I have a dataframe looks like below (the true data has many more people):
Year Player Club
2005 Phelan Chicago Fire
2007 Phelan Boston Pant
2008 Phelan Boston Pant
2010 Phelan Chicago Fire
2002 John New York Jet
2006 John New York Jet
2007 John Atlanta Elephant
2009 John Los Angeles Eagle
I want to calculate a player level measure (count) for each row (year) that captures the weighted number of club that a person experienced up to that point. The formula is (length of the experience 1/total years up to that point)^2+(length of the experience 2/total years up to that point)^2+......
Below is the ideal output for Phelan. For example, "count" for his first row is 1 as it is his first year in the data and (1/1)^2=1. For his second row, which includes three years (2005, 2006, 2007) up to this point, count=(1/3)^2+(2/3)=0.56 (assuming in 2006, which is missing data, Phelan also stayed in Chicago Fire). For his third row, count=(2/4)^2+(2/4)^2=0.5. For his fourth row, count=(3/6)^2+(3/6)^2=0.5 (assuming in 2009, which is missing data, Phelan also stayed in Boston Pant).
Year Player Club Count
2005 Phelan Chicago Fire 1
2007 Phelan Boston Pant 0.56
2008 Phelan Boston Pant 0.5
2010 Phelan Chicago Fire 0.5
This is a bit convoluted but I think it does what you want.
Using data.table:
library(data.table)
library(zoo) # for na.locf(...)
##
expand.df <- setDT(df)[, .(Year=min(Year):max(Year)), by=.(Player)]
expand.df[df, Club:=i.Club, on=.(Player, Year)]
expand.df[, Club:=na.locf(Club)]
expand.df[, cuml.exp:=1:.N, by=.(Player)]
expand.df <- expand.df[expand.df[, .(Player, cuml.exp)], on=.(Player, cuml.exp <= cuml.exp)]
expand.df <- expand.df[, .(Year=max(Year), club.exp=sum(sapply(unique(Club), \(x) sum(Club==x)^2))), by=.(Player, cuml.exp)]
expand.df[, score:=club.exp/cuml.exp^2]
result <- expand.df[df, on=.(Player, Year), nomatch=NULL]
result[, .(Player, Year, Club, cuml.exp, club.exp, score)]
## Player Year Club cuml.exp club.exp score
## 1: Phelan 2005 Chicago Fire 1 1 1.0000000
## 2: Phelan 2007 Boston Pant 3 5 0.5555556
## 3: Phelan 2008 Boston Pant 4 8 0.5000000
## 4: Phelan 2010 Chicago Fire 6 18 0.5000000
## 5: John 2002 New York Jet 1 1 1.0000000
## 6: John 2006 New York Jet 5 25 1.0000000
## 7: John 2007 Atlanta Elephant 6 26 0.7222222
## 8: John 2009 Los Angeles Eagle 8 30 0.4687500
So this expands your df to include one row per year per player, then joins back the clubs for the appropriate years, then fills the gaps per your description. Then we calculate cumulative years of experience for each player.
The next bit is the convoluted part: we need to expand further so that for each combination of player and cuml.exp we have all the rows up to that point. The join on=.(Player, cuml.exp <= cuml.exp) does that. Then we can count the number of instances of each club by player and cuml.exp to get the numerator of your score.
Then we calculate the scores, drop the extra years and the extra columns.
Note that this assumes you've got R 4.1+. If not, replcae \(x)... with function(x)....
Related
I have a dataframe looking like below (the real data has many more people and club):
Year Player Club
2005 Phelan Chicago Fire
2006 Phelan Chicago Fire
2007 Phelan Boston Pant
2008 Phelan Boston Pant
2009 Phelan Chicago Fire
2010 Phelan Chicago Fire
2002 John New York Jet
2003 John New York Jet
2004 John Atlanta Elephant
2005 John Atlanta Elephant
2006 John Chicago Fire
I want to calculate two club level measures (previous_exp & post_exp) for each club. The calculations are very similar to the calculation of Herfindahl–Hirschman index. Clubs are linked together through the mobility of players. "previous_exp" captures club-level inflow sources for each club and "post_exp" captures club-level outlow destinations for each club.
