I am using Oracle 11g and running the following query in oracle toad:
WITH
CTEDevices (CREATED_ON, CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, DEVICE_MAKE, DEVICE_Model) AS (
SELECT
Trunc(RD.CREATED_ON),
RD.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID,
RD.DEVICE_MAKE,
RD.DEVICE_Model
FROM Schema.Table1 RD
WHERE RD.PARAM_CHANNEL_ID = 1
AND RD.CREATED_ON >= '01-may-2022'
AND RD.CREATED_ON <= '02-may-2022'
GROUP BY
Trunc(RD.CREATED_ON),
RD.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID,
RD.DEVICE_MAKE,
RD.DEVICE_Model
),
CTERegistration (CREATED_ON, CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, DEVICE_MAKE, DEVICE_Model) AS
(
SELECT
CI.Customer_Info_Id,
Trunc(CI.created_on),
'CI.DEVICE_MAKE',
'CI.DEVICE_Model'
FROM Schema.Table2 CI
Where CI.CUSTOMER_TYPE = 'A'
AND CI.CREATED_ON >= '01-may-2022'
AND CI.CREATED_ON <= '02-may-2022'
)
SELECT
CTEDevices.CREATED_ON, CTEDevices.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, CTEDevices.DEVICE_MAKE, CTEDevices.DEVICE_Model,
CTERegistration.CREATED_ON, CTERegistration.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, CTERegistration.DEVICE_MAKE, CTERegistration.DEVICE_Model
FROM CTEDevices INNER JOIN CTERegistration ON (CTEDevices.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID = CTERegistration.CUSTOMER_INFO_ID AND (CTEDevices.CREATED_ON = CTERegistration.CREATED_ON));
Individual qeueries were running successfully but when going to run as combined one getting the following error:
ORA-00932: inconsistent datatypes: expected DATE got NUMBER
Please help.
Thanks
Culprit is the 2nd CTE:
CTERegistration (CREATED_ON, CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, DEVICE_MAKE, DEVICE_Model) AS
( 1st 2nd
SELECT
CI.Customer_Info_Id, 1st
Trunc(CI.created_on), 2nd
'CI.DEVICE_MAKE', ...
The 1st column is supposed to be CREATED_ON (which is, apparently, DATE datatype value), while the 2nd column is then CUSTOMER_INFO_ID. Your query has it just the opposite, so - fix it:
CTERegistration (CREATED_ON, CUSTOMER_INFO_ID, DEVICE_MAKE, DEVICE_Model) AS
(
SELECT
Trunc(CI.created_on),
CI.Customer_Info_Id,
'CI.DEVICE_MAKE', ...
If you wonder why separate queries work, well - no reason why not. Oracle doesn't care how you named columns, but you can't join them any way you want.
Related
as a newbie in SQL I am lost regarding nested queries.
I am trying to achieve the following: getting a table grouped by month with a count from all values of a column, then the same count filtered by status.
So for instance in January I could have the following result:
Jan 22 Count= 100 Count with Status filter= 57
I tried several variations along these lines:
SELECT
FORMAT ( [CreatedDate.table2] , 'yyyyMM' ) as create_month,
RecordTypeName__c,
count(*) as count_all,
count_filtered
FROM
(SELECT
FORMAT ( [CreatedDate] , 'yyyyMM' ) as create_month,
RecordTypeName__c,
Count(*) AS count_filtered
FROM DM_AccessNoAgg.DimLead
WHERE [CreatedDate] >= '2022-01-01'
AND [Status]='Qualifiziert'
GROUP BY RecordTypeName__c,FORMAT ( [CreatedDate] , 'yyyyMM' )
)
Basically I am using the same value in both cases, just that the second count has to be filtered. What's the best method to get this done?
Thanks for your help!
Pauline.
The oracle version has been updated and WM_CONCAT function stopped working.
I have to changed it for LISTAGG function but it takes only 2 arguments LISTAGG(measure_expr, delimiter)
What if there are two columns: WM_CONCAT(COB.COD_COB||':'||COB_1.NOM_COB) ?
