I have a desire to write a mod for Minecraft 1.12.2, writing a mod in 2022 for Minecraft 1.12.2 may sound like a retard, because 1.18 already exists.
I plan to write a mod on new versions in the future, but first I want to write for 1.12.2, but such a question arose.
Now I am writing this mod on MDK version 14.23.4.2705, but it is no less outdated than 14.23.5.2860, so I want to update, and that's the problem.
This MDK does not have the usual eclipse folder. On the Internet they say you just need to open the MDK folder itself, and the eclipse folder is no longer needed. Something a little different tells me... When I open this folder in Eclipse, I see nothing... Not a single file opens. An attempt to take the old assembly as a basis also does not give any result.
Related
There was a similar question on this 5 years ago - however it did not seem to have any conclusion.
https://community.oracle.com/tech/apps-infra/discussion/4112075/epm-uninstall-not-working
I am attempting to uninstall cleanly EPMSystem 11G R1 (old EPM Essbase Foundation) and having issues.
I have looked at several Oracle Support articles for this - namely the following below - but these do not detail manual deletion to mitigate the error I am getting as they all seem to suggest running the uninstall.
How to Uninstall Hyperion Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) (Doc ID 1265740.1)
Perform a Clean Uninstall of EPM 11.1.2 on Microsoft Windows (Doc ID 1140553.1)
The document DOC ID 1140553.1 suggests to use is not able to be found.
Going into the details - see attached screenshots.
It seems that the de-install has no concept of how the vpd.properties exists - even though it is definitely there in its folder/directory structure.
When attempting to run un-install via add/remove programs - it just runs the same .cmd and fails to execute.
I am aware Ora Central Inventory replaces vpd.properties (which defines the installed products) but in this case the jars seem to just want to see the vpd.properties (cannot open up the binary to see the location it seems to want vpd.properties to exist at).
Anyone see this issue before? I do not want to simply just delete the folders as that will mean I will need to also find all the registry keys etc that may be removed through clean uninstall.
If there is a manual process that works - willing to do it - but tried a lot of things to fix this error to no avail
I have R Studio on Windows. It works fine before I connect to the internet through my VPN. After I connect commands start to hang, autocomplete can take forever, and simple operations like 4 + 4 can take one minute or more.
I have a feeling the studio is making connections under the hood. I would like to disable all of these connections no matter what.
I have experienced the same thing - I am assuming your actual work is on a file server and not local. I found the culprit in my case to not be RStudio directly, but rather the RStudio project file. RStudio will create a generally small, hidden folder in the directory named .Rproj.user with some settings. This, living on the file server, caused constant read/writes through my VPN connection.
I unfortunately had to either (a) move projects off the file server into a local copy (not bad since I can use a company GitLab), or (b) delete the .Rproj and .Rproj.user folders from the project directory on the server and use here::here() or something like that as a work around in my workflow.
As another possibility, I have seen installations of R itself done onto a personal server drive instead of locally. This has been done to avoid needing administrator privileges to install. This is not a great idea and can also result in extremely slow performance through a VPN connection. You can check to see where R is installed as well. Sounds like this is not the problem though based on what you described.
Maybe it is something else, but this is what I found last week for me based on a very similar experience.
I had a R script open in RStudio. The file was saved many times over the course of several weeks and worked perfectly fine when RStudio was opened and closed. However, today, I restarted my computer and when I opened RStudio and more specifically the script that I mentioned, all of the R code vanished, leaving a single long row of "....." with red highlighting.
When I tried to open the R file in other text processors such as Sublime Text and Notepad++, only a line of zeroes was visible. None of my other R files were affected. I'm currently running Windows 8.1 and have the latest version of R and RStudio. What can I do to recover the code in the file and prevent something like this from happening again?
It might be an old thread and it might have been covered in 'user4458796' answer in suggestion #1 ("Use the history..."), but:
My friend had the same problem and we managed to recover the code from a 'history_database' files located on Windows at:
'C:\Users\%user%\AppData\Local\RStudio-Desktop\'
I assume there is an equivalent location in Linux in general.
Hopefully I won't get downvoted, just sharing my 2cents.
Ben.
