I'm currently working on the integration of the API to be able to search, confirm the price and book.
Currently we have a problem on the second step:
What I'm trying to get is to have a revalidate response having also all Ancillary and Baggage (hand and hold, also with a fee) to be able to create the page to show the information about the reservation.
I've tried to add the following (in a successfully request):
"TravelPreferences": {
"AncillaryFees": {
"Enable": true,
"Summary": true
},
"TPA_Extensions": {
"VerificationItinCallLogic": {
"Value": "B"
}
}
},
but I'm getting following error:
AIR EXTRAS SUMMARY REQUEST REQUIRES AT LEAST ONE GROUP CODE
Error during Processing
For the luggage, with this part
"Baggage": {
"CarryOnInfo": true,
"Description": true
},
I'll get info about baggage but no prices.
Any idea?
Thank you!
Related
I am trying to fetch the posts of the company from the api, I have already applied to the marketing development platform and it was approved. I already got the token with the scope: r_organization_social and I'm calling the /shares api:
https://api.linkedin.com/v2/shares?q=owners&owners=urn:li:organization:{company_ID}&sharesPerOwner=100&count=25&sharesPerOwner=10
But I'm getting the following response:
{
"paging": {
"start": 0,
"count": 25,
"links": [
{
"type": "application/json",
"rel": "next",
"href": "/v2/shares?count=25&owners=urn%3Ali%3Aorganization%3A{company_ID}&q=owners&sharesPerOwner=10&sharesPerOwner=100&start=0"
}
],
"total": 242
},
"elements": []
}
I tried to change the query params and it's still the same
This end-point worked for me:
https://api.linkedin.com/v2/ugcPosts?q=authors&authors=List(urn%3Ali%3Aorganization%3A<ID_ORGANIZATION>)
See documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/linkedin/marketing/integrations/community-management/shares/ugc-post-api?tabs=http#sample-request-6
Disclaimer: I've no access to the linkedin API and couldn't test. But these are some things I noticed:
Your url contains two times the paramater sharesPerOwner, try removing one.
In the docs it's recommended to set the sharesPerOwner to 1000 and the count to 50. I'd also include the start paramater, just to make sure:
Maybe try something like this:
GET https://api.linkedin.com/v2/shares?q=owners&owners=urn:li:organization:{id}&sharesPerOwner=1000&count=50&start=0
From the api-docs(https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/linkedin/marketing/integrations/community-management/shares/share-api?tabs=http#find-shares-by-owner): "Note that the pagination excludes UGC and Direct Sponsored Content (DSC) posts". Make sure that the owner you are testing contains posts.
If this doesn't work. Could you provide some information on how you are sending the request? Have you tried accessing other parts of the api?
My Watson Conversation bots typically have a node where I load some data into context. This usually contains all possible answers, strings, various other data.
So one of my first nodes in any bot looks like this:
{
"type": "standard",
"title": "Load Messages",
"output": {
"text": {
"values": [
""
],
"selection_policy": "sequential"
}
},
"context": {
// A whole bunch of data here
}
...
Is there a limit on how much data I can put there? Currently I have around 70 kilobytes, but potentially I can put a few megabytes there just for the convenience of running the logic inside Conversation. (Yes I am aware that this entire data will be sent back to the client, which is not very efficient)
There is no documented limit. You are more likely to hit network issues before Watson Assistant has any issues.
But storing your whole applications logic in the context object is considered an anti-pattern.
Your context object should only store what is required in Watson Assistant, and then if possible only for the related portion of the conversation.
For one time context values you can store them in the output object.
{
"context": {
},
"output": {
...
"one_time_var": "abc"
}
}
This will be discarded on your next call.
If you have a large volume of data that could be used at different times, then one pattern to use is a context request object.
For example:
"context": {
"request": "name,address,id"
}
Your next response from the application layer would send this:
"context": {
"name" : "Bob",
"address": "123 street",
"id": "1234"
}
You have your returning response update those variables, then clear the context variables again. If you have other context variables that need to stay, then store those in an object and erase just that object.
I'm calculating routes based on user input. Then storing the routeId and any additional informations I need. But the shape of the road is something I need occasionally; when the user wants to get a preview of the road again.
