I am working on a school thesis with the concept of Geofence. For my project, i have made notifications to arrive based on the boundary events. The project works with local notifications coming based on events:
Boundary.on(Events.ENTER, id => {
console.log('Background Enter');
PushNotification.localNotification({
channelId: 'boundary-demo',
title: 'ENTER SIGNAL',
message: `You've entered region: ${id} in background`,
importance: 'max',
priority: 'max',
ignoreInForeground: false,
allowWhileIdle: true,
});
});
Boundary.on(Events.EXIT, id => {
console.log('Background Exit');
PushNotification.localNotification({
channelId: 'boundary-demo',
title: 'EXIT SIGNAL',
message: `You've left region: ${id} in background`,
importance: 'max',
priority: 'max',
ignoreInForeground: false,
allowWhileIdle: true,
});
});
I am making a single app, which 2 users can login and use (Parent and child)
Right now, because it is using localnotification, One device can recieve the notification. But i need the same notifications to come at both devices.
So how do I convert PushNotification.localNotification to Firebase Push Notification.
NOTE: Both users have been linked together with firebase realtime database.
Please help, thank you so much
Related
I have created this function in Google Cloud Platform associated with Firebase Realtime Database. The function sends a notification to mobile applications when something appears in the database.
As you can see below I set the priorities so that the notification will be noticed by the user
var message = {
token: tokenSnapshot,
notification: {
title: "Title",
body: "Body",
},
android: {
priority: 'high',
notification: {
sound: 'default',
priority: 'high',
visibility: 'public'
}
},
};
Unfortunately, it doesn't do anything. The notification comes but the user sees when he checks manually if something has come
I use a standard approach in the application
messaging().enable.setBackgroundMessageHandler(async remoteMessage => {
console.log('Message handled in the background!', JSON.stringify(remoteMessage));
})
Is there any way for notifications to be with sound, vibration and to appear on the lock screen?
I haven't used the react-native-push-notification library yet. Can this library help in this?
If you are using firebase-cloud messaging i suggest using firebase in your app.
https://rnfirebase.io/messaging/usage
Make sure you follow the initial set up first.
Please read more about this here. https://rnfirebase.io/
I have some users signed into my actions-on-google app via Google Sign-In ( https://developers.google.com/actions/identity/google-sign-in )
I want to sent push notifications to one of those users.
For getting push notifications work with actions in the first place, I tried this sample: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/blob/master/functions/index.js but I only can get this to work without this commit: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/commit/c655062047b49e372da37af32376bd06d837fc7f#diff-1e53ef2f51bd446c876676ba83d7c888
It works fine, but I think const userID = conv.user.id; returns the deprecated Anonymous User ID. The commit suggests to use const userID = conv.arguments.get('UPDATES_USER_ID'); which returns undefined.
I use this nodejs code to send the push notifications.
const request = require('request');
const {JWT} = require('google-auth-library');
const serviceAccount = require('./service-account.json');
let jwtClient = new JWT(
serviceAccount.client_email, null, serviceAccount.private_key,
['https://www.googleapis.com/auth/actions.fulfillment.conversation'],
null
);
jwtClient.authorize((authErr, tokens) => {
let notification = {
userNotification: {
title: process.argv[2],
},
target: {
userId: USERID,
intent: 'tell_latest_status',
// Expects a IETF BCP-47 language code (i.e. en-US)
locale: 'en-US'
},
};
request.post('https://actions.googleapis.com/v2/conversations:send', {
'auth': {
'bearer': tokens.access_token,
},
'json': true,
'body': {
'customPushMessage': notification, 'isInSandbox': true
},
}, (reqErr, httpResponse, body) => {
console.log(httpResponse.statusCode + ': ' + httpResponse.statusMessage);
});
});
I simply can't get this to work with the const userID = conv.arguments.get('UPDATES_USER_ID'); version, because as I said
When I use conv.user.profile.payload.sub as suggested here: https://developers.google.com/actions/identity/user-info the AoG API returns "SendToConversation response: Invalid user id for target."
Is there any way to make this work with Google Sign-In?
Has anyone made this work? I mean with the UPDATES_USER_ID field?
I already created an issue on the samples repo: https://github.com/actions-on-google/dialogflow-updates-nodejs/issues/15 but I was sent here.
Thanks!
While researching why I sometimes got undefined I found an answer on this question that solved my issue.
I've found solution for this problem. While getting UPDATES_USER_ID
conv.arguments.get() only works for first attempt. So, while building
your action you must save it. If you didn't store or save, you can
reset your profile and try again, you will be able to get.
You can reset your user profile for the action here.
I get a problem using Firebase to create push notifications group in React Native, when I receive many push notifications I want to create it to be 1 group like WhatsApp (like red circle in image below).
I have tried to look for many examples but I didn't found a solution. Please anyone help me to create like that.
