Here is the portion of my ARM file about the database:
{
"type": "Microsoft.Sql/servers/databases",
"name": "[concat(variables('SqlServerName'), '/', variables('dbName'))]",
"tags": {
"displayName": "Database"
},
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"apiVersion": "2020-02-02-preview",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Sql/servers', variables('SqlServerName'))]"
],
"properties": {
"collation": "[parameters('dbCollation')]",
"edition": "[parameters('dbEdition')]",
"maxSizeBytes": "53687091200",
"requestedServiceObjectiveName": "[parameters('dbRequestedServiceObjectiveName')]"
}
}
And here my parameters:
"dbEdition": {
"value": "Standard"
},
"dbRequestedServiceObjectiveName": {
"value": "S2"
}
But these database properties are ignored and the deployed database doesn't respect them.
What's wrong?
UPDATE
As #SwathiDhanwada pointed out in comments, the edition property may not exist as per the doc.
I should use sku defined like:
Yet the powershell script to get a list of available skus for a given location returns something like:
The headers of the table are not the same as the properties of the sku object 🤦♂️
Related
With this query i can create a GTM event tag for Google Analytics 4. i would like to pass some event parameters aswell. I feel that im really close because the API seems to recognize the eventParameters key, it tells me that its value its invalid.
"vendorTemplate.parameter.eventParameters[0]: The value is invalid.\n",
If i change this eventParameters key to something else, the query goes through (obviously without taking into consideration my eventParameters) so i know that this code has to be close.
The documentation is really shallow so building queries with the GTM api its been very trial and error until now.
When i get this working i'll probably make a sample for automating trigger and tag creation for GA4 migrations
`
{
"name": "test2",
"type": "gaawe",
"parameter": [
{
"type": "template",
"key": "eventName",
"value": "hey"
},
{
"type": "tagReference",
"value": "LocalTag",
"key": "measurementId"
},
{
"type": "list",
"key": "eventParameters",
"list": [
{
"type": "template",
"value": "page_title",
"key": "page_title"
}
]
}
]
}
`
The parameters is a array
Here is the example:
{
"type": "MAP",
"map": [
{
"type": "TEMPLATE",
"key": "name",
"value": `${parameterName}`
},
{
"type": "TEMPLATE",
"key": "value",
"value": `${parameterValue}`
}
]
}
And if you want to pass a variable to the value
Just add the "{{" , "}}" as you used in GTM UI.
Like {{DataLayer-Ecommerce}}
So yes you are very close to it.
I am trying to deploy a App service webapp via ARM template and need to put a secret from a key vault into an app setting (env variable).
I have always simply used an array of values from a parameters file to populate these app settings, but now I am struggling to get a keyvault value into that array. Something like shown below in an ARM parameter file.
{
"$schema": "https://schema.management.azure.com/schemas/2019-04-01/deploymentTemplate.json#",
"contentVersion": "1.0.0.0",
"parameters": {
"someStringParam": {
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
"envVars": {
"value": [
{
"name": "envVarKeyName",
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"value": ##KEY VAULT SECRET HERE##
}
]
}
}
}
I have tried using a reference to the keyvault for the value but that errors on deployment.
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "/subscriptions/<subscription_id>/resourceGroups/<resource_group>/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/<vault_name>"
},
"secretName": "secret1"
}
}
I have also tried using a parameter inside of the parameter file, but that just used the literal string for the value.
"parameters": {
"KVsecret1": {
"reference": {
"keyVault": {
"id": "/subscriptions/<subscription_id>/resourceGroups/<resource_group>/providers/Microsoft.KeyVault/vaults/<vault_name>"
},
"secretName": "KVsecret1"
}
},
"envVars": {
"value": [
{
"name": "envVarKeyName",
"value": "stringLiteralValueHere"
},
{
"name": "KVsecret1",
"value": "[parameters('KVsecret1')]"
}
]
}
}
Is this possible??
EDIT: Adding some detail here.
I am also trying to shoe horn a reference to another resource to get put the app insights instrumentation key into an app setting. Below is what I would like to do, but the copy function needs to use the name of the property and that is dynamic in this case as it changes with the each member of the array from the parameter file.