It's not clear what happened to corrupt your file (and thus how to fix it if possible) and it is kind of ominous that you're just seeing 0's in other text editors, but I'll give you my best suggestion and some tips.
Suggestions for Attempting Recovery
Since your other R files were unaffected, you should have a messy record of your code in the history. Use the history to reconstruct your code.
Access a copy of your file from any version control, cloud, or offline backup you may have used -- git, SVN, iCloud, SugarSync, Dropbox, etc (I realize you probably wouldn't have posted this question if that were an option, but I had to throw it out there).
Use a Hex or sector editor to try to recover the data.
Use a data recover program to find an old version of your file.
Inspect your trash or recycling bin to see if it has an old version. Depending on your OS and the settings of how you (insecurely or securely) delete files, then you may be able to undelete a deleted version, even if it's not immediately available.
Try different methods of recovering text data from corrupted text files like OpenOffice's and Microsoft's suggestions.
Tips for the Future
I know that hindsight is 20/20, but a few quick tips for good measure:
Use version control. Git is supported in RStudio's GUI interface.
Have more than one version of your file. Many professors and professionals recommend writing/storing code in a text editor and using your IDE only for the working copy.
Make backups. Distinct from #2, you should backup your files to a hard drive, flash drive, or cloud service like Dropbox or Spideroak.
In a nutshell, the question is: I just finished my first application using Qt Creator on a computer running under Linux Ubuntu, now how do I make this available for everyone. Now follows the more detailed version ;)
I must apologize for asking this, I am aware that this question has probably been asked many times and that there is official documentation that I can read. I am just completely new to programming and I am very confused by everything I've read so far. If you are kind enough to help, please assume I know absolutely nothing :)
Here we go: I've just finished designing my first application (a scientific program) with Qt creator on my laptop which runs under Linux Ubuntu. It works fine and I'm very proud of it ;)
Here's what my project consists of: 40 header files, 42 source files, 1 pro file, 1 qrc file, 1 html file and 7 png files. In the code, I use #include for a bunch of fairly standard Qt classes (QWidget, QTextBrowser and so forth, maybe like 40 of those).
Now I'd like to make it available to other people. For Linux and Mac users, I've figured a way to do that: I can compress the folder containing my project, tell them to install Qt on their computer, then download and extract the files on their hard disk, open a terminal in the folder and run
qmake myProject.pro
qmake
make
That seems to work fine (by the way, does it matter that this is not precisely what Qt creator does? The qmake step there is qmake-qt4 myProject.pro -r -spec linux-g++ and the make step is make -w). Now, I assume there is a solution where I don't ask them to download and install something like 200Mo of Qt material. As for Microsoft Windows users, I don't have a clue.
I would be very grateful if you could explain to me in a very concrete way what I need to do. Needless to say, I'll go for the best and easiest solution, I don't need to understand everything about deployment. Many thanks in advance!
Edit: In case that's useful : I've been using Qt Creator 2.5.0 based on Qt 4.8.1 (64 bit), I'm working on a laptop with Ubuntu 12.04 64bits
For Linux and Mac users, I would compile the software for them in 32 and 64bit formats - no-one likes compiling unknown software from source. Obviously keep the source code option for those on more unusual architectures/OSs (and provide a shell script for them that mimics the commands Qt Creator calls!). As Qt runtimes are available from package managers on just about every distro (and come pre-installed on most anyway, KDE requires them for example), by not asking them to compile from source your users will have a much smaller download (if any) and won't require them to download software from a website potentially unknown to them. Of course the best way would be to try to get your software added as a package into the major distros' repositories, but that may take some time to organise.
Compile your software for Windows users for both 32 and 64bit formats. It's generally frowned upon to ask users to download runtime libraries they potentially don't know, and put them into their system32 folder... So most applications bundle all the libraries they need with their application. Qt-based applications are no different, and so put the runtimes into the folder where the executable is. Also it is much more professional to create a proper installer, there are a few free installer applications for Windows, a web search will give you the most popular (I think I saw a thread on SO about it as well).
As you can see the platforms aren't too dissimilar, the main point I would make is: Do not force people to compile from source! The vast majority of people on Earth do not even know what compiling is, so provide for the major arrchitectures/OSs yourself.
