I am using ASP.Net with VB to display records in a grid view.
In a normal ASP GridView, I can simply handle SelectedIndexChanged Event from code behind like this:
Sub mySub(ByVal sender as Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Handles GridView1.SelectedIndexChanged
Dim id as String = GridView1.SelectedRow.Item(0).ToString
Response.Redirect("Customer.aspx?ID=" & id) 'Or Whatever
End Sub
Now I am trying to do the same but with ASPxGridView that comes with DevExpress. Obviosly, there is no built in Event that can be handled directly from code behind. I have to go through client click with javascript, which I don't mind to but all my attempts to pass the click event from the client to the server code behind failed.
Here is my ASP page
<dx:ASPxGridView ID="ASPxGridView1" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
KeyFieldName="id" Width="550px" OnSelectionChanged="row_selected" >
<SettingsBehavior AllowFocusedRow="True" />
<SettingsText Title="Customers" />
<Columns>
<dx:GridViewDataTextColumn FieldName="id" ReadOnly="True" VisibleIndex="1">
<EditFormSettings Visible="False" />
</dx:GridViewDataTextColumn>
<dx:GridViewDataTextColumn FieldName="Name" VisibleIndex="2">
</dx:GridViewDataTextColumn>
</Columns>
<Settings ShowTitlePanel="True" />
<ClientSideEvents FocusedRowChanged="function(s, e) {
row_selected();
}" />
</dx:ASPxGridView>
And here is my code behind (Which never gets called)
Sub row_selected()
Dim id as String = ASPxGridView1.SelectedRow.Item(0).ToString
Response.Redirect("Customers.aspx?ID=" & id)
End Sub
How can I call a function from code behind by clicking on a row on ASPxGridView row?
Try this:
1. Set ASPxGridView1.SettingsBehavior.ProcessFocusedRowChangedOnServer to true.
2. Handle server side FocusedRowChanged event
This will do what you want..
In my case,
I want to get contents of a field ('ID') from ASPxGridView when the user clicks on the row...
Create the ClientSideEvent for row click and put "RowClick(s, e);" in the function.
Create the actual function the event will call as shown below - and here is the tricky part;
do not use GetFocusedRowIndex() to get the index because it is the FOCUSED index.
Use e.visibleIndex
function RowClick(s, e) {
// Do callback to get the row data for 'ID' using current row.
MyAspxGridView.GetRowValues(e.visibleIndex, 'ID', OnGetRowId);
}
Create your call back to get the field you want. I'm getting 'ID'.
function OnGetRowId(idValue) {
alert('ID: ' + idValue.toString());
}
Related
I can have a record with all filled in fields and then without an SO_ID or SO_Num. I want my eval to be able to handle these and just return a '-' in the grid column when this happens while still returning all other data for that row. I've tried other solutions online and couldn't find one that works.
<dx:GridViewDataColumn FieldName="SO_Num" VisibleIndex="19" runat="server" Caption="Sales Order Number">
<DataItemTemplate>
<a id="clickElement" href="../sales/order/view.aspx?ID=<%# Eval("SO_ID").ToString()%>"><%#Eval("SO_Num").ToString()%></a>
</DataItemTemplate>
</dx:GridViewDataColumn>
You can use a in-line "iif(), and thus this:
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="City">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:TextBox ID="txtCity" runat="server"
Text = '<%# IIf(IsDBNull(Eval("City")), "-", Eval("City")) %>'
></asp:TextBox>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
So, in above, if say Eval("City") is null, then we display a "-", else we display Eval("City")
Edit: display of values and some button to click and navgate are DIFFERENT!!
As I pointed out, if you need a Eval() in the GridView, and want to convert a null say into a "-", then do that (but, I fail to see why I would want to display some "-" in the GV. Why do that?? Seems rather strange to me?
However, if you have a button on the GV row, and you want to click on that button to jump or navigate to some other page? Fail to see how such a button click and navigate has ANY REALATIONSHIP to what we display? Why are the two concepts connected? I fail to see any sensible logic here?
If you want to drop in a pane jane button, or even a link button (no difference here), then wire up a click event for that given button you drop in.
so, say in our GV, we drop in a button to view a given row of data. Say this GV with hotels, and a button.