I tried:
LISTAGG((COB.COD_COB||':'||COB_1.NOM_COB), ':') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY COB.COD_COB,COB_1.NOM_COB) AS COB_DESC
but it gives me an error
SELECT DISTINCT
-- TO_CHAR(WM_CONCAT(COB.COD_COB||':'||COB_1.NOM_COB)) AS COB_DESC,
LISTAGG((COB.COD_COB||':'||COB_1.NOM_COB), ':') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY COB.COD_COB,COB_1.NOM_COB) AS COB_DESC
FROM COBERTURAS_REDUCIDA_UW COB
LEFT JOIN A1002150 COB_1 ON COB.COD_CIA = COB_1.COD_CIA
GROUP BY COB.COD_CIA
I need to output running balance in the following query, Please help me with the query-code:
select
WEAVING_YARN_TR.TR_ID,
WEAVING_YARN_TR.GP_NO,
WEAVING_YARN_TR.YR_ID,
WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS.TO_FROM as PARTY,
WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS.GP_DATE,
WEAVING_YARN_TR.BAGS_IN,
WEAVING_YARN_TR.BAGS_OUT,
SUM(NVL(WEAVING_YARN_TR.BAGS_OUT,0)-NVL(WEAVING_YARN_TR.BAGS_IN,0)) over (order by GP_DATE) as BALANCE
from WEAVING_YARN_TR,WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS
where WEAVING_YARN_TR.GP_NO=WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS."GP_NO." and WEAVING_YARN_TR.YR_ID=:P216_YR_ID and WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS.TO_FROM=:P216_YR_DESC
UNION ALL
select
null as TR_ID,
WEAVING_WARP_SET.SET_ID,
WEAVING_WARP_SET.YARN_ITEM,
WEAVING_WARP_SET.PARTY,
WEAVING_WARP_SET.RECEIVED_DATE,
WEAVING_WARP_SET.TOTAL_BAGS_CONSUMED,
null as BAGS_OUT,
NVL(null,0)-NVL(WEAVING_WARP_SET.TOTAL_BAGS_CONSUMED,0) as BALANCE
from WEAVING_WARP_SET
where WEAVING_WARP_SET.YARN_ITEM=:P216_YR_ID and WEAVING_WARP_SET.PARTY= :P216_YR_DESC
order by GP_DATE
So here is the thing; if you're going to use UNION or UNION ALL, each query block has to be the equal column and type.
For example; We have 2 queries and we want to bind them.
The first query block contains 3 columns and their type NUMBER, VARCHAR, NUMBER (in order). The second block has to be 3 column and types must be NUMBER, VARCHAR, VARCHAR (in order)
So your query does not seem like that. You want an output like the screenshot that you sent. Here is the query that edited:
select
weaving_yarn_gatepass.gp_date
,weaving_yarn_tr.gp_no
,weaving_yarn_gatepass.to_from as party
,weaving_yarn_tr.yr_id
,weaving_yarn_tr.bags_in
,weaving_yarn_tr.bags_out
,sum(nvl(weaving_yarn_tr.bags_out,0) - nvl(weaving_yarn_tr.bags_in,0)) over(order by gp_date) as balance
from weaving_yarn_tr
,weaving_yarn_gatepass
where weaving_yarn_tr.gp_no = WEAVING_YARN_GATEPASS."GP_NO."
and weaving_yarn_tr.yr_id = :p216_yr_id
and weaving_yarn_gatepass.to_from = :p216_yr_desc
union all
select
weaving_warp_set.received_date --I don't know if it means gp_date
,null as gp_no
,weaving_warp_set.party
,null yr_id -- If there is a column named YR_ID in WEAVING_WARP_SET put here
,weaving_warp_set.total_bags_consumed
,null as bags_out
,nvl(null,0) - nvl(weaving_warp_set.total_bags_consumed,0) as balance
from weaving_warp_set
where weaving_warp_set.yarn_item = :p216_yr_id
and weaving_warp_set.party = :p216_yr_desc
order by gp_date;
My table: CREATE TABLE T(id INT PRIMARY KEY, value INT UNIQUE)
This query, as I considered, would produce a median value of value in the table. But sqlite v.3.9.1 gives me the error no such column: ot.value to the line with group by. And it process line with where successfully, although it uses a similar expression. What's the problem of the query?