I have a Windows 2003 Server with IIS, I installed VisualSVN Server on it.
I have two developers, who are going to use TortoiseSVN.
Since this is my first time ever setting up a SVN server I am kind of confused on how this will all work. The way I see it, each developer would have a copy of the repository on his or her local pc, would each person be required to have IIS installed on their PC as well to test their copies before checking out?
Should I create a testing folder on the server and then a production ready? It seems as if that would cause more issues with copies?
What would you do?
EDIT
I dont know what I was thinking, I forgot that VS has a built in IIS when you debug so the issue about setting up IIS on either client or server is now a non-issue. But I am confused, I imported the site into the repo, it said it was on revision 2 but I dont see any of the files in the repo folder. Do I create a virtual folder in IIS pointing to the repo that I created?
No, each developer uses your repository, and checks out their own copies to do their work. They do not need IIS or svn, etc, installed on their systems.
I recommend reading up on the Subversion FAQ.
Your devs don't have a local repository, they have a Working Copy on their PC. Typically, this is the most recent version of the app with whatever changes have been made by the developers but not committed yet.
As this is a web app, then your developers will need some kind of web server locally to test it - this could be IIS, or Visual Studio's built in web server (although that does behave differently to IIS in subtle ways).
You said in a comment: "My problem is I dont want the devs to commit to the live site in case there was a bug.".
The devs commit to the SVN repository on the server: at some point you will want to export (aka 'publish') a copy from the latest version in your repository to your live site. In order to make sure this works, you can check out a specific version from the server, test it, and if it passes the tests upload it: devs will always check in code with bugs (even though it builds) as it's better to check code in frequently than build up lots of changes locally then commit them, as there are bound to be conflicts with work other developers have done.
Branching and Tagging are useful concepts here: when you have a version which is almost right, you 'branch' it away from the main 'trunk' of the source code tree, fix any issues in the branch (back-porting to the main trunk as required), then when you have a working version you 'tag' it (as version x.y.z) and upload it. This way you can always refer to the particular version of the code you have uploaded, which makes it a lot easier to identify bugs which turn up in production. As others have suggested, read the SVN documentation for more info.
It depends on how you work. There are other discussions about folder structure and such which play directly into how you use version control.
Uh, no, no local repositories. Setting up SVN is easy, well almost. You'll want to look for the svn windows installer and set it up on the server. You'll want to install Apache and then you'll have a little hurdle setting up the http.conf file to expose svn over http. There's a little complexity with setting up security so go with Windows Authentication, you'll need WebDav, google it.
Once that's done, any svn client can hit it and checkout a copy and work with SVN normally. If you get really stuck, comment here and I'll go get a copy of our install and config for you.
The good news is that it's rock solid, once you get it setup it'll run forever.
"Pragmatic Version Control Using Subversion" and the SVN red-bean are the two sources you need to see.
Set up SVN on a single server and have all your developers point to it.
I've installed tortoise on the server and do Updates / Checkouts of the release website. Some people don't like checking in compiled code, but I like having the production compiled site in SVN.
If you use tortoise on the server, Do the initial checkout to the inetpub/website directory and then on rollouts you just need to update the directory using tortoise->update
Of course checkin to rollout is considered bad practice without first rolling out and testing on staging servers, but depends on your team size.
I have used the following resources for learning SVN:
http://www.polymorphicpodcast.com/shows/subversion/
http://www.dimecasts.net/Casts/ByTag/SVN
Found both quite good, and learning by watching can be easier especially for getting started.
No - your central server will maintain the repository. Your developers will get copies of the repository, make changes, and then commit them to your repository.
You actually have quite a few things to figure out if you want to do a successful deployment of subversion.
One really good article about setting up subversion on Windows - https://blog.codinghorror.com/setting-up-subversion-on-windows/
No, SVN server must be installed on a single computer. Each developer point at this computer and get locally (and eventually) a full copy or a partial copy of the repository.
You may also buy a book from O'Reilly about Subversion. Don't remember the title, sorry, but it helps me a lot.
All the best ! Sylvain.