Since I don't want to store all the points from shape I tried using getroute endpoint (https://developer.here.com/documentation/routing/topics/resource-get-route.html#resource-get-route) but I get this response:
{
"_type": "ns2:RoutingServiceErrorType",
"type": "ApplicationError",
"subtype": "RouteNotReconstructed",
"details": "Error is NGEO_ERROR_ROUTE_DESERIALIZATION",
"additionalData": [
{
"key": "error_code",
"value": "NGEO_ERROR_ROUTE_DESERIALIZATION"
}
],
"metaInfo": {
"timestamp": "2018-08-01T15:01:56Z",
"mapVersion": "8.30.86.150",
"moduleVersion": "7.2.201830-34436",
"interfaceVersion": "2.6.34",
"availableMapVersion": [
"8.30.86.150"
]
}
}
So the question is: why do I get the error? Following the API documentation https://developer.here.com/documentation/routing/topics/resource-type-error-route-not-reconstructed.html I can exclude wrong routeId (it works for routes saved e.g. today but not for the older ones).
The route was calculated using the same version (7.2)
Is the routeId stored only for a certain amount of time?
If so, how long?
RouteID changes with map version.
https://developer.here.com/documentation/routing/topics/request-route-information.html
You'd need to recalculate periodically to get up to date RouteIDs.
I set up my intents using this intent schema:
{
"intents": [
{
"intent": "StartIntend"
},
{
"intent": "AMAZON.YesIntent"
},
{
"intent": "AMAZON.NoIntent"
}
]
}
My sample utterances look like this (it's german):
StartIntend Hallo
StartIntend Moin
StartIntend Guten Tag
Why does the Amazon Developer Console generate the following request, when I use the utterance "Yes" or "Ja"?
{
"session": {
"sessionId": "SessionId...",
"application": {
"applicationId": "amzn1.ask.skill...."
},
"attributes": {},
"user": {
"userId": "amzn1.ask.account...."
},
"new": true
},
"request": {
"type": "IntentRequest",
"requestId": "EdwRequestId...",
"locale": "de-DE",
"timestamp": "2017-02-17T21:07:59Z",
"intent": {
"name": "StartIntend",
"slots": {}
}
},
"version": "1.0"
}
Whatever I enter, it always is using the intend StartIntend.
Why is that? What have I forgotten / what have I done wrong?
The schema and utterance look correct.
I tried duplicating what you are seeing by performing the following steps:
Copied them as-is into a new skill on my account
Selected the North America region on the Configuration page.
Set the lambda to point to an existing lambda that I have. For testing purposes, I just need a valid ARN. I'm going to ignore the response anyways.
Then entered "Yes" into the service simulator
It indeed sent the Lambda the AMAZON.YesIntent.
So I conclude that there's nothing with the data you posted.
I tried entering Ja which resulted in the StartIntend, but I guess I would expect that since Ja is not "Yes" in North America.
Have you set the region to Europe, and entered a Lambda for the Europe region?
I talked about it with the Amazon Support. After some experiments it turned out, you have to write "ja" in lowercase. It seems to be a bug in the simulator itself.
When creating the skill in the Alexa Skills Kit, you need to choose the correct language i.e. German, see screenshot below.
Everything else seems to be correct.
could you please give me a hint on how to share a single event via google calendar api?
That is I'd like to invite other users to see the event programmatically without sharing the whole calendar. To mimic the "Add guests" UI action
As Claudio mentioned, you need to use the Google Calendar Advanced API for this.
You'll want to use a patch because you don't want to replace all the other data on the calendar invite. However, even in the case of patch, since the attendees lives in an array, if you attempt to pass a patch such as this:
{
attendees: [ { email: "new#example.com"} ]
}
... it'll replace all old invitees (i.e. it'll remove anyone that was on the invite before you called patch). To fix this, you must first get the current invitees, add a new person to the array, and then send a patch.
You can see a detailed example of this in this answer which also explains how to use Google Apps Scripting to ensure an email is sent to the user when adding them to a calendar event (see the addGuestAndSendEmail() method in that post).
You can use the API to add people to the attendees collection:
https://developers.google.com/google-apps/calendar/v3/reference/events/update
refer the following request.
method: POST
endpoint: https://www.googleapis.com/calendar/v3/calendars/primary/events?sendUpdates=all
here, sendUpdates means when you add any guest so he would get an invitation mail used based on scenario.
Input Json:
{
"kind": "calendar#event",
"etag": "etag",
"status": "confirmed",
"summary": "JayKara",
"description": "eqwbdjhwhhwhhwrhjehrhejhfj",
"location": "America",
"creator": {
"email": "#mail.com",
"self": true
},
"organizer": {
"email": "#mail.com",
"self": true
},
"start": {
"date": "2019-12-23"
},
"end": {
"date": "2019-12-24"
},
"originalStartTime": {
"date": "2019-12-24"
},
"visibility": "public",
"attendees": [
{
"email": "****#mail.com" //this guys are the guest
}
]
}.
After that there is no patch method required your guest guys will receive an invitation whenever update event
Cheers!