Spring Boot - inject map<Enum,Class> from application.yml - initialization

I use spring boot in a J2SE app.
I have some constant data, such as a map, indicating a HandlerClass to process one operation Type.
The map relation is not changed, so I want to config it in application.yml
I try this:
info:
modify_nodeip: omm.task.impl.ModifyNodeIpHandler
But the map is only can be recognized as Map<String,String>, How can I inject the map as Map<Enum,Class>?
Thank you!
Updated:
I followed #cfrick instruction, but it doen't work.
application.yml
config:
optHandlerMap:
modify_oms_nodeip: 'omm.task.opthandler.impl.ModifyOMSNodeIpHandler'
TestConfiguration:
#Configuration
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix = "config")
public class TestConfiguration
{
Map<OperationType,OptHandler> optHandlerMap; // here we store the handlers, same name in yaml
TestConfiguration() {}
}
and the main func used the configuration
#Autowired
private TestConfiguration testConfiguration;
what's wrong with that? But it doesn't work, optHandlerMap in testConfiguration is null.

You can play a trick like this:
In your TestConfiguration, define a Map<String,String>, and getter.
then provide a Map<Operator,Handler> getXXXX() function, in this function, convert the Map<String,String> to Map<Operator,Handler>.
Maybe you need to use reflect to new a instance.
By the way, you can use Maps.transform() in Guava to perform the conversion.

You write your own settings and annotate as #ConfigurationProperties (see 21.6 Typesafe Configuration Properties)
#Component
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="cfg") // the root in my yaml
class HandlerConfiguration {
public enum Handler { Handler1, Handler2 } // enum
Map<Handler,Class> handlers // here we store the handlers, same name in yaml
HandlerConfiguration() {}
}
Then my application.yaml looks like this:
cfg:
handlers:
Handler1: 'app.Handler1'
And accessing it like this:
def ctx = SpringApplication.run(Application, args)
ctx.getBean(HandlerConfiguration).with{
assert handlers.size()==1 // there is the one
assert handlers[HandlerConfiguration.Handler.Handler1] // it's key is the enum
assert handlers[HandlerConfiguration.Handler.Handler1] == Handler1 // its value is the actual class
handlers[HandlerConfiguration.Handler.Handler1].newInstance().run()
}
(app.Handler1 is just some random class I put there, all this is in the same package (app))

just enable config spring.data.rest.enable-enum-translation (Spring document) and Spring will do the trick

Related

Error: Scope IdentityServerApi not found in store

While trying to add routing to additional endpoints within my project built with IdentityServer4, I ran into the following issue:
Error: Scope IdentityServerApi not found in store.
I followed IdentityServer4's documentation for adding more API Endpoints exactly, so I wasn't sure why I was getting this error.
It turns out that in v4 IdentityServer is moving away from ApiResources and toward ApiScopes. For anyone just learning about IdentityServer4, it can be a little confusing navigating all of these changes, so hopefully this clarification will be helpful to someone else as well.
Solution: as opposed to what it says in the documentation included in my question, register your "LocalApi" as an ApiScope not an ApiResource. Following in an example of my setup for a local API:
Your config file:
// Add to your ApiScopes (not ApiResources)
public static IEnumerable<ApiScope> ApiScopes =>
new ApiScope[]
{
new ApiScope(IdentityServerConstants.LocalApi.ScopeName)
};
// Then add to your client's allowed scopes:
// ... extraneous code omitted ...
AllowedScopes = new string[]
{
IdentityServerConstants.LocalApi.ScopeName
}
Your startup/program.cs:
// Register IdentityServer, then:
builder.Services.AddLocalApiAuthentication();
Your "LocalApi" controller class:
[ApiController]
[Authorize(LocalApi.PolicyName)]
[Route("api/[controller]/[action]")]
public class YourController : ControllerBase
{
// ...
}

