my header and it adjusted nicely in every viewport.
But how does it work?
We need some constants up here. 100vw means the full width of viewport, and my goal was to establish full-width header with some padding.
The ratio. Getting a width and height in one viewport got me a ratio to play with, and with ratio I know what the height should be in other viewport width. Calculating them with hand would take plenty of time and at least take lots of bandwidth, so it's not a good answer.
Conclusion
I wonder why no-one has figured this out and some people are even telling that this would be impossible to tinker with CSS. I don't like to use JavaScript in adjusting elements, so I don't accept JavaScript (and forget about jQuery) answers without digging more. All in all, it's good that this got figured out and this is one step to pure-CSS implementations in website design.
I apologize of any unusual convention in my text, I'm not native speaker in English and am also quite new to writing Stack Overflow answers.
It should also be noted that we have evil scrollbars in some browsers. For example, when using Firefox I noticed that 100vw means the full width of viewport, extending under scrollbar (where content cannot expand!), so the fullwidth text has to be margined carefully and preferably get tested with many browsers and devices.
There is a big philosophy for this issue.
The easiest thing to do would be to give a certain font-size to body (I recommend 10), and then all the other element would have their font in em or rem.
I'll give you an example to understand those units.
Em is always relative to its parent:
body{font-size: 10px;}
.menu{font-size: 2em;} /* That means 2*10 pixels = 20 pixels */
.menu li{font-size: 1.5em;} /* That means 1.5*20 pixels = 30 pixels */
Rem is always relative to body:
body{font-size: 10px;}
.menu{font-size: 2rem;} /* That means 2*10 pixels = 20 pixels */
.menu li{font-size: 1.5rem;} /* that means 1.5*10 pixels = 15 pixels */
And then you could create a script that would modify font-size relative to your container width.
But this isn't what I would recommend. Because in a 900 pixels width container for example you would have a p element with a 12 pixels font-size let's say. And on your idea that would become an 300 pixels wide container at 4 pixels font-size. There has to be a lower limit.
Other solutions would be with media queries, so that you could set font for different widths.
But the solutions that I would recommend is to use a JavaScript library that helps you with that. And fittext.js that I found so far.
Here is the function:
document.body.setScaledFont = function(f) {
var s = this.offsetWidth, fs = s * f;
this.style.fontSize = fs + '%';
return this
};
Then convert all your documents child element font sizes to em's or %.
Then add something like this to your code to set the base font size.
document.body.setScaledFont(0.35);
window.onresize = function() {
document.body.setScaledFont(0.35);
}
http://jsfiddle.net/0tpvccjt/
There is a way to do this without JavaScript!
You can use an inline SVG image. You can use CSS on an SVG if it is inline. You have to remember that using this method means your SVG image will respond to its container size.
Try using the following solution...
HTML
<div>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 360.96 358.98" >
<text>SAVE $500</text>
</svg>
</div>
CSS
div {
width: 50%; /* Set your container width */
height: 50%; /* Set your container height */
}
svg {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
}
text {
transform: translate(40px, 202px);
font-size: 62px;
fill: #000;
}
Example:
https://jsfiddle.net/k8L4xLLa/32/
Want something more flashy?
SVG images also allow you to do cool stuff with shapes and junk. Check out this great use case for scalable text...
https://jsfiddle.net/k8L4xLLa/14/
CSS Container Queries
A late-2022 addition to the CSS feature set makes scaling font size with containers straightforward.
Container queries come with a new set of CSS units cqw/cqh (container query width/height). To use them you need to set the container-type property on the parent element whose size you want to use. Minimal example:
<div>
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet</p>
</div>
<style>
div {
container-type: inline-size;
}
p {
font-size: 5cqw;
}
</style>
The font size will increase smoothly as the container grows. At 1000px container width, the p font size will be 1000px / 100 * 5 = 50px.
container-type can be size or inline-size. size tracks both height and width of the container which allows you to use both cqw and cqh.
Most of the time on the web, heights are calculated based on content and you only specify the width. To save the browser some work, you'll generally want to set container-type: inline-size; so the browser only tracks the inline dimension which is usually width (unless you set writing-mode to vertical).
Browser support for container queries has grown rapidly in the 2nd half of 2022 and currently stands at 75% (2023-01-01).
This may not be super practical, but if you want a font to be a direct function of the parent, without having any JavaScript that listens/loops (interval) to read the size of the div/page, there is a way to do it. Iframes.
Anything within the iframe will consider the size of the iframe as the size of the viewport. So the trick is to just make an iframe whose width is the maximum width you want your text to be, and whose height is equal to the maximum height * the particular text's aspect ratio.