Thanks.
use react-native-push-notification
// create channel
import PushNotification, {Importance} from 'react-native-push-notification';
...
PushNotification.createChannel(
{
channelId: "channel-id", // (required)
channelName: "My channel", // (required)
channelDescription: "A channel to categorise your notifications", // (optional) default: undefined.
playSound: false, // (optional) default: true
soundName: "default", // (optional) See `soundName` parameter of `localNotification` function
importance: Importance.HIGH, // (optional) default: Importance.HIGH. Int value of the Android notification importance
vibrate: true, // (optional) default: true. Creates the default vibration pattern if true.
},
(created) => console.log(`createChannel returned '${created}'`) // (optional) callback returns whether the channel was created, false means it already existed.
);
// this shows each new notification for a while then pushes it into group
PushNotification.localNotification({
channelId: 'channel-id',
title: `New message`,
message: 'Hello world',
})
// this groups messages
PushNotification.localNotification({
channelId: 'channel-id',
id: 'messages',
group: 'messages',
groupSummary: true
})
Problem Description
My Android app collects data via Google Analytics for Firebase. For privacy reasons, users must be able to wipe their data off the Firebase servers, should they choose to do so.
The app requests a deletion by forwarding its Firebase APP_INSTANCE_ID to my own server. This server has been prepared in advance with credentials, from my personal Google account (via oauth2), for managing the Firebase project. The server authenticates with www.googleapis.com, and, using the supplied APP_INSTANCE_ID, invokes the upsert.
As noted by the documentation, the generic Google Analytics API is appropriate for this task.
After some initial trouble (b/c I didn't have the correct auth scope, and the Analytics API wasn't properly enabled), googleapis.com now returns HTTP 200 for each upsert request. (As an aside, even if you supply a bogus APP_INSTANCE_ID, it returns 200.)
Here is a sample response from the upsert, which shows nothing amiss:
{ kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id:
{ type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string) },
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED),
deletionRequestTime: '2018-08-28T12:46:30.874Z' }
I know the firebaseProjectId is correct, because if I alter it, I get an error. I have verified that the APP_INSTANCE_ID is correct, and stable up until the moment it is reset with resetAnalyticsData().
Test Procedure
To test the deletions, I populated Firebase with several custom events, using the procedure below (Nexus 5X emulator, no Google Play, no Google accounts configured, but that shouldn't make any difference):
Install the app
Fire off some custom events (FirebaseAnalytics.logEvent)
Observe those events appear on the Firebase console
(About a minute later:) Make the upsert call, observe HTTP 200, and note the "deletionRequestTime"
Immediately call FirebaseAnalytics.resetAnalyticsData (to clear any event data cached on the device)
Uninstall the app
Rinse & repeat 7 or 8 times
However, even 24 hours later, 100% of the Firebase events are still present in the events table. No discernable state change has taken place on the Firebase server as a result of the upserts.
Question
So, what am I doing wrong? how do I successfully delete user data from Google Analytics for Firebase?
EDIT
Here's the code I'm using to make a request (from node.js):
const request = require( 'request' );
...
_deletePersonalData( data )
{
return new Promise( (resolve, reject) => {
request.post({
url: 'https://www.googleapis.com/analytics/v3/userDeletion/userDeletionRequests:upsert',
body: {
kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id: {
type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: data.firebaseAppInstanceId
},
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED)
},
headers: {
Authorization: 'Bearer ' + iap.getCurAccessToken()
},
json: true
}, (err, res, body) => {
console.log( 'user-deletion POST complete' );
console.log( 'Error ' + err );
console.log( 'Body ', body );
if( err )
{
reject( err );
return;
}
if( body.error )
{
reject( new Error( 'The Google service returned an error: ' + body.error.message + ' (' + body.error.code + ')' ) );
return;
}
resolve({ deletionRequestTime: body.deletionRequestTime });
});
});
}
Here's a sample request body:
{
kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id: {
type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string)
},
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED)
}
And here's the console output for that same request (same userId and everything):
user-deletion POST complete
Error: null
Body: { kind: 'analytics#userDeletionRequest',
id:
{ type: 'APP_INSTANCE_ID',
userId: (REDACTED 32-char hexidecimal string) },
firebaseProjectId: (REDACTED),
deletionRequestTime: '2018-08-29T17:32:06.949Z' }
Firebase support just got back to me, and I quote:
Upsert method deletes any individual user data we have logged, but aggregate metrics are not recomputed. This means that you might not see any changes in the events tab in your Analytics console.
So, basically my mistake was expecting the events to disappear from the console.
This, of course, raises the question of how one determines that the API is actually working... but maybe the HTTP 200 is enough.
CONTEXT
I'm writing a custom checkout process using tokenized payments inside a WebView since I need to use payments outside US.