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
CssClass="table table-hover" Width="50%"
DataKeyNames="ID" >
<Columns>
<asp:BoundField DataField="FirstName" HeaderText="FirstName" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="LastName" HeaderText="LastName" />
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Hotel Name">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:Label ID="txtHotel" runat="server"
Text='<%# Eval("HotelName") %>' >
</asp:Label>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
<asp:BoundField DataField="Description" HeaderText="Description" />
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="View">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:Button ID="cmdView" runat="server" Text="View" CssClass="btn "
/>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Columns>
<PagerStyle CssClass="pagenavi" />
</asp:GridView>
so, we just dropped in a plane jane button for operations on that one row.
So, our code to load is this:
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
If Not IsPostBack Then
LoadGrid()
End If
End Sub
Sub LoadGrid()
Using conn As New SqlConnection(My.Settings.TEST4)
Dim strSQL As String =
"SELECT * from tblHotelsA ORDER BY HotelName"
Using cmdSQL As New SqlCommand(strSQL, conn)
conn.Open()
Dim rst As New DataTable
rst.Load(cmdSQL.ExecuteReader)
GridView1.DataSource = rst
GridView1.DataBind()
End Using
End Using
End Sub
And our results are now this:
Ok, so now lets wire up that plane jane button click.
As a normal rule, you can double click on a button to build the click event, or bring up the property sheet, choose events tab/section, and then add the click event. However, since the button is in the GV, then we have to add the click event this way (in the markup).
Type in OnClick=, and when you hit the "=" sign, intel-sense will popup a dialog to create the event.
You get this:
So, we select create new event. Don't seem like anything occurred, but flipping to code behind, we have a click event stub, and our code thus can be this:
Protected Sub cmdView_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim btn As Button = sender
Dim gRow As GridViewRow = btn.Parent.Parent
Dim intPKID As Integer = GridView1.DataKeys(gRow.RowIndex).Item("ID")
Debug.Print("Row click index = " & gRow.RowIndex)
Debug.Print("Row click database PK id = " & intPKID)
' now do whatever you want with this row information.
' to get values from non templated columns, use cells()
' to get values from tempated columns, use findcontrol
'eg:
' get last name (Boundfield)
Debug.Print("Last name = " & gRow.Cells(1).Text)
' get hotel name - template - "label"
Dim lblHotel As Label = gRow.FindControl("txtHotel")
Debug.Print("Hotel name (label) = " & lblHotel.Text)
End Sub
output:
So, as noted, I fail to see why ANY issue occurs here in regards to some data in a column of the GV being null?
In your case, just navigate based on the button click to anything you want, based on any value you want.
say like this:
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="View">
<asp:Button ID="cmdView" runat="server" Text="View" CssClass="btn "
OnClick= "cmdView_Click"
CommandArgument = '<%# Eval("SO_ID") %>' />
</asp:TemplateField>
And then in code behind:
Protected Sub cmdView_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim btn As Button = sender
Dim gRow As GridViewRow = btn.Parent.Parent
Dim intPKID As Integer = GridView1.DataKeys(gRow.RowIndex).Item("ID")
Debug.Print("Row click index = " & gRow.RowIndex)
Debug.Print("Row click database PK id = " & intPKID)
Dim intSOID = btn.CommandArgument
Dim strURLJumpTo = "../sales/order/view.aspx?ID=" & intSOID
Response.Redirect(strURLJumpTo)
So, you are free to cook up any URL navagation you want.
NOTE VERY close how I used the data keys feature of the GV. That allowed me to have, use, get, play with the database PK row id, but NEVER do I have to expose or show or have or mess with the database PK id in the actual GV markup.
This is not only nice, but also is a HUGE deal from a security point of view, since then the user, the browser (client side) thus NEVER has to see, or know or can munge or play with the database PK row id - it is 100% server side managed.
And in fact if you SO_ID or whatever values are not in the GV, or the user does not care? Then I would NOT pass the values in the URL as so called "query parms" of the URL, but would in fact pass the values in session() like say this:
Session("OrderID") = intPKID
Response.Redirect("../sales/order/view.aspx")
Then in the page load event of the target page, I do this:
and NEVER EVER forget to check/use the ispostback in your page load event.
