I have an app that uses CosmosDb as the database and using AspNetIdentityDocument. When I call var result = await _signInManager.PasswordSignInAsync(model.UserName, model.Password, model.RememberMe, false), i get the error Cross partition query is required but disabled. Please set x-ms-documentdb-query-enablecrosspartition to true, specify x-ms-documentdb-partitionkey
void InitializeDocumentClient(DocumentClient client) code attempts to create the container if not there. It works for the creating the container on my CossmosDb emultated store but fails on the Azure store requiring a partition key! My app works on the emulated store!
Program.cs
builder.Services.AddDefaultDocumentClientForIdentity(
builder.Configuration.GetValue<Uri>("DocumentDbClient:EndpointUri"),
builder.Configuration.GetValue<string>("DocumentDbClient:AuthorizationKey"),
afterCreation: InitializeDocumentClient);
builder.Services.AddIdentity<ApplicationUser, DocumentDbIdentityRole>()
.AddDocumentDbStores(options =>
{
options.UserStoreDocumentCollection = "AspNetIdentity";
options.Database = "RNPbooking";
})
.AddDefaultTokenProviders();
void InitializeDocumentClient(DocumentClient client)
{
try
{
var db = client.ReadDatabaseAsync(UriFactory.CreateDatabaseUri("RNPbooking")).Result;
}
catch (AggregateException ae)
{
ae.Handle(ex =>
{
if (ex.GetType() == typeof(DocumentClientException) && ((DocumentClientException)ex).StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
{
var db = client.CreateDatabaseAsync(new Microsoft.Azure.Documents.Database() { Id = "RNPbooking" }).Result;
return true;
}
return false;
});
}
try
{
var collection = client.ReadDocumentCollectionAsync(UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri("RNPbooking", "AspNetIdentity")).Result;
}
catch (AggregateException ae)
{
ae.Handle(ex =>
{
if (ex.GetType() == typeof(DocumentClientException) && ((DocumentClientException)ex).StatusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound)
{
DocumentCollection collection = new DocumentCollection()
{
Id = "AspNetIdentity"
};
collection = client.CreateDocumentCollectionAsync(UriFactory.CreateDatabaseUri("RNPbooking"),collection).Result;
return true;
}
return false;
});
}
}
Controller
[Authorize(Roles = "Admin)]
public class AdminController : Controller
{
private readonly UserManager<ApplicationUser> _userManager;
private readonly SignInManager<ApplicationUser> _signInManager;
public CosmosClient _client;
public AdminController(
UserManager<ApplicationUser> userManager,
SignInManager<ApplicationUser> signInManager,
)
{
_userManager = userManager;
_signInManager = signInManager;
}
You need to fill in CreateDocumentCollectionUri method with FeedOptions object as a parameter
UriFactory.CreateDocumentCollectionUri(DatabaseId, CollectionId),new FeedOptions { EnableCrossPartitionQuery=true})
UPDATED: From the code examples, you seem to be using this library https://github.com/codekoenig/AspNetCore.Identity.DocumentDb, AspNetCore.Identity.DocumentDb.
This error means the library you are using is performing a Document Query in their code at some point, it is not related to the creation of the Database or Collection.
The library code must be using CreateDocumentQuery somewhere, that code is missing:
new FeedOptions { EnableCrossPartitionQuery = true };
If you search their code base, you will see multiple scenarios like that: https://github.com/codekoenig/AspNetCore.Identity.DocumentDb/search?q=CreateDocumentQuery
Because this code is out of your control, you should try and contact the owner to see if this is a fix they can do on their end. The code for the library doesn't seem to have been updated in several years, so maybe this library is not maintained?