JpaSagaStore in conjunction with Jackson unable to properly store state

In a SpringBoot application, I have the following configuration:
axon:
axonserver:
servers: "${AXON_SERVER:localhost}"
serializer:
general: jackson
messages: jackson
events: jackson
logging.level:
org.axonframework.modelling.saga: debug
Downsizing the scenario to bare minimum, the relevant portion of Saga class:
#Slf4j
#Saga
#ProcessingGroup("AuctionEventManager")
public class AuctionEventManagerSaga {
#Autowired
private transient EventScheduler eventScheduler;
private ScheduleToken scheduleToken;
private Instant auctionTimerStart;
#StartSaga
#SagaEventHandler(associationProperty = "auctionEventId")
protected void on(final AuctionEventScheduled event) {
this.auctionTimerStart = event.getTimerStart();
// Cancel any pre-existing previous job, since the scheduling thread might be lost upon a crash/restart of JVM.
if (this.scheduleToken != null) {
this.eventScheduler.cancelSchedule(this.scheduleToken);
}
this.scheduleToken = this.eventScheduler.schedule(
this.auctionTimerStart,
AuctionEventStarted.builder()
.auctionEventId(event.getAuctionEventId())
.build()
);
}
#EndSaga
#SagaEventHandler(associationProperty = "auctionEventId")
protected void on(final AuctionEventStarted event) {
log.info(
"[AuctionEventManagerSaga] Current state: {scheduleToken={}, auctionTimerStart={}}",
this.scheduleToken,
this.auctionTimerStart
);
}
}
In the final compiled class, we will end up having 4 properties: log (from #Slf4j), eventScheduler (transient, #Autowired), scheduleToken and auctionTimerStart.
For reference information, here is a sample of the general approach I've been using for both Command and Event classes:
#Value
#Builder
#JsonDeserialize(builder = AuctionEventStarted.AuctionEventStartedBuilder.class)
public class AuctionEventStarted {
AuctionEventId auctionEventId;
#JsonPOJOBuilder(withPrefix = "")
public static final class AuctionEventStartedBuilder {}
}
When executing the code, you get the following output:
2020-05-12 15:40:01.180 DEBUG 1 --- [mandProcessor-4] o.a.m.saga.repository.jpa.JpaSagaStore : Updating saga id c8aff7f7-d47f-4616-8a96-a40044cb7e3b as {}
As soon as the general serializer is changed to xstream, the content is serialized properly, but I face another issue during deserialization, since I have private static final class Builder classes using Lombok.
So is there a way for Axon to handle these scenarios:
1- Axon to safely manage Jackson to ignore #Autowired, transient and static properties from #Saga classes? I've attempted to manually define #JsonIgnore at non-state properties and it still didn't work.
2- Axon to safely configure XStream to ignore inner classes (mostly Builder classes implemented as private static final)?
Thanks in advance,
EDIT: I'm pursuing a resolution using my preferred serializer: JSON. I attempted to modify the saga class and extend JsonSerializer<AuctionEventManagerSaga>. For that I implemented the methods:
#Override
public Class<AuctionEventManagerSaga> handledType() {
return AuctionEventManagerSaga.class;
}
#Override
public void serialize(
final AuctionEventManagerSaga value,
final JsonGenerator gen,
final SerializerProvider serializers
) throws IOException {
gen.writeStartObject();
gen.writeObjectField("scheduleToken", value.eventScheduler);
gen.writeObjectField("auctionTimerStart", value.auctionTimerStart);
gen.writeEndObject();
}
Right now, I have something being serialized, but it has nothing to do with the properties I've defined:
2020-05-12 16:20:01.322 DEBUG 1 --- [mandProcessor-0] o.a.m.saga.repository.jpa.JpaSagaStore : Storing saga id c4b5d94c-7251-40a5-accf-332768b1cacd as {"delegatee":null,"unwrappingSerializer":false}
EDIT 2 Decided to add more insight into the issue I experience when I switch general to use XStream (even though it's somewhat unrelated to the main issue described in the title).
Here is the issue it complains to me:
