Which element overlaps which if margin has a negative value [duplicate] - css

So if I understand z-index correctly, it would be perfect in this situation:
I want to place the bottom image (the tag/card) below the div above it. So you can't see the sharp edges. How do I do this?
z-index:-1 // on the image tag/card
or
z-index:100 // on the div above
doesn't work either. Neither does a combination of anything like this. How come?

The z-index property only works on elements with a position value other than static (e.g. position: absolute;, position: relative;, or position: fixed).
There is also position: sticky; that is supported in Firefox, is prefixed in Safari, worked for a time in older versions of Chrome under a custom flag, and is under consideration by Microsoft to add to their Edge browser.

If you set position to other value than static but your element's z-index still doesn't seem to work, it may be that some parent element has z-index set.
The stacking contexts have hierarchy, and each stacking context is considered in the stacking order of the parent's stacking context.
So with following html
div { border: 2px solid #000; width: 100px; height: 30px; margin: 10px; position: relative; background-color: #FFF; }
#el3 { background-color: #F0F; width: 100px; height: 60px; top: -50px; }
<div id="el1" style="z-index: 5"></div>
<div id="el2" style="z-index: 3">
<div id="el3" style="z-index: 8"></div>
</div>
no matter how big the z-index of el3 will be set, it will always be under el1 because it's parent has lower stacking context. You can imagine stacking order as levels where stacking order of el3 is actually 3.8 which is lower than 5.
If you want to check stacking contexts of parent elements, you can use this:
var el = document.getElementById("#yourElement"); // or use $0 in chrome;
do {
var styles = window.getComputedStyle(el);
console.log(styles.zIndex, el);
} while(el.parentElement && (el = el.parentElement));
There is a great article about stacking contexts on MDN

Your elements need to have a position attribute. (e.g. absolute, relative, fixed) or z-index won't work.

In many cases an element must be positioned for z-index to work.
Indeed, applying position: relative to the elements in the question would likely solve the problem (but there's not enough code provided to know for sure).
Actually, position: fixed, position: absolute and position: sticky will also enable z-index, but those values also change the layout. With position: relative the layout isn't disturbed.
Essentially, as long as the element isn't position: static (the default setting) it is considered positioned and z-index will work.
Many answers to "Why isn't z-index working?" questions assert that z-index only works on positioned elements. As of CSS3, this is no longer true.
Elements that are flex items or grid items can use z-index even when position is static.
From the specs:
4.3. Flex Item Z-Ordering
Flex items paint exactly the same as inline blocks, except that order-modified document order is used in place of raw
document order, and z-index values other than auto create a stacking context even if position is static.
5.4. Z-axis Ordering: the z-index property
The painting order of grid items is exactly the same as inline blocks, except that order-modified document order is
used in place of raw document order, and z-index values other than auto create a stacking context even if
position is static.
Here's a demonstration of z-index working on non-positioned flex items: https://jsfiddle.net/m0wddwxs/

Make sure that this element you would like to control with z-index does not have a parent with z-index property, because element is in a lower stacking context due to its parent’s z-index level.
Here's an example:
<section class="content">
<div class="modal"></div>
</section>
<div class="side-tab"></div>
// CSS //
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
.modal {
position: fixed;
z-index: 100;
}
.side-tab {
position: fixed;
z-index: 5;
}
In the example above, the modal has a higher z-index than the content, although the content will appear on top of the modal because "content" is the parent with a z-index property.
Here's an article that explains 4 reasons why z-index might not work:
https://coder-coder.com/z-index-isnt-working/

Z-index needs these to work:
Position: relative, absolute, fixed, ..
Make sure that the parent element hasn't overflow: hidden;

I have had the same problem with z-index
and you believe me or not it's fixed just by setting the background color
like this
background-color: white;

If all else fails, look for syntax errors in your HTML. It's not intuitive, but I've seen it be the reason why z-index doesn't work.
The following code has invalid HTML syntax:
<div class="over"/>
<div class="under"/>
...(it's is invalid syntax because a div isn't a self closing tag).
CSS properties that were applied to these rogue HTML elements, such as background-color: black, position: fixed, width: 150px, and top:150px, were all working as expected. However, the z-index: 2 property wasn't working under the exact same conditions.
Only when the invalid HTML was fixed did the z-index work correctly.
I'm not sure why z-index was pickier than the other CSS attributes, but maybe this answer can help someone.

In my case I had my Navbar's opacity to 0.9, I got my answer from codercoder.com, as I removed the opacity property from my Navbar's css, z-index worked

just give position other that static. And u should give both container a position than it will work.