Related
I set up my mock object using Moq like this:
var accountRepositoryMock = new Mock<IGenericRepository<Account>>();
accountRepositoryMock.Setup(r => r.SingleOrDefault(a => a.AccountId == It.IsAny<long>())).Returns(new Account { AccountId = 99999999, Valid = true });
var unitOfWorkMock = new Mock<IUnitOfWork>();
unitOfWorkMock.SetupGet(unitofwork => unitofwork.AccountRepository).Returns(accountRepositoryMock.Object);
Then I pass it to my service like this:
IQuickPayService quickPayService = new QuickPayService(unitOfWorkMock.Object);
Account account = quickPayService.ValidateAccount(accountId);
When I do this in my client code, I am getting account as null
public class QuickPayService : IQuickPayService
{
public QuickPayService(IUnitOfWork unitOfWork)
{
_unitOfWork = unitOfWork;
}
public AccountStatus ValidateAccount(long accountId)
{
var account;
using (_unitOfWork)
{
account = _unitOfWork.AccountRepository.SingleOrDefault(acc => acc.AccountId == 99999999);
}
return account;
}
}
Any ideas on what I am doing wrong?
Assuming that your interface is declared similarly to the following:
public interface IGenericRepository<T>
{
T SingleOrDefault(Func<T, bool> predicate);
}
Specifying a delegate in Setup won't work. See Issue 300: Mocking Method with Delegate as Parameter. I get a NotSupportedException when I tried it.
Instead, try this:
accountRepositoryMock.Setup(r => r.SingleOrDefault(It.IsAny<Func<Account, bool>>()))
.Returns(new Account { AccountId = 99999999, Valid = true });
There's a more detailed example at Moq framework Func<T,T>
I'm having some serious issues with Fluent Nhibernate in my ASP.NET WebForms app when trying to modify a child object and then saving the parent object.
My solution is currently made of 2 projects :
Core : A class library where all entities & repositories classes are located
Website : The ASP.NET 4.5 WebForms application
Here is my simple mapping for my Employee object:
public class EmployeeMap : ClassMap<Employee>
{
public EmployeeMap()
{
Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
Map(x => x.DateCreated);
Map(x => x.Username);
Map(x => x.FirstName);
Map(x => x.LastName);
HasMany(x => x.TimeEntries).Inverse().Cascade.All().KeyColumn("Employee_id");
}
}
Here is my my mapping for the TimeEntry object:
public class TimeEntryMap : ClassMap<TimeEntry>
{
public TimeEntryMap()
{
Id(x => x.Id).GeneratedBy.Identity();
Map(x => x.DateCreated);
Map(x => x.Date);
Map(x => x.Length);
References(x => x.Employee).Column("Employee_id").Not.Nullable();
}
}
As stated in the title, i'm using one session per request in my web app, using this code in Gobal.asax:
public static ISessionFactory SessionFactory = Core.SessionFactoryManager.CreateSessionFactory();
public static ISession CurrentSession
{
get { return (ISession)HttpContext.Current.Items["current.session"]; }
set { HttpContext.Current.Items["current.session"] = value; }
}
protected Global()
{
BeginRequest += delegate
{
System.Diagnostics.Debug.WriteLine("New Session");
CurrentSession = SessionFactory.OpenSession();
};
EndRequest += delegate
{
if (CurrentSession != null)
CurrentSession.Dispose();
};
}
Also, here is my SessionFactoryManager class:
public class SessionFactoryManager
{
public static ISession CurrentSession;
public static ISessionFactory CreateSessionFactory()
{
return Fluently.Configure()
.Database(MsSqlConfiguration.MsSql2008.ConnectionString(c => c.FromConnectionStringWithKey("Website.Properties.Settings.WebSiteConnString")))
.Mappings(m => m
.FluentMappings.AddFromAssembly(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly()))
.ExposeConfiguration(cfg => new SchemaUpdate(cfg).Execute(false, true))
.BuildSessionFactory();
}
public static ISession GetSession()
{
return (ISession)HttpContext.Current.Items["current.session"];
}
}
Here is one of my repository class, the one i use to handle the Employee's object data operations:
public class EmployeeRepository<T> : IRepository<T> where T : Employee
{
private readonly ISession _session;
public EmployeeRepository(ISession session)
{
_session = session;
}
public T GetById(int id)
{
T result = null;
using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
result = _session.Get<T>(id);
tx.Commit();
}
return result;
}
public IList<T> GetAll()
{
IList<T> result = null;
using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
result = _session.Query<T>().ToList();
tx.Commit();
}
return result;
}
public bool Save(T item)
{
var result = false;
using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
_session.SaveOrUpdate(item);
tx.Commit();
result = true;
}
return result;
}
public bool Delete(T item)
{
var result = false;
using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
_session.Delete(_session.Load(typeof (T), item.Id));
tx.Commit();
result = true;
}
return result;
}
public int Count()
{
var result = 0;
using (ITransaction tx = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
result = _session.Query<T>().Count();
tx.Commit();
}
return result;
}
}
Now, here is my problem. When i'm trying to insert Employee(s), everything is fine. Updating is also perfect... well, as long as i'm not updating one of the TimeEntry object referenced in the "TimeEntries" property of Employee...
