I'm using SVG for my footer background. Here's my code:
#footer-bg {
background-image: url("/assets/main-bg.svg#svgView(viewBox(2,0,590,700))");
background-size: 100% 100%;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
This is working in all browsers except Safari, and the culprit is the SVG identifier #svgView(viewBox(2,0,590,700)). When I tried to put the viewbox inside SVG file, it is working in Safari.
Is there a way to fix this?
Absolutely you can use a hack to use a media query to target only Safari browser and then modify that background-image value with the correct one for that browser. In this StackOverflow post you can have more info about those media queries.
Besides that, if you want to have that viewbox set for the SVG, why you don't just edit the svg file, setting that viewbox directly in there and removing it from the css?
I had some issues with the printing the background colors.
print-color-adjust made the background color issue solved in chrome.
body{
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;
}
What are the alternate CSS in firefox and IE for this.
Feb 2023 Update: As of mid-2022 onwards, we can simply use print-color-adjust: economy|exact on the element, without the need to place inside a print media query.
color-adjust on it's own will become depreciated. (Thank you to misterManSam for the depreciation warning.)
Previous answer (originally from 2016):
As mentioned -webkit-print-color-adjust: exact is specific to WebKit browsers, including Google's Chrome and Apple's Safari; therefore the code should work adequately in those aforementioned browsers with perhaps slightly varied results (depending on your site/app styling).
There have been proposals to standardize this snippet to work universally for not just browsers but for different devices too. The code is simplified to: color-adjust. Similarly to the webkit-print-color-adjust property, the possible values are the same for the proposed property economy | exact.
If you want to use the property for printing purposes, simply use within a selector inside a #media print query.
For example:
#media print {
body { color-adjust: exact; }
}
I cannot guarantee the widespread adoption on browsers for the drafted property, however it is currently working on the latest version of FireFox (at the time of writing, version 50.0).
[Source]
There is the alternate CSS to print background colors for Chrome And Firefox.
td {
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;//:For Chrome
color-adjust: exact;//:For Firefox
}
This is beginning to work in Firefox (at least version 48.0.2) with the "color-adjust" property.
td {
background: #000 !important;
-webkit-print-color-adjust: exact;
color-adjust: exact;
}
See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/print-color-adjust#browser_compatibility
Firefox accepts print-color-adjust and color-adjust;
Safari accepts print-color-adjust and -webkit-print-color-adjust (edit: https://caniuse.com/?search=print-color-adjust says it only supports -webkit- version; if anyone actually using Safari can settle this, I'll edit);
Chrome and Edge accept -webkit-print-color-adjust.
I am having a weird problem with the url of the background-image property in different browsers, for example my url is:
background: url("resources/images/icons/pdf.png") no-repeat;
In Google chrome doesn´t appears but in IE works.. but If I change the url by:
background: url("../images/icons/pdf.png") no-repeat;
In Chrome works but in IE not...
What am I doing wrong?
Chrome and Firefox supports relative paths in this tag but IE does not. IE is following the specs strictly. Try adding a forward slash
background: url("/resources/images/icons/pdf.png") no-repeat;
I found the solution,in the CSS property you can add two different url for example:
background-image: url("resources/images/icons/excel.png"), url("../images/icons/excel.png");
I put in a fallback image for some gradients that I have in a login box, but I've realized in both the modern firefox and chrome its skipping the code and going straight to the fallback image.
background:-moz-linear-gradient(19% 75% 90deg,#0177a9, #53c3e8);
background:-webkit-gradient(linear, 0% 0%, 0% 100%, from(#53c3e8), to(#0177a9));
background-color: #0177a9;
background: url(../images/signin.png);
background-repeat: repeat-x;
background-position: -5px -13px;
The fallback image is actually just a screenshot of the login box but it looks identical to how it looks when formed via the CSS3 gradients.
If I take out the fallback image and colour it will load the correct webkit or moz for each browser but as soon as I put the fallback it loads the fallback.
I know it uses the fallback because i set its position at a wrong angle just to see if it was loading and it did. Can anyone help me? It doesnt make sense that its happening.
Thanks!
If its a fallback then you need to have the image BEFORE the garadient definitions, otherwise its just going to override them.
Put the URL before everything else. The ordering might be what's doing it to you.
Usually, the last directive overrules the former ones. Try putting the "background: url" as the first in the file. If this doesn't help, I don't see a pure CSS solution. Use JS (look at the modernizer library to do feature detection).
An image set as the background of a DIV is displayed in IE, but not in Firefox.