Setting aside the limitation that viewport units can't also come along side parent units for text (as in, having the % size behave like everyone else), viewport units do provide a very powerful tool: being able to get the minimum/maximum dimension. You can't do that anywhere else - you can't say...make the height of this div be the width of the parent * something.
That being said, the trick is to use vmin, and to set the iframe size so that [fraction] * total height is a good font size when the height is the limiting dimension, and [fraction] * total width when the width is the limiting dimension. This is why the height has to be a product of the width and the aspect ratio.
For my particular example, you have
.main iframe{
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: calc(3.5 * 100%);
background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0);
border-style: none;
transform: translate3d(-50%, -50%, 0);
}
The small annoyance with this method is that you have to manually set the CSS of the iframe. If you attach the whole CSS file, that would take up a lot of bandwidth for many text areas. So, what I do is attach the rule that I want directly from my CSS.
var rule = document.styleSheets[1].rules[4];
var iDoc = document.querySelector('iframe').contentDocument;
iDoc.styleSheets[0].insertRule(rule.cssText);
You can write small function that gets the CSS rule / all CSS rules that would affect the text area.
I cannot think of another way to do it without having some cycling/listening JavaScript. The real solution would be for browsers to provide a way to scale text as a function of the parent container and to also provide the same vmin/vmax type functionality.
JSFiddle:
https://jsfiddle.net/0jr7rrgm/3/
(click once to lock the red square to the mouse, and click again to release)
Most of the JavaScript in the fiddle is just my custom click-drag function.
Using vw, em & co. works for sure, but IMO it always needs a human's touch for fine-tuning.
Here's a script I just wrote based on #tnt-rox' answer that tries to automatize that human's touch:
$('#controller').click(function(){
$('h2').each(function(){
var
$el = $(this),
max = $el.get(0),
el = null
;
max =
max
? max.offsetWidth
: 320
;
$el.css({
'font-size': '1em',
'display': 'inline',
});
el = $el.get(0);
el.get_float = function(){
var
fs = 0
;
if (this.style && this.style.fontSize) {
fs = parseFloat(this.style.fontSize.replace(/([\d\.]+)em/g, '$1'));
}
return fs;
};
el.bigger = function(){
this.style.fontSize = (this.get_float() + 0.1) + 'em';
};
while (el.offsetWidth < max) {
el.bigger();
}
// Finishing touch.
$el.css({
'font-size': ((el.get_float() -0.1) +'em'),
'line-height': 'normal',
'display': '',
});
}); // end of (each)
}); // end of (font scaling test)
div {
width: 50%;
background-color: tomato;
font-family: 'Arial';
}
h2 {
white-space: nowrap;
}
h2:nth-child(2) {
font-style: italic;
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.9.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<input type="button" id="controller" value="Apply" />
<div>
<h2>Lorem ipsum dolor</h2>
<h2>Test String</h2>
<h2>Sweet Concatenation</h2>
<h2>Font Scaling</h2>
</div>
It basically reduces the font-size to 1em and then starts incrementing by 0.1 until it reaches maximum width.
JSFiddle
Use CSS Variables
No one has mentioned CSS variables yet, and this approach worked best for me, so:
Let's say you've got a column on your page that is 100% of the width of a mobile user's screen, but has a max-width of 800px, so on desktop there's some space on either side of the column. Put this at the top of your page:
<script> document.documentElement.style.setProperty('--column-width', Math.min(window.innerWidth, 800)+'px'); </script>
And now you can use that variable (instead of the built-in vw unit) to set the size of your font. E.g.
p {
font-size: calc( var(--column-width) / 100 );
}
It's not a pure CSS approach, but it's pretty close.
100% is relative to the base font size, which, if you haven't set it, would be the browser's user-agent default.
To get the effect you're after, I would use a piece of JavaScript code to adjust the base font size relative to the window dimensions.
Artistically, if you need to fit two or more lines of text within the same width regardless of their character count then you have nice options.
It's best to find a dynamical solution so whatever text is entered we end up with a nice display.
Let's see how we may approach.
var els = document.querySelectorAll(".divtext"),
refWidth = els[0].clientWidth,
refFontSize = parseFloat(window.getComputedStyle(els[0],null)
.getPropertyValue("font-size"));
els.forEach((el,i) => el.style.fontSize = refFontSize * refWidth / els[i].clientWidth + "px")
#container {
display: inline-block;
background-color: black;
padding: 0.6vw 1.2vw;
}
.divtext {
display: table;
color: white;
font-family: impact;
font-size: 4.5vw;
}
<div id="container">
<div class="divtext">THIS IS JUST AN</div>
<div class="divtext">EXAMPLE</div>
<div class="divtext">TO SHOW YOU WHAT</div>
<div class="divtext">YOU WANT</div>
</div>
All we do is to get the width (els[0].clientWidth) and the font size (parseFloat(window.getComputedStyle(els[0],null).getPropertyValue("font-size"))) of the first line as a reference and then just calculate the subsequent lines font size accordingly.
