Is it possible to create custom graphs using ggplot2, for example I want to create a graph of kissing people.
Simple variant
Not completely, but partially, I was able to reproduce it, everything except for the "lines of the eyes" is not clear how to mark them
But how to make a more complex graph of kissing people. In general, is it possible to somehow approximate such a curve, more voluminou?
thank you for your help.
perhaps not what you are looking for, but if you have already got the image, and want to reproduce it in ggplot, then you can use the following method:
library(tidyverse)
library(magick)
library(terra)
# read image
im <- image_read("./data/kiss_1.png")
# conver to black/white image
im2 <- im %>%
image_quantize(
max = 2,
colorspace = "gray" )
# get a matrix of the pixel-colors
m <- as.raster(im2) %>% as.matrix()
# extract coordinates of the black pixels
df <- as.data.frame(which(m == "#000000ff", arr.ind=TRUE))
df$row <- df$row * -1
# plot point
ggplot(df, aes(x = col, y = row)) + geom_point()
Related
I have some data from lab equipment that can be represented as a matrix by a contour plot/heatmap.
I would like to try illustrating this data in R with the rayshader package.
My problem is that the data is far from square in shape, the matrix is 33 rows by 48003 columns. When I plot this with rayshader I get a thin line:
library(dplyr)
library(rayshader)
set.seed(1742)
df <- matrix(rnorm(10000), nrow = 10)
rownames(df) <- 1:10
colnames(df) <- seq(0.01, 10, 0.01)
df %>%
sphere_shade(texture = "desert") %>%
plot_map()
Is there a way to make rayshader plot this as a square by manipulating the x/y aspect ratios? Or to plot them on an equivalent scale (one dimension collects data much faster than the other)? I can't find anything in the docs.
In this example, I tried naming the rows and columns so they were both collected over 10 minutes, but it didn't change the result.
The end result should look similar to:
library(plotly)
set.seed(1742)
plot_ly(z = ~matrix(rnorm(10000), nrow = 10)) %>%
add_surface()
Many thanks.
Solution for rayshader::plot_3d() is to use scale = c(x, y, z), which will alter the x/y/z aspect ratios. This was hidden, but didn't take that much sluthing to find the answer. It is a setting in rgl::par3d(), which is called by plot_3d().
However, I couldn't get plot_map() to work. When I tried adding the argument asp = 1, which is used by rgl::par3d(), it threw errors.
In short: I'm looking for a way to get the exact coordinates of a series of mouse positions (on-clicks) in an interactive x/y scatter plot rendered by ggplot2 and ggplotly.
I'm aware that plotly (and several other interactive plotting packages for R) can be combined with Shiny, where a box- or lazzo select can return a list of all data points within the selected subspace. This list will be HUGE in most of the datasets I'm analysing, however, and I need to be able to do the analysis reproducibly in an R markdown format (writing a few, mostly less than 5-6, point coordinates is much more readable). Furthermore, I have to know the exact positions of the clicks to be able to extract points within the same polygon of points in a different dataset, so a list of points within the selection in one dataset is not useful.
The grid.locator() function from the grid package does almost what I'm looking for (the one wrapped in fx gglocator), however I hope there is a way to do the same within an interactive plot rendered by plotly (or maybe something else that I don't know of?) as the data sets are often HUGE (see the plot below) and thus being able to zoom in and out interactively is very much appreciated during several iterations of analysis.
Normally I have to rescale the axes several times to simulate zooming in and out which is exhausting when doing it MANY times. As you can see in the plot above, there is a LOT of information in the plots to explore (the plot is about 300MB in memory).
Below is a small reprex of how I'm currently doing it using grid.locator on a static plot:
library(ggplot2)
library(grid)
p <- ggplot(mtcars, aes(wt, mpg)) +
geom_point()
locator <- function(p) {
# Build ggplot object
ggobj <- ggplot_build(p)
# Extract coordinates
xr <- ggobj$layout$panel_ranges[[1]]$x.range
yr <- ggobj$layout$panel_ranges[[1]]$y.range
# Variable for selected points
selection <- data.frame(x = as.numeric(), y = as.numeric())
colnames(selection) <- c(ggobj$plot$mapping$x, ggobj$plot$mapping$y)
# Detect and move to plot area viewport
suppressWarnings(print(ggobj$plot))
panels <- unlist(current.vpTree()) %>%
grep("panel", ., fixed = TRUE, value = TRUE)
p_n <- length(panels)
seekViewport(panels, recording=TRUE)
pushViewport(viewport(width=1, height=1))
# Select point, plot, store and repeat
for (i in 1:10){
tmp <- grid.locator('native')
if (is.null(tmp)) break
grid.points(tmp$x,tmp$y, pch = 16, gp=gpar(cex=0.5, col="darkred"))
selection[i, ] <- as.numeric(tmp)
}
grid.polygon(x= unit(selection[,1], "native"), y= unit(selection[,2], "native"), gp=gpar(fill=NA))
#return a data frame with the coordinates of the selection
return(selection)
}
locator(p)
and from here use the point.in.polygon function to subset the data based on the selection.