select
ot.id,
ot.value
from T as ot
where (
select count(c) > count(DISTINCT c) from (
select count(*) c from T as it
where it.value != ot.value
group by it.value < ot.value
) LessMore
)
The same query succeeds in PostgreSQL and prints what was expected. MySQL gives the error Error Code: 1054. Unknown column 'ot.value' in 'where clause'
I have:
TABLE MESSAGES
message_id | conversation_id | from_user | timestamp | message
I want:
1. SELECT * WHERE from_user <> id
2. GROUP BY conversation_id
3. SELECT in every group row with MAX(timestamp) **(if there are two same timestamps in a group use second factor as highest message_id)** !!!
4. then results SORT BY timestamp
to have result:
2|145|xxx|10000|message
6|1743|yyy|999|message
7|14|bbb|899|message
with eliminated
1|145|xxx|10000|message <- has same timestamp(10000) as message(2) belongs to the same conversation(145) but message id is lowest
5|1743|me|1200|message <- has message_from == me
example group with same timestamp
i want from this group row 3 but i get row 2 from query
SELECT max(message_timestamp), message_id, message_text, message_conversationId
FROM MESSAGES
WHERE message_from <> 'me'
GROUP BY message_conversationId
ORDER by message_Timestamp DESC
what is on my mind to do union from message_id & timestamp and then get max???
Your query is based on non-standard use of GROUP BY (I think SQLite allows that only for compatibility with MySQL) and I'm not at all sure that it will produce determinate results all the time.
Plus it uses MAX() on concatenated columns. Unless you somehow ensure that the two (concatenated) columns have fixed widths, the results will not be accurate for that reason as well.
I would write the query like this:
SELECT
m.message_timestamp,
m.message_id,
m.message_text,
m.message_conversationId
FROM
( SELECT message_conversationId -- for every conversation
FROM messages as m
WHERE message_from <> 'me'
GROUP BY message_conversationId
) AS mc
JOIN
messages AS m -- join to the messages
ON m.message_id =
( SELECT mi.message_id -- and find one message id
FROM messages AS mi
WHERE mi.message_conversationId -- for that conversation
= mc.message_conversationId
AND mi.message_from <> 'me'
ORDER BY mi.message_timestamp DESC, -- according to the
mi.message_id DESC -- specified order
LIMIT 1 -- (this is the one part)
) ;
Try below sql to achieve your purpose by group by twice.
select m.*
from
Messages m
-- 3. and then joining to get wanted output columns
inner join
(
--2. then selecting from this max timestamp - and removing duplicates
select conversation_id, max(timestamp), message_id
from
(
-- 1. first select max message_id in remainings after the removal of duplicates from mix of cv_id & timestamp
select conversation_id, timestamp, max(message_id) message_id
from Messages
where message <> 'me'
group by conversation_id, timestamp
) max_mid
group by conversation_id
) max_mid_ts on max_mid_ts.message_id = m.message_id
order by m.message_id;
http://goo.gl/MyZjyU
ok it was more simple than I thought:
basically to change select from:
max(message_timestamp)
to:
max(message_timestamp || message_id)
or max(message_timestamp + message_id)
so it will search for max on concatenation of timestamp and message_id
ps. after a digging - it's working only if message id is growing with timestamp ( order of insertion is preserved )
edit:
edit2 :
so why it works ?
SELECT max(message_timestamp+message_id), message_timestamp, message_id, message_conversationId, message_from,message_text
FROM MESSAGES
WHERE message_conversationId = 1521521
AND message_from <> 'me'
ORDER by message_Timestamp DESC