I currently have something like the following:
Basically it's just three divs contained in one container_div which has its width and height specified. CSS code for the container and the top div looks like:
.container_div{
width: 800px;
height: 500px;
}
.top_div{
width:100%;
height:100px;
}
What I am now trying to do is come up with CSS code for the center_div and bottom_div elements in a way that:
Bottom div has no overflow
Bottom div can grow/shrink without causing its parent element to change its size ( something like bottom:0 absolute positioning )
Whenever bottom div grows, center div shrinks and vice-versa.
This is what should happen when bottom div grows:
I am looking for a pure CSS solution. Firefox support is enough.
This can be easily achieved by a css table layout. In your case, involving table rows, that will (by default) automatically fill the space of it's display: table container.
In your case, just set:
The top div to be a fixed height
The middle div to be 100% height. This will squize the bottom div to its own content height.
The bottom div to be zero height.
body { margin: 0; }
#container {
display: table;
position: absolute;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
color: white;
}
#container > div:nth-child(1) {
display: table-row;
height: 50px;
background: red;
}
#container > div:nth-child(2) {
display: table-row;
height: 100%;
background: green;
}
#container > div:nth-child(3) {
display: table-row;
height: 0;
background: blue;
}
<div id="container">
<div>div 1 (fixed 100px)</div>
<div>div 2 (expand to fill remaining space) </div>
<div>
div 3 (fit its own content)
loren ipsum dolor sit amet... loren ipsum dolor sit amet... loren ipsum dolor sit amet... loren ipsum dolor sit amet...
</div>
</div>
Related
I’ve noticed some unexpected layout behaviour of flex content, namely it affects positioning of the unrelated elements on the page.
Scenario: I have div.container and div.content inside. div.container has the display set to inline-flex and centres div.content vertically.
Now, any content (that uses regular flow) I put after the container can’t go higher than the top of div.content.
When I add some free text after the div.container, it is aligned with the div.content top, even though it is completely outside the flex container and should be unrelated to it.
When I add another div.container, it is positioned the way its div.content is no higher that div.content of the previous, unrelated div.container. This container (or rather its div.content) in turn affects the position of the subsequent ones.
https://flex-content-affects-outside.stackblitz.io/
It looks as if the top of a div cannot be placed higher than the top of divs before it in the document flow.
In my case, this doesn’t affect inline-flex containers directly, but rather their content. The vertical position of the flex containers if affected as the result – so that their content is aligned.
This behaviour is visible in Chrome and IE11. On the other hand, in Firefox everything works as expected.
My question is: What causes such a behaviour? Is it in any way standardized?
In the example above isn’t a significant problem, we can wrap all the boxes in another flex to get the expected behaviour. However, I’m afraid that in more complex layouts some unexpected relations between seemingly independent content can ruin the layout.
Edit: I'm adding a code snippet.
.container {
font-size: 30px;
margin: 10px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid #888;
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
}
.container .content {
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(200, 200, 200, 0.5);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
Content.
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
</div>
</div>
As Paulie_D noticed in the comment, it was caused by vertical-align. Once we specify vertical-align: top everything works as expected.
.container {
font-size: 30px;
margin: 10px;
width: 200px;
height: 200px;
border: 1px solid #888;
display: inline-flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
vertical-align: top;
}
.container .content {
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(200, 200, 200, 0.5);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
Content.
</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="content">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.
</div>
</div>
Or, more elaborate one:
https://stackblitz.com/edit/flex-content-affects-outside-baseline-elwwvc?file=style.scss
More precisely, the layout was due to the implicit vertical-align:baseline (in Chrome and IE). The boxes are inline-flex and there were laid out according to the baseline. Once we specify this explicitly the behaviour is consistent among browsers. Another font size in one of the boxes makes it more visible.
https://stackblitz.com/edit/flex-content-affects-outside-baseline?file=style.scss
I'm working on a little design challenge, and it's getting the better of me right now.
Essentially, it's a material design card, which means when I click it it takes me somewhere else.
The easy route would be (and as it is now) is to surround the content with an anchor. However, in this case I ONLY want the anchor text to be "My keyword".
Here's the simple html output:
<a class="post-card md-card">
<div class="md-card-title aspect-16x9">
<div class="title-large"></div>
</div>
<div class="md-card-content">
<div class="sup-text"></div>
</div>
</a>
So, the 2 things I want to do are:
Only have the keyword inside the anchor
Be able click the whole thing (the link covers the entire outer div)
Here's the stuff that make it more difficult:
The blue box on top has an aspect ratio set, which means its not a
constant height
The text inside the blue box is centered using Flexbox
The white box isn't a fixed height either
Here's how the aspect ratio is calculated:
.AspectRatio(#widthRatio:16; #heightRatio:9; #useableWidth:100%) {
&:extend(.clearfix all);
overflow:hidden;
max-width:#useableWidth;
&::before {
content:"";
float:left;
padding-top:percentage(#heightRatio / #widthRatio);
}
}
So I need to keep the keyword text where it is but make the whole thing clickable.
I've been playing around with the idea an absolutely positioned anchor on top, which I can do but I can't get it to stretch to the bottom without moving the text.
Any CSS gurus got some ideas?
This should give you a good starting place...
