I have created a code that takes temperature measurement data and saves it in a variable. Now I would like to save the data in a .txt file inside an SD card connected to Arduino. The initialization of the SD works, but when it manages to access the file it gives me errors, writing me a set of strange symbols instead of the file name and it doesn't write inside the file. I tried a very similar code to write inside the SD and it works fine. What problem can it be? I enclose the part of the writing code on the SD and the photo with the output.
Initialization part:
Serial.println(F("Intializing SD card"));
if(!SD.begin(4))
{
Serial.print(F("Initialization failed"));
while(!SD.begin(4))
{
Serial.print(F("."));
delay(1000);
}
}
else Serial.println(F("Initialization done"));
Writing part:
sdFile = SD.open("records.txt",FILE_WRITE);
Serial.print("Writing to ");
Serial.println(sdFile.name());
sdFile.print(" Temperature: ");
sdFile.print(tempC);
sdFile.print(" taken at: ");
sdFile.print(hour());
sdFile.print(":");
sdFile.print(minute());
sdFile.print(":");
sdFile.println(second());
sdFile.close();
Image with the strange output
I suspect you are opening the SD card before it has a chance to initialise, to fix this, implement a check at the start like so:
if(!SD.begin(8)){ // Here, 8 is the CS (chip select) pin of your SD card.
Serial.println("initialization failed!");
while (1);
}
sdFile = SD.open("records.txt",FILE_WRITE);
if(myFile){ // If we opened our file successfully!
// Write to our card here
}
sdFile.close();
Does this fix your issue? Also, watch out for size limitations on how large the Arduino can read SD cards. This is usually 2GB for full-size cards, and 16GB for "micro" cards.
Additional documentation can be found on the arduino website, as well as examples here.
Related
Is there somethimg like theading in arduino?
I'm using Stepper.h library to use steppers and I want to rotate two of them at the same time, is that possible?
Additional info:
I'm using two drivers ULN2003 and Arduino Nano to controll steppers.
Code for one of them:
void AStep(){
AStepper.step(i1.toInt());
display.println("Turned A stepper;");
display.display();
}
You can make them appeir as they are moving at the some time by making the stepper do smaller "steps".
The only thing is that this method DOESN'T make them turn in actual sync.
Snippet by PaulS from the Arduino forums.
for(int s=0; s<step_360; s++)
{
AStepper.step(1);
BStepper.step(1);
}
I am trying to write a simple integer value from an Arduino Mega 2560 to a Qt Application. Baudrate is set to 9600 and Serial.read() works fine when I send data through an open port with serial->write(some_data); from Qt Application.
digitalWrite(SS, LOW);
if (Serial.available() == 2) {
response1 = SPI.transfer(Serial.read());
response2 = SPI.transfer(Serial.read());
}
digitalWrite(SS, HIGH);
The above code works fine. I read another by before and had to add delay(3) to make this work. Now I want to send back the response
Serial.print((response2 << 8 ) | (response1 & 0xFF));
But there are always truncated digits. I know from the logic analyzer that the response is e.g. 8193 so with QByteArray b = serial->readAll(); I get results like 8, 81, 819, and sometimes 8193. I.e.: always the last digits are truncated randomly. I assume that this is also a timing issue but I could not find a fix for this.
Just in case anyone facing the same issue: Changing the Baudrate from 9600 to 112500 fixed this.
Is it possible to put a sketch (.HEX file) to an SD card and run it from there?
My objective is to utilize SD storage instead of flash memory for a program.
If yes, are there any libraries doing exactly this?
All i found was "flashing arduino from sd card", which is not what i need.
UPDATE:
the sketch's loop calling is implemented in the bootloader.
so i assume there is something like this in the bootloader:
while(true)
{
call_sketch_loop();
}
can it be changed to this? :
//signature changed from void loop() to int loop()
while(true)
{
int retval = call_sketch_loop(); //get loop call's return value
if( 0 == retval )
continue; // if 0, iterate the loop as usual
else
{
//copy 1.HEX from sd to flash and reboot
copy_hex_from_sd_to_flash( retval + ".HEX" );
reboot();
}
}
change loop singature to int loop()
put {int}.HEX files to an SD card - 1.HEX , 2.HEX , 3.HEX
the loop() call returns 0
continue with next iteration as usual
the loop() call returns 2
copy file 2.HEX from SD card into program flash memory
reboot device
with this approach, we can run flash-capacity-exceeding programs if we split them up to smaller subprograms.
The technical term you are looking for is "SD card bootloader".
Have you looked into this: "https://github.com/thseiler/embedded/tree/master/avr/2boots"?
As far as I understand, 2boot will first load the hex into the flash and then execute it from there. This is not exactly what you are looking for (you want to load it directly to RAM, right?).
The problem with what you are looking for is that arduino's RAM is really small. And there is liittle advantage in loading directly to RAM. Therfore such library might not exist at all.
