I'm trying to add a Wiremock stub that matches if the JSON in a request body is either non-existent OR an empty string.
The stub I have at the moment is:
{
"id" : "e331007e-3e6d-4660-b575-b04e774e88c6",
"request" : {
"urlPathPattern" : "/premises/([0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12})/bookings/([0-9a-f]{8}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{4}-[0-9a-f]{12})/non-arrivals",
"method" : "POST",
"bodyPatterns" : [ {
"matchesJsonPath" : "$.[?(#.reason === '' || #.reason == null)]"
} ]
},
"response" : {
"status" : 400,
"jsonBody" : {
"type" : "https://example.net/validation-error",
"title" : "Invalid request parameters",
"code" : 400,
"invalid-params" : [ {
"propertyName" : "reason",
"errorType" : "blank"
} ]
},
"headers" : {
"Content-Type" : "application/problem+json;charset=UTF-8"
}
},
"uuid" : "e331007e-3e6d-4660-b575-b04e774e88c6"
}
It matches is the reason is '', but not if reason is not present. Any ideas?
Related
My firebase database structure is as below. I would like to search with a particular "Info/Email", let's say "abc#abc.com".
{
"-KhWrBcYyMluJbK7QpnK" : {
"Info" : {
"Email" : "xyz#gmail.com"
},
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Accepted"
}
},
"-KhX0tgQvDtDYqt4XRoL" : {
"Info" : {
"Email" : "abc#abc.com"
},
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Accepted"
}
},
"-KhX1eo7uFnOxqncDXQ5" : {
"Info" : {
"Email" : "abc#abc.com"
},
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Pending"
}
}
}
I added a rule too
"Invitation" : {
".indexOn": ["Info/Email","Settings/Status"]
}
My AngularFire code is as follows:
var rootRef = firebase.database().ref().child('Invitation');
var userInvitations = rootRef.child("Info").orderByChild("Email").equalTo("abc#abc.com");
var allInvitations = $firebaseArray(userInvitations);
But I am getting a FIREBASE WARNING: Using an unspecified index. Consider adding ".indexOn": "Email" at /Invitation/Info to your security rules for better performance. and of course I am not receiving any data.
What are the mistakes I made here? Also can I add multiple orderByChild, for example: if I want to find details of the record, which has "Info/Email" equal to "abc#abc.com" and "Settings/Status" equal to "Pending" ?
The Firebase API only allows you to filter children one level deep
So with reference to your data structure:
if it were to be this way,
{
"-KhWrBcYyMluJbK7QpnK" : {
"Email" : "xyz#gmail.com",
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Accepted"
}
},
"-KhX0tgQvDtDYqt4XRoL" : {
"Email" : "abc#abc.com",
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Accepted"
}
},
"-KhX1eo7uFnOxqncDXQ5" : {
"Email" : "abc#abc.com",
"Settings" : {
"Status" : "Pending"
}
}
}
You should write your rules this way instead.
"Invitation" : {
"Info" : {
".indexOn": "Email",
},
"Settings" : {
".indexOn": "Status",
}
}
Then you will be able to query the data
var allInvitations = [];
var rootRef = firebase.database().ref().child('Invitation');
var userInvitations = rootRef.orderByChild("Email").equalTo("abc#abc.com");
userInvitations.on('value', snap => {
var invitations = snap.val()
for (prop in invitations ) {
allInvitations.push(invitations[prop ]);
}
console.log(allInvitations);
})
I have a page that is calling addCheckin() method which is inside a controller. In the controller, I am trying to create a reference as follows:
var ref = firebase.database().ref("users/" + $scope.whichuser + "/meetings/" +$scope.whichmeeting + "/checkins");
$scope.whichuser and $scope.whichmeeting are the $routeParams that I am passing from another route.
Here's my checkin controller-
myApp.controller("CheckinsController",
['$scope','$rootScope','$firebaseArray','$routeParams','$firebaseObject',
function($scope,$rootScope,$firebaseArray,$routeParams,$firebaseObject){
$scope.whichuser = $routeParams.uid;
$scope.whichmeeting = $routeParams.mid;
var ref = firebase.database().ref("users/" + $scope.whichuser + "/meetings/" +$scope.whichmeeting + "/checkins");
$scope.addCheckin = function(){
var checkinInfo = $firebaseArray(ref);
var data={
firstname:$scope.firstname,
lastname:$scope.lastname,
email:$scope.email,
date:firebase.database.ServerValue.TIMESTAMP
}
checkinInfo.$add(data);
}
}]);/*controller*/
There are two errors that I am getting here-
Error 1:
Error: permission_denied at /users/Vp2P1MqKm7ckXqV2Uy3OzTnn6bB3/meetings: Client doesn't have permission to access the desired data.
Error 2:
Error: permission_denied at /users/Vp2P1MqKm7ckXqV2Uy3OzTnn6bB3/meetings/-KT5tqMYKXsFssmcRLm6/checkins: Client doesn't have permission to access the desired data.
