I am trying to create a for loop to index thorugh each individual response variable I have and train a model using the train() funciton within the Caret Package. I have about 30 response variable and 43 predictor variables. I can train each model individually but I would like to automate the process and have a for loop run through a model (I would like to eventually upscale to multiple models if possible, i.e. lm, rf, cubist, etc.). I then want to save each model to a dataframe along with R-squared values and RMSE values. The individual models that I currenlty have that will run for me goes as follows, with column 11 being the response variable and column 35-68 being predictor variables.
data_Mg <- subset(data_3, !is.na(Mg))
mg.lm <- train(Mg~., data=data_Mg[,c(11,35:68)], method="lm", trControl=control)
mg.cubist <- train(Mg~., data=data_Mg[,c(11,35:68)], method="cubist", trControl=control)
mg.rf <- train(Mg~., data=data_Mg[,c(11,35:68)], method="rf", trControl=control, na.action = na.roughfix)
max(mg.lm$results$Rsquared)
min(mg.lm$results$RMSE)
max(mg.cubist$results$Rsquared)
min(mg.cubist$results$RMSE)
max(mg.rf$results$Rsquared) #Highest R squared
min(mg.rf$results$RMSE)
This gives me 3 models with everything the relevant information that I need. Now for the for loop. I've only tried the lm model so far for this.
bucket <- list()
for(i in 1:ncol(data_4)) { # for-loop response variables, need to end it at response variables, rn will run through all variables
data_y<-subset(data_4, !is.na(i))#get rid of NA's in the "i" column
predictors_i <- colnames(data_4)[i] # Create vector of predictor names
predictors_1.1 <- noquote(predictors_i)
i.lm <- train(predictors_1.1~., data=data_4[,c(i,35:68)], method="lm", trControl=control)
bucket <- i.lm
#mod_summaries[[i - 1]] <- summary(lm(y ~ ., data_y[ , c("i.lm", predictors_i)]))
#data_y <- data_4
}
Below is the error code that I am getting, with Bulk_Densi being the first variable in predictors_1.1. The error code is that variable lengths differ so I originally thought that my issue was that quotes were being added around "Bulk_Densi" but after trying the NoQuote() function I have not gotten anywehre so I am unsure of where I am going wrong.
Error code that I am getting
Please let me know if I can provide any extra info and thanks in advance for the help! I've already tried the info in How to train several models within a loop for and was struggling with that as well.
Related
I have created a list that contains all possible combinations of my dependent variables and I am trying to create multiple glm with all of those combinations.
combinations = list()
models = list()
for(i in length(combinations) {
models[[i]]<- glm ( as.formula(paste("(x) ~", combinations[i])), family= 'Gamma' , data = df)
}
I get the error message:
Error: no valid set of coefficients has been found: please supply starting values
I know that is because one or a few models the combination of dependent variables seems to create some issues. How can I skip the models that create those issues (or leave them blank) and keep the loop going?
As a side comment: I tried implementing a normal exponential glm, which worked, but I would really like to stay with the gamma family.
combinations = list()
models = list()
for(i in length(combinations) {
models[[i]]<- glm ( as.formula(paste("exp(x) ~", combinations[i])), family= 'gaussian' , data = df)
}
Many thanks!
I would like to do something with MLFlow but I do not find any solution on Internet. I am working with MLFlow and R, and I want to save a regression model. The thing is that by the time I want to predict the testing data, I want to do some transformation of that data. Then I have:
data <- #some data with numeric regressors and dependent variable called 'y'
# Divide into train and test
ind <- sample(nrow(data), 0.8*nrow(data), replace = FALSE)
dataTrain <- data[ind,]
dataTest <- data[-ind,]
# Run model in the mlflow framework
with(mlflow_start_run(), {
model <- lm(y ~ ., data = dataTrain)
predict_fun <- function(model, data_to_predict){
data_to_predict[,3] <- data_to_predict[,3]/2
data_to_predict[,4] <- data_to_predict[,4] + 1
return(predict(model, data_to_predict))
}
predictor <- crate(~predict_fun(model,dataTest),model)
### Some code to use the predictor to get the predictions and measure the accuracy as a log_metric
##################
##################
##################
mlflow_log_model(predictor,'model')
}
As you can notice, my prediction function not only consists in predict the new data you are evaluating, but it also makes some transformations in the third and fourth columns. All examples I saw on the web use the function predict in the crate as the default function of R.