2020-05-12 17:08:06.495 DEBUG 1 --- [ault-executor-0] o.a.a.c.command.AxonServerCommandBus : Received command response [message_identifier: "79631ffb-9a87-4224-bed3-a957730dced7"
error_code: "AXONIQ-4002"
error_message {
message: "No converter available\n---- Debugging information ----\nmessage : No converter available\ntype : jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread\nconverter : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ReflectionConverter\nmessage[1] : Unable to make field private static final jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread.UNSAFE accessible: module java.base does not \"opens jdk.internal.misc\" to unnamed module #7728643a\n-------------------------------"
location: "1#600b5b87a922"
details: "No converter available\n---- Debugging information ----\nmessage : No converter available\ntype : jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread\nconverter : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ReflectionConverter\nmessage[1] : Unable to make field private static final jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread.UNSAFE accessible: module java.base does not \"opens jdk.internal.misc\" to unnamed module #7728643a\n-------------------------------"
}
request_identifier: "2f7020b1-f655-4649-bbe0-d6f458b3c2f3"
]
2020-05-12 17:08:06.505 WARN 1 --- [ault-executor-0] o.a.c.gateway.DefaultCommandGateway : Command 'ACommandClassDispatchedFromSaga' resulted in org.axonframework.commandhandling.CommandExecutionException(No converter available
---- Debugging information ----
message : No converter available
type : jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread
converter : com.thoughtworks.xstream.converters.reflection.ReflectionConverter
message[1] : Unable to make field private static final jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe jdk.internal.misc.InnocuousThread.UNSAFE accessible: module java.base does not "opens jdk.internal.misc" to unnamed module #7728643a
-------------------------------)
Still no luck on resolving this...
I've worked on Axon systems where the only used Serializer implementation was the JacksonSerializer too. Mind you though, this is not what the Axon team recommends. For messages (i.e. commands, events and queries) it makes perfect sense to use JSON as the serialized format. But switching the general Serializer to jackson means you have to litter your domain logic (e.g. your Saga) with Jackson specifics "to make it work".
Regardless, backtracking to my successful use case of jackson-serialized-sagas. In this case we used the correct match of JSON annotations on the fields we desired to take into account (the actual state) and to ignore the one's we didn't want deserialized (with either transient or #JsonIgnore). Why both do not seem to work in your scenario is not entirely clear at this stage.
What I do recall is that the referenced project's team very clearly decided against Lombok due to "overall weirdnes" when it comes to de-/serialization. As a trial it thus might be worth to not use any Lombok annotations/logic in the Saga class and see if you can de-/serialize it correctly in such a state.
If it does work at that moment, I think you have found your culprit for diving in further search.
I know this isn't an exact answer, but I hope it helps you regardless!
Might be worthwhile to share the repository where this problems occurs in; might make the problem clearer for others too.
I was able to resolve the issue #2 when using XStream as general serializer.
One of the Sagas had an #Autowired dependency property that was not transient.
XStream was throwing some cryptic message, but we managed to track the problem and address it.
As for JSON support, we had no luck. We ended up switched everything to XStream for now, as the company only uses Java and it would be ok to decode the events using XStream.
Not the greatest solution, as we really wanted (and hoped) JSON would be supported properly out of the box. Mind you, this is in conjunction with using Lombok which caused for the nuisance in this case.

