Is it possible to release host memory created by clEnqueueMapBuffer?
For example, create a buffer and map host memory:
cl_mem buffer = clCreateBuffer(...);
float* dataPtr = (float*)clEnqueueMapBuffer(...,buffer,...);
Do some OpenCL stuff, then cleanup:
clEnqueueUnmapMemObject(...,buffer,(void *)dataPtr,...);
clReleaseMemObject(buffer);
However, at this point the dataPtr is not null. How do you release the memory on the host allocated by clEnqueueMapBuffer? Delete and free don't work and I can find nothing in OpenCL documentation that provides a means to release the buffer.
As far as I'm aware, clEnqueueMapBuffer doesn't actually allocate any memory as such, but maps a certain address range on the host to look like host memory but actually be referring to device memory. This means that it doesn't need deallocating as there was never any memory allocated in the first place (new/malloc style) by clEnqueueMapBuffer
Related
I have a lot of situations where I create a buffer with an input data from host's memory (with either CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR or CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR) and pass it as an argument to my kernel only to copy its contents to group's local memory right away at the beginning of the kernel.
I was wondering then, if it is maybe possible to directly initialize a local memory buffer with values from host's memory without an unnecessary write to device's global memory (which is what CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR does, as far as I understand) nor its cache (which is what CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR does, AFAIU).
Each work-group would need to have its local buffer initialized with a different offset of the host's input data of course.
Alternatively, is there a way to tell CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR to definitely not cache the values as each of them will be read only once? Whatever host-access or read-write flags I combine it with and whether I annotate kernel's param as __global, __constant or __global const, the performance is always few % worse than CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR, which seems to suggest that the kernel tries to cache input values heavily, I guess. (my guess is that CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR writes a whole continuous memory region, which is faster than ad-hoc writes by CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR when it caches values being read)
According to OpenCL specification, host has no access to local memory. Only kernel can read and write LDS.
As for CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR vs CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR, the latter gives you full control while CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR can either copy the whole buffer to device before kernel execution either make PCI-e transactions for every buffer read operation from inside the kernel.
I am fairly new to OpenCL and though I have understood everything up until now, but I am having trouble understanding how buffer objects work.
I haven't understood where a buffer object is stored. In this StackOverflow question it is stated that:
If you have one device only, probably (99.99%) is going to be in the device. (In rare cases it may be in the host if the device does not have enough memory for the time being)
To me, this means that buffer objects are stored in device memory. However, as is stated in this StackOverflow question, if the flag CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR is used in clCreateBuffer, the memory used will most likely be pinned memory. My understanding is that, when memory is pinned it will not be swapped out. This means that pinned memory MUST be located in RAM, not in device memory.
So what is actually happening?
What I would like to know what do the flags:
CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR
CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR
CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR
imply about the location of buffer.
Thank you
Let's first have a look at the signature of clCreateBuffer:
cl_mem clCreateBuffer(
cl_context context,
cl_mem_flags flags,
size_t size,
void *host_ptr,
cl_int *errcode_ret)
There is no argument here that would provide the OpenCL runtime with an exact device to whose memory the buffer shall be put, as a context can have multiple devices. The runtime only knows as soon as we use a buffer object, e.g. read/write from/to it, as those operations need a command queue that is connected to a specific device.
Every memory object an reside in either the host memory or one of the context's device's memories, and the runtime might migrate it as needed. So in general, every memory object, might have a piece of internal host memory within the OpenCL runtime. What the runtime actually does is implementation dependent, so we cannot not make too many assumptions and get no portable guarantees. That means everything about pinning etc. is implementation-dependent, and you can only hope for the best, but avoid patterns that will definitely prevent the use of pinned memory.
Why do we want pinned memory?
Pinned memory means, that the virtual address of our memory page in our process' address space has a fixed translation into a physical memory address of the RAM. This enables DMA (Direct Memory Access) transfers (which operate on physical addresses) between the device memory of a GPU and the CPU memory using PCIe. DMA lowers the CPU load and possibly increases copy speed. So we want the internal host storage of our OpenCL memory objects to be pinned, to increase the performance of data transfers between the internal host storage and the device memory of an OpenCL memory object.
As a basic rule of thumb: if your runtime allocates the host memory, it might be pinned. If you allocate it in your application code, the runtime will pessimistically assume it is not pinned - which usually is a correct assumption.
CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR
Allows us to provide memory to the OpenCL implementation for internal host-storage of the object. It does not mean that the memory object will not be migrated into device memory if we call a kernel. As that memory is user-provided, the runtime cannot assume it to be pinned. This might lead to an additional copy between the un-pinned internal host storage and a pinned buffer prior to device transfer, to enable DMA for host-device-transfers.
CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR
We tell the runtime to allocate host memory for the object. It could be pinned.
CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR
We provide host memory to copy-initialise our buffer from, not to use it internally. We can also combine it with CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR. The runtime will allocate memory for internal host storage. It could be pinned.
Hope that helps.
The specification is (deliberately?) vague on the topic, leaving a lot of freedom to implementors. So unless an OpenCL implementation you are targeting makes explicit guarantees for the flags, you should treat them as advisory.
First off, CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR actually has nothing to do with allocation, it just means that you would like clCreateBuffer to pre-fill the allocated memory with the contents of the memory at the host_ptr you passed to the call. This is as if you called clCreateBuffer with host_ptr = NULL and without this flag, and then made a blocking clEnqueueWriteBuffer call to write the entire buffer.
Regarding allocation modes:
CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR - this means you've pre-allocated some memory, correctly aligned, and would like to use this as backing memory for the buffer. The implementation can still allocate device memory and copy back and forth between your buffer and the allocated memory, if the device does not support directly accessing host memory, or if the driver decides that a shadow copy to VRAM will be more efficient than directly accessing system memory. On implementations that can read directly from system memory though, this is one option for zero-copy buffers.
CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR - This is a hint to tell the OpenCL implementation that you're planning to access the buffer from the host side by mapping it into host address space, but unlike CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR, you are leaving the allocation itself to the OpenCL implementation. For implementations that support it, this is another option for zero copy buffers: create the buffer, map it to the host, get a host algorithm or I/O to write to the mapped memory, then unmap it and use it in a GPU kernel. Unlike CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR, this leaves the door open for using VRAM that can be mapped directly to the CPU's address space (e.g. PCIe BARs).
Default (neither of the above 2): Allocate wherever most convenient for the device. Typically VRAM, and if memory-mapping into host memory is not supported by the device, this typically means that if you map it into host address space, you end up with 2 copies of the buffer, one in VRAM and one in system memory, while the OpenCL implementation internally copies back and forth between the 2.
Note that the implementation may also use any access flags provided ( CL_MEM_HOST_WRITE_ONLY, CL_MEM_HOST_READ_ONLY, CL_MEM_HOST_NO_ACCESS, CL_MEM_WRITE_ONLY, CL_MEM_READ_ONLY, and CL_MEM_READ_WRITE) to influence the decision where to allocate memory.
Finally, regarding "pinned" memory: many modern systems have an IOMMU, and when this is active, system memory access from devices can cause IOMMU page faults, so the host memory technically doesn't even need to be resident. In any case, the OpenCL implementation is typically deeply integrated with a kernel-level device driver, which can typically pin system memory ranges (exclude them from paging) on demand. So if using CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR you just need to make sure you provide appropriately aligned memory, and the implementation will take care of pinning for you.
I have a piece of code in which I use clCreateBuffer with the CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR flag and I realised that this allocates memory from the device. Is that correct and I'm missing something from the standard?
CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR: This flag specifies that the application wants the OpenCL implementation to allocate memory from host accessible memory.
Personally I understood that that buffer should be a host-side buffer that, later on, can be mapped using clEnqueueMapBuffer.
Follows some info about the device I'm using:
Device: Tesla K40c
Hardware version: OpenCL 1.2 CUDA
Software version: 352.63
OpenCL C version: OpenCL C 1.2
It is described as
OpenCL implementations are allowed to cache the buffer contents
pointed to by host_ptr in device memory. This cached copy can be used
when kernels are executed on a device.
in
https://www.khronos.org/registry/OpenCL/sdk/1.0/docs/man/xhtml/clCreateBuffer.html
The description is for CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR but it is only different by its allocator from CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR. USE uses host-given pointer, ALLOC uses opencl implementation's own allocators return value.
The caching is not doable for some integrated-gpu types so its not always true.
The key phrase from the spec is host accessible:
This flag specifies that the application wants the OpenCL implementation to allocate memory from host accessible memory.