And this is what I am trying to achieve:
Here's my JSON tree of the database:
{
"users" : {
"43ZU72ndoKb9LSEjBODKXe3nrou1" : {
"email" : "roy#123.com",
"firstname" : "Roy",
"lastname" : "Marshal",
"regUser" : "43ZU72ndoKb9LSEjBODKXe3nrou1"
},
"BHcYb40FC8YlCKL54ngyMhxPx2q1" : {
"date" : 1475574109981,
"email" : "sky#on.com",
"firstname" : "Sky",
"lastname" : "Thakur",
"meetings" : {
"-KTE3_45wXBqd-_yR1xv" : {
"date" : 1475574125198,
"name" : "ARET"
}
},
"regUser" : "BHcYb40FC8YlCKL54ngyMhxPx2q1"
},
"Vp2P1MqKm7ckXqV2Uy3OzTnn6bB3" : {
"email" : "jon#me.com",
"firstname" : "John",
"lastname" : "Cena",
"meetings" : {
"-KT5tqMYKXsFssmcRLm6" : {
"date" : 1475437094667,
"name" : "hourly"
},
"-KTAvH-ZkWyxrJrK_SDb" : {
"date" : 1475521356544,
"name" : "Hourly"
},
"-KTAwV69txdeT4i_horE" : {
"date" : 1475521676006,
"name" : "asdfg"
},
"-KTAwkH35EyPQZ17DmN9" : {
"date" : 1475521742244,
"name" : "qwerty"
},
"-KTAwsrqe24e8wFfRxpN" : {
"date" : 1475521777422,
"name" : "asfdsf"
},
"-KTAyYPSZLQUtOJ4g8Ak" : {
"date" : 1475522213781,
"name" : "Yearly"
},
"-KTB05PfXZLLk9Of3_Nb" : {
"date" : 1475522881473,
"name" : "Meet"
},
"-KTBG2cP9YLoP4lalN5M" : {
"date" : 1475527064378,
"name" : "JOI"
}
},
"regUser" : "Vp2P1MqKm7ckXqV2Uy3OzTnn6bB3"
}
}
}
My database rules are:
{
"rules": {
".read": true,
".write": true
}
}
I also posted this question before, but didn't get any appropriate solution.
I am still working with previous API, however I just came across one little issue. I am trying to query data from Firebase based on the limitToLast(100), however the .val() of snapshot is always null.
Here is sample data structure of my Messaging:
“Messaging” :{
"10153530036627802" : {
"10155174395220402" : {
"LastUpdate" : 1429295238531,
"Messages" : {
"1428338024339" : {
"date" : 1428338024339,
"message" : "Yo",
"sender" : "Uksz"
},
"1428338024488" : {
"date" : 1428338024487,
"message" : "Yo",
"sender" : "Uksz"
},
"1429023827304" : {
"date" : 1429023827303,
"message" : "Fygh",
"sender" : "Uksz"
},
"1429023828469" : {
"date" : 1429023828468,
"message" : "Fygh",
"sender" : "Uksz"
},
"1429295238532" : {
"date" : 1429295238531,
"message" : "Hgh",
"sender" : "Uksz"
}
},
"Name" : "Matt",
"Picture" : "https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/xxxx"
},
NEXT_USER_ID
And my code is:
var firebaseRef = new Firebase ("https://xxxx.firebaseio.com/Messages/");
var messageRef = firebaseRef.child(userId).child(recipient).child("Messages");
var messagesRef2 = messageRef.limitToLast(10);
messagesRef2.on("value", function(snapshot){
console.log(snapshot.val())
})
Whenever I am getting snapshot.val(), its value is equal to null. Where did I go wrong?
Thanks,
Uksz
When I query /mycollections?ql=Select * where name='dfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf' I get
{
"action" : "get",
"application" : "859e6180-de8a-11e4-9360-f1aabbc15f58",
"params" : {
"ql" : [ "Select * where name='dfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf'" ]
},
"path" : "/mycollections",
"uri" : "http://localhost:8080/myorg/myapp/mycollections",
"entities" : [ {
"uuid" : "2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35",
"type" : "mycollection",
"name" : "dfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf",
"created" : 1428577466865,
"modified" : 1428577466865,
"metadata" : {
"path" : "/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35",
"connections" : {
"relations" : "/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations"
}
}
} ],
"timestamp" : 1428589309204,
"duration" : 53,
"organization" : "myorg",
"applicationName" : "myapp",
"count" : 1
}
Now if I query /mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations I get the second entity
{
"action" : "get",
"application" : "859e6180-de8a-11e4-9360-f1aabbc15f58",
"params" : { },
"path" : "/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations",
"uri" : "http://localhost:8080/myorg/myapp/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations",
"entities" : [ {
"uuid" : "56a1185a-dec1-11e4-9ac0-e9343f86b604",
"type" : "secondcollection",
"name" : "coucou",
"created" : 1428588269141,
"modified" : 1428588269141,
"metadata" : {
"connecting" : {
"relations" : "/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations/56a1185a-dec1-11e4-9ac0-e9343f86b604/connecting/relations"
},
"path" : "/mycollections/2ff8961a-dea8-11e4-996b-63ce373ace35/relations/56a1185a-dec1-11e4-9ac0-e9343f86b604"
}
} ],
"timestamp" : 1428589668542,
"duration" : 51,
"organization" : "myorg",
"applicationName" : "myapp"
}
What I want is that instead of providing me the path of the related entity Usergrid directly nest it in the first JSON answer so that I only need to make a single http request instead of two.
