Is posible to save SS template variable in database from CMS and after execute it in template?
Okay lets see example:
In CMS i have settings where i put social media links and contact informatios.
Also in CMS i have module where i create HTML block-s which after that i loop in website.
In that html block i want to put existing $SiteConfig.Email variable.
I Try that but that is rendered in template like $SiteConfig.Email not show real email?
Is this posible to do or i need some extra modification?
Check photo
The question you have written makes no sense to me, but I understand the screenshot.
So, SilverStripe renders .ss files with a class called SSViewer. Basically it reads the file as string and then runs it through SSViewer to generate the HTML output.
But, as you saw, the output of variables is not processed.
I can think of 3 ways to get what you want:
Run the variables through SSViewer aswell (in this example, use $RenderedHTMLContent in the template)
class MyDataObject extends DataObject {
private static array $db = [
'Title' => DBVarchar::class,
'HTMLContent' => DBText::class,
];
public function Foobar() { return "hello from foobar"; }
public function RenderedHTMLContent() {
$template = \SilverStripe\View\SSViewer::fromString($this->HTMLContent);
// using $this->renderWith() will allow you access to all things of $this in the template. so eg $ID, $Title or $Foobar. Probably also $SiteConfig because it's global
return $this->renderWith($template);
// if you want to add extra variables that are not part of $this, you can also do:
return $this->renderWith($template, ["ExtraVariable" => "Hello from extra variable"]);
// if you do not want $this, you can do:
return (new ArrayData(["MyVariable" => "my value"]))->renderWith($template);
}
}
Please be aware of the security implications this thing brings. SilverStripe is purposely built to not allow content authors to write template files. A content author can not only call the currently scoped object but also all global template variables. This includes $SiteConfig, $List, .... Therefore a "bad" content author can write a template like <% loop $List('SilverStripe\Security\Member') %>$ID $FirstName $LastName $Email $Salt $Password<% end_loop %> or perhaps might access methods that have file access. So only do this if you trust your content authors
Use shortcodes instead of variables. But I never liked shortcodes, so I don't remember how they work. You'll have to lookup the docs for that.
Build your own mini template system with str_replace.
class MyDataObject extends DataObject {
private static array $db = [
'Title' => DBVarchar::class,
'HTMLContent' => DBText::class,
];
public function Foobar() { return "hello from foobar"; }
public function RenderedHTMLContent() {
return str_replace(
[
'$SiteConfig.Title',
'$SiteConfig.Tagline',
'$Title',
'$Foobar',
],
[
SiteConfig::current_site_config()->Title,
SiteConfig::current_site_config()->Tagline,
$this->Title,
$this->Foobar(),
],
$this->HTMLContent
);
}
}
Related
Starting out with the Elemental module for Silverstripe 4 and by default it lists the Elemental area(s) under the Main "Content" tab. I'd like to put them under their own tab.
How do I do that in my Page class getCMSField function?
What I have is:
A specific page (ElementPage) for using the module
ElementPage:
extensions:
- DNADesign\Elemental\Extensions\ElementalPageExtension
In ElementPage.php I have two $has_one like this:
private static $has_one = [
'LeftElemental' => ElementalArea::class,
'RightElemental' => ElementalArea::class
];
Those work fine, fields display and can render them in the template.
Trying to put them under their own tab, the getCMSFields:
public function getCMSFields()
{
$fields = parent::getCMSFields();
// To remove the default added one
$fields->removeByName('ElementalArea');
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.LeftContentBlocks', ElementalArea::create('LeftElementalID'));
return $fields;
}
Resulting error:
[User Warning] DataObject::__construct passed The value
'LeftElementalID'. It's supposed to be passed an array, taken straight
from the database. Perhaps you should use DataList::create()->First();
instead?
I didn't really expect that to work but I can't see the create signature it needs.
EDIT:
This seems to get it done:
public function getCMSFields()
{
$fields = parent::getCMSFields();
// To remove the default added one
$fields->removeByName('ElementalArea');
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.LeftContentBlocks', ElementalAreaField::create('LeftElemental', $this->LeftElemental(), $this->getElementalTypes()));
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.RightContentBlocks', ElementalAreaField::create('RightElemental', $this->RightElemental(), $this->getElementalTypes()));
return $fields;
}
I'm not entirely sure $this->getElementalTypes() is what I should be doing. Any improvements/corrections are welcomed.
I would like to be able to set custom values in the CMS, such as with the site name and tagline. I can't currently find any way of doing this other than on individual pages.
You can do so by extending SiteConfig. Your Extension might look like this:
class CustomSiteConfig extends DataExtension
{
private static $db = array(
'CustomContent' => 'Varchar(255)'
);
public function updateCMSFields(FieldList $fields)
{
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Main',
TextField::create('CustomContent', 'Custom content')
);
}
}
Then you need to apply the extension to SiteConfig. Add the following to mysite/_config/config.yml
SiteConfig:
extensions:
- CustomSiteConfig
And that's it. Run dev/build and your new field should be editable in the CMS as well as accessible in the Template using: $SiteConfig.CustomContent
I have correctly created a custom widget, evreything is translating well with a correct .po file, except the title.
Here is my code :
$concert_widget_name = __('Tour Dates', 'concerts');
wp_register_sidebar_widget (
'tourdates', // your unique widget id
$concert_widget_name, // widget name
'tourdates_widget_display', // callback function to display widget
array( // options
'description' => 'Displaying upcoming tour dates'
)
);
Is there an error ? An other way to translate the widget name ?