Related

Is there stacking context(z-index) priority? [duplicate]

So if I understand z-index correctly, it would be perfect in this situation:
I want to place the bottom image (the tag/card) below the div above it. So you can't see the sharp edges. How do I do this?
z-index:-1 // on the image tag/card
or
z-index:100 // on the div above
doesn't work either. Neither does a combination of anything like this. How come?
The z-index property only works on elements with a position value other than static (e.g. position: absolute;, position: relative;, or position: fixed).
There is also position: sticky; that is supported in Firefox, is prefixed in Safari, worked for a time in older versions of Chrome under a custom flag, and is under consideration by Microsoft to add to their Edge browser.
If you set position to other value than static but your element's z-index still doesn't seem to work, it may be that some parent element has z-index set.
The stacking contexts have hierarchy, and each stacking context is considered in the stacking order of the parent's stacking context.
So with following html
div { border: 2px solid #000; width: 100px; height: 30px; margin: 10px; position: relative; background-color: #FFF; }
#el3 { background-color: #F0F; width: 100px; height: 60px; top: -50px; }
<div id="el1" style="z-index: 5"></div>
<div id="el2" style="z-index: 3">
<div id="el3" style="z-index: 8"></div>
</div>
no matter how big the z-index of el3 will be set, it will always be under el1 because it's parent has lower stacking context. You can imagine stacking order as levels where stacking order of el3 is actually 3.8 which is lower than 5.
If you want to check stacking contexts of parent elements, you can use this:
var el = document.getElementById("#yourElement"); // or use $0 in chrome;
do {
var styles = window.getComputedStyle(el);
console.log(styles.zIndex, el);
} while(el.parentElement && (el = el.parentElement));
There is a great article about stacking contexts on MDN
Your elements need to have a position attribute. (e.g. absolute, relative, fixed) or z-index won't work.
In many cases an element must be positioned for z-index to work.
Indeed, applying position: relative to the elements in the question would likely solve the problem (but there's not enough code provided to know for sure).
Actually, position: fixed, position: absolute and position: sticky will also enable z-index, but those values also change the layout. With position: relative the layout isn't disturbed.
Essentially, as long as the element isn't position: static (the default setting) it is considered positioned and z-index will work.
Many answers to "Why isn't z-index working?" questions assert that z-index only works on positioned elements. As of CSS3, this is no longer true.
Elements that are flex items or grid items can use z-index even when position is static.
From the specs:
4.3. Flex Item Z-Ordering
Flex items paint exactly the same as inline blocks, except that order-modified document order is used in place of raw
document order, and z-index values other than auto create a stacking context even if position is static.
5.4. Z-axis Ordering: the z-index property
The painting order of grid items is exactly the same as inline blocks, except that order-modified document order is
used in place of raw document order, and z-index values other than auto create a stacking context even if
position is static.
Here's a demonstration of z-index working on non-positioned flex items: https://jsfiddle.net/m0wddwxs/
Make sure that this element you would like to control with z-index does not have a parent with z-index property, because element is in a lower stacking context due to its parent’s z-index level.
Here's an example:
<section class="content">
<div class="modal"></div>
</section>
<div class="side-tab"></div>
// CSS //
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
.modal {
position: fixed;
z-index: 100;
}
.side-tab {
position: fixed;
z-index: 5;
}
In the example above, the modal has a higher z-index than the content, although the content will appear on top of the modal because "content" is the parent with a z-index property.
Here's an article that explains 4 reasons why z-index might not work:
https://coder-coder.com/z-index-isnt-working/
Z-index needs these to work:
Position: relative, absolute, fixed, ..
Make sure that the parent element hasn't overflow: hidden;
I have had the same problem with z-index
and you believe me or not it's fixed just by setting the background color
like this
background-color: white;
If all else fails, look for syntax errors in your HTML. It's not intuitive, but I've seen it be the reason why z-index doesn't work.
The following code has invalid HTML syntax:
<div class="over"/>
<div class="under"/>
...(it's is invalid syntax because a div isn't a self closing tag).
CSS properties that were applied to these rogue HTML elements, such as background-color: black, position: fixed, width: 150px, and top:150px, were all working as expected. However, the z-index: 2 property wasn't working under the exact same conditions.
Only when the invalid HTML was fixed did the z-index work correctly.
I'm not sure why z-index was pickier than the other CSS attributes, but maybe this answer can help someone.
In my case I had my Navbar's opacity to 0.9, I got my answer from codercoder.com, as I removed the opacity property from my Navbar's css, z-index worked
just give position other that static. And u should give both container a position than it will work.

Overlaying two sections with CSS

I'm working in a design and I need to overlay one section over other keeping a curve like this
Design
So I've created two sections first (blue) and second (gray), and looks like this
Pre CSS
I am using the property translateY to raise the second section but it covers the first, and I lose the curve
post Css
I've tried using property z-index, but it seems not work, I' dont want to use property position: absolute/relative, beacuse are different sections. Any one comes with something?
I've tried using property z-index, but it seems not work
To have z-index work for you, position property must not be static. As stated in W3Schools:
Note: z-index only works on positioned elements (position: absolute, position: relative, position: fixed, or position: sticky) and flex items (elements that are direct children of display: flex elements).
I couldn't check as you didn't provide a fiddle, was your CSS for the sections have a position like this?
.section-1 { position: relative; z-index:1; }
.section-2 { position: relative; z-index:2; }

Is position: fixed z-index relative to its parent's z-index?

