Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 6 months ago.
Improve this question
There are 2 QML types of the text edit. They're TextEdit and TextArea. I wonder which one is better? What should I use?
The description for TextArea should be enough to work this out:
TextArea is a multi-line text editor. TextArea extends TextEdit with a placeholder text functionality, and adds decoration.
Hence, if "has more functionality" is your definition of "better", that would be TextArea.
Of course, it all depends on whether the added functionality is necessary since added functionality is rarely without some cost. As to which one you should use, that really depends on your own needs, so it's hard to make a definitive answer to that part of your question.
You should investigate whether the added functionality is needed in your case.
textedit is best for me
you can use text area for some place
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed last year.
Improve this question
I have an existing form with some main and conditional fields.
I want the conditional fields to show as a floating pop-up beside the main fields (instead of having that conditional fields showing within the page/form itself), but there seems to have no native way of doing it, nor existing add-on. Any input on how I could do it?
Thanks!
This might help: https://gravitywiz.com/documentation/gravity-forms-nested-forms/
You can make the nested forms show up with conditional logic in your setup. The nested forms appear in a pop-up window.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
The topic is about system fonts. what is the purpose of setting button {font:caption;}? system-fonts
The question asks what is the purpose of setting button {font:caption;}
The system the user is on (normally a browser like Chrome or Safari together with their device's operating system and related storage) will itself have styles for various different items.
In this case the question is about 'caption' - when used as font:caption as above it is saying to the browser when you see a button element in my HTML please use the same font that you would use to show a button.
This means you can have a website which blends in with the look that the user is used to - buttons (and other things depending on what else you set) will look the same as system ones - in this case at least as far as the font goes.
See https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/font for information on what other in-built system formatting can be used.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have used both Foundation and Bootstrap, but I realised that the thing I only use it the grid.
I haven't had any problems with their grids, and don't really have a preference yet.
My question is, is it worth keep using them or is it better to use a framework that only has a grid system?
I prefer SASS over LESS
I'd keep using Bootstrap in case you ever want to borrow a bit of its functionality but don't want Bootstrap clashing with some other grid system's code.
If you don't want any of Bootstrap's extra styling muddling your design, follow these instructions to load only the grid from Bootstrap. Then, if you decide you need a quick dropdown navbar, just import the bits of Bootstrap you need.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I am reading Google's R Style Guide. It said:
When indenting your code, use two spaces. Never use tabs or mix tabs and spaces.
I use R Studio to program and feel it is very convenient and beautiful to use tabs. Other programming languages also use tabs for indentation.
I don't know why Google's R Style Guide does not recommend use tabs but two blanks.
You will notice if you check the options in Rstudio under code editing there is a choice for replacing tabs with a defined number of spaces. If you select this (which is set as default, with width = 2), then your tabs will be replaced automatically.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
There are tons of resources on how to program using the APIs of various widget toolkits but I can't seem to find much in the way of a tutorial on how to create widget toolkits themselves or how they work n detail. They are basically just black boxes to me right now.
There is some info on QT:
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:QtInternals
but it seems quite specific to QT and not geared towards general theory.
Could anyone point me to some resources?
Thanks for reading
There are powerpoint presentaion slides on the following link:
http://aplcenmp.apl.jhu.edu/~davids/605741/handouts/6_SWT_Programming.pdf
Also you may have a look on pdf given on the following link:
http://www.loria.fr/~dutech/DDZ/SWT.pdf
It would have been great to know which programming language you are using (or you'll use) to develop widgets.
Anyways,there is a link which shows the basic concepts behind widgets and also their creation:
http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/idl/Widget_Programming_Concepts.html
Go through the tutorial/description to see if it meets your need.
Hope it'll help you.