Does anyone know a way to do this.. I searched their API and came up blank http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/developers
I was using blogger before and was able to set the results like this blogspot.com/feeds/posts/default?max-results=1000
thanks
Here is the answer straight from Tumblr's tech support (it's no)
Tess, Sep-22 09:54 (EDT):
I'm sorry, but that isn't supported at this time. My apologies.
Tess
-- Tumblr Support support#tumblr.com
Sam Saccone, Sep-21 21:14 (EDT):
hello, I requested an rss feed only to find that it was limited at 20
results
is there a way to get all the results?
Related
I'm really amazed how Google provides the showtimes of all the current movies in my country (Argentina)! I was about to start a project related to this, and needed that info so I thought to scrap all the cinemas websites of my city... but then I just asked my self how does google do this? I mean their algorithms are so good that they can tell if the site is a cinema site or not, and they can grab the info they need all automatically?
Does anyone know any good book or site to read about this? I mean how to do an "smart scrapping"?
Thanks!
I don't know how they get the data, maybe really smart scrapers but for your other question:
http://www.google.com/insidesearch/features/search/knowledge.html
I'm creating an application that generates RSS feeds that include an <enclosure> (for showing an audio player).
Since RSS readers are kinda flaky, in my experience, I'd like to test how my feeds look in as many readers as possible.
I only use Google Reader. What other RSS readers (websites or installable apps, for Windows, Linux AND Mac) are popular? Which are the ones I must test on?
Thanks!
Daniel
Edit: a more recent list (just one feed, so might not represent population) is at http://pelfusion.com/tools/top-11-feed-readers-and-aggregators/
here's a helpful list from http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3458291
A few years old, but possibly a good start
Aggregator Name (Market Share Percentage)
Bloglines (32.86%)
NetNewsWire (16.95%)
Firefox Live Bookmarks (7.78%)
Pluck (7.20%)
NewsGator Online(4.45%)
(not identified) (4.07%)*
FeedDemon (3.83%)
SharpReader (3.27%)
My Yahoo (2.58%)
iPodder (2.42%)
NewsGator (2.23%)
Thunderbird (2.13%)
RSS Bandit (1.12%)
NewsFire (1.05%)
iPodderX (1.02%)
Sage (0.71%)
FeedReader (0.67%)
RssReader (0.54%)
LiveJournal (0.46%)
Opera RSS Reader (0.45%)
Maybe the information on these links will help you:
email.about
feed-readers
Web: Bloglines: http://bloglines.com/
Mac OS X: NetNewsWire: http://www.newsgator.com/INDIVIDUALS/NETNEWSWIRE/
Windows: SharpReader: http://www.sharpreader.net/
Linux: Liferea: http://liferea.sourceforge.net/
Top 9 Windows RSS Feed Readers:
NewzCrawler, FeedDemon, Omea Reader, Bloglines, NewsGator Online Services, NewsGator Inbox for Outlook, Awasu and SharpReader are the most popular RSS readers.
edit: according to http://email.about.com/od/rssreaderswin/tp/top_rss_windows.htm
I'd like an rss feed from this google scholar search: Scholar Fish Oil Search
I've looked a little bit at yahoo pipes, and I thought I had found a solution when I found this pipe: Old Pipe But it doesn't work (it's a couple years old now). If someone can either tell me what's wrong with that pipe, or tell me how to retrieve a feed from that search through another means, I'd be very appreciative.
Thanks for your time,
-Landon
You could try a 3rd party website that creates feeds from other websites. See 7 Tools To Make An RSS Feed Of Any Website. (Disclaimer: I have no idea if they work or are any good, but they may be worth investigating).
[Edit: Google disallows indexing of this content via their robots.txt file, apparently. Check out http://scholar.google.com/robots.txt. Yahoo Pipes respects the robots.txt file—perhaps one of the other tools doesn't suffer from this snag?]
It appears that markup may have been altered slightly since the publication of this Pipe.
When I use the URL builder module in Pipes and populate the sample query with "fish oil", I get the following search string:
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?scoring=r&q=%22fish+oil%22&lr=&hl=en&as_ylo=2007
(Which, when entered into a browser window, does generate results.)
I am currently parsing through their regular expressions to make sure the proper elements are captured.
Did you have any luck with the tools Dan mentioned? Would also be quite interested if any were simple, effective, and (ideally) non-proprietary or self-hostable.
I've been working with pipes for a while now, I am trying to output more than the basic structure of:
Item
title
link
description
guid
pubDate
I want to publish more data in the RSS feed under different fields but cannot figure out if this is even possible. Any ideas?
This post at the Yahoo Pipes blog goes through the basics of building a complex RSS feed with a couple examples.
http://blog.pipes.yahoo.net/2009/06/10/new-create-rss-and-rss-item-builder-modules/
I know this is not related to yahoo pipes, but if you are looking for etl tools, i found yahoo pipes very limiting. I have had the best luck with Open Kapow. Just in case you have not heard about/used it.
It seems like such a simple thing, but I can't find any obvious solutions...
I want to be able to take two or three feeds, and then merge then in to a single rss feed, to be published internally on our network.
Is there a simple tool out there that will do this? Free or commercial..
update: Should have mentioned, looking for a windows application that will run as a scheduled service on a server.
There are a whole pile of options here: http://allrss.com/rssremixers.html.
Maybe http://www.planetplanet.org/
will do what you want.
It's for creating blog aggregations like planet lisp.
Google reader, create a group, add your feeds into the folder and then share that as an RSS feed.
:-)
Works while you're asleep!
Yahoo Pipes could be nice. Depends on how much "private" you want the resulting feed to be.
For 100% offline solution investigate Atomisator. It's a Python framework basically for doing offline what Yahoo Pipes does online.
If you're using PHP, the SimplePie library will do this. Here's a tutorial.