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
If Not IsPostBack Then
ViewState("OrderID") = Session("OrderID")
Now, in that code behind, and that page, you use this to get/use/have the orederid
dim intOrderID = ViewState("OrderID")
So, on page load (first page, ispostback = false), you transfer the session() value to the ViewState. And you do this since the user might have more then one copy of the browser running - and thsu using session() to pass the value is ok, but session() is global to the ONE user, where as ViewState is per page. So, that's why we transfer to ViewState on page load, since FROM THAT POINT onwards in that page, and code behind, we use ViewState. If we used session() in the code behind, then it is global, and if more then one copy of the browser is running or even multiple tables, they will all have the same session() value.
So, say you click on a house to view or buy?
Well, then they might open another tab - display same GV, and click on a different row. If we use session, you now display two pages - but both have the one and same row PK id value - and if you click buy house, you get the wrong house if your code behind uses session(), but with ViewState, the issue does not exist.
And thus, you can even dump your ugle "id" and parameters out of the URL - they look much nicer, but are also much more secure, and the user thus does not have to see, or know about things such as database row PK junk and stuff.
I'm trying to use Session to record the data of the 1st column of current row to be used in another Web From which will be opened using a LinkButton that is in the GridView.
Basically, if I click the LinkButton on the 1st row, the 1st column data of the 1st row will be copied to the next Web Form. But before I do that, I want to do a smaller scale experiment to test it. So instead for now I want the Session to copy the data into a TextBox in the same form.
For reference, here is the design of the GridView, most rows removed since they're not relevant:
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
BorderColor="Black" BorderStyle="Solid" BorderWidth="1px" Font-Names="Arial">
<AlternatingRowStyle BackColor="#B7DBFF" />
<Columns>
<asp:BoundField DataField="caseticket" HeaderText="Ticket #" >
<HeaderStyle BackColor="#000066" ForeColor="White" Wrap="False" width="10%"/>
<ItemStyle Wrap="False" />
</asp:BoundField>
<asp:TemplateField ShowHeader="False">
<HeaderStyle BackColor="#000066" ForeColor="White" Wrap="False" width="10%"/>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:linkbutton ID="newLog" runat="server" onclick = "CaseLog_click" >Add Log </asp:linkbutton>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Columns>
<HeaderStyle BackColor="#000066" />
<RowStyle HorizontalAlign="Center" />
</asp:GridView>
For the TemplateField is a LinkButton with a onclick property. With it, I created the sub:
Sub CaseLog_click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs)
Session("ticket") = GridView1.SelectedRow.Cells(1).Text
'Response.Redirect("~/CaseLog.aspx") ==> will be using this to proceed to next Web Form
TextBox1.Text = Session("ticket") '==> For test use only.
End Sub
If I only kept the Response.Redirect("~/CaseLog.aspx") in the sub, the LinkButton can direct me to the next Web Form. But as it is now, during testing when I use the LinkButton I get an error on the session line of the sub.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Is the code salvageable, or do I need to redo this?
Thanks.
It looks like the button event to select the row is not wired up.
I would use say this:
<asp:BoundField DataField="HotelName" HeaderText="HotelName" SortExpression="HotelName" />
<asp:ButtonField CommandName="Select" HeaderText="Select" ShowHeader="True" Text="Button" />
Note CAREFULL how we put the CommandName="Select" in above. If you don't do this, then the selected row does not come though correctly to the click event you have.
You could try the select command as per above on your link button, but I would just use the above. Now, hightlight the grid in the form desinger. On the properity sheet, go to events, and double click on the SelectedIndex Change event. So, your buttion is not changing the selected index correctly.
The code stub will look like this:
Protected Sub GridView1_SelectedIndexChanged(sender As Object, e As EventArgs) Handles GridView1.SelectedIndexChanged
Dim lgridrow As GridViewRow = Me.GridView1.SelectedRow
Debug.Print("<" & lgridrow.Cells(0).Text & ">")
Debug.Print("<" & lgridrow.Cells(3).Text & ">")
Debug.Print("<" & Me.GridView1.SelectedRow.Cells(3).Text & ">")
End Sub
Note VERY careful how the event code stub is setup - the event args are different then yours.
So, you can try the CommandName="Select" in your existing code, but if not, then try the above button field as opposed to your custom asp.net button you have. As it stands, it don't look like your asp.net button is firing the row-changed event.
Edit and follow up:
Can I have extra buttons - run their own code?
Yes, you can. You can do this several ways (one is to pick up which button was clicked in the SelectedIndex change event.
Or, you can drop in extra buttons and use that event code stub.