{
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites/config",
"apiVersion": "2022-03-01",
"name": "[concat(parameters('backEndwebAppName'),'/appsettings')]",
"kind": "string",
"properties": {
"APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY": "[reference(concat('microsoft.insights/components/',parameters('appInsightsName')),'2020-02-02').InstrumentationKey]",
"secret1FromKeyvault": "[parameters('secret1FromKeyvault')]",
"copy": [
{
"name": "envVarsFromParams",
"count": "[length(parameters('backEndEnvVariables'))]",
"input": {
"name": "[parameters('backEndEnvVariables')[copyIndex('envVarsFromParams').name]]",
"value": "[parameters('backEndEnvVariables')[copyIndex('envVarsFromParams').value]]"
}
}
]
},
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/sites', parameters('backEndwebAppName'))]"
]
},
This isn't possible today within the param file, but in your scenario (if it's as simple as your OP example) you can just union the two in your template. So in your parameter file, you have 2 params kvSecret (the reference) and envVars (all your other env vars) and then in the template use:
"variables": {
"keySecretObj": {
"name": "kvSecret",
"value": "[parameters('kvSecret')]"
},
"envVarsFinal": "[union(parameters(variables('kvSecretObj`), parameters(`envVars`))]"
That help?
I halve arm template that is overwriting existing iprules of cosmosDb account, is it possible to modify arm template so it will only add new ip and not to clean already existing rules.
My template:
{
"type": "Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts",
"apiVersion": "2021-10-15",
"name": "cosmosdbaccountname",
"location": "East US",
"properties": {
"ipRules": {
"ipAddressOrRange": "some ip"
}
}
}
If configuring IP Firewall to an already deployed Cosmos account, ensure the locations array matches what is currently deployed. You cannot simultaneously modify the locations array and other properties.
Below example shows how the ipRules property is exposed in API version 2020-04-01 or later:
{
"type": "Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts",
"name": "[variables('accountName')]",
"apiVersion": "2020-04-01",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"kind": "GlobalDocumentDB",
"properties": {
"consistencyPolicy": "[variables('consistencyPolicy')[parameters('defaultConsistencyLevel')]]",
"locations": "[variables('locations')]",
"databaseAccountOfferType": "Standard",
"enableAutomaticFailover": "[parameters('automaticFailover')]",
"ipRules": [
{
"ipAddressOrRange": "40.76.54.131"
},
{
"ipAddressOrRange": "52.176.6.30"
},
{
"ipAddressOrRange": "52.169.50.45"
},
{
"ipAddressOrRange": "52.187.184.26"
}
]
}
}
Here's the same example for any API version prior to 2020-04-01:
{
"type": "Microsoft.DocumentDB/databaseAccounts",
"name": "[variables('accountName')]",
"apiVersion": "2019-08-01",
"location": "[parameters('location')]",
"kind": "GlobalDocumentDB",
"properties": {
"consistencyPolicy": "[variables('consistencyPolicy')[parameters('defaultConsistencyLevel')]]",
"locations": "[variables('locations')]",
"databaseAccountOfferType": "Standard",
"enableAutomaticFailover": "[parameters('automaticFailover')]",
"ipRangeFilter":"40.76.54.131,52.176.6.30,52.169.50.45,52.187.184.26"
}
}
Refer this configure IP to Cosmos account using ARM
We're trying to deploy an ARM template which deploys a Stream Analytics job with n Event Hubs outputs depending on an input parameter.
Right now we're having success with all but the listKeys() function inside the outputs property copy loop function which gets each Event Hub's primary keys:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
We get the error:
17:44:31 - Error: Code=InvalidTemplate; Message=Deployment template
validation failed: 'The template resource
'tailor-router-axgf7t3gtspue' at line '129' and column '10' is not
valid: The template function 'copyIndex' is not expected at this
location. The function can only be used in a resource with copy
specified. Please see https://aka.ms/arm-copy for usage details..
Please see https://aka.ms/arm-template-expressions for usage
details.'.
However, if we change this to be a specific index:
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[0].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]"
it works.