It doesn't say it'll be allocated in host memory: it says it'll be accessible by the host.
This includes any memory that can be mapped into CPU-visible memory addresses. Typically some, if not all VRAM in a discrete graphics device will be available through a PCI memory range exposed in one of the BARs - these get mapped into the CPU's physical memory address space by firmware or the OS. They can be used similarly to system memory in page tables and thus made available to user processes by mapping them to virtual memory addresses.
The spec even goes on to mention this possibility, at least in combination with another flag:
CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR can be used with CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR to initialize the contents of the cl_mem object allocated using host-accessible (e.g. PCIe) memory.
If you definitely want to use system memory for a buffer (may be a good choice if GPU access to it is sparse or less frequent than CPU acccess), allocate it yourself and wrap it in a buffer with CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR. (Which may still end up being cached in VRAM, depending on the implementation.)
The buffer object is created using clCreateBuffer(), But where does that reside? And how to control this location?
Its created in the targeted device(s)(you are choosing it yourself righT? otherwise a first visible device is chosen automatically) memory but it can be mapped to host memory for i/o operations. When you are creating it, you give the creation function flags like CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR and alike.
Take a look at : AMD's opencl tutorial and NVIDIA's
For example, I'm using
deviceType=CL_DEVICE_TYPE_CPU;
memoryModel=CL_MEM_READ_WRITE|CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR;// uses host memory pointer
to compile on my CPU and
deviceType=CL_DEVICE_TYPE_GPU;
memoryModel=CL_MEM_READ_WRITE; // on GPU memory.
for discrete GPU to try some GL-CL interoperability tests.
clCreateBuffer(context,memoryModel,Sizeof.cl_float * numElms), null, null);
When buffer is not on host memory and if you need to alter values in that buffer, you need explicit buffer copies/writes. When mapped, you dont need explicit read/write to host memory. Mapping also can give some i/o performance through DMA access for some systems.
I've a vector on the host and I want to halve it and send to the device. Doing a benchmark shows that CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR is faster than CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR and much faster than CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR. Also memory analysis on device doesn't show any difference in the buffer size created on device. This differs from the documentation of the mentioned flag on Khronos- clCreateBuffer. Does anyone know what's going on?
The answer by Pompei 2 is incorrect. The specification makes no guarantee as to where the memory is allocated but only how it is allocated. CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR makes the clCreateBuffer allocate the host side memory for you. You can then map this into a host pointer using clEnqueueMapBuffer. CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR will cause the runtime to scoop up the data you give it into a OpenCL buffer.
Pinned memory is achieved through the use of CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR: the runtime is able to allocate the memory as it can.
All this performance is implementation dependant. Reading section 3.1.1 more carefully will show that in one of the calls (with no CL_MEM flag) NVIDIA is able to preallocate a device side buffer whilst the other calls merely get the pinned data mapped into a host pointer ready for writing to the device.
First off and if I understand you correctly, clCreateSubBuffer is probably not what you want, as it creates a sub-buffer from an existing OpenCL buffer object. The documentation you linked also tells us that:
The CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR, CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR and CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR values cannot be specified in flags but are inherited from the corresponding memory access qualifiers associated with buffer.
You said you have a vector on the host and want to send half of it to the device. For this, I would use a regular buffer of half the vector's size (in bytes) on the device.
Then, with a regular buffer, the performance you see is expected.
CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR only allocates memory on the host, which does not incur any transfer at all: it is like doing a malloc and not filling the memory.
CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR will allocate a buffer on the device, most probably the RAM on GPUs, and then copy your whole host buffer over to the device memory.
On GPUs, CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR most likely allocates so-called page-locked or pinned memory. This kind of memory is the fastest for host->GPU memory transfer and this is the recommended way to do the copy.
To read how to correctly use pinned memory on NVidia devices, refer to chapter 3.1.1 of NVidia's OpenCL best practices guide. Note that if you use too much pinned memory, performance may drop below a host copied memory.
The reason why pinned memory is faster than copied device memory is well-explained in this SO question aswell as this forum thread it points to.
Pompei2, you says CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR and CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR allocates memory on the device while OpenCL 1.1 Specification says that with CL_MEM_ALLOC_HOST_PTR or CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR specified memory will be allocated (in first case) on or will be used from (in second) host memory? Im newble in OpenCL, but want know where is true?)