Spring-boot return json and xml from controllers

I have a spring-boot 1.1.7 application that uses Thymeleaf for much of the UI, so the response from my controllers hasn't really been a concern. However, now I need to provide a XML response when a user submits a request via URL.
Here is a typical Request:
http://localhost:9001/remote/search?sdnName=Victoria&address=123 Maple Ave
Here is most of my gradle configuration:
project.ext {
springBootVersion = '1.1.7.RELEASE'
}
dependencies {
compile("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web:$springBootVersion")
compile("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-thymeleaf")
compile("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-security")
compile("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-jpa:$springBootVersion")
compile("org.springframework.security:spring-security-web:4.0.0.M1")
compile("org.springframework.security:spring-security-config:4.0.0.M1")
compile('org.thymeleaf.extras:thymeleaf-extras-springsecurity3:2.1.1.RELEASE')
compile("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-actuator")
compile('com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-xml:2.5.0')
}
And here is my controller:
#Controller
public class RemoteSearchController {
#Autowired
private SdnSearchService sdnSearchService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/remote/search", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_XML_VALUE)
public List<Sdn> search(#ModelAttribute SdnSearch sdnSearch) {
List<Sdn> foundSdns = sdnSearchService.find( sdnSearch );
return foundSdns;
}
Here is my Object to be returned:
#Entity
public class Sdn {
#Id
private long entNum;
private String sdnName;
...
//getters & setters here
}
I am able to receive the request via REST client (such as CocoaREST) and handle it. But When I return the list of SDN i get the following exception, even though I do have Jackson & jackson-dataformat-xml on my classpath:
org.springframework.web.HttpMediaTypeNotAcceptableException: Could not find acceptable representation
at org.springframework.web.servlet.mvc.method.RequestMappingInfoHandlerMapping.handleNoMatch(RequestMappingInfoHandlerMapping.java:229)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.lookupHandlerMethod(AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.java:301)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.getHandlerInternal(AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.java:248)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.getHandlerInternal(AbstractHandlerMethodMapping.java:57)
at org.springframework.web.servlet.handler.AbstractHandlerMapping.getHandler(AbstractHandlerMapping.java:299)
My REST Client is including a Accept Header of "text/xml" (but in all honesty I would rather them not have to set this. Ideally any call to this Controller would always get XML, regardless of header being present).
Is there a way to handle this? I thought the Media Converters were included and just returned whatever the controller told them to?
SOLUTION:
See below for the answer I posted.
I had the exact same problem and I found the solution on Spring documentation website : here
In synthesis, I added the following dependency to the pom.xml of my project :
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-dataformat-xml</artifactId>
</dependency>
Then I added the following code block to the class that the service had to return :
import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement;
#XmlRootElement
public class Greeting {...}
And it worked.
SOLUTION: I used a combination of both answers below (thank you very much!). I am posting here in case anyone else needs help.
My modified controller:
#Controller
public class RemoteSearchController {
#Autowired
private SdnSearchService sdnSearchService;
#RequestMapping(value = "/remote/search", method = RequestMethod.GET, produces = { "application/xml", "text/xml" }, consumes = MediaType.ALL_VALUE )
#ResponseBody
public SdnSearchResults search(#ModelAttribute SdnSearch sdnSearch) {
List<Sdn> foundSdns = sdnSearchService.find( sdnSearch );
SdnSearchResults results = new SdnSearchResults();
results.setSdns( foundSdns );
return results;
}
}
And on my client, I set the request headers:
Content-type: application/text
Accept: text/xml
I think ultimately the problem was that my client headers were not being set correctly, so I may not have had to make some of these changes. But I liked the idea of a SearchResults class containing a list of results:
#XmlRootElement
public class SdnSearchResults {
private List<Sdn> sdns;
...
}
It may be better to create a new class:
public class SdnSearchResult {
private List<Sdn> sdns;
...
}
Then, a slight change will be required to the existing classes as follows:
public interface SdnSearchService {
SdnSearchResult find(SdnSearch sdnSearch);
}
#Controller
public class UISearchController {
#Autowired
private SdnSearchService sdnSearchService;
#RequestMapping("/search")
public ModelAndView search(#ModelAttribute SdnSearch sdnSearch) {
return new ModelAndView("pages/search/results", "sdns", sdnSearchService.find(sdnSearch).getSdns());
