I've created a small application. The GUI is ugly, I've done it quickly. I've created a ui.qml file with Qt Design Studio.
My question is : is it simple to use my ui.qml file instead of my ui file ? I mean, do I have to change all my code when I call ui->ComponentName ?
I tried to understand how ui.qml files works, but it seems it's a completely different way to use component in C++ files than ui files..
Depending on the build system you are using, files ending with .ui are used by autouic to generate C++ code that you can call to create your user interface, usually from the constructor of your class that will be the parent for those components.
This is done by calling setupUi on the member variable 'ui', which is the same class name as the parent class, just under the Ui namespace.
QML code is interpreted, however, and can be read by QQmlApplicationEngine. You can expose properties with setContextProperty, taking a QString and a QObject*, as explained further here: https://doc.qt.io/qt-6/qtqml-cppintegration-exposecppattributes.html#exposing-methods-including-qt-slots
Related
I'm working on an application that requires saving and loading of files.
To load files, I'm using QtGui.QFileDialog(), and then calling file_browser.exec_(). That gives this result:
To save a file, I'm calling file_browser.getSaveFileName() which gives a completely different looking window:
Is there any way to make both of these windows look consistent?
The static functions like getSaveFileName will always use a native dialog, unless you include DontUseNativeDialog in the options argument.
On the other hand, the QFileDialog constructor will always create an instance of Qt's built-in file dialog, no matter what options are set. You can change the file-mode to get the type of dialog you want.
When *.ui files are saved, they generate an *.h file which defines and implements a translation method "retranslateui()" which uses a QApplication::translate call where the context for the translation equals the UI class name.
I need to be able to override that and put in my own custom context name.
The reason if you must know is that we have a non-QT legacy translation tables, with 14 languages. I built a tool that translates those strings into a *.TS file. The problem is, there IS NO CONTEXT, it's just a flat list of strings, so my tool forces one context for my entire application. The automatic generation of translate method calls where the context = the UI class name fails my ui translation.
I found that the UIC command line utility, creating this *.h file from the *.ui file has a parameter to define a different translation method. I can use this to route to my own translation method that'll add on the single context. My problem is that I can't find out how to change the UIC call from qmake to include this parameter with a custom value.
You can modify QMAKE_UIC property in your .pro file
QMAKE_UIC += -params to add
According to the answers to this question here, the reason why I'm not seeing errors as I work in Flash Builder is that FB is "optimizing" them out because they aren't referenced at any point in the code execution. Is there an option to force Flash Builder to compile all files regardless of whether they're used in the software? This would make my development process a lot more intuitive.
The only way to do this is to actually reference the class somewhere in code that you know actually is being compiled, such as the Document Class in a .fla, or your Main.as file in a pure AS3 project. It can be as simple as declaring a variable of the given type, even if no value is ever assigned to it.
private var complieMe:OtherwiseUnreferencedClass;
// ^ This will cause your class to be compiled.
You need to reference each class somewhere in your project. The easiest/shortest way I've found to do this is to add an import followed by the class name in some common place, such as a script block in Main.mxml, although it really doesn't matter where:
import some.package.MyClass; MyClass;
Hope that helps.
when I compile some .py codefiles with no class definitions into dlls , the compiled dll is created with a "DRLCachedCode" class inside. Why is that?
When you compile IronPython code it doesn't get compiled to normal .NET code where you'd have a class at the IL level for each class you have at the source level. Instead it gets compiled into the same form that we compile to internally using the DLR.
For user code this is just a bunch of executable methods. There's one method for each module, function definition, and class definition. When the module code runs it executes against a dictionary. Depending on what you do in the module the .NET method may publish into the dictionary a:
PythonType for new-style classes
An OldClass for old-style classes
A PythonFunction object for function
definitions
Any values that you assign to (e.g.
Foo=42)
Any side effects of doing exec w/o providing a dictionary (e.g. exec "x=42")
etc...
The final piece of the puzzle is where is this dictionary stored and how do you get at it? The dictionary is stored in a PythonModule object and we create it when the user imports the pre-compiled module and then we execute the module against it. Therefore this code is only available via Python's import statement (or the extension method on ScriptEngine "ImportModule" which is exposed via IronPython.Hosting.Python class).
So all of the layout of the code is considered an internal implementation detail which we reserve the right to change at any point in time.