This web component changes the font size so the inner text width matches the container width. Check the demo.
You can use it like this:
<full-width-text>Lorem Ipsum</full-width-text>
You may be you looking for something like this:
http://jsfiddle.net/sijav/dGsC9/4/
http://fiddle.jshell.net/sijav/dGsC9/4/show/
I have used flowtype, and it's working great (however it's JavaScript and not a pure CSS solution):
$('body').flowtype({
minFont: 10,
maxFont: 40,
minimum: 500,
maximum: 1200,
fontRatio: 70
});
I've prepared a simple scale function using CSS transform instead of font-size. You can use it inside of any container, you don't have to set media queries, etc. :)
Blog post:
Full width CSS & JS scalable header
The code:
function scaleHeader() {
var scalable = document.querySelectorAll('.scale--js');
var margin = 10;
for (var i = 0; i < scalable.length; i++) {
var scalableContainer = scalable[i].parentNode;
scalable[i].style.transform = 'scale(1)';
var scalableContainerWidth = scalableContainer.offsetWidth - margin;
var scalableWidth = scalable[i].offsetWidth;
scalable[i].style.transform = 'scale(' + scalableContainerWidth / scalableWidth + ')';
scalableContainer.style.height = scalable[i].getBoundingClientRect().height + 'px';
}
}
Working demo:
https://codepen.io/maciejkorsan/pen/BWLryj
Inside your CSS, try adding this at the bottom changing the 320 pixels width for wherever your design starts breaking:
#media only screen and (max-width: 320px) {
body { font-size: 1em; }
}
Then give the font-size in "px" or "em" as you wish.
Try http://simplefocus.com/flowtype/. This is what I use for my sites, and it has worked perfectly.
My own solution, jQuery-based, works by gradually increasing the font size until the container gets a big increase in height (meaning it got a line break).
It's pretty simple, but works fairly well, and it is very easy to use. You don't have to know anything about the font being used, everything is taken care of by the browser.
You can play with it on http://jsfiddle.net/tubededentifrice/u5y15d0L/2/
The magic happens here:
var setMaxTextSize=function(jElement) {
// Get and set the font size into data for reuse upon resize
var fontSize=parseInt(jElement.data(quickFitFontSizeData)) || parseInt(jElement.css("font-size"));
jElement.data(quickFitFontSizeData, fontSize);
// Gradually increase font size until the element gets a big increase in height (i.e. line break)
var i = 0;
var previousHeight;
do
{
previousHeight=jElement.height();
jElement.css("font-size", "" + (++fontSize) + "px");
}
while(i++ < 300 && jElement.height()-previousHeight < fontSize/2)
// Finally, go back before the increase in height and set the element as resized by adding quickFitSetClass
fontSize -= 1;
jElement.addClass(quickFitSetClass).css("font-size", "" + fontSize + "px");
return fontSize;
};
My problem was similar, but related to scaling text within a heading. I tried Fit Font, but I needed to toggle the compressor to get any results, since it was solving a slightly different problem, as was Text Flow.
So I wrote my own little plugin that reduced the font size to fit the container, assuming you have overflow: hidden and white-space: nowrap so that even if reducing the font to the minimum doesn't allow showing the full heading, it just cuts off what it can show.
(function($) {
// Reduces the size of text in the element to fit the parent.
$.fn.reduceTextSize = function(options) {
options = $.extend({
minFontSize: 10
}, options);
function checkWidth(em) {
var $em = $(em);
var oldPosition = $em.css('position');
$em.css('position', 'absolute');
var width = $em.width();
$em.css('position', oldPosition);
return width;
}
return this.each(function(){
var $this = $(this);
var $parent = $this.parent();
var prevFontSize;
while (checkWidth($this) > $parent.width()) {
var currentFontSize = parseInt($this.css('font-size').replace('px', ''));
// Stop looping if min font size reached, or font size did not change last iteration.
if (isNaN(currentFontSize) || currentFontSize <= options.minFontSize ||
prevFontSize && prevFontSize == currentFontSize) {
break;
}
prevFontSize = currentFontSize;
$this.css('font-size', (currentFontSize - 1) + 'px');
}
});
};
})(jQuery);
Try to use the fitText plugin, because Viewport sizes isn't the solution of this problem.