You cannot. Usergrid is not designed in that way. You need to write an extra wrapper rest endpoint to simulate one response.
Not sure what DB you are using. If you are using document db like mongo then you can write a node.js scripts to do this manipulation. Apigee has volvo.js check is it possible to do scripting.
We work with two types of documents on elastic search (ES): items and slots, where items are parents of slot documents.
We define the index with the following command:
curl -XPOST 'localhost:9200/items' -d #itemsdef.json
where itemsdef.json has the following definition
{
"mappings" : {
"item" : {
"properties" : {
"id" : {"type" : "long" },
"name" : {
"type" : "string",
"_analyzer" : "textIndexAnalyzer"
},
"location" : {"type" : "geo_point" },
}
}
},
"settings" : {
"analysis" : {
"analyzer" : {
"activityIndexAnalyzer" : {
"alias" : ["activityQueryAnalyzer"],
"type" : "custom",
"tokenizer" : "whitespace",
"filter" : ["trim", "lowercase", "asciifolding", "spanish_stop", "spanish_synonym"]
},
"textIndexAnalyzer" : {
"type" : "custom",
"tokenizer" : "whitespace",
"filter" : ["word_delimiter_impl", "trim", "lowercase", "asciifolding", "spanish_stop", "spanish_synonym"]
},
"textQueryAnalyzer" : {
"type" : "custom",
"tokenizer" : "whitespace",
"filter" : ["trim", "lowercase", "asciifolding", "spanish_stop"]
}
},
"filter" : {
"spanish_stop" : {
"type" : "stop",
"ignore_case" : true,
"enable_position_increments" : true,
"stopwords_path" : "analysis/spanish-stopwords.txt"
},
"spanish_synonym" : {
"type" : "synonym",
"synonyms_path" : "analysis/spanish-synonyms.txt"
},
"word_delimiter_impl" : {
"type" : "word_delimiter",
"generate_word_parts" : true,
"generate_number_parts" : true,
"catenate_words" : true,
"catenate_numbers" : true,
"split_on_case_change" : false
}
}
}
}
}
Then we add the child document definition using the following command:
curl -XPOST 'localhost:9200/items/slot/_mapping' -d #slotsdef.json
Where slotsdef.json has the following definition:
{
"slot" : {
"_parent" : {"type" : "item"},
"_routing" : {
"required" : true,
"path" : "parent_id"
},
"properties": {
"id" : { "type" : "long" },
"parent_id" : { "type" : "long" },
"activity" : {
"type" : "string",
"_analyzer" : "activityIndexAnalyzer"
},
"day" : { "type" : "integer" },
"start" : { "type" : "integer" },
"end" : { "type" : "integer" }
}
}
}
Finally we perform a bulk index with the following command:
curl -XPOST 'localhost:9200/items/_bulk' --data-binary #testbulk.json
Where testbulk.json holds the following data:
{"index":{"_type": "item", "_id":35}}
{"location":[40.4,-3.6],"id":35,"name":"A Name"}
{"index":{"_type":"slot","_id":126,"_parent":35}}
{"id":126,"start":1330,"day":1,"end":1730,"activity":"An Activity","parent_id":35}
We see through ES Head plugin that definitions seem to be ok. We test the analyzers to check that they have been loaded and they work. Both documents appear listed in ES Head browser view. But if we try to retrieve the child item using the API, ES responds that it does not exist:
$ curl -XGET 'localhost:9200/items/slot/126'
{"_index":"items","_type":"slot","_id":"126","exists":false}
When we import 50 documents, all parent documents can be retrieved through API, but only SOME of the requests for child elements get a successful response.
My guess is that it may have something to do with how docs are stored across shards and the routing...which certainly is not clear to me how it works.
Any clue on how to be able to retrieve individual child documents? ES Head shows they have been stored but HTTP GETs to localhost:9200/items/slot/XXX respond randomly with "exists":false.
The child documents are using parent's id for routing. So, in order to retrieve child documents you need to specify parent id in the routing parameter on your query:
curl "localhost:9200/items/slot/126?routing=35"
If parent id is not available, you will have to search for the child documents:
curl "localhost:9200/items/slot/_search?q=id:126"
or switch to an index with a single shard.