I recently started looking into Makefiles to keep track of the scripts inside my research project. To really understand what is going on, I would like to understand the contents of .Rout files produced by R CMD BATCH a little better.
Christopher Gandrud is using a Makefile for his book Reproducible research with R and RStudio. The sample project (https://github.com/christophergandrud/rep-res-book-v3-examples/tree/master/data) has only three .R files: two of them download and clean data, the third one merges both datasets. They are invoked by the following lines of the Makefile:
# Key variables to define
RDIR = .
# Run the RSOURCE files
$(RDIR)/%.Rout: $(RDIR)/%.R
R CMD BATCH $<
None of the first two files outputs data; nor does the merge script explicitly import data - it just uses the objects created in the first two scripts. So how is the data preserved between the scripts?
To me it seems like the batch execution happens within the same R environment, preserving both objects and loaded packages. Is this really the case? And is it the .Rout file that transfers the objects from one script to the other or is it a property of the batch execution itself?
If the working environment is really preserved between the scripts, I see a lot of potential for issues if there are objects with the same names or functions with the same names from different packages. Another issue of this setup seems to be that the Makefile cannot propagate changes in the first two files downstream because there is no explicit input/prerequisite for the merge script.
I would appreciate to learn if my intuition is right and if there are better ways to execute R files in a Makefile.
By default R CMD BATCH will save your workspace to a hidden .Rdata file after running unless you choose --no-save. That's why it's not really the recommended way to run R script. The recommended way is with Rscript which will not save by default. You must write code explicitly to save if that's what you want. This is different than the Rout file which should only have the output from the commands run in the script.
In this case, execution doesn't happen in the exact same environment. R is still called three times, but that environment is serialized and reloaded between each run.
You are correct that there may be a lot of problems with saving and re-loading workspaces by default. That's why most people recommend you do not do that. But in this cause, the author just figured it made things easier for their workflow so they used it. It would be better to be more explicit about input and output files in general though.
Does anyone have any wisdom on workflows for data analysis related to custom report writing? The use-case is basically this:
Client commissions a report that uses data analysis, e.g. a population estimate and related maps for a water district.
The analyst downloads some data, munges the data and saves the result (e.g. adding a column for population per unit, or subsetting the data based on district boundaries).
The analyst analyzes the data created in (2), gets close to her goal, but sees that needs more data and so goes back to (1).
Rinse repeat until the tables and graphics meet QA/QC and satisfy the client.
Write report incorporating tables and graphics.
Next year, the happy client comes back and wants an update. This should be as simple as updating the upstream data by a new download (e.g. get the building permits from the last year), and pressing a "RECALCULATE" button, unless specifications change.
At the moment, I just start a directory and ad-hoc it the best I can. I would like a more systematic approach, so I am hoping someone has figured this out... I use a mix of spreadsheets, SQL, ARCGIS, R, and Unix tools.
Thanks!
PS:
Below is a basic Makefile that checks for dependencies on various intermediate datasets (w/ .RData suffix) and scripts (.R suffix). Make uses timestamps to check dependencies, so if you touch ss07por.csv, it will see that this file is newer than all the files / targets that depend on it, and execute the given scripts in order to update them accordingly. This is still a work in progress, including a step for putting into SQL database, and a step for a templating language like sweave. Note that Make relies on tabs in its syntax, so read the manual before cutting and pasting. Enjoy and give feedback!
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/index.html#Top
R=/home/wsprague/R-2.9.2/bin/R
persondata.RData : ImportData.R ../../DATA/ss07por.csv Functions.R
$R --slave -f ImportData.R
persondata.Munged.RData : MungeData.R persondata.RData Functions.R
$R --slave -f MungeData.R
report.txt: TabulateAndGraph.R persondata.Munged.RData Functions.R
$R --slave -f TabulateAndGraph.R > report.txt
I generally break my projects into 4 pieces:
load.R
clean.R
func.R
do.R
load.R: Takes care of loading in all the data required. Typically this is a short file, reading in data from files, URLs and/or ODBC. Depending on the project at this point I'll either write out the workspace using save() or just keep things in memory for the next step.
clean.R: This is where all the ugly stuff lives - taking care of missing values, merging data frames, handling outliers.
func.R: Contains all of the functions needed to perform the actual analysis. source()'ing this file should have no side effects other than loading up the function definitions. This means that you can modify this file and reload it without having to go back an repeat steps 1 & 2 which can take a long time to run for large data sets.
do.R: Calls the functions defined in func.R to perform the analysis and produce charts and tables.