.post-card {
background-color: #63d9ff;
box-sizing: border-box;
position: relative;
width: 200px;
}
.post-card * {
box-sizing: inherit;
}
.post-card .md-card-title {
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
text-align: center;
top: 0;
}
.post-card .md-card-title .content-prop,
.post-card .md-card-title .content {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.post-card .md-card-title .content-prop {
padding-top: 56%;
width: 0;
}
.post-card .md-card-title .content {
padding: 1rem;
width: 100%;
}
.post-card .space-prop {
display: block;
padding-top: 56%;
}
.md-card-content {
background-color: grey;
padding: 1rem;
}
<div class="post-card md-card">
<a class="md-card-title aspect-16x9" href="#">
<span class="content-prop"></span><!--
--><span class="content">My Keyword</span>
</a>
<span class="space-prop"></span>
<div class="md-card-content">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In quis mauris ut eros consectetur efficitur vitae at leo.
</div>
</div>
JSFiddle
So the explaination...
The whole post card is positioned relative, the anchor is then positioned absolute within it. The anchor is given a top, left, bottom, and right value of 0 which makes it cover it's parent container.
The content-prop and space-prop are given no height but have a top padding of 56%. This means that their top-padding value is 56% of their width which works out at a 16:9 ratio. The space banner is used here to add a empty gap at the top of the post card to make room for the anchor.
Both the content-prop and the content elements are set to display inline-block and vertical aligned to middle. Because the prop is taller than the content, the content floats in the centre. The HTML comment between these two elements eliminates white space so that the content div can be set to 100% width even when the prop is on the same horizontal row.
Okay lets say I have a cooled tiled background like on this website.
http://www.leeslights.com/colors-shapes-sizes-and-prices.html
How would I make it so that the image tiles to the browser, but once it has done that it would become static, like the background is one this website.
http://www.worshipatthemountaintop.org/
This code below will work, it works on the tiled star image site, just replace what's in the brackets with your own image
background:url('ewExternalFiles/space_bg.gif')repeat fixed center;
I think the simplest solution to this is creating a separate div for page background with fixed position and full view size. Here is a Pen
HTML:
<div class="background"></div>
<div class="content">
<h1>Lorem ipsum dolor sit.</h1>
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.</p>
<!-- and any other page content -->
</div>
CSS:
div.background {
position: fixed;
top: 0;
z-index: -100;
background-image: url("http://lorempixel.com/200/200/abstract/6/");
background-size: tiled;
width: 100%;
height: 100vh;
}
Some styling for the content:
div.content {
background: white;
width: 80%;
padding: 20px;
margin: 40px auto 60px auto;
}
I need to set width or max-width in order for margin:auto to work, right? Like in this jsFiddle.
Trouble is, the paragraph width is equal to max-width and so the block of text is not properly centered.
How can I make the width of the paragraph contract to be only just big enough to contain the text, expanding to max-width as necessary?
No javascript and no fixed widths. Thanks.
I'm not sure, but maybe an inline-block paragraph is what you're looking for:
<div>
<p>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet</p>
</div>
div { text-align: center; }
p { display: inline-block; text-align: left; max-width: 40ex; }
http://jsfiddle.net/wuqaH/1/
did you try to set a max-width / or a width in percentage ?
It would be like that :
div {
width: 100%;
background: red;
}
p {
margin: 0 auto 0 auto;
background: blue;
max-width: 90%; }
you can try it on your jsFiddle.
Hope this will help you.
Do you want to center the text in p, why not use text-align:center; property
http://jsfiddle.net/H7qrp/5/
I have a page in which expanding content flows out of the holding div, the relevant CSS is below as well. Simply removing the height:510px line will allow the div to expand as needed. However, new users who have no content will not have any height and the page will look unblanced. How do I set a minimum height?
.Bb1
{
width:680px;
height:510px;
background-color:#ffffff;
float:left;
border-right:3px solid #edefed;
border-radius: 10px;
}
CSS allows a "min-height" property. This can be used to set the minimum height of the div you're talking about.
#div-id { min-height: 100px; }
Incase you want to set a minimum/maximum height and minimum/maximum width to a div, CSS allows the specific feature.
To set the minimum width of the div or any other class/id/element, use;
min-width: 150px;
To set the minimum height of the div or any other class/id/element, use;
min-height: 300px;
Similarly for setting maximum width and height of a div or any other class/id/element, use;
max-width: 600px;
max-height: 600px;
Important:
For your div to expand freely in height and width after data is available for users; you will have to set the width/height to auto immediately after you have set the min-width or min-height.
min-width: 300px;
width: auto;
min-height: 100px;
height: auto;
min-height:510px;
css has a min-height attribute
Here is d way through which you can set min height of a div
<div id="bb1" style="min-height:200px;>
.....
</div>
or apply
#bb1{
min-height:200px;
}
if you have used class
like
<div class="bb1">
in div then use
.bb1{
min-height:200px;
}
.comments { min-height:650px;height:auto; }
<div class="comments">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Nam cursus. Morbi ut mi.</div>
Do this:
.minHeight {
min-height: 100px;
height: auto;
border: 1px solid red;
/* IMPORTANT -- always set 'height: auto;' immediately after the min-height attribute */
}
<div class="minHeight">
this div has a min-height attribute
</div>