I have a fixed position element inside a relatively positioned element, as far as I'm concerned the position: relative element shouldn't have any effect on the position: fixed (fixed elements are positioned relative to the window, right?).
However, the fixed elements z-index seems to be inherited by it's parent, to the point where it's z-index can be no higher than its parent's z-index.
I hope I'm making sense? Below is a HTML example of what I'm talking about:
.outer {
position: relative;
z-index: 2;
}
.inner {
background: #fff;
left: 50px;
position: fixed;
top: 40px;
z-index: 1000000;
}
.fade {
background: #555;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
opacity: 0.5;
position: fixed;
right: 0;
top: 0;
z-index: 3;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner">testing testing</div>
</div>
<div class="fade"></div>
If you change the following:
.outer { position: relative; z-index: 4; }
Then the .inner element appears in front of the fade element.
I find this behaviour very peculiar... is there a way of working around this without moving the .inner div, or changing the CSS of the .outer div?
Fiddles of above code samples:
http://jsfiddle.net/n2Kq5/
http://jsfiddle.net/U8Jem/1/
In short, yes, an element with position:fixed is limited by its parent's z-index given the parent's z-index is defined.
Sad to inform you, but what you want is not currently possible. The only way you can get the effect you desire is to change your HTML or remove the z-index from outer.
Changing HTML options
The first option is to move inner outside of outer, which would look like this.
The second option for an HTML fix is to move fade inside of outer (using the same CSS even) - demo of that here.
A third option would be to put fade inside of outer and then also put inner inside of fade, but that requires you to use rgba colors and opacity - that demo is found here.
Changing CSS options
The closest thing you can get using the same HTML you have currently is to remove the z-index of outer - Demo here. You would think that you could simply increment each element's z-index by two, but that does not work due to the fact that children elements cannot have a higher z-index than their parents (if the parent's z-index is set).
Explanation
If you think about it, fade and outer are on the same level. What you're trying to do is have fade remain on that same level but also have it be on the level above, which is impossible. It's like trying to be on two floors of a building at once, it can't be done.
Although what you need is not directly related to this article, Philip Walton created a great post on z-indexes and the effect opacity has on them, which could be useful to others looking at this question.

CSS Divs overlapping, how do I force one above the other?

I'm new to CSS and trying to build my site.
I'm coming across a problem.
I've created a div with a fixed position, however it is appearing below other elements on the site. How do I force it to the top?
div#floater {
position: fixed;
top: 420px;
left: -110px;
}
div#floater:hover {
left: 0;
The site can be found at goinnativerecords.com (hover over the images to the side).
I know my coding isn't the cleanest (tips are appreciated).
Thanks!
simply use z-index:
z-index : 1;
Note that z-index only works on elements that have some kind of positioning set (relative, absolute, fixed)
nuances:
Elements with a higher z-index will appear in front of elements with a lower z-index in the same stacking context. If two elements have the same z-index, the latter one appears on top. Stacking context is defined by:
The Document Root
Elements with position: absolute or position: relative and a z-index
Elements that are partially transparent, that is they have an opacity < 1
In IE7, any element with position: absolute or position: relative (this can cause many bugs since it is the only browser that acts this way)
If IE7 is an issue, you can make all browsers behave the same by always adding z-index : 1 to any element that also has some position set.
Make use of CSS z-index Property will resolve your issue
.myclass
{
z-index:1;
}
for your problem have look : Layer on layer with z-index (Layers)
this should do it, with Absolute position your elements are always positioned according to Top, Left value you specify
div#floater { position: absolute; top: 420px; left: -110px; }
div#floater:hover { left: 0;}

Div doesn't autoresize with absolute content div

<style type="text/css">
.a {
border: 1px solid #000;
position: relative;
}
.b {
background: #F93;
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
left: 50px;
}
</style>
<div class="a">
<div class="b">test</div>
</div>
a's height doesn't autoresize with it's content(beause b has flow), but how to resolve this problem, use css possible, not javascript.
If you are expecting to see your a-div resize, then I think you've misunderstood something. When you set an element to be absolute, you're taking it out of the "rendering flow", which means it won't interfere with any other elements on the page.
In the absolute positioning model, a box is explicitly offset with respect to its containing block. It is removed from the normal flow entirely (it has no impact on later siblings). An absolutely positioned box establishes a new containing block for normal flow children and absolutely (but not fixed) positioned descendants. However, the contents of an absolutely positioned element do not flow around any other boxes. They may obscure the contents of another box (or be obscured themselves), depending on the stack levels of the overlapping boxes.
You see the following documentation: Absolute positioning
When you have a Div with position:relative, you can control any absolute element inside. In fact, absolute Div is out of the flow of the normal document as Greg mentioned above. As I see you set left and top for b and then if you set width of a to 60px like this. Your <div class="b"> is outside the parent box. This is how absolute elements work.
Try "float: left;" in both classes. Didn't test, however. In wich browser are you testing?
if div b is positioned absolute it's not considered 'inside a' anymore, because it's not rendered inside of it.
so div a will not resize as div b gets larger or smalller...
By setting position: absolute you're taking the div outside the normal document flow, which is why the container won't resize to contain it.
Did you want to set margin-top: 50px; margin-left: 50px; instead?

Resources