So, in my example, lets add an extra button.
we now have this:
<Columns>
<asp:BoundField DataField="ID" HeaderText="ID" InsertVisible="False" ReadOnly="True" SortExpression="ID" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="LastName" HeaderText="LastName" SortExpression="LastName" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="FirstName" HeaderText="FirstName" SortExpression="FirstName" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="HotelName" HeaderText="HotelName" SortExpression="HotelName" />
<asp:ButtonField CommandName="Select" HeaderText="Select" ShowHeader="True" Text="Button" />
<asp:TemplateField>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:LinkButton ID="LinkButton1" runat="server" OnClick="LinkButton1_Click"
CommandName="MySelect" CommandArgument ="<%# Container.DisplayIndex %>"
style="background-color:gray;color:white;text-decoration:none;padding-left:6px;padding-right:6px"
text="Mybutton"></asp:LinkButton>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Columns>
We thus have this:
Now, we can attach/have button code for the extra button. But NOTE careful we did NOT use the built in SELECT for the command argument. The REASON is that if we have Command=select, then the selected index WILL fire, but AFTER our button code stub. That means we cannot use the selectedrow (too early).
So, what we do/did in above was have the CommandArguemnt PASS the selected row value - that value will pass ok, and thus we don't care that the selected index event does not fire (and by CHANGING our command argument to NOT "select", then in fact the selectedindexchange event DOES NOT fire.
As a result, we use the passed row in the command argument, and we have this for the button code:
Protected Sub LinkButton1_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim ixrow As Integer = sender.CommandArgument
Debug.Print(Me.GridView1.Rows(ixrow).Cells(0).Text)
End Sub
And note while we are editing the markup, intel-sense will give a list of options when editing. Eg this:
So, that gives us a chance to wire up (add) a standard click event). No selected index code stub is required (since the button would fire before selected index anyway). So we are now manually wiring up this event. We are NOT thus using the selectedindex change event - we don't even need it.
So, now in our button stub, we are free to do anything we want - including jumping to another page
eg:
Protected Sub LinkButton1_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
Dim ixrow As Integer = sender.CommandArgument
Debug.Print(Me.GridView1.Rows(ixrow).Cells(0).Text)
Session("HotelName") = Me.GridView1.Rows(ixrow).Cells(3)
Response.Redirect("~/ShowHotelDetails.aspx")
End Sub
So, to add separate code buttons:
Don't use selected index change event - you MIGHT still want it to run but it will run/fire AFTER your button code (so can't use selectedrow - too early).
But, you do need Command="myjunk" because without a command, then the command argument does not work. By passing the row index in commandargument, then we are free to grab data from the gridview as per above code via row index.
So, you can well dump the selected index change event. You just have to pass the row index, and work from that. The code stub can thus walk the dog, setup values in session, or even pass/make the url with parameters.
I have a gridview loaded from a database with a checkbox in the first column. What I want is that when clicking on any row the grid will be filtered to show only the rows in which the value of the second cell is the same as the one I clicked on (having the option to select more rows with that value). Removing the checks he would reload all the information again. I tried doing it using the OnChecked event, but due to AutoPostBack it filters but loses the value of the checkbox checked. What is the best way to do what I want? I hope I have been explicit. Thank you
asp:GridView ID="gridview" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="false" DataKeyNames="Id">
<Columns>
<asp:TemplateField>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:CheckBox ID="chkRow" OnCheckedChanged="chkRow_CheckedChanged" AutoPostBack="true" runat="server" />
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
<asp:BoundField DataField="Document" ItemStyle-Width="10%" HeaderText="Documento" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="Entidad" ItemStyle-Width="55%" HeaderText="Entidad" />
</Columns>
For Each row As GridViewRow In gvEncomendasPendentes.Rows
If row.RowType = DataControlRowType.DataRow Then
Dim chkRow As CheckBox = TryCast(row.Cells(0).FindControl("chkRow"), CheckBox)
If chkRow.Checked Then
'Bind with filter
End If
End If
Next
Does the table display the entire dataset at all times? If so, I'd check into client-side filtering (JavaScript). Not having the round trip to the server/database would make your page a lot more responsive.