I can sugget a poor-mans approach for doing this. First write a sketch that contains a function that have an infinite loop inside it and inside this loop, put the code of your desired "loop". In the setup of the sketch take the pointer to this function and write sufficient ammount of bytes into a binary file on the SD card.
Then upload another sketch wich has an empty buffer. This sketch will load the binary file into it and refernce to it's beginning as a pointer to a function. Viola, you can now execute your "loop".
This is ugly and unless you have very specific and isoteric need for loading directly into RAM, I suggest to try the 2boot library.
I am an electrical student and want to use arduino due to generate pulses for driving MOSFETs. I am making a inverter and want to generate pulses. I have arduino due with me. My main aims are :
1) one software interrupt for sampling the next time period (this will be changing..). After three cycles I will analogRead() new value of time period and same continues .
2) During one time period,set by RC count of Timer channel TC0, I want to load RA0 and RB0 with appropriate counts to get output pulses with different duty ratios(depending on RA0 and RB0 values).
I wrote a program which gives software interrupts with TC3 which is working fine. i.e. I am able to load new values into RA0 and RB0 automatically for every new sampled value( every 3 cycles new values comes else same values will be loaded).
Now I also used TC0 (i used Olavi Kamppari's library) for stopping, loading new values and starting the timer.
when i checked PIO_PB25B_TIOA0 and PIO_PB27B_TIOB0 in the serial monitor i am getting 33554432,134217728 .
I am really confused.I expected a 1 and 0 output. I just want two pulses from TC0 without interrupt.I set the ACPA value to 3 (Toggle) and I enabled the clock to the timer as well.Still I am not getting the output.
So if possible please provide me a sample program that can output pulses from PB25 and PB27 (TIOA0 and TIOB0). Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for reading my question.
Thank you.
The following sketch outputs a 3 MHz signal on TIOA6 (Pin 5 from memory)
I am about to post a question regarding the same code - I want to get to 8 (and a little bit) MHz but have hit a conceptual brick wall!
Note that this is under development - the IRQ handler is not used - and the PMC_Enable_Periph should be referring to ID_TC6 (I believe) - then the IRQ handler can be placed in the dust bin of history!
void TC6_Handler()
{
TC_GetStatus(TC2, 0);
}
void startTimer(Tc *tc, uint32_t channel, IRQn_Type irq) {
pmc_set_writeprotect(false);
pmc_enable_periph_clk((uint32_t)irq);
TC_Configure(tc, channel,
TC_CMR_WAVE |
TC_CMR_WAVSEL_UP_RC |
TC_CMR_TCCLKS_TIMER_CLOCK1|
TC_CMR_ACPA_TOGGLE ); // RC compare TOGGLES TIOA)smiley-wink;
TC_SetRA(tc, channel, 1); //50% high, 50% low
TC_SetRC(tc, channel, 1);
PIO_Configure(PIOC,
PIO_PERIPH_B,
PIO_PC25B_TIOA6,
PIO_DEFAULT);
TC_Start(tc, channel);
}
void setup(){
startTimer(TC2, 0, TC6_IRQn);
}
void loop(){
}
I have a bizarre one here with the serial output when trying to write some code for my Arduino Uno.
I have this proto-code:
MyClass myclass;
void setup()
{
Serial.Begin(9600);
Serial.println("Starting...");
}
void loop()
{
int status = myclass.DoWork();
Serial.println("Status: " + status);
}
class MyClass
{
int DoWork()
{
Serial.println("Doing some work...");
return 1;
}
}
Now when this runs I get the following output:
Starting...
Doing some work...
atus: 1
So the strange part is the "Status: 1" missing the first few characters. Is this because I am using serial in an object improperly or something?
I have noticed when I reference another library that also uses serial like MyClass does that I get other strange output behavior... so I assume that I am doing something wrong.
EDIT: In the end this turned out to actually be a memory issue. A library I was including was quite large and it was consuming the available memory. I found this by adding a few more debugging statements and found the corruption shifted around based on the string lengths and positions. By using the F() function I moved the strings to flash memory (e.g. I now run Serial.println(F("Starting...")); and it has corrected the strange output.
You cannot add strings and integers in C++. It would have been better for you if this failed to compile:
Serial.println("Status: " + status);
Instead the compiler guessed at something. It guessed wrong. Use this:
Serial.print("Status :");
Serial.println(status);
or for complete control of outputting numbers and strings learn to use C string formatting, sprintf()
In the end this turned out to actually be a memory issue. A library I was including was quite large and it was consuming the available memory. I found this by adding a few more debugging statements and found the corruption shifted around based on the string lengths and positions. By using the F() function I moved the strings to flash memory (e.g. I now run Serial.println(F("Starting...")); and it has corrected the strange output.
One more possible explanation.
I was running minicom to monitor, and I usually like that it auto-reconnects after resetting my device.
Well I minimized a terminal running minicom last night, and today I started a new instance that somehow also got connected to the same serial port (if that is even possible).
I think the two instances of minicom were each reading ~50% of the serial characters roughly at random, leaving me with quite a mess of text.