<MasterData>
<Name>AA</Name>
<EmpId>123</EmpId>
<AccountNo>111</AccountNo>
<IFSC>ABC</IFSC>
<AccountData>
<AccountNo>111</AccountNo>
<IFSC>ABC</IFSC>
</AccountData>
<AccountData>
<AccountNo>222</AccountNo>
<IFSC>DEF</IFSC>
</AccountData>
</MasterData>
I have an xml like this in my database,I have a requirement to check the combination of AccountNo+IFSC present in the MasterData(not under the AccountData section) and compare with all documents present in the collection and check whether its matching to the data present in the AccountData section,If its matching identify the URI of the document.
First identify the unique combination of AccountNo+IFSC from Masterdata section and then check whether this combination present under any of the AccountData section, there are more elements in this xml other than AccountNo and IFSC
If you had range indexes on the AccountNo and IFSC elements, then you could:
retrieve the set of values from AccountNo, IFSC, and a cts:uri-reference() with cts:value-tuples().
create a map using a composite key with the AccountNo and IFSC values and the URIs as the values for those map entries
prune any entry that only has one URI associated
return the map that will have the set of URIs corresponding to each combo of AccountNo and IFSC value
Something like this:
let $accountNumber-IFSC :=
cts:value-tuples(
(
cts:element-reference(xs:QName("AccountNo")),
cts:element-reference(xs:QName("IFSC")),
cts:uri-reference()
)
)
let $map := map:new()
let $_create_map_value_to_uris := for $co-occurrence in $accountNumber-IFSC
let $key := concat($co-occurrence[1], " ", $co-occurrence[2])
let $value := (map:get($map, $key), $co-occurrence[3])
return map:put($map, $key, $value)
let $_prune_single_uri :=
for $key in map:keys($map)
let $value := map:get($map, $key)
where not(tail($value))
return
map:put($map, $key, ())
return
$map
If you just wanted the list of URIs, you can invert the map: -$map and return it's keys: return map:keys(-$map)
If you had a range-index on the EmpId you could pivot on that instead of the document URIs.
Using the Optic API functions, you can do something similar with element-range indexes:
import module namespace op = "http://marklogic.com/optic" at "/MarkLogic/optic.xqy";
op:from-lexicons(
map:entry("AccountNo", cts:element-reference(xs:QName("AccountNo")))
=> map:with("IFSC", cts:element-reference(xs:QName("IFSC")))
=> map:with("URI", cts:uri-reference())
)
=> op:group-by(
("IFSC", "AccountNo"),
(
op:group-concat("URIs", "URI", map:entry("separator", ", ")),
op:count("count", op:col("URI"))
)
)
=> op:where(op:gt(op:col("count"), 1))
=> op:result()
Related
I have CLub model (clubs) hasMany with User model like
Club n-n User
and I have UserClub model with columns: id, club_id, user_id, etc
In Club model
public function getCountUsers()
{
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id'])->count();
}
I wanna count all User on Club as code:
$query = Club::find()
->joinWith(['countUsers']);
// ->with('countUsers');
->all();
so it is not working and throwing an error
Club has no relation named \"countUsers\"."
Because it isn't a relation as it does not return a model object or an array of model objects, instead you are using ->count() that makes it return a string that contains the total count for the user against the club.
If you are looking to get a count for the users against all the Clubs you can use the currently defined relation like $club->countUser see below.
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo $club->countUser;
}
or change the relation to
public function getCountUser(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
and use it like
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo count($club->countUser);
}
or like below
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo $club->getCountUser()->count();
}
EDIT
You are actually trying to transform the following query using ActiveRecord as far as I understood from the discussion.
SELECT clubs.id, count(user_clubs.id) as total
FROM
clubs
left join user_clubs on clubs.id = user_clubs.club_id
group by clubs.id
if that is correct you can use the following
Clubs::find ()
->alias ( 'c' )
->select ( [ new \yii\db\Expression ( 'c.[[id]], count(uc.[[id]]) as total' ) ] )
->leftJoin ( '{{%user_clubs}} uc' , 'uc.club_id=c.id' )
->groupBy ( 'c.id' )
->all ();
Note : You have to do one more thing you have to add a public property $total inside your Club model and add it to safe rules, because you are selecting the count as an alias total and until unless you define it inside the model the result set won't show you the count, so add the following inside the Club model.
public $total;
under rules
[[other fields...,'total'] , 'safe' ] ,
EDIT2
For some reason, I have a feeling that you are trying to count by specifying a relation instead of specifying the ->leftJoin () with the table user_clubs in the query.
If that is so then you have to change your relation getUserCount() you should better give a meaningful name that describes it. i would rename it to getClubUsers()
public function getClubUsers(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
After this, you still have to declare a public property $total as I described before inside your Club model, and add it to safe rules.
Now you can write your query in the following way
Clubs::find ()
->alias ( 'c' )
->select ( [ new \yii\db\Expression ( 'c.[[id]], count(cu.[[id]]) as total' ) ] )
->joinWith( ['clubUsers cu'] )
->groupBy ( 'c.id' )
->all ();
You can do this with join, in my case i get users who have more than 0 referrals.