For the calculations of "previous_exp" and "post_exp", I want to only consider the immediate sources and destinations of each club. For example, for Chicago Fire, Phelan came to this club in 2005 and then left. He returned in 2010. Before Phelan's first stay in Chicago Fire, he had zero previous experience (so we ignore it). However, before his second stay in Chicago Fire, he stayed in Boston pant for 2 years. Similarly,John stayed in Atlanta Elephant for 2 years before coming to Chicago. For Chicago Fire, based on the career records of Phelan and John, it in total accumulated 2+2=4 years of previous experience from other clubs. Among these 4 years, 2 years are from Boston Pant and 2 years are from Atlanta Elephant (John 2007-2008). I can then calculate the "previous_exp" value for Chicago Fire by using the formula: (length of the experience 1/total years)^2+(length of the experience 2/total years)^2+......, which equals to (2/4)^2+(2/4)^2=0.5.
I can use the similar procedure to calculate values for "post_exp".
The sample output looks like below:
Club previous_exp
Chicago Fire 0.5
Boston Pant 1
New York Jet NA
Atlanta Elephant 1
Club post_exp
Chicago Fire 1
Boston Pant 1
New York Jet 1
Atlanta Elephant 1
I have a dataframe looks like below:
person year Office Job rank
Harry 2002 Los Angeles CEO 0
Harry 2006 Boston CEO 0
Harry 2006 Los Angeles Advisor 1
Harry 2006 Chicago Chairman 2
Peter 2001 New York Director 0
Peter 2001 Chicago CFO 1
Peter 2002 Chicago CEO 0
Lily 2005 Springfield CEO 0
Lily 2007 New York CFO 0
Lily 2008 Boston COO 0
Lily 2011 Chicago Advisor 0
Lily 2011 New York board 1
I want to know at a person level, who has at least one of the following two patterns:
in a previous available year, an office has rank 0 and in the next available year, the office still exist but rank is bigger than 0 (job does not matter). For example, Los Angeles for Harry.
in a next availabe year, an office has rank 0 and in the previous available year, the office still exist but rank is bigger than 0 (For example, Chicago for Peter).
Note that New York for Lily does not have either of the above situation as 2007 is not the previous available year for Lily (2008 is).
Thus, the output should look like:
person yes/no
Harry 1
Peter 1
Lily 0
We can use
library(dplyr)
df1 %>%
group_by(person, Office) %>%
summarise(yes_no =n_distinct(rank) > 1) %>%
summarise(yes_no = +(any(yes_no)), .groups = 'drop')
Assuming that the dataframe is stored as someData, and is in the following format:
ID Team Games Medal
1 Australia 1992 Summer NA
2 Australia 1994 Summer Gold
3 Australia 1992 Summer Silver
4 United States 1991 Winter Gold
5 United States 1992 Summer Bronze
6 Singapore 1991 Summer NA
How would I count the frequencies of the medal, based on the Team - while excluding NA as an variable. But at the same time, the total frequency of each country should be summed, rather than displayed separately for Gold, Silver and Bronze.
In other words, I am trying to display the total number of medals PER country, with the exception of NA.
I have tried something like this:
library(plyr)
counts <- ddply(olympics, .(olympics$Team, olympics$Medal), nrow)
names(counts) <- c("Country", "Medal", "Freq")
counts
But this just gives me a massive table of every medal for every country separately, including NA.
What I would like to do is the following:
Australia 2
United States 2
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you!
We can use count
library(dplyr)
df1 %>%
filter(!is.na(Medal)) %>%
count(Team)
# A tibble: 2 x 2
# Team n
# <fct> <int>
#1 Australia 2
#2 United States 2
You can do that in base R with table and colSums
colSums(table(someData$Medal, someData$Team))
Australia Singapore United States
2 0 2
Data
someData = read.table(text="ID Team Games Medal
1 Australia '1992 Summer' NA
2 Australia '1994 Summer' Gold
3 Australia '1992 Summer' Silver
4 'United States' '1991 Winter' Gold
5 'United States' '1992 Summer' Bronze
6 Singapore '1991 Summer' NA",
header=TRUE)
I'm a bit new to R and tm so struggling with this exercise!
I have one description column with messy unstructured data containing words about the name, city and country of a customer. And another column with the amount of sold items.
**Description Sold Items**
Mrs White London UK 10
Mr Wolf London UK 20
Tania Maier Berlin Germany 10
Thomas Germany 30
Nick Forest Leeds UK 20
Silvio Verdi Italy Torino 10
Tom Cardiff UK 10
Mary House London 5
Using the tm package and documenttermmatrix, I'm able to break down each row into terms and get the frequency of each word (i.e. the number of customers with that word).