}
}
Once this is done, the other controller must be coded as:
#Controller
public class RemoteSearchController {
#Autowired
private SdnSearchService sdnSearchService;
#RequestMapping("/remote/search")
#ResponseBody
public SdnSearchResult search(#RequestBody SdnSearch sdnSearch) {
return sdnSearchService.find(sdnSearch);
}
}
A quick explanation of the changes from your code:
#RequestBody will automatically deserialize the entire HTTP request body to an SdnSearch instance. External applications will typically submit the request data as HTTP body, so #RequestBody will ensure that the deserialization to Java object happens automatically.
#ResponseBody will automatically serialize the return value according to the external client's capabilities and the libraries available on the classpath. If Jackson is available on the classpath and the client has indicated that they can accept JSON, the return value will be automatically sent as JSON. If the JRE is 1.7 or higher (which means that JAXB is included with the JRE) and the client has indicated that they can accept XML, the return value will be automatically sent as XML.
List<Sdn> needs to be changed to SdnSearchResult to ensure that the application can exchange JSON, XML, RSS and ATOM formats with a single controller method, since XML (and XML based formats) require a root-tag on the output, which a List<Sdn> cannot be translated to.
Once these changes are done, fire up a REST client such as the Postman extension for Chrome and submit a request to /remote/search with the following information:
Request header Accepts set to application/json.
Request header Content-Type set to application/json.
Request body set to the JSON string { "sdnName" : "Victoria", "address" : "123 Maple Ave" }.
This will give you a JSON response.
You've marked the controller method as producing application/xml responses (produces = MediaType.APPLICATION_XML_VALUE). The request's accept header (Accept: text/xml) doesn't match so Spring determines that your search method cannot handle the request.
There are a few different ways to fix this on the server, depending on your exact requirements:
You could remove the produces attribute entirely
You could specify multiple media types: produces = { "application/xml", "text/xml" }
I am not sure about your version of Spring Boot (1.1.7.RELEASE) but I am on version 1.5.2.RELEASE and this xml conversion / serialization happens automatically without usage of any jackson dependencies as mentioned in few of the answers.
I guess that is happening because org.springframework.http.converter.xml.Jaxb2RootElementHttpMessageConverter is automatically configured since Spring Boot version 1.5.1.RELEASE & that converter uses default JAXB implementation of JRE ( so no explicit xml conversion dependency needed ) .
Second, Accept header set by clients in request decides which format the output is expected so a request mapping like below ( i.e. a single end point ) ,
#RequestMapping(method = RequestMethod.GET, value = "/remote/search", produces = {
MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE, MediaType.APPLICATION_XML_VALUE, MediaType.TEXT_XML_VALUE })
can be used to produce an xml as well as a JSON response ( if Accept header is set as text/xml or application/xml & application/json respectively.
Note 1 : javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlRootElement needs to be specified on root class if xml response is expected for a Java class. This is mandatory.
Note 2 : Jackson for json is already included in Spring Boot so that is not to be explicitly included for json outputs
Note 3 : Accept header - Output match off happens automatically by framework & developer doesn't have to code anything specific for that.
So in my opinion, if you only add XmlRootElement to your base class & upgrade your Spring Boot version, your server side is all set. Responsibility to set correct Accept header lies with the clients.
In addition to what Michael told in his answer, I added the following dependencies as well to pom.xml
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.woodstox</groupId>
<artifactId>woodstox-core-asl</artifactId>
<version>4.4.1</version>
</dependency>
For some reason, the jackson-dataformat-xml alone was not helping.
I also made sure that ResponseEntity is returned in the get call and removed the produces=MediaType from the RequestMapping annotation.
With these changes, I was able to get the correct data but I had to give the extension of mime type to the REST URL during get call. ie, specify explicitly like: http://localhost:8080/hello.xml or http://localhost:8080/hello.json in browser
In my case I wanted to return a formatted XML string and it was all combined into one line.
Adding produces = { "application/xml", "text/xml" } to the request mapping was enough to return the string as formatted XML (with indentation).
example:
#RequestMapping(method= RequestMethod.GET, value="/generate/{blabla}", produces = { "application/xml", "text/xml" })
public String getBlaBla(#PathVariable("param") String param) throws IOException {
}
Goodluck.