But assuming that's not the case, and to actually answer the posted question, here's how I'd approach it in the VB.Net Code. Try changing the Change Event like this:
Protected Sub chkRow_CheckedChanged (sender as object, e As EventArgs)
Dim chk As CheckBox = DirectCast(sender, CheckBox)
dim grv As GridRowView = DirectCast(chk.NamingContainer, GridRowView)
dim hdn AS HiddenField = grv.FindControl("hdnFieldWithValue")
If chk.Checked then
AddValueToFilerList(hdn.Value)
Else
RemoveValueFromFilterList(hdn.Value)
End If
BindGridView()
End Sub
Your way does work, but that has a Log(N) time on processing, as it needs to look at every row in the grid. The above way will KNOW which checkbox was checked, and deal with it appropriately.
And this small change to the markup:
<asp:hiddenField runat='server' id='hdnFilterList' />
<asp:GridView ID="gridview" runat="server" AutoGenerateColumns="false" DataKeyNames="Id">
<Columns>
<asp:TemplateField>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:CheckBox ID="chkRow" OnCheckedChanged="chkRow_CheckedChanged" AutoPostBack="true" runat="server" checked='<%# CheckValueInFilterList(Eval("Entidad")) %>' />
<asp:hiddenField id="hdnFieldWithValue" runat="server" value='<%# Eval("Entidad")' />
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
<asp:BoundField DataField="Document" ItemStyle-Width="10%" HeaderText="Documento" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="Entidad" ItemStyle-Width="55%" HeaderText="Entidad" />
</Columns>
You'll also a function something like this:
Protected Function CheckValueInFilterList(input as string) as boolean
Return MyListOfFilterItems.Contains(input)
End Function
The purpose of that would be to see if the input is contained in your list of filters you're applying to your query and returning true/false depending on that.
Which is directly related to why you're not retaining a check in the checkboxes between postbacks. Since you're rebinding the grid, the existing form state is thrown away in favor of the values from the bind. Since your markup lacked a setter for the checkbox's checked state in the databind, it always resorted to false.
I also added a hidden field to the Markup which would contain the filter list as some type of serialized string (JSON, XML, etc). I'd read it from that field on the Page Load where IsPostBack is True, and always write the list to it in the PreRender event. The point is to just have that passed back and forth through the posted form state so that you can remember them between postbacks.
Maintaining that list of filters in a control outside of the gridview as described does add a bit of overhead in the data that is sent to/from the server on roundtrips. But I wouldn't expect that to a large amount, and would expect a preformance increase due to not having to iterate through the entire gridview item list on every postback.
We are working with an ASP.Net DetailsView with a VB.Net code-behind file. We are trying to allow the user to edit and save changes in the DetailsView by allowing the user to click the Edit button and then click the Update button.
Nothing happens when the user clicks the Edit button so we added an OnClick handler for the Edit button. The DetailsView will go into edit mode but only if the user clicks the Edit button twice. (Maybe an ASP.Net bug?)
Once the DetailsView is in Edit mode the Update and Cancel buttons are displayed as expected but nothing happens when the user clicks either of those buttons. We placed an OnClick on the Update button in an attempt to force the DetailsView to Update but the only choices for .ChangeMode(DetailsViewMode. are Edit, Insert, ReadOnly.
I also thought DetailsViews did not need additional OnClicks unless we needed to perform special handling.
Here is the markup for the DetailsView:
<asp:DetailsView
ID="DetailsView"
runat="server"
Height="50px"
Width="218px" AutoGenerateRows="False">
<Fields>
<asp:TemplateField ShowHeader="False">
<EditItemTemplate>
<asp:Button ID="ButtonUpdate" runat="server" CausesValidation="True"
CommandName="Update" Text="Update" OnClick="ButtonUpdate_Click" />
<asp:Button ID="ButtonCancelUpdate" runat="server" CausesValidation="False"
CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" />
</EditItemTemplate>
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:Button ID="ButtonEdit" runat="server" CausesValidation="False"
CommandName="Edit" Text="Edit" OnClick="ButtonEdit_Click"/>
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
<asp:BoundField DataField="Forename" HeaderText="First Name:" />
</Fields>
</asp:DetailsView>
Here is the coding in the code-behind file:
Public Class StudentDetailsMaintenance
Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
Dim theTableAdapter As New DataSetSingleStudentTableAdapters.StudentsMaintenanceTableAdapter
Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
' Load the data from the database into the DetailsView.
'------------------------------------------------------
DetailsView.DataSource = theTableAdapter.GetDataByStudentID(StudentMaintenance.IntStudentID)
DetailsView.DataBind()
End Sub
Protected Sub ButtonEdit_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
' Place the DetailsView into Edit mode.