$users = User::find()->with('referrals')
->from(User::tableName() . ' t')
->join('left join',User::tableName().' r','r.Deeplink = t.ReferralID')
->select('t.*,count(r.ID) as ct')
->groupBy('t.ID')
->andFilterHaving(['>','ct',0])
->all();
Hi your relation is correct check you error Club has no relation named \"countUsers\"."
Means you are calling a relation which not exist :
change query like this, Relation name should be in Club Model
public function getCount(){
return $this->hasMany(UserClub::className(), ['club_id'=>'id']);
}
$clubs=Club::find()->all();
foreach($clubs as $club){
echo count($club->getCount);
}
$query = Club::find()
->joinWith(['count']);
// ->with('countusers');
->all();
If you want count just do like this .
Load the Club model .
$club_model = Club::find()
$count = club_model->count;
I have an XML fragment where I want to have different queries based in the existence of the id attribute:
<author order="1"
id="99999999"
initials="A."
given-names="Able"
surname="Baker"
fullname="Able Baker"/>
I have tried:
let $first-query := if ($first)
then cts:or-query((
cts:element-attribute-word-match(xs:QName("author"), xs:QName("given-names"), $first || "*", ("collation=http://marklogic.com/collation/codepoint")),
cts:element-attribute-word-match(xs:QName("author"), xs:QName("initials"), $first || "*", ("collation=http://marklogic.com/collation/codepoint"))
))
else ()
let $last-query := if ($last)
then cts:element-attribute-word-match(xs:QName("author"), xs:QName("surname"), $last || "*", ("collation=http://marklogic.com/collation/codepoint"))
else ()
let $author-no-id-query :=
cts:and-query((
cts:not-query(
cts:element-attribute-value-query(xs:QName("author"), xs:QName("id"), "*")
),
$first-query,
$last-query
))
let $query := cts:element-query(xs:QName("author"),
cts:or-query(($author-no-id-query, $author-id-query
)))
If the id exists, then a different query takes place and a match against the id occurs. How do I detect an absence of an attribute in MarkLogic?
I have inserted two test documents into the database:
xdmp:document-insert('/example.xml', <author order="1"
id="99999999"
initials="A."
given-names="Able"
surname="Baker"
fullname="Able Baker"/>)
xdmp:document-insert('/example2.xml', <author order="1"
initials="A."
given-names="Able"
surname="Baker"
fullname="Able Baker"/>)
And run the following query against these documents:
cts:search(fn:doc(),
cts:element-query(xs:QName('author'), cts:and-query((
cts:not-query(cts:element-attribute-value-query(xs:QName('author'), xs:QName('id'), '*', ("wildcarded")))
)
)))
This search only matches the document where the ID attribute does not exist.
I have a csv file. I've managed import these data into MarkLogic using mlcp which then created a xml file in MarkLogic.
Now in csv I have this format "6/29/2013 5:00:00 PM" random in one of the column. How do I use xquery and probably node-replace as a transform function to convert this date into a different format such as "2013-06-29" as MarkLogic default date format?
Any help is appreciated...
I have created transform.xqy and install it on Modules in MLogic. I'm
thinking about using "xdmp:node-replace" to replace the date with expected
format. Or should I go thorugh the csv column by column (How to do?) and
use "castable as xs:dateTime" to determine date value or not. Yet, even
just printing out the content value/uri, always giving me error.
xquery version "1.0-ml";
module namespace example = "http://test.com/example";
(: If the input document is XML, insert #NEWATTR, with the value
: specified in the input parameter. If the input document is not
: XML, leave it as-is.
:)
declare function example:transform(
$content as map:map,
$context as map:map
) as map:map*
{
let $the-doc-uri := map:get($content, "uri")
let $the-doc := map:get($content, "value")
return
trace($the-doc, 'The value of doc is: ')
};
The MarkLogic documentation contains a full example of an MLCP transform:
https://docs.marklogic.com/guide/mlcp/import#id_65640
It shows this example, which adds an attribute to the XML content:
declare function example:transform(
$content as map:map,
$context as map:map
) as map:map*
{
let $attr-value :=
(map:get($context, "transform_param"), "UNDEFINED")[1]
let $the-doc := map:get($content, "value")
return
if (fn:empty($the-doc/element()))
then $content
else
let $root := $the-doc/*
return (
map:put($content, "value",
document {
$root/preceding-sibling::node(),
element {fn:name($root)} {
attribute { fn:QName("", "NEWATTR") } {$attr-value},
$root/#*,
$root/node()
},
$root/following-sibling::node()
}
), $content
)
};
Keep in mind you are supposed to update the "value" property of the $content map:map, and return $content to get your transformation result added to the database. I suggest using a (potentially recursive) typeswitch to identify element nodes, and then adjusting their value accordingly..
HTH!
finally did it.
The thing is I must use mem:node-replace because it is on the fly, on memory. While xdmp:node-replace is when the data is already on MarkLogic.
