I updated nodes in the Nebula Graph database, but I cannot find the updated nodes with NebulaGraph studio. I used the following command for querying the updated nodes.
match （v：Comment） return v limit 10
The error message said that tag comment does not exist.
I checked that there were no syntax errors or no capitalization problems.
Can you help me with this issue?
Try adding backquotes (`) before and after the Comment.
Related
Ho to check if edge already exist before create one with gremlin query? How to update existing edge instead of deleting and recreating?
I'm not sure if you're still looking for an answer; however, the simple answer is that Cosmos DB is somewhat limited in its Gremlin support. See here: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cosmos-db/gremlin-support. The only way to update an edge as at the time of writing this answer is to delete and recreate the edge. That is true whether you're adding properties or updating them.
In terms of querying if the edge already exists, you can use g.E('<xyz-id-guid>') or g.V('id', '<xyz-id-guid>', '<partition-key-property>', '<xyz-id>').outE('<edge-label>').hasId('<xyz-id-guid>'). The hasId() part is optional but recommended as is the use of the partition key value. Both help performance.
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Seb
I've seen this via the UI and directly through the REST API (which the UI of course uses) but the version search on a path does not return more than 10 results.
You can see this easily in the UI if you right click on a path with more than 10 versions and you choose Delete Versions. You see an error stating:
"Search exceeded the limit and some versions are not shown. Try running this action from deeper node"
This seems like a bug. I see no way to retrieve paginated results. Also, I'm going to try uncommenting this line in the main properties file:
artifactory.search.userQueryLimit=1000
But that seems ridiculous, what kind of default is 10?
The error you are getting seems to be related to the parameter that you added:
artifactory.search.userQueryLimit=1000
But one thing that you need to understand, the limit you got is that the search went over 1000 entries, not results. For that reason, the directory search worked. This search doesn't work with pagination.
If you wish to use a more efficient way to search for your binaries you might want to consider using Artifactory AQL as you can see below:
https://www.jfrog.com/confluence/display/RTF/Artifactory+Query+Language
I am just getting into Flyway for our SQL Server database. So far, everything is straight forward.
However, I can't seem to find a setting for the migrate command that will put a useful comment in the schema_version.description column. Granted, all I have done is a few minor migrations just to test out, but I can't seem to find any setting to create this. Is there one? Is it pulled from the comments of a script?
The migration description is taken from the name of your migration file. eg
V1__this_will_be_your_description.sql
The resulting description will have the version prefix, version and file suffix trimmed as well as underscores replace with spaces. So the resulting description for the above would be
this will be your description
See MigrationInfoHelper if you are interested in the details.
To the best of my knowledge there is no other way to influence the description.
See the documentation.
I am a novice user of Oracle Report Builder, so forgive me if the answer should be obvious.
I am attempting to run a 9i report, and I keep getting an error that appears like there is an issue with frames overlapping. I have two versions and both are getting the same error. One version is the report I want. The other is a stripped down version with only a couple fields, to narrow down what might be causing it.
Terminated with error: <br>REP-271187990: Virtual Memory System error. REP-0200: Cannot allocate enough memory. cavaa 22 REP-0002: Unable to retrieve a string from the Report Builder message file. REP-271187990:
Occasionally, it kicks out the message below when I try to run it, with no other accompanying details. The select runs and returns the desired results, and the function returns the ref cursor results as expected. The package is valid and compiled, so the query itself should be fine. There is only one query in the report, and I have tried various things, including stripping the report to narrow down the source of the error, with no luck. Any ideas to try would be appreciated.
Terminated with error: <br>REP-1401: 'qr_1refcurds1': Fatal PL/SQL error occurred.
It turns out that the problem was with data returned from my refcursor.
In the package spec I had one of the fields wrong field in the table.field%type declaration.
For those experiencing a similar error I would suggest:
If you have your SQL in functions, as opposed to right in the report, check your package spec to ensure your field order matches usage in the body.
If you have any overlapping frames in your report, this message can also come up. Check the object navigator for any hidden frames. They can be totally invisible, and the only way to know for sure is by checking in the navigator. Hint - Give meaningful names to your fields and text labels, so you can see what's contained in each frame. Also check the source of container frames is... but that's another REP error to enjoy.
Depending on setup, the first time you load a report it may error out referring to one of your queries. That happens after compile. Just try again, and every time going forward it's fine.
Consider the server patches mentioned above if your SQL statements are dynamic.
Feel free to add to this list if you know of others.
According to Oracle Support Note 430044.1 -
MS Windows: Reports 10g with Ref Cursors Fails with REP-200 and REP-65
Virtual Memory System Error [ID 430044.1]
This is a known Oracle Reports bug for MS Windows Platform.
Bug 5584001 DYNAMIC REF CURSORS DON'T WORK IN VERSION 10.1.2.0.2
REPORTS BUILDER
There are step by step instructions in the Oracle Note to apply the patch to resolve this issue. Also note, this problem is specific to MS Windows.
The suggested Oracle One-off patches are-
One-off patch 4505133
One-off patch 5634746
Log-on to Oracle Support, download the two patches and follow the step by step instructions mentioned in Note 430044.1 to apply the patch.
So I'm using SQLite with .NET and System.Data.SQLite library (which shouldn't be relevant to the question). I'm executing a simple UPDATE statement with a WHERE clause, such that 0 rows should be affected. Instead, SQLite inserts a new row satisfying the provided WHERE clause.
I've read through SQLite documentation on UPDATE statement, but couldn't find anything about this feature. Googling around also doesn't seem to help. Anyone knows what's going on?