Which two conditions do you test with a unit test? (Choose Two)
A . A data page populates without any errors.
B . A property value is set correctly by a data transform.
C . An application displays user views for 20 users within three
seconds.
D . An application is successfully migrated to a test system.
My answer is A and C. Can someone confirm it, and If different please explain.
A & B can be tested using Pega Unit tests
Related
I'm trying to find inactive members in my GitLab-CE instance via the Gitlab API (v4).
One of the criteria for "(in)activity" is, whether a given user is member of any project or group.
While this information seems to be readily available via the webinterface (Groups and projects tab on the user's overview page in the admin area), I cannot find that information via the API.
The only way i currently found is, to iterate over all projects (resp. groups) and check whether the user is member thereof.
This strikes me as very slow (as there are probably zillions of projects), so I'm looking for a more direct way to query the system for all projects where user is member-of.
As in doc(https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/api/members.html), you can use:
GET /groups/:id/members
GET /projects/:id/members
to get only members added directly in a group/project
or:
GET /groups/:id/members/all
GET /projects/:id/members/all
to get all members (even those inherit from groups above)
---EDIT regards to #Nico question ---
In order to know if a user is a member of a project the solution tested by #umläute is to iterate over project members then all subgroup untill it reaches the user:
Given \fu\bar\project_p
With project_p.id = 1
bar.id = 10
fu.id = 100
Is user 'Nico' a member of project_p ?
GET /projects/1/members returns ('Paul') / No
GET /groups/10/members returns ('Marc', 'Jean') / No
GET /groups/100/members returns ('Nico') / Yes
Instead Gitlab provide an other API :
GET /projects/1/members/all returns ('Paul', 'Marc', 'Jean', 'Nico') / Yes
In order to test how the filter by user property works , I've did the bellow test :
1. I've run the bellow code, which set user property favorite_food to pizza . and send event called test_audience_event2 . it should associate the property to the event . right ?
FIRAnalytics.setUserPropertyString("pizza", forName: "favorite_food2")
FIRAnalytics.logEventWithName("test_audience_event2", parameters: nil)
after 24 hours, i succeed to see test_audience_event2 as you can see in the bellow picture:
2. Now I've set filter = userProperty.favorite_food2.pizza, but i got nothing as i can see in the bellow picture. why ?
Thanks.
Audiences have a 10 users threshold before showing data, maybe filtering also have a 10 users threshold ? Have you try launching your on 10 different device, or install-launch-uninstall-reinstall etc 10 times on one devices ?
I currently have an application using flask-sqlalchemy. My model is connected to a postgresql database, and now I would like to write unit tests (using nose). I was told to use SQLite to create a new database for testing, and after a lot of searching (and looking at the texting section on the flask-sqlalchemy website) I'm still confused as how to do it. Each class in my model.py looks something like the following:
db = SQLAlchemy(app)
class Prod(db.Model):
__tablename__ = 'prod'
id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True)
desc = db.Column(db.String)
def __init__(self, id, desc):
self.id = id
self.desc = desc
My config.py:
app = Flask(__name__)
app.config['SQLALCHEMY_DATABASE_URI'] = 'postgres://name:pass#server/db
and I would like to test my insert functions in a new file by setting up and tearing down a new database for each test. If anyone can give me some example code that would be great. Thanks!
I can't answer your specific question, but will provide some general advise:
You will find that setting up and tearing down the complete database for each test will be too slow. Imagine in the future when you might have hundreds of tests or even thousands.
The approach we take is:
For testing purposes we have a database populated with test data. We have a script which creates a fresh database and populates it with this test data.
We run this script prior to running our test suite. All tests can assume this data exists.
Each test may create additional records if necessary, but it is their responsibility to undo any changes they make (delete new records, undo changes) - in order words to leave the database in the same state as it was before the test began. This prevents tests from interfering with each other.
In a project I manage we have a test suite of 1070 tests which runs in about 5 minutes using this approach.
What if we had taken your approach? Let's assume that 50% of these tests actually exercise the database (and need a fresh reload). That's 1070 * .50 * 20 seconds for the reload / 3600 = 2.97 hours. Oops - that's far too slow to be useful.
Even at a much smaller scale though, you'll be much happier if your test suite runs in 1 minute instead of 20 minutes.
I want to download HTML default report for a test run from Performance Center storage (using Rest API). Actually I need just summary.html file.
I was using the following steps in PC 11.5:
Request test scenarios:
http://{server:port}/qcbin/rest/domains/{domain}/projects/{project}/tests?fields=id,last-modified,name,owner&query={subtype-id[=PERFORMANCE-TEST]}&page-size=max
Let user choose the scenario (id) and request all its runs:
http://{server:port}/qcbin/rest/domains/{domain}/projects/{project}/runs?page-size=max&fields=id,owner,pc-start-time,duration,status,test-id&query={test-id[=234]}
Let user choose the run (id) and request Report (result entity):
http://{server:port}/qcbin/rest/domains/{domain}/projects/{project}/results?page-size=max&query={run-id[=123];name[=Reports]}&fields=id,name
Request "summary.html" file using file-id taken from previous step response:
http://{server:port}/qcbin/rest/domains/{domain}/projects/{project}/results/{file-id}/storage/report/summary.html
However it is not working with Performance Center 11.0. It fails at last step:
qccore.general-error
Not Found
I guess it is because the path of report was changed.
Can someone tell the path for summary.html for Performance Center 11.0?
I've been able to have a little bit of success with this. Rather than use the request you are using above I used the following:
http://{server:port}/qcbin/rest/domains/{domain}/projects/{project}/results/{file-id}/logical-storage/
This gave me a zip file, which contained the report inside it.
I have a broker query where I need to sort by 2 different fields (using JSP and 2011 SP1)
The API has the method "addSorting" which I am applying.
It appears, however, that the second addSorting call is overwriting the first addSorting call - rather than adding the second sort:
// Sort by Date
CustomMetaKeyColumn customMetaKeyColumnDate = new CustomMetaKeyColumn("date", MetadataType.DATE);
query.addSorting(new SortParameter(customMetaKeyColumnDate, SortParameter.DESCENDING));
// Sort by Owner
CustomMetaKeyColumn customMetaKeyColumnOwner = new CustomMetaKeyColumn("owner", MetadataType.STRING);
query.addSorting(new SortParameter(customMetaKeyColumnOwner, SortParameter.ASCENDING));
They sorts work fine individually.
Is this expected? Is addSorting really a setSorting - where only 1 sort can be specified or am I missing a way to combine 2 sorts?
The addSorting method works just fine. However, it simply does not work for CustomMeta columns!!! There is already a confirmed defect regarding this subject with the following summary: "SortParameter does not work with two metadata fields". This is still an open defect for 2011SP1 and is scheduled to be fixed only for the next release.
Cheers,
Daniel.