A possible solution could be to add, say 100x100, invisible points to the plot and then use the plotly_click feature of event_data() in a Shiny app, but this is not at all ideal.
Thanks in advance for your ideas or solutions, I hope my question was clear enough.
-- Kasper
I used ggplot2. Besides the materials at https://shiny.rstudio.com/articles/plot-interaction.html, I'd like to mention the following:
Firstly, when you create the plot, don't use "print( )" within "renderPlot( )", or the coordinates would be wrong. For instance, if you have the following in UI:
plotOutput("myplot", click = "myclick")
The following in the Server would work:
output$myplot <- renderPlot({
p = ggplot(data = mtcars, aes(x=mpg, y=hp)) + geom_point()
p
})
But the clicking coordinates would be wrong if you do:
output$myplot <- renderPlot({
p = ggplot(data = mtcars, aes(x=mpg, y=hp)) + geom_point()
print(p)
})
Then, you could store the coordinates by adding to the Server:
mydata = reactiveValues(x_values = c(), y_values = c())
observeEvent(input$myclick, {
mydata$x_values = c(mydata$x_values, input$myclick$x)
mydata$y_values = c(mydata$y_values, input$myclick$y)
})
In addition to X-Y coordinates, when you use facet with ggplot2, you refer to the clicked facet panel by
input$myclick$panelvar1
Okay so I'm sure this has been asked before but I can't find a nice answer anywhere after many hours of searching.
I have some data, I run a classification then I make a dendrogram.
The problem has to do with aesthetics, specifically; (1) how to cut according to the number of groups (in this example I want 3), (2) make the group labels aligned with the branches of the trees, (2) Re-scale so that there aren't any huge gaps between the groups
More on (3). I have dataset which is very species rich and there would be ~1000 groups without cutting. If I cut at say 3, the tree has some branches on the right and one 'miles' off to the right which I would want to re-scale so that its closer. All of this is possible via external programs but I want to do it all in r!
Bonus points if you can put an average silhouette width plot nested into the top right of this plot
Here is example using iris data
library(ggplot2)
data(iris)
df = data.frame(iris)
df$Species = NULL
ED10 = vegdist(df,method="euclidean")
EucWard_10 = hclust(ED10,method="ward.D2")
hcd_ward10 = as.dendrogram(EucWard_10)
plot(hcd_ward10)
plot(cut(hcd_ward10, h = 10)$upper, main = "Upper tree of cut at h=75")
I suspect what you would want to look at is the dendextend R package (it also has a paper in bioinformatics).
I am not fully sure about your question on (3), since I am not sure I understand what rescaling means. What I can tell you is that you can do quite a lot of dendextend. Here is a quick example for coloring the branches and labels for 3 groups.
library(ggplot2)
library(vegan)
data(iris)
df = data.frame(iris)
df$Species = NULL
library(vegan)
ED10 = vegdist(df,method="euclidean")
EucWard_10 = hclust(ED10,method="ward.D2")
hcd_ward10 = as.dendrogram(EucWard_10)
plot(hcd_ward10)
install.packages("dendextend")
library(dendextend)
dend <- hcd_ward10
dend <- color_branches(dend, k = 3)
dend <- color_labels(dend, k = 3)
plot(dend)
You can also get an interactive dendrogram by using plotly (ggplot method is available through dendextend):
library(plotly)
library(ggplot2)
p <- ggplot(dend)
ggplotly(p)
I have a few rasters I would like to plot using gplot in the rasterVis package. I just discovered gplot (which is fantastic and so much faster than doing data.frame(rasterToPoints(r))). However, I can't get a discrete image to show. Normally if r is a raster, I'd do:
rdf=data.frame(rasterToPoints(r))
rdf$cuts=cut(rdf$value,breaks=seq(0,max(rdf$value),length.out=5))
ggplot(rdf)+geom_raster(aes(x,y,fill=cuts))
But is there a way to avoid the call to rasterToPoints? It is very slow with large rasters. I did find I could do:
cuts=cut_interval(r#data#values,n=5)
but if you set the fill to cuts it plots the integer representation of the factors.