Just add the library:
<script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1/jquery.min.js"></script>
And change font-size for correct by settings the coefficient of text:
$("#text_div").fitText(0.8);
You can set maximum and minimum values of text:
$("#text_div").fitText(0.8, { minFontSize: '12px', maxFontSize: '36px' });
Here is a pure CSS solution with the understanding that you admit breakpoints are necessary but also want text scaling:
I'm aware I can add breakpoints, but I really want the text to scale
as well as having extra breakpoints, otherwise....
Here is an approach using:
Custom properties
Media queries for breakpoints
clamp() (browser support in Feb 2022 is pretty good at 93%)
calc()
If one common scaling factor can be used to control ALL the text scaling within a container per screen max-width, all you need to do is scale a custom property per max-width, and apply this factor to 1 calculation.
A basic setup starts like this:
:root {
--scaling-factor: 1
}
.parent {
font-size: 30px
}
.largest {
font-size: clamp(60%, calc(var(--scaling-factor) * 100%), 100%);
}
.middle {
font-size: clamp(60%, calc(var(--scaling-factor) * 85%), 100%);
}
.smallest {
font-size: clamp(60%, calc(var(--scaling-factor) * 70%), 100%);
}
Then nest your media queries something like this (or whatever you need for your breakpoints):
#media (max-width: 1200px) {
:root {
--scaling-factor: 0.9
}
#media (max-width: 800px) {
:root {
--scaling-factor: 0.8
}
#media (max-width: 600px) {
:root {
--scaling-factor: 0.5 /* nope, because the font-size is floored at 60% thanks to clamp() */
}
}
}
}
This minimizes your media query markup.
Advantages
One custom property controls ALL scaling ... no need to add multiple declarations per media breakpoint
The use of clamp() sets a lower-limit on what the font-size should be, so you ensure your text is never too small (here the floor is 60% of the parent's font-size)
Please see this JSFiddle for a demo. Resize the window until at the smallest widths, the paragraphs are all the same font-size.
Always have your element with this attribute:
JavaScript: element.style.fontSize = "100%";
or
CSS: style = "font-size: 100%;"
When you go fullscreen, you should already have a scale variable calculated (scale > 1 or scale = 1). Then, on fullscreen:
document.body.style.fontSize = (scale * 100) + "%";
It works nicely with little code.
Take look at my code. It makes the font size smaller to fit whatever there.
But I think this doesn't lead to a good user experience
var containerWidth = $("#ui-id-2").width();
var items = $(".quickSearchAutocomplete .ui-menu-item");
var fontSize = 16;
items.each(function(){
// Displaying a value depends sometimes on your case. You may make it block or inline-table instead of inline-block or whatever value that make the div take overflow width.
$(this).css({"whiteSpace": "nowrap", "display": "inline-block"});
while ($(this).width() > containerWidth){
console.log("$(this).width()" + $(this).width() + "containerWidth" + containerWidth)
$(this).css("font-size", fontSize -= 0.5);
}
});
For dynamic text, this plugin is quite useful:
http://freqdec.github.io/slabText/
Simply add CSS:
.slabtexted .slabtext
{
display: -moz-inline-box;
display: inline-block;
white-space: nowrap;
}
.slabtextinactive .slabtext
{
display: inline;
white-space: normal;
font-size: 1em !important;
letter-spacing: inherit !important;
word-spacing: inherit !important;
*letter-spacing: normal !important;
*word-spacing: normal !important;
}
.slabtextdone .slabtext
{
display: block;
}
And the script:
$('#mydiv').slabText();
This worked for me:
I try to approximate font-size based on a width/height got from setting `font-size: 10px`. Basically, the idea is "if I have 20 pixels width and 11 pixels height with `font-size: 10px`, so what would it be the maximum font-size to math a container of 50 pixels width and 30 pixels height?"
The answer is a double proportion system:
{ 20:10=50:X, 11:10=30:Y } = { X= (10*50)/20, Y= (10*30)/11 }
Now X is a font-size that will match width, and Y is a font-size that will match height; take the smallest value
function getMaxFontSizeApprox(el){
var fontSize = 10;
var p = el.parentNode;
var parent_h = p.offsetHeight ? p.offsetHeight : p.style.pixelHeight;
if(!parent_h)
parent_h = 0;
var parent_w = p.offsetHeight ? p.offsetWidth : p.style.pixelWidth;
if(!parent_w)
parent_w = 0;
el.style.fontSize = fontSize + "px";
var el_h = el.offsetHeight ? el.offsetHeight : el.style.pixelHeight;
if(!el_h)
el_h = 0;
var el_w = el.offsetHeight ? el.offsetWidth : el.style.pixelWidth;
if(!el_w)
el_w = 0;
// 0.5 is the error on the measure that JavaScript does
// if the real measure had been 12.49 px => JavaScript would have said 12px
// so we think about the worst case when could have, we add 0.5 to
// compensate the round error
var fs1 = (fontSize*(parent_w + 0.5))/(el_w + 0.5);
var fs2 = (fontSize*(parent_h) + 0.5)/(el_h + 0.5);
fontSize = Math.floor(Math.min(fs1,fs2));
el.style.fontSize = fontSize + "px";
return fontSize;
}
NB: the argument of the function must be a span element or an element which is smaller than its parent, otherwise if children and parent have both the same width/height function will fail.