Once I save this model, when I run it in another notebook with some Test data, I get the error: "predict_fun" doesn't exist. That is because my algorithm has not saved this specific function. Do you know what can I do to save and specific prediction function that I have created instead of the default functions that are in R?
This is not the real example I am working with, but it is an approximation of it. The fact is that I want to save extra functions apart from the model itself.
Thank you very much!
I need to create a table in which i I have the id of the panel data regressions in the rows, and the statistics of the model in the columns. I am trying to extract the results (Statistics, df, p-value) from the Breusch Godfrey test to insert into the table. One remark is that I am running many regressions with the same command. I tried doing
GodfreyallModelsResultsF <- lapply(allModelsList, function(x)
bgtest(plm(x, data=data, model="within")))
GodfreyallModelsResultsF2 <- as.data.frame(
matrix(unlist(GodfreyallModelsResultsF,use.names=TRUE),
nrow=length(unlist(GodfreyallModelsResultsF[1]))))
GodfreyallModelsResultsF <- t(GodfreyallModelsResultsF)
colnames(GodfreyallModelsResultsF) <- c("BPTest","df","name","Pvalue","code")
But it didn't work. One last remark is that I was able to use this code to successfully extract from Breusch Pagan test.
Could someone help me in the B-G issue?
Here is the way of extracting p-value:
model <- plm(x, data = data, model = "within")
as.numeric(pbgtest(model)[4])
Using R 3.2.0 with caret 6.0-41 and randomForest 4.6-10 on a 64-bit Linux machine.
When trying to use the predict() method on a randomForest object trained with the train() function from the caret package using a formula, the function returns an error.
When training via randomForest() and/or using x= and y= rather than a formula, it all runs smoothly.
Here is a working example:
library(randomForest)
library(caret)
data(imports85)
imp85 <- imports85[, c("stroke", "price", "fuelType", "numOfDoors")]
imp85 <- imp85[complete.cases(imp85), ]
imp85[] <- lapply(imp85, function(x) if (is.factor(x)) x[,drop=TRUE] else x) ## Drop empty levels for factors.
modRf1 <- randomForest(numOfDoors~., data=imp85)
caretRf <- train( numOfDoors~., data=imp85, method = "rf" )
modRf2 <- caretRf$finalModel
modRf3 <- randomForest(x=imp85[,c("stroke", "price", "fuelType")], y=imp85[, "numOfDoors"])
caretRf <- train(x=imp85[,c("stroke", "price", "fuelType")], y=imp85[, "numOfDoors"], method = "rf")
modRf4 <- caretRf$finalModel
p1 <- predict(modRf1, newdata=imp85)
p2 <- predict(modRf2, newdata=imp85)
p3 <- predict(modRf3, newdata=imp85)
p4 <- predict(modRf4, newdata=imp85)
Among the last 4 lines, only the second one p2 <- predict(modRf2, newdata=imp85) returns the following error:
Error in predict.randomForest(modRf2, newdata = imp85) :
variables in the training data missing in newdata
It seems that the reason for this error is that the predict.randomForest method uses rownames(object$importance) to determine the name of the variables used to train the random forest object. And when looking at
rownames(modRf1$importance)
rownames(modRf2$importance)
rownames(modRf3$importance)
rownames(modRf4$importance)
We see:
[1] "stroke" "price" "fuelType"
[1] "stroke" "price" "fuelTypegas"
[1] "stroke" "price" "fuelType"
[1] "stroke" "price" "fuelType"
So somehow, when using the caret train() function with a formula changes the name of the (factor) variables in the importance field of the randomForest object.