I usually register my widgets using the register_widget function. In the constructor of the widget class I place the following code:
class TourDates extends WP_Widget
{
public function __construct()
{
$options = array('classname' => 'tour-dates', 'description' => __('Display upcoming tour dates'));
parent::__construct('tour_dates', __('Tour Dates'), $options);
}
}
You can also check out the Widgets API on the WordPress Codex site. Hopefully this helps you in creating your custom widget.
Also what I usually do is merge my translations with the default ones loaded from WordPress, like so:
function loadTextDomain() {
$locale = get_locale();
$languageDir = dirname(__FILE__) . '/languages';
$domain = 'default';
$mofile = $languageDir . '/theme.' . $locale . '.mo';
global $l10n;
$mo = new MO();
if (!$mo->import_from_file($mofile)) {
return false;
}
if (isset($l10n[$domain]) && !empty($l10n[$domain]->entries)) {
$l10n[$domain]->merge_with($mo);
} else {
$l10n[$domain] = $mo;
}
}
add_action('init', 'loadTextDomain');
This code looks similar to the load_textdomain function from WordPress but it avoids all the filters that do exist in the original function, which helps in avoiding any WordPress hook from altering your $domain and $mofile variables.
But I will leave that up to you. Maybe the load_textdomain() function from WordPress will work just as fine, but in case it doesn't this function should do the trick.
Now if your using the loadTextDomain() function I pasted above you can just place a languages folder in the same folder as your functions.php resides, in that new folder you could place theme.nl_NL.mo or theme.de_DE.mo files depending on the language your using. This should allow translation of your website and also the admin area.
So I have created my custom view helper and used it in layout.phtml like this:
<?php echo $this->applicationBar(); ?>
It is working flawlessly in the browser but my unit tests that were working before are failing now:
1) UnitTests\Application\Controller\IndexControllerTest::testIndexActionCanBeAccessed
Zend\ServiceManager\Exception\ServiceNotFoundException: Zend\ServiceManager\ServiceManager::get was unable to fetch or create an instance for applicationBar
When I comment out the view helper in the layout file, test passes again.
I have the same problem, and i solved it in not a good way (but it solved for my specific problem).
The phpunit tests is not finding my factories view helpers, but it is finding my invokables. Then, i did the following:
public function getViewHelperConfig() {
return array(
'factories' => array(
'aplicationBar' => function($service) {
$applicationBar = new ApplicationBar();
return $applicationBar;
},
),
'invokables' => array(
'applicationBar' => 'Application\View\Helper\ApplicationBar',
),
);
When i use the browser, it uses the correct Factory. When i use phpunit, it uses the invokables.
The problem happens when i need to set some parameters. And then, i set some default parameters, that will be used only by phpunit.
namespace Application\View\Helper;
use Zend\View\Helper\AbstractHelper;
class ApplicationBar extends AbstractHelper {
protected $parameter;
public function __construct($parameter = 'something') {
$this->parameter = $parameter;
}
public function __invoke() {
return $this->parameter;
}
}
It is not the best solution, but if i solve it in a better way, i will post here.
I am trying to create a back-end interface for silverstripe that gives the CMS user the option to choose between a set of Post Types (like tumblr) in Silverstripe3. So they can choose to create a News Post, Video Post, Gallery Post, etc.
I initially started off giving all Posts the necessary fields for each Type and adding an enum field that allowed the user to choose the Post Type. I then used the forTemplate method to set the template dependent upon which Post Type was chosen.
class Post extends DataObject {
static $db = array(
'Title' => 'Varchar(255),
'Entry' => 'HTMLText',
'Type' => 'enum('Video, Photo, Gallery, Music')
);
static $many_many = array(
'Videos' => 'SiteVideo',
'Photos' => 'SitePhoto,
'Songs' => 'SiteMp3'
);
public function forTemplate() {
switch ($this->Type) {
case 'Video':
return $this->renderWith('VideoPost');
break;
case 'Photo':
return $this->renderWith('ImagePost');
break;
etc...
}
function getCMSFields($params=null) {
$fields = parent::getCMSFields($params);
...
$videosField = new GridField(
'Videos',
'Videos',
$this->Videos()->sort('SortOrder'),
$gridFieldConfig
);
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Videos', $photosField);
$photosField = new GridField(
'Photos',
'Photos',
$this->Photos()->sort('SortOrder'),
$gridFieldConfig
);
$fields->addFieldToTab('Root.Videos', $photosField);
return $fields;
}
}
I would rather the user be able to choose the Post Type in the backend and only the appropriate tabs show up. So if you choose Video, only the Video GridField tab would show up. If you choose Photo Type only the Photo's GridField would show.Then I would like to be able to call something like
public function PostList() {
Posts::get()
}
and be able to output all PostTypes sorted by date.
Does anyone know how this might be accomplished? Thanks.
Well the first part can be accomplished using javascript. Check out this tutorial and the docs let me know if you have questions on it.
The second part would be trickier but I think you could do something with the page controller. Include a method that outputs a different template based on the enum value but you would have to set links somewhere.
I managed this with DataObjectManager in 2.4.7 as I had numerous DataObjects and all were included in one page but I'm not sure if that is feasible in SS3.
return $this->renderWith(array('CustomTemplate'));
This line of code will output the page using a different template. You need to include it in a method and then call that method when the appropriate link is clicked.