CSS example:
div.something {
background:transparent url(../images/table_column.jpg) repeat scroll 0 0;
}
(The issue is described in many places but haven't seen any conclusive explanation or fix.)
Sorry this got huge, but it covers two possibilities that consistently happen to me.
Possibility 1
You may find the path to the CSS file isn't correct. For example:
Say I have the following file structure:
public/
css/
global.css
images/
background.jpg
something/
index.html
index.html
On public/index.html the following paths will include the CSS file:
#1: <link href="./css/global.css"
#2: <link href="/css/global.css"
#3: <link href="css/global.css"
However on public/something/index.html number 1 and 3 will fail. If you are using a directory structure like this (or an MVC structure e.g.: http://localhost/controller/action/params) use the second href type.
Firebug's Net monitor tab will tell you if the CSS file can't be included.
On the subject of paths remember that images are relative to the path of the CSS file. So:
url('./images/background.jpg') /* won't work */
url('../images/background.jpg') /* works: ../ == up one level */
Hover over the url() part of the background attribute in Firebug's CSS tab to check if the file's being loaded.
Possibility 2
It could be that the div has no content and thus has a 0 height. Make sure the div has at least a line of something in (e.g.: lorem ipsum delors secorum) or:
div.something {
display: block; /* for verification */
min-height: 50px;
min-width: 50px;
}
Check Firebug's layout tab (of the HTML tab) to check the div has a height/width.
Strangely enough, after smashing my head on the keyboard for hours, I added display:table; to the DIV's style and the background image magically appeared in FF.
It looks like a background-attachment issue. It needs to be set to fixed (not scroll) to work in FF.
See: http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/tryit.asp?filename=trycss_background-position
Happend with me. The jpg does shows in IE but not in Firefox or Chrome. Here is the solution
Change the following css for the element where image is displayed. It can be span, div or any other element :
display:block
Old post but I just Had a similar problem images not showing up in Firefox turns out it was Ad-block add-on, had to change the names of my images
Try putting the image name in quotes, e.g.:
background-image: url('image.jpg');
I've had a similar issue. The reason is that firefox is sensitive for missing fields in your css. Chrome will (sometimes) auto complete missing field, thus the issue appears on your firefox browser.
You need to add a display type, because right now it is being translated to 0 height.
In my case:
.left-bg-image {
display: block; // add this line
background-image: url('../images/profile.jpeg');
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-size: cover;
background-position: center center;
opacity: .6;
min-width: 100%;
min-height: 100vh;
}
Make sure that the image you are referring to is relative to the css file and not the html file.
try this.
background-color: transparent;
background-image: url("/path/to/image/file.jpg");
background-repeat: repeat;
background-position: top;
background-attachment: scroll;
Instead of using URLs relative to the page/stylesheet, a cross-browser solution is to give a relative URL starting with the application/domain root.
/* Relative to Stylesheet (Works in Firefox) */
background: url('../images/logo.gif');
/* Relative to Page (Works in IE, Chrome etc.) */
background: url('images/logo.gif');
/* Absolute path (Fine, unless you change domains)*/
background: url('http://www.webby.com/myproduct/images/factsheet.gif');
/* Domain Root-relative path (Works in Firefox, IE, Chrome and Opera) */
background: url('/myproduct/images/factsheet.gif');
FYI: As far as I'm concerned, there is no requirement to use quotes in CSS URLs, I've used them here 'cause it looks prettier.
I solved a similar problem by renaming the CSS class. MSIE allows CSS class IDs to begin with numbers; Firefox doesn't. I had created a class using the width of the image in pixels e.g. .1594px-01a
I actually knew it was non-standard syntax but since it was working fine in MSIE I had forgotten about it. After trying all the other stuff it finally dawned on me that it could be a simple as the naming, and as soon as I put a letter in front of the class, presto!
For me, it was a matter of the file-name being case-sensitive. I'm not sure if it was CSS or if it was my Ubuntu operating system, or if it was firefox, but the way that I finally got the background images to display was by referring to BlueGrad.jpg instead of bluegrad.jpg. The former of the two is how it was saved. I didn't think it would be case sensitive, but it was.
You could try this:
div.something {
background: transparent url(../images/table_column.jpg);
}
The other declarations are shorthand CSS properties, and I afaik they are not needed.
Do you have this online somewhere? I'd like to see if I can fiddle with it a bit. (locally)
More questions than answers I'm afraid, but they might help you get to the right answer:
Is it possible that you are collapsing the div in Firefox in some way (with some floats or similar)?