'--------------------------------------
DetailsView.ChangeMode(DetailsViewMode.Edit)
End Sub
Protected Sub ButtonUpdate_Click(sender As Object, e As EventArgs)
' Place the DetailsView into Update mode.
'----------------------------------------
DetailsView.ChangeMode(DetailsViewMode.)
End Sub
End Class
The ButtonUpdate_Click routine is incomplete because we don't know how to get the DetailsView to do the update.
Addional Note:
This is the first time we are trying to do a DetailsView by not setting up a DataSource in the markup. Instead of doing that we are using the data from a DataSet TableAdapter created in the DataSet designer.
If we did the DetailsView along with the DataSource all in the markup then the Edit and Update buttons work without any problem. We were also doing this in an attempt to eliminate extra coding if possible.
If you want the DetailsView's automatic behaviour for Edit, you need to use a CommandField to show the Edit button:
<asp:DetailsView id="dvDetailsView" runat="server" DataSourceId="sqlDS" DataKeyNames="primaryKey">
<Fields>
<asp:CommandField ButtonType="Button" ShowEditButton="true" />
</Fields>
</asp:DetailsView>
As noted above you need to include the DataKeyNames property to specify the primary key for the datasource so that ASP.NET knows which record in the data source to update. Also as mentioned above, you need to make sure that the Bind("columnName") statements use the same field names as used in your data store.
Also, make sure that you provide an UpdateCommand in your SqlDataProvider (or equivalent for your data store) so that the update can take place.
Now when you place the DetailsView into Edit mode, the Update and Cancel buttons will automatically be displayed where the is. If you need to do some work with the data before the data is updated in the data store, then handle the DetailView's ItemUpdating event in the code behind.
Well, looking real briefly, try wrapping your Page_Load databind in an If Not Page.IsPostback.
Postback wreaks havoc on databound controls.
i have added a button control in gridview and i want to redirect
to the another page on button's click event,
and also i want to access the values of selected row in a gridview and show that values on other page on button
click event which is inside the gridview,, can anybody plz help me out in this .
this should be helpful: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb907626.aspx
for accessing values inside RowCommand event find your row first (by index):
int index = Convert.ToInt32(e.CommandArgument);
GridViewRow row = MyGridView.Rows[index];
and then controls inside it which holds the values you need:
Label MyLabel= (Label)row.FindControl(MyLabel);
after that all you need to do is to transfer to your page and send values from your controls with it (do that with querystring):
Server.Transfer("MyPage.aspx?value="+MyLabel.Text)
here you can read more about gridview RowCommand event: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.ui.webcontrols.gridview.rowcommand.aspx
You need to add either a ButtonField or a TemplateField with a button inside and then you can add your code to the RowCommand and use the e.CommandName and e.CommandArgument
To redirect you can use Response.Redirect(address)
To see the values it depends where in the program you want to do it. If during databinding you can use the dataitem("column"). Outside of databinding you can go through the Gridview.Rows collection for the row you want and then look at the row.Cells(columnNumber).Text to see the value.
we have an event in gridview called, gridview rowcommand event, in that you can write the code for redirecting to another page using button. First you have to bind the value of which you want to pass in button property called commandargument.
protected void GridView1_RowCommand(object sender, GridViewCommandEventArgs e)
{
Response.Redirect("abc.aspx?id=" + e.CommandArgument);
//here id means passing the value using querystring to another page.
}
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server">
<Columns>
<asp:BoundField HeaderText="ID" DataField="ID" />
<asp:BoundField HeaderText="Name" DataField="fullname" />
<asp:TemplateField HeaderText="Action">
<ItemTemplate>
<asp:Button runat="server" ID="btnDelete" Text="Delete" OnClick="btnDelete_Click" />
</ItemTemplate>
</asp:TemplateField>
</Columns>
</asp:GridView>
// This focuses the current row where the button lies. you can perform all events of server-controlls
//instead of Button e.g LinkButton, Dropdownlist index changes...
protected void btnDelete_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
Button btn = (Button)sender;
GridViewRow gvRow = (GridViewRow)btn.NamingContainer;
string id = gvRow.Cells[0].Text;
string name = gvRow.Cells[1].Text;
//use these values in query string or any logic you prefer for cross page posting
Response.Redirect("your URL ?id=" + id + "&name=" + name);
}