Securing controller method with #RolesAllowed and #PreAuthorize

I've been banging my head over this one for a while now. I've done everything I could in order to find an appropriate solution and followed a lot of Stackoverflow examples and solutions.
First, I'm using annotation based solution. When I annotate my services, prePostEnabled works, but not when I annotate the controllers, it doesn't. Also, even on my services, jsr250Enabled doesn't work.
I've found a lot of case closed by moving the annotation from the security config to the MVC config, which in my case doesn't work.
I've a setup that looks like this: https://github.com/spring-projects/spring-security-oauth-javaconfig/tree/master/samples/oauth2-sparklr
But I use Servlet 3.0 and doesn't have anything in my web.xml.
My SecurityInitializer looks like this:
public class SecurityWebApplicationInitializer extends AbstractSecurityWebApplicationInitializer {
}
My MVC initializer looks like this:
public class MvcWebApplicationInitializer extends AbstractAnnotationConfigDispatcherServletInitializer {
#Override
protected Class<?>[] getRootConfigClasses() {
return new Class<?>[]{WebSecurityConfig.class, MethodSecurityConfig.class};
}
#Override
protected Class<?>[] getServletConfigClasses() {
return new Class<?>[]{SpringMvcConfig.class};
}
#Override
protected String[] getServletMappings() {
return new String[]{ApiPaths.API + "/*", "/res.jsp"};
}
My WebSecurity config is initialized like this:
#Configuration
#EnableWebSecurity
#ComponentScan(value = {"com.roler.res.**.server"}, excludeFilters = {
#Filter(type = FilterType.ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, value = SpringMvcConfig.class),
#Filter(type = FilterType.ASSIGNABLE_TYPE, value = MethodSecurityConfig.class),
#Filter(type = FilterType.REGEX, pattern = "com.xyz.*.controller.*")})
public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter {
And my SpringMvcConfig is initialized like this:
#Configuration
#EnableWebMvc
#ComponentScan(value = "com.xyz.**.controller")
public class SpringMvcConfig extends WebMvcConfigurerAdapter {
If you have any ideas, I'm out of juice, Thanks!
The symptoms you describe make me think to a problem of proxying. Annotations works fine on service layer, because services generally implements interfaces, and Spring can easily use a JDK proxy to put the AOP authorizations.
But controllers generally do not implement interfaces. That's the reason why PreAuthorize annotation are more frequently used in service layer. IMHO, you'd better try to use URL pattern based authorization instead of PreAuthorize annotations on controller. The alternative would be to use target class proxying with CGLIB.
To use PreAuthorize and JSR-250 annotations, you must
annotate you spring security configuration class with :
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true, jsr250Enabled = true)
if you use anywhere else in your application Spring AOP with JDK proxies, make all controller classes in which you want to use method security implement interfaces declaring all protected methods
if you use anywhere else in your application Spring AOP with CGLIB proxies, add proxyTargetClass = true to #EnableGlobalMethodSecurity :
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true, jsr250Enabled = true,
proxyTargetClass = true)
if you want to use CGLIB proxies with Spring version under 3.2, add CGLIB library to your classpath (CGLIB classes are included in Spring 3.2+)
avoid mixing CGLIB and JDK proxying as it is not recommended by Spring documentation : Multiple sections are collapsed into a single unified auto-proxy creator at runtime, which applies the strongest proxy settings that any of the sections (typically from different XML bean definition files) specified. This also applies to the and elements.
To be clear: using 'proxy-target-class="true"' on , or elements will force the use of CGLIB proxies for all three of them.
But anyway, my advice is to try to move method security to service layer which normally already supports AOP.
Two things I noticed (as mentioned on this thread):
prePostEnabled in the annotation to enable Pre/Post annotations
use of CGLib proxies (Serge mentioned this too)
Does your #EnableGlobalMethodSecurity have those two attributes?
#EnableGlobalMethodSecurity(prePostEnabled = true, proxyTargetClass = true)