Here is where an exception is raised (in a ASPX file of the web project):
var emp = new Employee(1);
foreach (var timeEntry in emp.TimeEntries)
{
timeEntry.Length += 1;
}
emp.Save();
Here is the exception that is raised:
[NonUniqueObjectException: a different object with the same identifier
value was already associated with the session: 1, of entity:
Core.Entities.Employee]
Basically, whenever I try to
Load an employee and
Modify one of the saved TimeEntry, I get that exception.
FYI, I tried replacing the SaveOrUpdate() in the repository for Merge(). It did an excellent job, but when creating an object using Merge(), my object never gets it's Id set.
I also tried creating and flushing the ISession in each function of my repository. It made no sense because as soon as i was trying to load the TimeEntries property of an Employee, an exception was raised, saying the object could not be lazy-loaded as the ISession was closed...
I'm at lost and would appreciate some help. Any suggestion for my repository is also welcome, as i'm quite new to this.
Thanks you guys!
This code
var emp = new Employee(1);
foreach (var timeEntry in emp.TimeEntries)
{
timeEntry.Length += 1;
}
emp.Save();
is creating a new Employee object, presumable with an ID of 1 passed through the constructor. You should be loading the Employee from the database, and your Employee object should not allow the ID to be set since you are using an identity column. Also, a new Employee would not have any TimeEntries and the error message clearly points to an Employee instance as the problem.
I'm not a fan of transactions inside repositories and I'm really not a fan of generic repositories. Why is your EmployeeRepository a generic? Shouldn't it be
public class EmployeeRepository : IRepository<Employee>
I think your code should look something like:
var repository = new EmployeeRepository(session);
var emp = repository.GetById(1);
foreach (var timeEntry in emp.TimeEntries)
{
timeEntry.Length += 1;
}
repository.Save(emp);
Personally I prefer to work directly with the ISession:
using (var txn = _session.BeginTransaction())
{
var emp = _session.Get<Employee>(1);
foreach (var timeEntry in emp.TimeEntries)
{
timeEntry.Length += 1;
}
txn.Commit();
}
This StackOverflow Answer gives an excellent description of using merge.
But...
I believe that you are facing issues with setting up a correct session pattern for your application.
I you suggest to take a look at session-per-request pattern
where in you create a single NHibernate session object per request. the session is opened when the request is received and closed/flushed on generating a response.
Also make sure that instead of using SessionFactory.OpenSession() to get a session try using SessionFactory.GetCurrentSession() which puts the onus on NHibernate to return you the current correct session.
I hope this pushes you in the right direction.
"How can i use engine in my console application"
I shouldn't use the ITemplate-interface and Transform-Method.
I am using Tridion 2011
Could anyone please suggest me.