let textElement = document.getElementById('text1');
let parentElement = textElement.parentElement;
const parentClientHeight = parentElement.clientHeight;
const parentClientWidth = parentElement.clientWidth;
textElement.style.padding = "unset";
textElement.style.margin = "auto";
let fontSize = parentClientHeight;
let minFS = 3,
maxFS = fontSize;
while (fontSize != minFS) {
textElement.style.fontSize = `${fontSize}px`;
if (
parentElement.scrollHeight <= parentClientHeight &&
parentElement.scrollWidth <= parentClientWidth
) {
minFS = fontSize;
} else {
maxFS = fontSize;
}
fontSize = Math.floor((minFS + maxFS) / 2);
}
textElement.style.fontSize = `${minFS}px`;
<div style="height:200px; width:300px;">
<div id='text1'>
test
</div>
</div>
As a JavaScript fallback (or your sole solution), you can use my jQuery Scalem plugin, which lets you scale relative to the parent element (container) by passing the reference option.
In case it's helpful to anyone, most of the solutions in this thread were wrapping text into multiple lines, form e.
But then I found this, and it worked:
https://github.com/chunksnbits/jquery-quickfit
Example usage:
$('.someText').quickfit({max:50,tolerance:.4})

how to set fixed height based on sibling element's height

Let's say I've two sibling elements A and B. I want to set B's height fixed to (container's height - A's height). So, child elements of B won't increase the height of B.
I've tried using Height: 100%;, but it is taking container's height, not (container's height - A's height)
Sample angular app:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-ivopeh
B's height should be fixed to (container's height - A's height) = (50px -30px) = 20px. So, if child element of B has height more then 20px, it should restrict its height to 20px and add scrollbar to it
I Would place this as a comment if I could.
To add a scrollbar to section b if the children are bigger than 20px you could overflow-y:scroll on section b(more documentation on overflow below). this way you only have to take care of the height which could be solved by adding flexbox or fixed values.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/overflow
if A has a fixed height then changing class B as follows should do it;
.B {
display: block;
height: calc(100% - 20px /* A's fixed height. can be percentage, pixel, em, rem etc. */);
overflow-y: auto;
}
display: block; is required for any height value set on B to be effective.
overflow-y: auto is required to display scroll bars in case B's content overflows.
here is a working demo: https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-mw3ugb

CSS - Behaviour of a div with height and max-height

If you have a div:
<div id="test">
<img src="http://..." />
</div>
With CSS:
#test {
height: x;
max-height: x + y;
overflow: auto;
}
Is it safe to assume that the div will always grow past its initial height of x and stop growing (and start scrolling) at x + y as the image with height x + y + z loads?
If not, how would I go about achieving this behaviour consistently across modern browsers?
no, you need to use min-height instead of height.
height will set a fixed height and the container will not grow or shrink.
min-height will set a minimum height and max-height a maximum height, the container will then grow and shrink between those 2 points and the overflow auto will apply when its greater than the max-height.

Scaling down images with css to fit in a container

So I want to scale an image down with css into the size of a container, while maintaining its aspect ratio. It seems easy enough to achieve this when specifying the minimum height OR width, but not both. Any ideas?
Find out if the height is less or the width is less; whichever dimension is less, set that property of the img but not the other. Assuming you aren't setting the size of the img in CSS, this should maintain the aspect ratio while making the image as large as possible within the constraints of the container. This code assumes your container is a div.
var height = $('#divImg').Height();
var width = $('#divImg').Width();
if (height > width)
{
$('#divImg img').Width(width);
}
else
{
$('#divImg img').Height(height);
}
EDIT:
If you aren't using jQuery, you can use the following CSS trick to maintain aspect ratio. Change 100px to the size of your container:
#divImg img {
height: 100px;
width: auto;
}
#divImg img {
height: auto;
width: 100px;
}
Borrowed from CSS styling image height and width while maintaining aspect ratio.

Resources