The main motivation for this set up is for working with large data whereby you don't want to have to reload the data each time you make a change to a subsequent step. Also, keeping my code compartmentalized like this means I can come back to a long forgotten project and quickly read load.R and work out what data I need to update, and then look at do.R to work out what analysis was performed.
If you'd like to see some examples, I have a few small (and not so small) data cleaning and analysis projects available online. In most, you'll find a script to download the data, one to clean it up, and a few to do exploration and analysis:
Baby names from the social security administration
30+ years of fuel economy data from the EPI
A big collection of data about the housing crisis
Movie ratings from the IMDB
House sale data in the Bay Area
Recently I have started numbering the scripts, so it's completely obvious in which order they should be run. (If I'm feeling really fancy I'll sometimes make it so that the exploration script will call the cleaning script which in turn calls the download script, each doing the minimal work necessary - usually by checking for the presence of output files with file.exists. However, most times this seems like overkill).
I use git for all my projects (a source code management system) so its easy to collaborate with others, see what is changing and easily roll back to previous versions.
If I do a formal report, I usually keep R and latex separate, but I always make sure that I can source my R code to produce all the code and output that I need for the report. For the sorts of reports that I do, I find this easier and cleaner than working with latex.
I agree with the other responders: Sweave is excellent for report writing with R. And rebuilding the report with updated results is as simple as re-calling the Sweave function. It's completely self-contained, including all the analysis, data, etc. And you can version control the whole file.
I use the StatET plugin for Eclipse for developing the reports, and Sweave is integrated (Eclipse recognizes latex formating, etc). On Windows, it's easy to use MikTEX.
I would also add, that you can create beautiful reports with Beamer. Creating a normal report is just as simple. I included an example below that pulls data from Yahoo! and creates a chart and a table (using quantmod). You can build this report like so:
Sweave(file = "test.Rnw")
Here's the Beamer document itself:
%
\documentclass[compress]{beamer}
\usepackage{Sweave}
\usetheme{PaloAlto}
\begin{document}
\title{test report}
\author{john doe}
\date{September 3, 2009}
\maketitle
\begin{frame}[fragile]\frametitle{Page 1: chart}
<<echo=FALSE,fig=TRUE,height=4, width=7>>=
library(quantmod)
getSymbols("PFE", from="2009-06-01")
chartSeries(PFE)
#
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}[fragile]\frametitle{Page 2: table}
<<echo=FALSE,results=tex>>=
library(xtable)
xtable(PFE[1:10,1:4], caption = "PFE")
#
\end{frame}
\end{document}
I just wanted to add, in case anyone missed it, that there's a great post on the learnr blog about creating repetitive reports with Jeffrey Horner's brew package. Matt and Kevin both mentioned brew above. I haven't actually used it much myself.
The entries follows a nice workflow, so it's well worth a read:
Prepare the data.
Prepare the report template.
Produce the report.
Actually producing the report once the first two steps are complete is very simple:
library(tools)
library(brew)
brew("population.brew", "population.tex")
texi2dvi("population.tex", pdf = TRUE)
For creating custom reports, I've found it useful to incorporate many of the existing tips suggested here.
Generating reports:
A good strategy for generating reports involves the combination of Sweave, make, and R.
Editor:
Good editors for preparing Sweave documents include:
StatET and Eclipse
Emacs and ESS
Vim and Vim-R
R Studio
Code organisation:
In terms of code organisation, I find two strategies useful:
Read up about analysis workflow (e.g., ProjectTemplate,
Josh Reich's ideas, my own presentation on R workflow
Slides
and Video )
Study example reports and discern the workflow
Hadley Wickham's examples
My examples on github
Examples of reproducible research listed on Cross Validated
I use Sweave for the report-producing side of this, but I've also been hearing about the brew package - though I haven't yet looked into it.
Essentially, I have a number of surveys for which I produce summary statistics. Same surveys, same reports every time. I built a Sweave template for the reports (which takes a bit of work). But once the work is done, I have a separate R script that lets me point out the new data. I press "Go", Sweave dumps out a few score .tex files, and I run a little Python script to pdflatex them all. My predecessor spent ~6 weeks each year on these reports; I spend about 3 days (mostly on cleaning data; escape characters are hazardous).
