I know how to create a new hierarchy on an existing dimension using ExecuteMdxScript from the IcCube API using something like :
create category hierarchy [Groupe Spécifique].[NouvelleHierarchie], DEFAULT_MEMBER_NAME = "Tout"
Is there a possibility to create a new Dimension itself (which type would be "Stats") using this channel ?
Unfortunately, this is currently not possible.
Related
I want to do horizontal partitioning for the "users" table which is having a large number of rows. So I split the table and will have then users_1, users_2 etc. These tables are generated dynamically.
My issue is how to set the table name dynamically in laravel models. I have tried below option and it works fine.
$hash = 1;
$user = new User();
$user->setTable('users_'. $hash);
$user->where('id', 23)->get();
Here I get the result from the users_1 table;
But when I call
User::all();
It is using the table users and not users_1.
I have also tried by using setTable() in the __construct method of model. But the issue is $hash is calculated based on the value used in controller which is not getting in the construct method of model.
Is there any solution for this?
You can make a scope that switches the "from" part of the query builder
add this in the model -
public function scopeFromTable($query, $tableName)
{
$query->from($tableName);
}
Then use
$DynamicTableData = ModelName::fromTable($tableName)->get();
you can use all Eloquent methods by this approach
It is due to User::all() is called statically getting a new Model class object and looking for table users by default. If you can use the instance you have created $this with setTable() then you can call with dynamic table names. $this refers the member variables and function for a particular instance.
Best solution for your case, would be to use the database level partitioning. So you don't need to manage the hashing. Just give a partitioning key static or range, with created_at field and then you can call to a single table with User::all() to get all the users and no need to call dynamically. Or can checkout database shard.
May be this can help you:
$data = new Model;
$data->setTable('users');
dump($data->get());
$data->setTable('users_status');
dump($data->get());
die;
Good Luck.
I found some discussions about doing this using the inject method, like this one https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/paperjs/16ToDJquig8
But I cannot find this method in the official doc. So what is the officially recommended way to add custom properties to Paperjs objects?
If you just want to add properties to an Item, you can use Item.data.
From paper.js documentation:
Item.data: A plain javascript object which can be used to store arbitrary data on the item.
Example:
var path = new Path();
path.data.remember = 'milk';
Is it possible to create a new array in windows workflow? More specifically, in the designer.
I've created a variable of System.Int32[], but when I use it I get a NullReferenceException.
I've tried New Int32(5), and various permutations of Dim - nothing I have tried has worked.
I was able to create the array and pass it as an in/out parameter - this works, however the workflow will need to determine the actual size of the array.
To create and instantiate an array, you have to set a default value to your variable with New Int32(FOO SIZE){} or use an Assign activity to instantiate it with the correct size in runtime
You can also use List(Of T) or any other .NET collection structure to achieve dynamic size.
Note that the value must be the right part of a set expression. So, you can google how to do it in VB.NET and you will be fine.
I assume that if you are creating the array in the designer, as you stated, it is either a workflow variable or a workflow argument. The "WF" way to do this would be to use the "Default Value" column under the "Variables" and/or "Arguments" tab.
If it is an argument then the Default Value column only works if the Direction is "In". If your argument is a property, or an Out, or In/Out direction then you would have to use the method mentioned by Davi.
If you are creating it under the "Variables" tag then using the Default value column would be the more built-in approach. The syntax in the default column would be the same syntax mentioned by Davi: New Int32(FOO SIZE) {}
I have a http service producing the following resutls svcSessionCreate.lastResult.children())
I'm looking for a way to use those results in my application. Currently the only way I know how to do it is using a datagrid - and I don't want to do that this time. I want to be able to drill down to a particular node in the xml.
How do I create a variable that I can use. I was trying this but it's not working.
private var myXMLListCollection:XMLListCollection = new XMLListCollection();
myXMLListCollection.source ="{XMLList(svcSessionCreate.lastResult.children())}";
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
Try using a tree control. Here's an example to get you started.
http://blog.flexexamples.com/2008/01/15/expanding-nodes-in-a-flex-tree-control-using-the-openitems-property/
I need to access data from pre-existing tables. I've started working my way through creating a module to display the data etc. However, Orchard is prefixing the table commands with the 'Table_Prefix' and 'Module Name'.
Is there any way I can specify what table to bind the model, so that I can use the existing IRepository
I'm trying to steer clear of modifying the core code, or implement my own IRepository ( which I've got a feeling is what I'm going to have to do.)
Thanks in advance.
You can create custom table naming convention (so that it would fit your current naming) by altering the core code, in three ways:
Record name mapping is created in BuildRecord method of
CompositionStrategy class
(Orchard.Framework/Environment/ShellBuilders/CompositionStrategy), so you can simply modify the code here.
By altering the Apply method of Orchard.Data.Conventions.RecordTableNameConvention class. This is where the record table name mappings (built in point 1.) get pushed to NHibernate.
Create your own implementation of FluentNHibernate.Conventions.IClassConvention (similar to RecordTableNameConvention mentioned above and replace the default one used by AutoMap in Orchard.Data.Providers.AbstractDataServicesProvider's CreatePersistenceModel(...) method with it.
You could also create your own IDataServicesProvider implementation, but that would surely be an overkill if you only need to change the table naming convention.
I was modifying CompositionStrategy and discovered that you have to modify the following
1. SetupService.cs (Modules\Orchard.Setup\Services):
Tables hardcoded in the Setup method are
"Orchard_Framework_DataMigrationRecord" and
"Settings_ShellDescriptorRecord"
2. InfosetController.cs (Modules\Upgrade\Controllers):
Multiple tables were hardcoded in this class which need to be updated.
3. DataMigrationManager.cs (Data\Migration):
Replace the SchemaBuilder parameters to the contructor.