I'm trying to use a 2 dimension array with below code :
var table: [[Int]] = []
table[0].append(contentsOf: 10...15)
but get error :
error: Execution was interrupted, reason: EXC_BREAKPOINT (code=1, subcode=0x18f6dd21c).
Don't know what to try
table[0] doesn't exist.
let range = 10...15
if table.isEmpty {
table = [.init(range)]
} else {
table[0].append(contentsOf: range)
}
Or, initialize it with an element.
var table: [[Int]] = [[]]
Related
I am interested to see if anyone knows of any better alternative to using conditional count statements in Terraform. By "conditional count statement", I mean a statement where depending a condition like a variable input, count will evaluate to create either 0 or 1 of a resource.
A simple example:
resource "xxxxxxxx" "example" {
count = var.example != null ? 1 : 0
}
Here, the resource will only be created if var.example has a value (is not null), otherwise it will not get created.
Conditional counts usually work ok in practice, but sometimes in more complex uses than the one above it introduces a risk of getting an error during Terraform Plan where it cannot evaluate the result of the count pre-apply.
The "count" value depends on resource attributes that cannot be determined
until apply, so Terraform cannot predict how many instances will be created.
To work around this, use the -target argument to first apply only the
resources that the count depends on.
Is there any better way to achieve the same effect of creating resources on a conditional basis in Terraform?
Keeping in mind that your terraform config not shown I've used a general example of for_each instead of count.
This is an example of how 2 CNAME records will be created using & in this example terraform modules are used but the same can be done directly on terraform resources.
locals {
cname_records = {
"email" = ["email.domain.net."]
"imap" = ["imap.domain.net."]
}
}
module "aws_route53_record_CNAME" {
source = "app.terraform.io/terraform-cloud-org/route53-record/aws"
version = "1.0.0"
for_each = local.cname_records
records = each.value
name = each.key
zone_id = "YOUR-HOSTED-ZONE-ID"
type = "CNAME"
ttl = "300"
}
It varies by case, but there are some cases where you need to get around this. There is a clever trick, but it seems obtuse in the single item (binary exists or not) case. But in a case where there are actually multiple items, this should help.
This is a completely contrived example but I actually use the method quite a bit. In short, a list of things not known until apply, can be replaced by a list of objects with a key you don't care about. The purpose is that for_each doesn't mind if the value is unknown at plan-time, only if the key is.
Consider the following root module with these four modules.
main.tf
resource "aws_s3_bucket" "this" {
bucket = "h4s-test-bucket"
}
# module "with_count" { # cannot be determined until apply
# source = "./with-count"
# x = aws_s3_bucket.this.id
# }
module "with_for_each_over_item" { # handy workaround
source = "./with-for-each-over-item"
x = aws_s3_bucket.this.id
}
output "with_for_each_over_item" {
value = module.with_for_each_over_item
}
# module "with_for_each_list" { # cannot be determined until apply
# source = "./with-for-each-list"
# x = [aws_s3_bucket.this.id]
# }
module "with_for_each_list_better" { # handy workaround
source = "./with-for-each-list-better"
x = [{ y = aws_s3_bucket.this.id }]
}
output "with_for_each_list_better" {
value = module.with_for_each_list_better
}
module "with_for_each_list_best" { # handier workaround
source = "./with-for-each-list-best"
x = [aws_s3_bucket.this.id]
}
output "with_for_each_list_best" {
value = module.with_for_each_list_best
}
with-count/main.tf (problematic)
variable "x" {
type = string
default = null
}
resource "null_resource" "this" {
count = var.x != null ? 1 : 0
}
output "this" {
value = null_resource.this
}
with-for-each-over-item/main.tf (handy workaround)
variable "x" {
type = string
default = null
}
resource "null_resource" "this" {
for_each = { for i, v in [var.x] : i => v }
}
output "this" {
value = null_resource.this
}
with-for-each-list/main.tf (problematic)
variable "x" {
type = list(string)
default = []
}
resource "null_resource" "this" {
for_each = toset(var.x)
}
output "this" {
value = null_resource.this
}
with-for-each-list-better/main.tf (handy workaround)
variable "x" {
type = list(object({ y = string }))
default = []
}
resource "null_resource" "this" {
for_each = { for i, v in var.x : i => v }
}
output "this" {
value = null_resource.this
}
with-for-each-list-best/main.tf (handiest workaround)
variable "x" {
type = list(string)
default = []
}
resource "null_resource" "this" {
for_each = { for i, v in var.x : i => v }
}
output "this" {
value = null_resource.this
}
Summary
In cases where the variable has a value not known at plan-time, consider using an object where the key is known.