UK London Germany … Mary
Frequency 4 3 2 … 1
However, I would also like to sum the total amount of sold items.
The desired output should be:
UK London Germany … Mary
Frequency 4 3 2 … 1
Sum of Sold Items 60 35 40 … 5
How can I get to this result?
Assuming you can get to the stage where you have the Frequency table:
UK London Germany … Mary
Frequency 4 3 2 … 1
and you can extract the words you can use an apply function with a grep. Here I will create a vector which represents your dictionary you extract from your frequency table:
S_data<-read.csv("data.csv",stringsAsFactors = F)
Words<-c("UK","London","Germany","Mary")
Then use this in an apply as follows. This could be more efficiently done. But you will get the idea:
string_rows<-sapply(Words, function(x) grep(x,S_data$Description))
string_sum<-unlist(lapply(string_rows, function(x) sum(S_data$Items[x])))
> string_sum
UK London Germany Mary
60 35 40 5
Just bind this onto your frequency table
I have a question about creating lag variables depending on a time factor.
Basically I am working with a baseball dataset where there are lots of names for each player between 2002-2012. Obviously I only want lag variables for the same person to try and create a career arc to predict the current stat. Like for example I want to use lag 1 Average (2003) , lag 2 Average (2004) to try and predict the current average in 2005. So I tried to write a loop that goes through every row (the data frame is already sorted by name and then year, so the previous year is n-1 row), check if the name is the same, and if so then grab the value from the previous row.
Here is my loop:
i=2 #as 1 errors out with 1-0 row
for(i in 2:6264){
if(TS$name[i]==TS$name[i-1]){
TS$runvalueL1[i]=TS$Run_Value[i-1]
}else{
TS$runvalueL1 <- NA
}
i=i+1
}
Because each row is dependent on the name I cannot use most of the lag functions. If you have a better idea I am all ears!
Sample Data won't help a bunch but here is some:
edit: Sample data wasn't producing useable results so I just attached the first 10 people of my dataset. Thanks!
TS[(6:10),c('name','Season','Run_Value')]
name Season ARuns
321 Abad Andy 2003 -1.05
3158 Abercrombie Reggie 2006 27.42
1312 Abercrombie Reggie 2007 7.65
1069 Abercrombie Reggie 2008 5.34
4614 Abernathy Brent 2002 46.71
707 Abernathy Brent 2003 -2.29
1297 Abernathy Brent 2005 5.59
6024 Abreu Bobby 2002 102.89
6087 Abreu Bobby 2003 113.23
6177 Abreu Bobby 2004 128.60
Thank you!
Smth along these lines should do it:
names = c("Adams","Adams","Adams","Adams","Bobby","Bobby", "Charlie")
years = c(2002,2003,2004,2005,2004,2005,2010)
Run_value = c(10,15,15,20,10,5,5)
library(data.table)
dt = data.table(names, years, Run_value)
dt[, lag1 := c(NA, Run_value), by = names]
# names years Run_value lag1
#1: Adams 2002 10 NA
#2: Adams 2003 15 10
#3: Adams 2004 15 15
#4: Adams 2005 20 15
#5: Bobby 2004 10 NA
#6: Bobby 2005 5 10
#7: Charlie 2010 5 NA
An alternative would be to split the data by name, use lapply with the lag function of your choice and then combine the splitted data again:
TS$runvalueL1 <- do.call("rbind", lapply(split(TS, list(TS$name)), your_lag_function))
or
TS$runvalueL1 <- do.call("c", lapply(split(TS, list(TS$name)), your_lag_function))
But I guess there is also a nice possibility with plyr, but as you did not provide a reproducible example, that is all for the beginning.
Better:
TS$runvalueL1 <- unlist(lapply(split(TS, list(TS$name)), your_lag_function))
This is obviously not a problem where you want to create a matrix with cbind, so this is a better data structure:
full=data.frame(names, years, Run_value)
The ave function is quite useful for constructing new columns within categories of other columns:
full$Lag1 <- ave(full$Run_value, full$names,
FUN= function(x) c(NA, x[-length(x)] ) )
full
names years Run_value Lag1
1 Adams 2002 10 NA
2 Adams 2003 15 10
3 Adams 2004 15 15
4 Adams 2005 20 15
5 Bobby 2004 10 NA
6 Bobby 2005 5 10
7 Charlie 2010 5 NA
I thinks it's safer to cionstruct with NA, since that will help prevent errors in logic that using 0 for prior years in year 1 would not alert you to.