The rest is as expected I must use format-date and xdmp:parse-dateTime to get date format as required.
Here is some snippets
xquery version "1.0-ml";
module namespace ns_transform = "this_is_my_namespace";
import module namespace mem = "http://xqdev.com/in-mem-update" at "/MarkLogic/appservices/utils/in-mem-update.xqy";
declare variable $ns := "this_is_my_namespace";
declare function ns_transform:transform(
$content as map:map,
$context as map:map
) as map:map*
{
let $doc := map:get($content, "value")
let $format_in := "[M]/[D]/[Y0001] [h01]:[m01]:[s01] [P]"
let $format_out := "[Y0001]-[M01]-[D01]"
let $old_date := $doc/*:root_doc/*:date/text()
let $new_date := format-date(xs:date(xdmp:parse-dateTime($format_in, $old_date)), $format_out)
let $new_doc := mem:node-replace($doc/*:root_doc/*:date,element {fn:QName($ns, "date")}{$new_date})
let $_ := map:put($content, "value", $new_doc)
return $content
};
For each post, there is a custom field name "Function", the key/value pair is like this:
Key : Functions
Value : <!--en-->Nourishing Yin and invigorating the vital essence of kidneys.<!--:--><!--tw-->滋陰補腎。<!--:-->
The problem is if I simply use get_post_meta , it return string of both language, how can I get the value based on the language?
I am using qTranslate right now, Thanks.
Updated (the code):
$custom_fields = get_post_custom(get_the_ID());
$function = get_post_custom_values('Functions', get_the_ID());
You can simply fetch the strings considering comments as prefix and suffix -
After you get the custom field value,
e.g.
$function = "<!--en-->Nourishing Yin and invigorating the vital essence of kidneys.<!--:--><!--tw-->滋陰補腎。<!--:-->";
$arr = explode("<!--:-->", $function);
$new_arr = array();
foreach($arr as $a ){
if(!empty($a)){
$lang = str_replace( "-->", "", substr($a, 4, 5) );
$str = substr($a, 9);
$new_arr[$lang] = $str;
}
}
Now $new_arr will have key/value pairs like array(language_code => sentence).
If you do print_r($new_arr);
It will give output as follows:
Array ( [en] => Nourishing Yin and invigorating the vital essence of kidneys. [tw] => 滋陰補腎。 )
Now you can identify the strings using their respective language codes.
I have a basic search control which lists companies from a CRM depending on predefined search/filtering criteria supplied by dropdowns. The default selection is "ALL" for each DropDown, otherwise the user chooses a specific item(s). I'd like to be able to construct a Linq query dynamically based on the selections. Out of the 5 selectors they supply values that I can match against the Company table, but two of the selectors (if either or both are chosen) would require a join or joins, else no action should be taken again the base result set. I hope this makes sense.
I'm not sure how to do this effectively. Here is my code:
private void Search()
{
EnergyPubsCRMDataContext dc = new EnergyPubsCRMDataContext();
var results = (from c in dc.Companies
select c);
//only create the join if the selected index > 0
if (ddlIndustry.SelectedIndex > 0)
{
//A company can be in 1 or more industries, thus here I want to join
//with the CompanyIndustry table and have a WHERE clause to match on the ddlIndustry.SelectedValue
}
//only create the join if the selected index > 0
if (ddlServices.SelectedIndex > 0)
{
//A company can offer 1 or more services. Here I want to join to the CompanyService table
//on the CompanyID and have a WHERE clause to match the ddlServices.SelectedValue
}
//These work OK to shape the overal query further (they don't need joins)
if (ddlCountry.SelectedIndex > 0)
results = results.Where(c => c.CountryID == Convert.ToInt32(ddlCountry.SelectedValue));
if (ddlStateRegion.SelectedIndex > 0)
results = results.Where(c => c.StateRegionID == Convert.ToInt32(ddlStateRegion.SelectedValue));
if (ddlAccountManagers.SelectedIndex > 0)
{
Guid g = new Guid(ddlAccountManagers.SelectedValue);
results = results.Where(c => c.UserId == g);
}
results = results.OrderBy(c => c.CompanyName);
//Bind to Grid....
}
if (ddlIndustry.SelectedIndex > 0)
{
//A company can be in 1 or more industries, thus here I want to join
//with the CompanyIndustry table and have a WHERE clause to match on the ddlIndustry.SelectedValue
results = results.Where(c => c.CompanyIndustry.IndustryID == ddlIndustry.SelectedValue);
}
Assuming you have correct foreign keys in your database/DBML.
This will generate the join implicitly.
I had very similar issue and no foreign keys I could leverage.
My solution would translate to something like this:
results = results
.Join(dc.CompanyIndustry, c => c.CompanyID, ci => ci.CompanyID, (c, ci) => new { c, ci.IndustryID })
.Where (a => a.IndustryID == ddlIndustry.SelectedValue)
.Select(a => a.c);
Basically:
1) first we create a join, with a projection that gives us IndustryID (join)
2) we filter based on IndustryID (where)
3) we return original anonymous type, so that we can modify original query (select)