Finally the name DLRCachedCode comes because the DLR (outer layer) saves this code for us. Multiple languages can actually be saved into a single DLL if someone really wanted to.
This link answers the question: http://www.ironpython.info/index.php/Using_Compiled_Python_Classes_from_.NET/CSharp_IP_2.6 how to access an IronPython class from C#.
Manual compilation: \IronPython 2.7\Tools\Scripts>ipy pyc.py /out:MyClass /target:dll MyClass.py did not work. Only when I used SharpDevelop with IronPython it worked as in the post.
I have a Flex application where load time is extremely important (consumer site). i want to be able to get something up on screen and then allow additional modules to be loaded as necessary.
The issue I'm facing is that the sum total of all the modules is much larger than if i were to include all the components in a single .swf file.
Its pretty obvious why. For instance the classes needed for web service access seem to take about 100kb. If I dont use those classes in my main.swf then they'll be included in EVERY module that uses them. So if I have 5 modules thats an extra 500kB wasted.
In theory I want 3 levels
main.swf - minimum possible layout / style / font / framework type stuff
common.swf - additional classes needed by module 1 + module 2 (such as web services)
module1.swf - module 1 in site
module2.swf - module 2 in site
I dont know if this is even possible.
I'm wondering if I can load swz/swf files for portions of the framework instead of the entire framework.
I really need to get my main app size down to 200Kb. It grows to 450kb when I add web services and basic datagrid functionality.
Any lessons learned would be appreciated.
I know this was awhile ago, but I figured I'd post another response in case anyone is still looking for an answer on this.
I've been looking into optimizing Flex apps and, after some checking into it, have decided to use Modules. Primarily 'cause they have such good options for optimization.
The two mxmlc commands you need are:
mxmlc -link-report=MyAppReport.xml MyApp.mxml
and
mxmlc -load-externs=MyAppReport.xml MyModule.mxml
My external swf (using the Flex Framework) is now only 21k. It's doing much (yet), but even as it does more and more, it will continue to use resources from the main app code.
Here's the batch file I created to speed up the process (you have to have put mxmlc in your Environment Path variable for it to work like this. Control Panel -> System -> Advanced -> Environment Variables, Edit the Path System Variable, adding the path to your mxmlc (requires a reboot)):
cd C:\Projects\MyProject\Develop\Modules
mxmlc -link-report=MyAppReport.xml C:\Projects\MyProject\Develop\Source\Main.mxml
mxmlc -load-externs=MyAppReport.xml MyModule.mxml
move /Y MyModule.swf ..\Runtime\Modules
More info here:
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/help.html?content=modular_4.html
Hope that helps!
Flex is a bit of a pig when it comes to file size. There really is only one way to get your app sizes down and that is to use an external swz for the framework. There is an Adobe Devnet article on Improving Flex application performance using the Flash Player cache which I recommend you read.
On a project I worked on we had problems with our preloading module sucking in classes that we didn't want. What we had to do was create interfaces to the classes that resided in the other modules and reference them that way. When the module is loaded we simply assigned a reference to the IApplicationModule in order to call our initialization code.
Also look into putting your classes into a seperate SWF file and then use ApplicationDomain to get access to the classes
(this code taken from this forum post which explains how to access classes loaded from modules in Flex)
private function loadContent(path:String):void
{
var contentLoader:Loader = new Loader();
contentLoader.contentLoaderInfo.addEventListener(
Event.COMPLETE,
loadContent_onComplete);
contentLoader.load(new URLRequest(path));
}
private function loadContent_onComplete (event:Event):void
{
var content:DisplayObject = event.target.content;
if(content is IFlexModuleFactory)
{
var content_onReady:Function = function (event:Event):void
{
var factory:IFlexModuleFactory = content as IFlexModuleFactory;
var info:Object = factory.info();
var instanceClass:Class = info.currentDomain.getDefinition(
info.mainClassName) as Class;
addChild (new instanceClass ());
}
content.addEventListener ("ready", content_onReady);
}
else
{
addChild (content);
}
}
There is an option on the command-line compiler to exclude class definitions that are already compiled into another swf. It works like this:
Compile the Main Application (which contains a loader) and opt to generate a report.
Compile the Module and opt to exclude classes in the above report.
You could look into the ModuleLoader class, maybe you can load up your core stuff in the first 200kbs then load the rest when and if it's needed.
Also it's worth bearing in mind that any SWC's you use are embedded at compile time whereas any SWF's are loaded at runtime.