Is copyIndex('propertyName') inside a listKeys() a supported function?
If not, is there a workaround that would achieve the same effect?
Kind regards,
Nick
Stream Analytics job resource definition:
{
"apiVersion": "2016-03-01",
"type": "Microsoft.StreamAnalytics/StreamingJobs",
"name": "[variables('routerStreamAnalyticsName')]",
"location": "[variables('location')]",
"dependsOn": [ "clientsEventHubCopy" ],
"tags": {
"boundedContext": "[variables('boundedContextName')]"
},
"properties": {
"sku": {
"name": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]"
},
"outputErrorPolicy": "drop",
"eventsOutOfOrderPolicy": "adjust",
"eventsOutOfOrderMaxDelayInSeconds": 0,
"eventsLateArrivalMaxDelayInSeconds": 5,
"dataLocale": "en-US",
"compatibilityLevel": "1.0",
"inputs": [
{
"name": "input0",
"properties": {
"type": "stream",
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
},
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[parameters('input0EventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[parameters('input0EventHubSharedAccessPolicyKey')]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('input0EventHubName')]"
}
}
}
}
],
"transformation": {
"name": "routing",
"properties": {
"streamingUnits": "[parameters('routerStreamAnalyticsSkuTier')]",
"query": "omitted"
}
},
"copy": [
{
"name": "outputs",
"count": "[length(parameters('clients'))]",
"input": {
"name": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]",
"properties": {
"datasource": {
"type": "Microsoft.ServiceBus/EventHub",
"properties": {
"serviceBusNamespace": "[variables('clientEventHubNamespace')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyName": "[variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')]",
"sharedAccessPolicyKey": "[listKeys(resourceId('Microsoft.EventHub/namespaces/eventhubs/authorizationRules', variables('clientEventHubNamespace'), parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id, variables('clientEventHubClientSharedAccessName')), '2015-08-01').primaryKey]",
"eventHubName": "[parameters('clients')[copyIndex('outputs')].id]"
}
},
"serialization": {
"type": "Avro"
}
}
}
}
]
}
},
Thanks for reporting this and sorry for the inconvenience.
I just talked to the ARM team, we had an issue when copyindex was inside the index tags eg 'array[copyindex()]'. It should be fixed now.
Let us know how it goes.
Thanks,
JS - Azure Stream Analytics
I've got a master ARM deployment file with these resources:
{
"apiVersion": "2015-01-01",
"name": "SharedServicePlanTemplate",
"type": "Microsoft.Resources/deployments",
"properties": {
"templateLink": { "uri": "[concat(variables('templateBase'), 'serviceplan.template.json')]" },
"parametersLink": { "uri": "[concat(variables('parametersBase'), 'serviceplan.shared.json')]" },
"mode": "Incremental"
}
},
{
"name": "my_website",
"type": "Microsoft.Web/sites",
"location": "[resourceGroup().location]",
"apiVersion": "2015-08-01",
"dependsOn": [
"[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', 'ServicePlanShared')]"
],
"tags": {
"[concat('hidden-related:', resourceGroup().id, '/providers/Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/', 'ServicePlanShared')]": "Resource",
"displayName": "my_website"
},
"properties": {
"name": "my_website",
"serverFarmId": "[resourceId('Microsoft.Web/serverfarms', 'ServicePlanShared')]"
}
}
When I try to deploy, I get the following error:
New-AzureRmResourceGroupDeployment : InvalidTemplate: Deployment template validation failed: 'The resource
'Microsoft.Web/serverfarms/ServicePlanShared' is not defined in the template.
I thought that was the whole reason for using the resourceId function, though. I can merge my serviceplan.template.json and the website resource into the same template file, but I'd rather not do that since I will have multiple websites using that plan, and I want to be able to deploy them separately.
Change your dependsOn property to:
"dependsOn" : ["SharedServicePlanTemplate"]
One gotcha with your nested approach is if the name of your service plan changes in the linked parameters file, the resource won't be found. Passing that in as a parameter (whether you use the linked parameters file or pass it through) might be a better approach. A bit orthogonal but something to think about.