It's very possible that there are better approaches now, but if you do decide to go this route, let me know - I've been meaning to put up some of my Sweave hacks, and that would be a good kick in the pants to do so.
I'm going to suggest something in a different sort of direction from the other submitters, based on the fact that you asked specifically about project workflow, rather than tools. Assuming you're relatively happy with your document-production model, it sounds like your challenges really may be centered more around issues of version tracking, asset management, and review/publishing process.
If that sounds correct, I would suggest looking into an integrated ticketing/source management/documentation tool like Redmine. Keeping related project artifacts such as pending tasks, discussion threads, and versioned data/code files together can be a great help even for projects well outside the traditional "programming" bailiwick.
Agreed that Sweave is the way to go, with xtable for generating LaTeX tables. Although I haven't spent too much time working with them, the recently released tikzDevice package looks really promising, particularly when coupled with pgfSweave (which, as far as I know is only available on rforge.net at this time -- there is a link to r-forge from there, but it's not responding for me at the moment).
Between the two, you'll get consistent formatting between text and figures (fonts, etc.). With brew, these might constitute the holy grail of report generation.
At a more "meta" level, you might be interested in the CRISP-DM process model.
"make" is great because (1) you can use it for all your work in any language (unlike, say, Sweave and Brew), (2) it is very powerful (enough to build all the software on your machine), and (3) it avoids repeating work. This last point is important to me because a lot of the work is slow; when I latex a file, I like to see the result in a few seconds, not the hour it would take to recreate the figures.
I use project templates along with R studio, currently mine contains the following folders:
info : pdfs, powerpoints, docs... which won't be used by any script
data input : data that will be used by my scripts but not generated by them
data output : data generated by my scripts for further use but not as a proper report.
reports : Only files that will actually be shown to someone else
R : All R scripts
SAS : Because I sometimes have to :'(
I wrote custom functions so I can call smart_save(x,y) or smart_load(x) to save or load RDS files to and from the data output folder (files named with variable names) so I'm not bothered by paths during my analysis.
A custom function new_project creates a numbered project folder, copies all the files from the template, renames the RProj file and edits the setwd calls, and set working directory to new project.
All R scripts are in the R folder, structured as follow :
00_main.R
setwd
calls scripts 1 to 5
00_functions.R
All functions and only functions go there, if there's too many I'll separate it into several, all named like 00_functions_something.R, in particular if I plan to make a package out of some of them I'll put them apart
00_explore.R
a bunch of script chunks where i'm testing things or exploring my data
It's the only file where i'm allowed to be messy.
01_initialize.R
Prefilled with a call to a more general initialize_general.R script from my template folder which loads the packages and data I always use and don't mind having in my workspace
loads 00_functions.R (prefilled)
loads additional libraries
set global variables
02_load data.R
loads csv/txt xlsx RDS, there's a prefilled commented line for every type of file
displays which files hava been created in the workspace
03_pull data from DB.R
Uses dbplyr to fetch filtered and grouped tables from the DB
some prefilled commented lines to set up connections and fetch.
Keep client side operations to bare minimum
No server side operations outside of this script
Displays which files have been created in the workspace
Saves these variables so they can be reloaded faster
Once it's been done once I switch off a query_db boolean and the data will reloaded from RDS next time.
It can happen that I have to refeed data to DBs, If so I'll create additional steps.
04_Build.R
Data wrangling, all the fun dplyr / tidyr stuff goes there
displays which files have been created in the workspace
save these variables
Once it's been done once I switch off a build boolean and the data will reloaded from RDS next time.
05_Analyse.R
Summarize, model...
report excel and csv files
95_build ppt.R
template for powerpoint report using officer
96_prepare markdown.R
setwd
load data
set markdown parameters if needed
render
97_prepare shiny.R
setwd
load data
set shiny parameters if needed
runApp
98_Markdown report.Rmd
A report template
99_Shiny report.Rmd
An app template
For writing a quick preliminary report or email to a colleague, I find that it can be very efficient to copy-and-paste plots into MS Word or an email or wiki page -- often best is a bitmapped screenshot (e.g. on mac, Apple-Shift-(Ctrl)-4). I think this is an underrated technique.
For a more final report, writing R functions to easily regenerate all the plots (as files) is very important. It does take more time to code this up.
On the larger workflow issues, I like Hadley's answer on enumerating the code/data files for the cleaning and analysis flow. All of my data analysis projects have a similar structure.