You can't. The Engine class is part of the TOM.NET and that API is explicitly reserved for use in:
Template Building Blocks
Event Handlers
For all other cases (such as console applications) you should use the Core Service.
There are many good questions (and articles on other web sites) already:
https://stackoverflow.com/search?q=%5Btridion%5D+core+service
http://www.google.com/#q=tridion+core+service
If you get stuck along the way, show us the relevant code+configuration you have and what error message your get (or at what step you are stuck) and we'll try to help from there.
From a console application you should use the Core Service. I wrote a small example using the Core Service to search for items in the content manager.
Console.WriteLine("FullTextQuery:");
var fullTextQuery = Console.ReadLine();
if (String.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(fullTextQuery) || fullTextQuery.Equals(":q", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase))
{
break;
}
Console.WriteLine("SearchIn IdRef:");
var searchInIdRef = Console.ReadLine();
var queryData = new SearchQueryData
{
FullTextQuery = fullTextQuery,
SearchIn = new LinkToIdentifiableObjectData
{
IdRef = searchInIdRef
}
};
var results = coreServiceClient.GetSearchResults(queryData);
results.ToList().ForEach(result => Console.WriteLine("{0} ({1})", result.Title, result.Id));
Add a reference to Tridion.ContentManager.CoreService.Client to your Visual Studio Project.
Code of the Core Service Client Provider:
public interface ICoreServiceProvider
{
CoreServiceClient GetCoreServiceClient();
}
public class CoreServiceDefaultProvider : ICoreServiceProvider
{
private CoreServiceClient _client;
public CoreServiceClient GetCoreServiceClient()
{
return _client ?? (_client = new CoreServiceClient());
}
}
And the client itself:
public class CoreServiceClient : IDisposable
{
public SessionAwareCoreServiceClient ProxyClient;
private const string DefaultEndpointName = "netTcp_2011";
public CoreServiceClient(string endPointName)
{
if(string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(endPointName))
{
throw new ArgumentNullException("endPointName", "EndPointName is not specified.");
}
ProxyClient = new SessionAwareCoreServiceClient(endPointName);
}
public CoreServiceClient() : this(DefaultEndpointName) { }
public string GetApiVersionNumber()
{
return ProxyClient.GetApiVersion();
}
public IdentifiableObjectData[] GetSearchResults(SearchQueryData filter)
{
return ProxyClient.GetSearchResults(filter);
}
public IdentifiableObjectData Read(string id)
{
return ProxyClient.Read(id, new ReadOptions());
}
public ApplicationData ReadApplicationData(string subjectId, string applicationId)
{
return ProxyClient.ReadApplicationData(subjectId, applicationId);
}
public void Dispose()
{
if (ProxyClient.State == CommunicationState.Faulted)
{
ProxyClient.Abort();
}
else
{
ProxyClient.Close();
}
}
}
When you want to perform CRUD actions through the core service you can implement the following methods in the client:
public IdentifiableObjectData CreateItem(IdentifiableObjectData data)
{
data = ProxyClient.Create(data, new ReadOptions());
return data;
}
public IdentifiableObjectData UpdateItem(IdentifiableObjectData data)
{
data = ProxyClient.Update(data, new ReadOptions());
return data;
}
public IdentifiableObjectData ReadItem(string id)
{
return ProxyClient.Read(id, new ReadOptions());
}
To construct a data object of e.g. a Component you can implement a Component Builder class that implements a create method that does this for you:
public ComponentData Create(string folderUri, string title, string content)
{
var data = new ComponentData()
{
Id = "tcm:0-0-0",
Title = title,
Content = content,
LocationInfo = new LocationInfo()
};
data.LocationInfo.OrganizationalItem = new LinkToOrganizationalItemData
{
IdRef = folderUri
};
using (CoreServiceClient client = provider.GetCoreServiceClient())
{
data = (ComponentData)client.CreateItem(data);
}
return data;
}
Hope this gets you started.
