I am new to Firebase Hosting and tring to deploy a Pre-trained tensorflow model on Firebase Hosting to invocation from cloud funtions for prediction. But I am not sure how to emulate Hosting pricing.
Like if I deploy a tensorflow serving on Hosting, but different size of microservice still effect usage of processer and ram isn't it? and pricing model only says Hosting costs Storage and Data transfer, a bit don't know how Hosting scale itself. Thanks for any help.
Related
My team is currently thinking about uploading files to our repository (BitBucket) to minimize storage cost on our on-prem DC. We'd like to build a web application (ASP.NET) that will upload files to the application's repository on a separate folder. Basically using the repo as a cloud storage.
I have little knowledge on repositories and I think repos should only be used for code/versioning. I'd like to explain why is this feasible or not to my team.
Is it possible to use BitBucket as a cloud storage why or why not?
I am trying to implement a CI/CD workflow with Firebase hosting as production environment. So, I am writing a Dockerfile that reproduce Firebase environment.
The problem is: I don't find any technical documentation about how is made Firebase hosting environment.
What should I put into my Dockerfile ? Could a simple HTTP server be sufficient ?
So, my conclusion is that it's not possible to create Firebase hosting production-like container. As stated in the comments, all environments should use angular-cli emulator in order to simulate production environment.
I'm using Google Firebase: Database (to store my data) and Hosting (to run my web application). The web application is build with Webpack/Vue.
Now I would like to use some Database Functions as a backend API for some server handling.
Is this possible? If so, how can I deploy two separate projects to Firebase Hosting and Functions?
I dont know if this is what you're looking for but you can either
firebase deploy --only hosting or database or functions
or install firebase in different
I am currently using Windows hosting for my Android app, from a local Domain provider.
I have developed and published my app on the Firebase platform. I want to know if moving (the hosting) from current Windows hosting to Firebase will make the app respond faster?
firebase surely will respond faster as it use ssds as and seperated server cdn to reach user in global but it's just the server that cached and optimezed for faster respond it's depend to your code for threading the process for more tricky performance :)
I have an ASP.NET application running on shared hosting and want to use Windows Azure blob storage to store images (my shared hosting has limited storage). My application will upload and download these images from/to the client PC.
I created a new cloud project to test this out and got it working successfully with the offline storage emulator, but I noticed that the cloud project has a web worker role which, I believe, needs a compute instance when deployed to Azure. Azure storage is very cheap, but if I need a compute instance for my application to talk to to access it then it becomes much more expensive, even with the smallest instance.
My question is - do I need a compute instance in order to upload and download files to blob storage or can my application talk directly to the blob storage?
Short answer: You do not need compute instances to talk to Azure storage. You can talk to Azure storage directly from client apps or from apps hosted by other providers.
Nor do you need to create a new Cloud project within Visual Studio to take advantage of Azure blob storage. Simply, reference appropriate .DLLs (Azure Storage Client) and you're good to go.