Is there any other content in the div to ensure it's large enough to display the image?
Have you installed Firebug and taken a look at the CSS definitions on the page?
Are you absolutely sure the image is a JPG file and not a PNG/Other file?
I'm wondering if IE is letting you get away with something other browsers are not.
Likewise, is the files case exactly as specified?
There's this HTML 'base' tag like in
<head>
<base href="http://example.com/some/bizarre/directory"/>
</head>
If this is present in your page, the image for the url is not relative to your current url, but to the given base url. I wouldn't know why IE displays it and Firefox doesn't, though.
The Webdeveloper Firefox extension provides the option to "Display broken images" - this may come in handy. Also, you might try "Live Http Headers" to see if/what image is requested and what the return code is.
I had a similar problem regarding the CSS background-image property in FF. It worked fine in IE but refused to work in FF ;) After reading a few posts I established that the issue was indeed that there was no content in the div except for a table (I was trying to make the background image adjust to the size of the broswer without collapsing or expanding and therefore used a much larger image in the background of the div in order to form a 'cropping' of sorts.) The solution for me it seems was to simply 'cheat' by placing an img tag that displayed a blank .png file that I then re-adjusted to the the correct height of the image with width set to 100%. This worked for my problem, and I hope it helps anyone else who is running into a similar problem. Probably not the best fix, but it's a fix ;)
The only other thing I can think of besides what has already been said is the way the picture was created. If you made/edited the image in Photoshop, make sure you save as Save For Web...
Sometimes if you use a JPG image for Photoshop without saving as a Web image, it may not appear in Firefox. I had that happen a few weeks ago where a graphic artist created a beautiful header for a mini site and it would NOT appear in FF!
Wait...
Try setting a width and height on the div to expand it. It may be a no-content issue in your div.
For those, who encounter the problem in FF, but not in Chrome:
You could mistakenly mix between different value types for the position.
For example,
background: transparent url("/my/image.png") right 60% no-repeat;
Will make this error. The fix could be:
background: transparent url("/my/image.png") 100% 60% no-repeat;
My mistake was to use '\' instead of '/'. Worked OK in IE, but not in other browsers.
I found two things that were causing this problem:
I was using a .tif file which Firefox did not seem to like - I changed to a .png file.
I added overflow:auto; to the CSS for the div - display:block; did not work for me.
It may look very weird, but this works for me >
#hwrap {
background-color: #d5b75a;
background: url("..//design/bg_header_daddy.png"), url("..//design/nasty_fabric.png");
background-position: 50% 50%, top left;
background-origin: border-box, border-box;
background-repeat: no-repeat, repeat;
}
Yes, a double dot and double slash ... ??!!?? ... I can't find anything on the internet that reports this strange behaviour.
[edit]
I've made a seperate post > https://stackoverflow.com/q/18342019/529802
(It doesn't seem like these are the exact circumstances as of the OP but the issue is somewhat related and I've found a workaround for that which I want to share)
I've had the same problem – background-image visible everywhere except in Firefox – and for me, the issue had to do with the fact that I'm working on a browser add-on.
I'm injecting a file style.css in the pageMod module with the contentStyleFile attribute. In it, there's the rule background-image: url(/img/editlist.png); where I'm referencing an image file external to the add-on. The problem here is that Firefox, unlike other browsers, misinterprets this external domain root as the add-on's internal root!
The css-file is a 1:1 port from the Chrome version of the extension/add-on, so I didn't want to mess around with it. That's why I've added an additional contentStyle rule in combination with a copy of that image in my resource folder. This rule simply overwrites the rule inside the css-file.
(In hindsight maybe even a more elegant method than before …)
Nobody mentioned background-origin so there you go :
background-image:url('dead.beef');
background-size: 100% 100%;
background-origin:border-box;
Solved the problem for me ; my background apparently was outside my div.
In my case it caused by "Strict" mode in FF Privacy & Security settings. After I have changed to "Standard" all background images had become visible.
This worked for me:
1) Click on the background image table.
2) Right click on the status bar at the bottom of the page.
3) Click Inline styles.
4) Click the Background styles tab.
5) If you see 'Transparent' in the colour title, that is the problem.
6) Click the colour box and select a colour (white is a good choice.)
7) The colour title should now read white.
8) Click OK.
9) Save the page.
10) Upload the page and overwrite the existing file.
11) Refresh the page and your background picture will display.
Note: Please ensure that you have uploaded your background picture jpeg. I forgot to upload the background jpeg once and spent ages trying to sort it before I realised my error.
Regards
Martin