I'm using a Linq query to retrieve entities from an SQL server using the Entity Framework. When I update an entitiy, the EF is caching the result. I suspect this is because the ObjectContext is in a static variable (below). The only way to refresh the data using my code below is to call a method and set _db to null when there might be stale data displayed (Eg: in a GridView). Is there a way to just prevent it from caching, or to add some sort of end request handler to call this method on my data layer instead of needing to detect when there may be stale data displayed?
private static ServiceEntities _db;
protected static ServiceEntitiesDb
{
get
{
if (_db == null)
{
_db = new ServiceEntities();
_db.Contacts.MergeOption = MergeOption.OverwriteChanges; // failed
}
return _db;
}
}
public static IEnumerable<Contact> GetContactsByName(string name) {
var items = Db.Contacts;
var filteredName = items.Where(i => (i.Name??string.Empty).IndexOf(name) >=0);
return filteredName;
}
The slightly verbose solution (which I wanted to avoid) is to wrap it in a using block. Ie:
public static IEnumerable<Contact> GetContactsByName(string name) {
var items = Db.Contacts;
var filteredName = items.Where(i => (i.Name??string.Empty).IndexOf(name) >=0);
return filteredName;
}
Becomes
public static IEnumerable<Contact> GetContactsByName(string name) {
using (var db = new SomeContext()) {
var items = db.Contacts;
var filteredName = items.Where(i => (i.Name??string.Empty).IndexOf(name) >=0);
return filteredName;
}
}
Somehow this update code is not working:
Here is my Controller code:
private UserRepository repo = new UserRepository();
[AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)]
public ActionResult Edit(int id, UserInfo user_)
{
try
{
repo.UpdateUser(user_);
return RedirectToAction("Index");
}
catch
{
return View();
}
}
Here is the repo code that is used above (UserRepository)
private UsersDataContext db = new UsersDataContext();
public void UpdateUser(UserInfo user_)
{
UserInfo origUser = GetUser(user_.Id);
origUser.First = user_.First;
origUser.Last = user_.Last;
origUser.City = user_.City;
origUser.Country = user_.Country;
origUser.State = user_.State;
origUser.Street_Address = user_.Street_Address;
db.SubmitChanges();
}
public UserInfo GetUser(int id_)
{
return db.UserInfos.SingleOrDefault(d => d.Id == id_);
}
EDIT:
Note that when debugging everything is running fine (no exceptions) but when it redirects back to Index the data has not been updated when the changes from the update.
i just changed the userrepository to the following:
private UsersDataContext db = new UsersDataContext();
public void UpdateUser(UserInfo user_)
{
UserInfo origUser = db.UserInfos.SingleOrDefault(d => d.Id == id_);
origUser.First = user_.First;
origUser.Last = user_.Last;
origUser.City = user_.City;
origUser.Country = user_.Country;
origUser.State = user_.State;
origUser.Street_Address = user_.Street_Address;
db.SubmitChanges();
}
so all i did was move the GetUser() method inline and it worked.
It might have been a red herring and it was just a caching issue . .
You don't mention how you've defined UserInfo, is it a struct or a class?
If it's a struct, returning it from GetUser will create a new object and thus you will not update the database object, only a local copy of it.
Moving the GetUser inline avoid this temp copy creation and that's likely why it's working.
afaik you could do something like
public void GetUser(int id_, out UserInfo user_)
{
user_ = db.UserInfos.SingleOrDefault(d => d.Id == id_);
}
You would then call it like this
public void UpdateUser(UserInfo user_)
{
UserInfo origUser;
GetUser(user_.Id, out origUser);
origUser.First = user_.First;
origUser.Last = user_.Last;
origUser.City = user_.City;
origUser.Country = user_.Country;
origUser.State = user_.State;
origUser.Street_Address = user_.Street_Address;
db.SubmitChanges();
}
Maybe you disabled Object Tracking?