I am looking for alternatives to Datashake that would be compatible using webhooks for either Zapier or Pabbly. Let me know if there is any other tool that has a review scraper and is compatible with Zapier and Pabbly.
Tried integrating datashake with pabbly and zapier. We could not integrate datashake with them. We are looking for alternatives.
See https://www.reviewsmaker.com - There are other places you can look specifically for APIs such as APIfy or Webautomation.io; RM is by far the most superior and is worth checking out. Anything that has an endpoint that consumes and gives a payload can be used with webhooks. :)
Related
I am using PageSpeed Insights API to grab speed metrics of different websites and integrate the data in a tool I'm creating.
If I try a query using the API test tool (https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/insights/v4/reference/pagespeedapi/runpagespeed), then everything is fine and I get the info I need.
However, when I perform the very same query (as far as I can see) from my server, the response json does not include the same information. Some information is just missing.
Basically, other than the 'initial_url', all the metrics information that should be included in the 'loadingExperience' branch is missing. No info on 'FIRST_CONTENTFUL_PAINT_MS' or 'DOM_CONTENT_LOADED_EVENT_FIRED_MS'.
On the other hand, I can't seem to find the way to request info on USABILITY and SECURITY under the 'ruleGroups' branch. According to the API reference, this branch should feature information on these aspects too, but nothing like that is return after the query. Just the SPEED branch info is returned.
This is the URL I use to query the API:
https://www.googleapis.com/pagespeedonline/v4/runPagespeed?url=https://stackoverflow.com&strategy=mobile&screenshot=true&locale=en&key=XXXXXXXXmyAPIKeyXXXXXXXX';
Am I missing anything? I have checked the API documentation and Google'd for more info on this, but I can't seem to find any parameter to force request this information.
(By the way, this is my first question at StackOverFlow, so I hope I have shared all the necessary information. And apologies if my english is bad. I do my best.)
I'm having the same issue with some websites. The problem is related to the website. Some websites are providing the userExperience.metrics object and some are not. I have no idea what is causing this.
However you can try to use strategy=desktop parameter to get the userExperience.metrics object in version 5. This worked for me.
Working URL: https://www.googleapis.com/pagespeedonline/v5/runPagespeed?url=https://stackoverflow.com&strategy=desktop&key=[SetYourApiKeyHere]
This is something I have never seen before and I do not know if my Google search skills are lacking, but I cannot find anything saying it is and actual way of specifying the HTTP verb for a request.
To give some context on where I have encountered this: I am working on a project to create a very basic LRS to capture Statements from an Articulate Story.
I had Fiddler running to monitor the requests and noticed the Articulate Story tries to POST to a specified endpoint like so: 'endpoint/statements?method=PUT'
Anybody know what is up with this?
Upon further reading of the xAPI specification and the Articulate Documentation, this is something Articulate does... See this link [Implementation of the Tin Can API for articulate content][1]
[1]:https://articulate.com/de-DE/support/article/Implementing-Tin-Can-API-to-Support-Articulate-Content https://articulate.com/de-DE/support/article/Implementing-Tin-Can-API-to-Support-Articulate-Content
Earlier today, I was able to send snapshots to the Face API and get responses including faceAttributes describing emotion.
I'm using JavaScript via XMLHttpRequest.
Now, though I've not changed the code, I get OK 200 from the API calls, but the responseText and the response properties are both, "[]".
I'd like to troubleshoot to see what I'm doing wrong, but it seems like the only information available in the cognitive services portal relates to quota.
Where should I look for further analytics?
You'll get an empty response if the API does not detect a face in the image or if the image file is too large (>4MB). You can confirm by testing with an image you know previously worked. To get the best results, make sure the face is well-lit and all features are reasonably visible.
Hello from Cognitive Services - Face API Team,
I wonder the problem belongs to one specific image or all API calls?
For a quick check, you can try the image on the online demo [1].
[1] https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/cognitive-services/face/
Unfortunately doing the troubleshooting from the external perspective is quite difficult since you don't get any logs. The most common steps are to try to repro your problem using either the testing console (https://westus.dev.cognitive.microsoft.com/docs/services/563879b61984550e40cbbe8d/operations/563879b61984550f3039523b) or a tool such as curl or Fiddler so that you can see the raw REST request and response.
With one of those tools you can try to change up your request, try to call a different API, make sure there are no additional details being returned in the body or response headers, etc.
If all else fails please open a support incident from the Azure management portal and we can work with you.
We are also working to improve the logging and troubleshooting capabilities, but it may be some time to see improvements in this area.
I used to use whurl.heroku.com to make http web requests and share the responses with people. It's a great service for allowing people to see the results of requests themselves and test fixes.
It appears that whurl is going offline soon. Are there any good alternatives out there (besides hosting my own)?
Similar to what Mihai posted, I found Advanced Rest Client, a google chrome app. I prefer ARC a little more as it's an app so it doesn't take up space in my URL bar, and also because it's easier to use and has a richer saved history feature than XHR.
It seems someone is hosting Whurl again on heroku.com, https://gcurl.heroku.com/.
You can use XHR Poster extension for Google Chrome. Contains many of the functionalities of whurl.
It has JSON pretty print feature and handles all types of requests.
I wanted to know if JSON is still used in live applications? I am creating a service and want to understand if I should output data using JSON too?
What is the latest standard now?
JSON is very popular, and there is no sign that this is changing.
I am creating a service and want to understand if I should output data using JSON too?
You really need to ask the potential customers of the service that question. Or at least, give us some hint as to what the service is and what clients are likely to use it.
What is the latest standard now?
There is no official standard for JSON. In theory, JSON is a subset of ECMAScript (aka JavaScript), so the relevant ECMAScript standard would be normative.
In practice, JSON is implemented in many languages independently of ECMAScript. The description on the JSON.org website, and IETF RFC 4627 are probably the most relevant to someone implementing JSON for themselves, but neither of these sources have the authority of a standard. If you want JSON libraries, the JSON.org site is a good place to start looking.
Yes, JSON is still very popular. Even Google web services API gives search output in JSON.
Take a look at this example:
http://zamples.com/JspExplorer/samples/google.jsp
Overwhelmingly yes. For me, JSON is the transport format of choice for AJAX requests and inter-application data sharing. To date, there are 1271 questions about JSON on SO.