I Have the following model
class Process: Object {
#objc dynamic var processID:Int = 1
let steps = List<Step>()
}
class Step: Object {
#objc private dynamic var stepCode: Int = 0
#objc dynamic var stepDateUTC: Date? = nil
var stepType: ProcessStepType {
get {
return ProcessStepType(rawValue: stepCode) ?? .created
}
set {
stepCode = newValue.rawValue
}
}
}
enum ProcessStepType: Int { // to review - real value
case created = 0
case scheduled = 1
case processing = 2
case paused = 3
case finished = 4
}
A process can start, processing , paused , resume (to be in step processing again), pause , resume again,etc. the current step is the one with the latest stepDateUTC
I am trying to get all Processes, having for last step ,a step of stepType processing "processing ", ie. where for the last stepDate, stepCode is 2 .
I came with the following predicate... which doesn't work. Any idea of the right perform to perform such query ?
my best trial is the one. Is it possible to get to this result via one realm query .
let processes = realm.objects(Process.self).filter(NSPredicate(format: "ANY steps.stepCode = 2 AND NOT (ANY steps.stepCode = 4)")
let ongoingprocesses = processes.filter(){$0.steps.sorted(byKeyPath: "stepDateUTC", ascending: false).first!.stepType == .processing}
what I hoped would work
NSPredicate(format: "steps[LAST].stepCode = \(TicketStepType.processing.rawValue)")
I understand [LAST] is not supported by realm (as per the cheatsheet). but is there anyway around I could achieve my goal through a realm query?
There are a few ways to approach this and it doesn't appear the date property is relevant because lists are stored in sequential order (as long as they are not altered), so the last element in the List was added last.
This first piece of code will filter for processes where the last element is 'processing'. I coded this long-handed so the flow is more understandable.
let results = realm.objects(Process.self).filter { p in
let lastIndex = p.steps.count - 1
let step = p.steps[lastIndex]
let type = step.stepType
if type == .processing {
return true
}
return false
}
Note that Realm objects are lazily loaded - which means thousands of objects have a low memory impact. By filtering using Swift, the objects are filtered in memory so the impact is more significant.
The second piece of code is what I would suggest as it makes filtering much simpler, but would require a slight change to the Process model.
class Process: Object {
#objc dynamic var processID:Int = 1
let stepHistory = List<Step>() //RENAMED: the history of the steps
#objc dynamic var name = ""
//ADDED: new property tracks current step
#objc dynamic var current_step = ProcessStepType.created.index
}
My thought here is that the Process model keeps a 'history' of steps that have occurred so far, and then what the current_step is.
I also modified the ProcessStepType enum to make it more filterable friendly.
enum ProcessStepType: Int { // to review - real value
case created = 0
case scheduled = 1
case processing = 2
case paused = 3
case finished = 4
//this is used when filtering
var index: Int {
switch self {
case .created:
return 0
case .scheduled:
return 1
case .processing:
return 2
case .paused:
return 3
case .finished:
return 4
}
}
}
Then to return all processes where the last step in the list is 'processing' here's the filter
let results2 = realm.objects(Process.self).filter("current_step == %#", ProcessStepType.processing.index)
The final thought is to add some code to the Process model so when a step is added to the list, the current_step var is also updated. Coding that is left to the OP.
I'm using Dart, trying to do some low level project euler problems; this problem is for both the prime number counter and greatest prime factor problem.
Here is the Unit Test and the error below which is produced (my other two unit tests evaluate fine):
test('evaluate if target is not factorable', () {
// Arrange
var maximum = 14;
var control_list_of_primes = <int>[2,3,5,7,11];
var test_list_of_primes = <int>[2,3,5,7,11];
// Act
prime_list_expansion(maximum, test_list_of_primes);
// Assert
expect(test_list_of_primes[-1] == 13, true);
});
ERROR: -prime factor generator- should evaluate if target is not factorable
Test failed: Caught RangeError: -1
List.[]
Here is the function prime_list_expansion (the functions it calls pass the tests I've designed for them so I don't think they are the problem):
prime_list_expansion (int maximum, List prime_list) {
var start = prime_list[-1];
for (var i = start; i < maximum; i = i+2) {
if (target_not_factorable (i, prime_list)) {
prime_list.add(i);
}
}
}
expect(test_list_of_primes[-1] == 13, true);
and
var start = prime_list[-1];
-1 will never be a valid index for a List, hence out of range error.