Is it really an inconsistency between the formula and and non-formula version of the caret train() function? Or am I missing something?
First, almost never use the $finalModel object for prediction. Use predict.train. This is one good example of why.
There is some inconsistency between how some functions (including randomForest and train) handle dummy variables. Most functions in R that use the formula method will convert factor predictors to dummy variables because their models require numerical representations of the data. The exceptions to this are tree- and rule-based models (that can split on categorical predictors), naive Bayes, and a few others.
So randomForest will not create dummy variables when you use randomForest(y ~ ., data = dat) but train (and most others) will using a call like train(y ~ ., data = dat).
The error occurs because fuelType is a factor. The dummy variables created by train don't have the same names so predict.randomForest can't find them.
Using the non-formula method with train will pass the factor predictors to randomForest and everything will work.
TL;DR
Use the non-formula method with train if you want the same levels or use predict.train
There can be two reasons why you get this error.
1. The categories of the categorical variables in the train and test sets don't match. To check that, you can run something like the following.
Well, first of all, it is good practice to keep the independent variables/features in a list. Say that list is "vars". And say, you separated "Data" into "Train" and "Test". Let's go:
for (v in vars){
if (class(Data[,v]) == 'factor'){
print(v)
# print(levels(Train[,v]))
# print(levels(Test[,v]))
print(all.equal(levels(Train[,v]) , levels(Test[,v])))
}
}
Once you find the non-matching categorical variables, you can go back, and impose the categories of Test data onto Train data, and then re-build your model. In a loop similar to above, for each nonMatchingVar, you can do
levels(Test$nonMatchingVar) <- levels(Train$nonMatchingVar)
2. A silly one. If you accidentally leave the dependent variable in the set of independent variables, you may run into this error message. I have done that mistake. Solution: Just be more careful.
Another way is to explicitly code the testing data using model.matrix, e.g.
p2 <- predict(modRf2, newdata=model.matrix(~., imp85))
I am doing just a regular logistic regression using the caret package in R. I have a binomial response variable coded 1 or 0 that is called a SALES_FLAG and 140 numeric response variables that I used dummyVars function in R to transform to dummy variables.
data <- dummyVars(~., data = data_2, fullRank=TRUE,sep="_",levelsOnly = FALSE )
dummies<-(predict(data, data_2))
model_data<- as.data.frame(dummies)
This gives me a data frame to work with. All of the variables are numeric. Next I split into training and testing:
trainIndex <- createDataPartition(model_data$SALE_FLAG, p = .80,list = FALSE)
train <- model_data[ trainIndex,]
test <- model_data[-trainIndex,]
Time to train my model using the train function:
model <- train(SALE_FLAG~. data=train,method = "glm")
Everything runs nice and I get a model. But when I run the predict function it does not give me what I need:
predict(model, newdata =test,type="prob")
and I get an ERROR:
Error in dimnames(out)[[2]] <- modelFit$obsLevels :
length of 'dimnames' [2] not equal to array extent
On the other hand when I replace "prob" with "raw" for type inside of the predict function I get prediction but I need probabilities so I can code them into binary variable given my threshold.
Not sure why this happens. I did the same thing without using the caret package and it worked how it should:
model2 <- glm(SALE_FLAG ~ ., family = binomial(logit), data = train)
predict(model2, newdata =test, type="response")
I spend some time looking at this but not sure what is going on and it seems very weird to me. I have tried many variations of the train function meaning I didn't use the formula and used X and Y. I used method = 'bayesglm' as well to check and id gave me the same error. I hope someone can help me out. I don't need to use it since the train function to get what I need but caret package is a good package with lots of tools and I would like to be able to figure this out.
Show us str(train) and str(test). I suspect the outcome variable is numeric, which makes train think that you are doing regression. That should also be apparent from printing model. Make it a factor if you want to do classification.
Max