Here is some reproducible data:
x=seq(-107,-106,.1)
y=seq(33,34,.1)
coords=expand.grid(x,y)
rdf=data.frame(coords,depth=runif(nrow(coords),0,2)))
names(rdf)=c('x','y','value')
r=rasterFromXYZ(rdf)
Thanks
gplot is a very simple wrapper around ggplot so don't expect too
much from it. Instead, you can use part of its code to build your own
solution. The main point here is to use sampleRegular to reduce the
number of points to be displayed.
library(raster)
library(ggplot2)
x <- sampleRegular(r, size=5000, asRaster = TRUE)
dat <- as.data.frame(r, xy=TRUE)
dat$cuts <- cut(dat$value,
breaks=seq(0, max(dat$value), length.out=5))
ggplot(aes(x = x, y = y), data = dat) +
geom_raster(aes(x, y, fill=cuts))
However, if you are open to plot without ggplot2 you may find useful
this other
answer.
I just came by the following plot:
And wondered how can it be done in R? (or other softwares)
Update 10.03.11: Thank you everyone who participated in answering this question - you gave wonderful solutions! I've compiled all the solution presented here (as well as some others I've came by online) in a post on my blog.
Make.Funny.Plot does more or less what I think it should do. To be adapted according to your own needs, and might be optimized a bit, but this should be a nice start.
Make.Funny.Plot <- function(x){
unique.vals <- length(unique(x))
N <- length(x)
N.val <- min(N/20,unique.vals)
if(unique.vals>N.val){
x <- ave(x,cut(x,N.val),FUN=min)
x <- signif(x,4)
}
# construct the outline of the plot
outline <- as.vector(table(x))
outline <- outline/max(outline)
# determine some correction to make the V shape,
# based on the range
y.corr <- diff(range(x))*0.05
# Get the unique values
yval <- sort(unique(x))
plot(c(-1,1),c(min(yval),max(yval)),
type="n",xaxt="n",xlab="")
for(i in 1:length(yval)){
n <- sum(x==yval[i])
x.plot <- seq(-outline[i],outline[i],length=n)
y.plot <- yval[i]+abs(x.plot)*y.corr
points(x.plot,y.plot,pch=19,cex=0.5)
}
}
N <- 500
x <- rpois(N,4)+abs(rnorm(N))
Make.Funny.Plot(x)
EDIT : corrected so it always works.
I recently came upon the beeswarm package, that bears some similarity.
The bee swarm plot is a
one-dimensional scatter plot like
"stripchart", but with closely-packed,
non-overlapping points.
Here's an example:
library(beeswarm)
beeswarm(time_survival ~ event_survival, data = breast,
method = 'smile',
pch = 16, pwcol = as.numeric(ER),
xlab = '', ylab = 'Follow-up time (months)',
labels = c('Censored', 'Metastasis'))
legend('topright', legend = levels(breast$ER),
title = 'ER', pch = 16, col = 1:2)
(source: eklund at www.cbs.dtu.dk)
I have come up with the code similar to Joris, still I think this is more than a stem plot; here I mean that they y value in each series is a absolute value of a distance to the in-bin mean, and x value is more about whether the value is lower or higher than mean.
Example code (sometimes throws warnings but works):
px<-function(x,N=40,...){
x<-sort(x);
#Cutting in bins
cut(x,N)->p;
#Calculate the means over bins
sapply(levels(p),function(i) mean(x[p==i]))->meansl;
means<-meansl[p];
#Calculate the mins over bins
sapply(levels(p),function(i) min(x[p==i]))->minl;
mins<-minl[p];
#Each dot is one value.
#X is an order of a value inside bin, moved so that the values lower than bin mean go below 0
X<-rep(0,length(x));
for(e in levels(p)) X[p==e]<-(1:sum(p==e))-1-sum((x-means)[p==e]<0);
#Y is a bin minum + absolute value of a difference between value and its bin mean
plot(X,mins+abs(x-means),pch=19,cex=0.5,...);
}
Try the vioplot package:
library(vioplot)
vioplot(rnorm(100))
(with awful default color ;-)
There is also wvioplot() in the wvioplot package, for weighted violin plot, and beanplot, which combines violin and rug plots. They are also available through the lattice package, see ?panel.violin.
Since this hasn't been mentioned yet, there is also ggbeeswarm as a relatively new R package based on ggplot2.
Which adds another geom to ggplot to be used instead of geom_jitter or the like.
In particular geom_quasirandom (see second example below) produces really good results and I have in fact adapted it as default plot.
Noteworthy is also the package vipor (VIolin POints in R) which produces plots using the standard R graphics and is in fact also used by ggbeeswarm behind the scenes.
set.seed(12345)
install.packages('ggbeeswarm')
library(ggplot2)
library(ggbeeswarm)
ggplot(iris,aes(Species, Sepal.Length)) + geom_beeswarm()
ggplot(iris,aes(Species, Sepal.Length)) + geom_quasirandom()
#compare to jitter
ggplot(iris,aes(Species, Sepal.Length)) + geom_jitter()