I assume you are trying to get the last element in the list, instead use list.last
I've looked at this other question, but can't get my select box to work correctly:
Binding initial/default value of dropdown (select) list
I've got the following Game object:
function Game(visitingTeamDetails, homeTeamDetails, game) {
if (arguments.length > 0) {
this.VisitingTeamDetails = visitingTeamDetails;
this.HomeTeamDetails = homeTeamDetails;
this.GameId = ko.observable(game.GameId);
this.HomeTeamName = ko.observable(game.HomeTeamName);
this.VisitingTeamName = ko.observable(game.VisitingTeamName);
this.SportTypeName = ko.observable(game.SportTypeName);
this.HomeAccountName = ko.observable(game.HomeAccountName);
this.VisitingAccountName = ko.observable(game.VisitingAccountName);
this.GameDateString = ko.observable(game.GameDateString);
this.GameTimeString = ko.observable(game.GameTimeString);
this.AvailableSportTypes = ko.observableArray(game.Sports);
this.sportTypeFunction = function () {
for (sportType in this.AvailableSportTypes()) {
if (this.AvailableSportTypes()[sportType].Name == this.SportTypeName()) {
return this.AvailableSportTypes()[sportType];
}
}
return null;
};
this.SportType = ko.observable(game.SportType);
}
}
SportType is an object with Name and SportTypeId.
I have the following template:
<td rowspan="3"><select data-bind="options: AvailableSportTypes, value: SportType, optionsText:'Name', optionsCaption: 'Choose...'" class="sportType"></select></td>
AvailableSportTypes is a list of SportType.
The list is coming in with the names of the SportTypes in the drop down list, but I can't make the initial selection be SportType. I wrote sportTypeFunction to show myself that the data was coming in correctly, and it would select the correct value, but changing my selection in the drop down would not update SportType.
I'm sure I'm doing something wrong. Anyone see it?
Thanks
When game.SportType gets passed in, it needs to be a reference to the an item in the game.AvailableSportTypes and not just an object that looks the same.
Basically two objects are not equal unless they are actually a reference to the same object.
var a = { name: "test" },
b = { name: "test" };
alert(a === b); //false
So, you would need to call your function to locate the correct object in the array and set it as the value of your observable.
Not that it is way better, but in KO 1.3 you can extend .fn of observables, observableArrays, and dependentObservables to add additional functionality.
Here is a sample: http://jsfiddle.net/rniemeyer/ZP79w
If I have a list of items in an array that represent the names of modules:
var phaseNames:Array = new Array("directorsPrep", "checkIO", "pickupPhoto", "pickupPhoto", "syncing", "dailies", "pictureEdit", "soundEdit", "soundMix", "colorCorrection", "finishing");
and I want to go through each one of these and call a function within each instance of each module, how would I go about doing so. So far, I have the following:
private function changeStartViewDate(numDays:Number):void
{
startViewDate = rightDate(startViewDate.getMonth(), startViewDate.getDate() + numDays, startViewDate.getFullYear());
getDateInfo();
determineCalendarWeek();
var phaseNames:Array = new Array("directorsPrep", "checkIO", "pickupPhoto", "pickupPhoto", "syncing", "dailies", "pictureEdit", "soundEdit", "soundMix", "colorCorrection", "finishing");
for (var i:int = 0; i < wholeProject.length; i++)
{
wholeProject[i].moveProject(Number((1-2) * numDays));
}
for (i = 0; i < phaseNames.length; i++)
{
for (var j:int = 0; j < [phaseNames[i]].length; j++)
{
[phaseNames[i]].movePhase(Number((-1) * numDays));
}
}
}
But when I try to save it, I get the following error:
1084: Syntax Error: expecting identifier before dot.
It's telling me the error is on the following line:
[phaseNames[i]].movePhase(Number((-1) * numDays));
I tried doing something like the following, but it didn't work:
[phaseNames[i].movePhase(Number((-1) * numDays))];
The above attempt of trying to figure this out gave me the following error
1064: Invalid metadata.
Any help would be appreciated.
I am going to assume that:
Each value of your phaseNames array references an actual instance of some other class [and not the name of the class]
The instance defined in the phaseNames array is a child of the current class.
You should be able to do something like this:
var childName = phaseNames[0];
var myChild : myObjectType = this[childName];
// then call function
myChild.doStuff();
This approach is not dissimilar to what you have; I'm just doing it in more lines. I'm also adding the this keyword to access the child.
I bet if you tried this, directly, it would work:
this[phaseNames[i]].movePhase(Number((-1) * numDays));
I have to wonder why you haven't created an array of all the instances instead of an array of all the variables names that point to the instances.