I'll add my voice to sweave. For complicated, multi-step analysis you can use a makefile to specify the different parts. Can prevent having to repeat the whole analysis if just one part has changed.
I also do what Josh Reich does, only I do that creating my personal R-packages, as it helps me structure my code and data, and it is also quite easy to share those with others.
create my package
load
clean
functions
do
creating my package: devtools::create('package_name')
load and clean: I create scripts in the data-raw/ subfolder of my package for loading, cleaning, and storing the resulting data objects in the package using devtools::use_data(object_name). Then I compile the package.
From now on, calling library(package_name) makes these data available (and they are not loaded until necessary).
functions: I put the functions for my analyses into the R/ subfolder of my package, and export only those that need to be called from outside (and not the helper functions, which can remain invisible).
do: I create a script that uses the data and functions stored in my package.
(If the analyses only need to be done once, I can put this script as well into the data-raw/ subfolder, run it, and store the results in the package to make it easily accessible.)
R noobie here.
I'm am trying to use a package that I download off of github using source_gist, but it appears that I need to re-download it every time I quit R (I'm using RStudio).
To clarify, the function that I'm using is part of plotrix package and is called barp. Someone made a modified version of it (called barp2) and put it up on github. That's what I want to use.
So my question is this: is there anyway to have this modified code saved inside the plotrix package, so I wouldn't have to download it every time?
I hope I'm explaining this correctly.
So, let's get some quick terminology straight: the function you're getting off of github isn't a package, it's just a single function. If it was a package, you could use devtools::install_github once and then load it with require() or library() like any other package.
A good solution isn't too different. Just go to the gist, copy the code, paste it into your R editor, and save it somewhere as a .R script file. Something like C:/path/to/barp2.R (adjusting, of course, based on where you actually want to keep it and based on your OS). Then you can read it locally using source("C:/path/to/barp2.R") instead of devtools::source_gist().
If you always want to load it, you could load plotrix and then source this file every time R starts with a couple lines in your R profile, see ?Startup as #BondedDust suggests for details on this.
Reading it off of github every time does have the advantage that, if the author fixes bugs or otherwise improves it, you'll always be using the up-to-date version. It has several disadvantages too: requiring an internet connection, losing access if the gist is deleted, or being unable to access old versions if the author changes it in a way you don't like. Keeping a copy of a version you like is a smart move.
At our site, we have a large amount of custom R code that is used to build a set of packages for internal use and distribution to our R users. We try to maintain the entire library in a versioning scheme so that the version numbers and the date are the same. The problem is that we've gotten to the point where the number of packages is substantial enough that manual modification of the DESCRIPTION file and the package .Rd file is very time consuming, and it would be nice to automate these pieces.
We could write a pre-script that goes through the full set of files and writes the current data and version number. This could be done with out a lot of pain, but it would modify our current build chain and we would have to adapt the various steps.
Is there a way that this can be done without having to do a pre-build file modification step? In other words, can the DESCRIPTION file and the .Rd file contain something akin to an environment variable that will be substituted with the current information when called upon by R CMD build ?
You cannot use environment variables as R, when running R CMD build ... or R CMD INSTALL ..., sees the file as fixed.
But the no problem that cannot be fixed by another layer of indirection saying remains true. Your R source code could simply be files within another layer in which you text substitution according to some pattern. If you like autoconf, you could just have DESCRIPTION.in and have a configure script query the environment variables, or a meta-config file or database, or something else, and have that written out. Similarly you could have a sed or perl or python or R or ... script doing the textual substitution.
I used to let svn fill in the argument to Date: in DESCRIPTION, and also encoded revision numbers in an included header file. It's all scriptable to your heart's content.
I have written and collected R code on various topics that solve particular problems at hand. I stored the R script/code in .txt files. I have now 100s of them.
How do you keep your R code at hand efficiently?
#Manetheran has the right idea: write a package. It's easy to do (especially with RStudio). Read "Writing R Extensions" and then on top of that learn about roxygen2 (which allows you to document each function in-line and avoid writing .Rd files).
Then you can use devtools to load your package locally, or once it's stable if you think other people can use the functions you can submit your package to CRAN.
I prefer to keep it simple. I use Total Commander and when I need an example which uses some R function, I just do Alt-F7 and search for *.R files which contain the desired string.
I use RStudio and have created two or three basic scripts. I save my much-used functions in the basic script that is most appropriate. Then, at the start of an RStudio script for a project, I source one or more of the basic scripts as is appropriate.