creating and access properties file in spring mvc

read this article on SO, and had some clarifying questions.
I put my config.properties under src/main/resources
In spring-servlet.xml config file
I added the following:
<context:property-placeholder location="classpath:config.properties"/>
In my business layer, I am trying to access it via
#Value("${upload.file.path}")
private String uploadFilePath;
Eclipse shows error:
The attribute value is undefined for the annotation type Value
Can i not access the property in the business layer or are property files only read in the controller?
UPDATE::
src/main/java/com.companyname.controllers/homecontroller.java
public String home(Locale locale, Model model) {
MyServiceObject myObj = new MyServiceObject();
System.out.println("Property from my service object: = " + myObj.PropertyValue());
if(myObj.PerformService())
{
///
}
}
src/main/java/com.companyname.services/MyService.java
public class MyServiceObject {
#Value("${db.server.ip}")
private String _dbServerIP;
public String PropertyValue() {
return _dbServerIPaseURL;
}
}
Another site where I found the explanation
Please check that you import Value from org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation package:
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
also the property placeholder must be declared in the respective context configuration file, in case of controller it's likely Spring dispatcher servlet configuration file.
update You are confusing property-placeholder that post processes bean values, that contain dollar symbol ${<property name>} with Spring expression language container extension that process values containing a hash symbol #{<Spring expression language expression>}, in the link you have shown the latter approach is used.
regarding the instantiation of MyServiceObject myObj
If you want the object to be managed by Spring you should delegate its creation to the container:
if MyServiceObject is a stateless service then it's a singleton with the singleton bean scope, you should register it in your application context, for example with the following xml configuration:
<bean class="my.package.MyServiceObject"/>
and inject it to your controller:
private MyServiceObject myServiceObject;
#Autowired
public void setMyServiceObject(MyServiceObject myServiceObject){
this.myServiceObject = myServiceObject;
}
if many instances of MyServiceObject are required, you can declare it as a bean with some other (non-singleton) bean scope (prototype, or request, for example).
However, as there's only one instance of the controller, you can't merely let the Spring container to autowire MyServiceObject instance to the controller field, because there will be only one field and many instances of MyServiceObject class. You can read about the different approaches(for the different bean scopes) for resolving this issue in the respective section of the documentation.
Here is a method that allows us to fetch whatever values are needed from a property file. This can be in Java code (Controller class) or in a JSP.
Create a property file WEB-INF/classes/messageSource.properties It will be in the classpath and accessible in both controllers and JSTL.
Like any property file, this one consists of a key and a value
For example:
hello=Hello JSTL, Hello Contoller
For the Controllers
Locate the xml file that you use to define your Spring beans. In my case it is named servlet-context.xml. You may need to determine that by looking in your web.xml in cases where you are using the servlet contextConfigLocation property.
Add a new Spring bean definition with the id="messageSource". This bean will be loaded at runtime by Spring with the property file key value pairs. Create the bean with the following properties:
bean id="messageSource"
class = org.springframework.context.support.ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource
property name="basename" value="WEB-INF/classes/messageSource
In the bean definition file for the controller class (testController) add the messageSource as a property. This will inject the messageSource bean into the controller.
bean id="testController" class="com.app.springhr.TestController"
beans:property name="messageSource" ref="messageSource"
In the controller JAVA class, add the messageSource Spring Bean field and its getters and setters. Note the field type is ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource.
private org.springframework.context.support.ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource messageSource;
public org.springframework.context.support.ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource getMessageSource() {
return messageSource;
}
public void setMessageSource(
org.springframework.context.support.ReloadableResourceBundleMessageSource messageSource) {
this.messageSource = messageSource;
}
In your controller code, you can now fetch any known property value from the bundle.
String propValue = getMessageSource().getMessage("hello", objArray, null);
Using JSTL
Since the property file messageSource.properties is in the classpath, JSTL will be able to find it and fetch the value for the given key.
Add the import of the fmt taglib
taglib uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/fmt" prefix="fmt"
Use the fmt:tag in the JSP to fetch a value from the property file.
Sorry about the pseudo syntax, this editor doesn't seem to render any XML.
fmt:bundle basename="messageSource"
fmt:message key="hello"
Hope this helps others

Resources