I'm using this code, based on this facebook guide, to ask for the user's credit card info.
const saveThis = this
MessengerExtensions.requestPaymentCredentials(
function success(name, email, cardType, cardLastFourDigits, shippingAddress) {
console.log('success getting user payment info', cardLastFourDigits)
saveThis.printAsyncData(cardType)
},
function error(err, errorMessage) {
console.log('error trying to get user payment info', errorMessage)
saveThis.printAsyncData(errorMessage)
},
['CONTACT_NAME', 'CONTACT_EMAIL', 'CONTACT_PHONE', 'SHIPPING_ADDRESS']
);
CONSIDERATIONS
saveThis.printAsyncData() function is a workaround to log the
output in mobile devices so I can debug the code, since payments
don't work using the Messenger web client.
I'm testing this chatbot with my facebook account which is the one having the chatbot's Administrator role.
Administrator user returns the profile property is_payment_enabled: true
OUTPUT
I'm getting the following error: "An unexpected error has occured.24002". In the facebook's error reference, 24002 means "Payment request cannot be processed due to missing privacy url".
QUESTION
Does that mean that I have to provide a privacy policy URL to test payments even when I'm using the Administrator's chatbot account in a testing environment??
UPDATE
As suggested, I implemented the updated WebView payment code as follows:
const methodData = [{
supportedMethods: ['fb'], //only 'fb' is supported
data: {
merchantTitle: 'Merchant name', // optional, defaults to the Facebook Page name
merchantImageUrl: 'imageURL', //optional, defaults to the app icon
confirmationText: 'Thank you!', // optional, defaults to "Thank you for your payment"
merchantFBPageId: '28636603843****', // page id with onboarded payment method. Need to be the same with the page id in thread or messenger extension
termsUrl: 'https://www.facebook.com/' // Merchant payment privacy terms and conditions.
}
}]
const paymentDetails = {
displayItems: [ //array of items being charged for
{
label: 'T-shirt',
amount: {
currency: 'USD',
value : '15.00'
}
}
],
total: {
label: 'Total', // defaults to "Total"
amount: {
currency: 'USD',
value : '16.23'
}
},
shippingOptions: [ // Optional. Array of options for user to select
{
id: 'free-shipping', // custom ID
label: 'Free shipping in US', //human-readable name
amount: {currency: 'USD', value: '0.00'},
selected: true
}
]
}
const additionalOptions = {
requestShipping: false, // If shipping is required. If true, handle shippingoptionchange and shippingaddresschange events.
requestPayerName: true, // Name of the payer sent with the final response
requestPayerEmail: true, // Email address, same as above
requestPayerPhone: false // Phone number, same as above
}
let request = new this.messengerExtensions.PaymentRequest(
methodData, // array of payment methods and their setup
paymentDetails, // array of items, total, shipping options
additionalOptions, // request shipping information, payee email address, etc
);
request.canMakePayment()
.then(response => {
this.printAsyncData(response + ' from canMakePayment')
if (response === true) {
// proceed
} else {
// something went wrong, e.g. invalid `displayItems` configuration
// or the device does not run a
// recent enough version of the Facebook app
}
})
.catch(error => {
this.printAsyncData(error+' error from canMakePayment')
// an error such as `InvalidStateError`
// if a payment is already in process
});
This suggested implementation returns the variable response as false. Each configuration variable is copied from this link. I changed the MerchantPageID with the PageID I found on my Chatbot's fb page > Information, so I don't think this could be the problem. I checked the Messenger's version of my Android device and is the latest, being the 147.0.0.25.86 one.
I even tried to implement the payment dialog as follows just to see how it behaves.
request.show().then(response => {
// Process the payment if using tokenized payments.
// Process the confirmation if using Stripe/PayPal
this.printAsyncData(response)
// paymentResponse.complete('success').then(() => {
// // cleanup UI, log, etc
// });
}).catch(error => this.printAsyncData(error+'from show()'));
Payment dialog pops over nicely. It shows user's name and email but under the METHOD PAYMENT header it shows a loading spinner indefinitely. Moreover, .show() never triggers the callback thus not allowing to print its response on the line before paymentResponse.complete('success').
UPDATE 2
I've got the supported features with the following code to try to get some clue of what I'm missing
const saveThis = this
MessengerExtensions.getSupportedFeatures(function success(result) {
var features = result.supported_features;
saveThis.printAsyncData(features)
}, function error(err, errorMessage) {
saveThis.printAsyncData(errorMessage)
});
This is the output on my android messenger client:
["sharing_broadcast","sharing_direct", "sharing_open_graph", "permissions", "thread_context", "context", "sharing_media_template"]
There is no "payments" as it should be, based on this reference
Yes, but since you are just testing it can be any URL. Once you submit your bot for approval it will need to point to a real privacy policy.
You are also using the deprecated version of payments. For webview payments you should use PaymentRequest which is explained here:
https://developers.facebook.com/docs/messenger-platform/payments/webview-payments