I'm currently trying to develop a progress bar which grows or shrinks depending on the number of inputs that aren't empty.
I've tried 2 solutions to animate the bar depending on the var percentage.
First one:
I've tried to write the transition style inline like this in App.js:
<div className="progress-div" >
<div style={{transition:"all 500ms", width: `${progress}%`}} className="progress"/>
</div>
and in the App.css:
.progress-div {
background-color:#E2E2F6;
border-radius: .5rem;
}
.progress {
background-color: #8B8CC7;
height: 15px;
}
Second one:
<div className="progress-div" >
<div style={{width: `${progress}%`}} className="progress"/>
</div>
.progress-div {
background-color:#E2E2F6;
border-radius: .5rem;
}
.progress {
background-color: #8B8CC7;
height: 15px;
transition: all 500ms
}
Neither of those worked, I guess it won't because I'm giving the width in the inline code, but I don't know how I could pass the variable to the css file or have another way around to make it work.
I've tried both of your solutions, both work on my sandbox HERE
The only thing that comes to my mind is incorrect "progress" variable value, please check that.
Related
Edit: Apologies, forgot to add the sandbox to tinker: https://codesandbox.io/s/inspiring-wing-tekl08
I'm having an issue with my CSS. To clarify, the reason I want to do this is because I want my text to have a mix-blend-mode: difference on h1 within a media query, and after researching on here and other forums I've concluded that it's only possible if the background image which the text blends with is inserted via CSS instead of an <img/> in my React Component. If this is possible in any other way and I'm going about this wrong, feel free to give me a better option.
For some reason, the background image that I've inserted (see code below) is placing itself in front of h1. I've tried setting a z-index: 1 on the image and position: relative - z-index:something>1 on the text but it doesn't seem to work. Same goes for the <Nav/> tag that can be seen in the component - it ends up hidden behind the image.
Component:
const PageHeader = () => {
return (
<motion.div
id="header"
variants={imgFade}
initial="hidden"
animate="show"
className="bg-image"
>
<div className="header-container">
<div className="title-container">
<motion.h1
variants={textAnimate(0.7)}
initial="hidden"
animate="show"
>
FNAME
</motion.h1>
</div>
<br />
<div className="title-container">
<motion.h1
variants={textAnimate(0.8)}
initial="hidden"
animate="show"
>
SNAME
</motion.h1>
</div>
<Nav />
</div>
</motion.div>
);
};
export default PageHeader;
CSS:
.bg-image {
background: url("img/compressed/Website\ Cover_Open_NoBG.png") no-repeat
bottom right;
background-size: contain;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
float: right;
}
.header-container {
margin-left: 100px;
margin-top: 200px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: flex-start;
}
.title-container {
overflow: hidden;
}
h1 {
font-family: "Lato";
font-size: 5rem;
font-weight: 300;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: left;
mix-blend-mode: color;
pointer-events: none;
}
Apologies if it's blaringly obvious - again if someone can find an alternative to do the code below then I would much rather follow through with that:
#media screen and (max-width: 1200px) {
.h1 {
mix-blend-mode: difference;
}
Thanks!
UPDATE: This has been solved by just putting position: relative; z-index: 2 on .header-container. Perfect example of stopping coding after 3am or else you get blinders on and can't see the obvious answer.
In case anyone can help regarding mix-blend-mode: difference do let me know.
UPDATE 2: Second issue solved! Had to put a background color of white on the background property and also put the mix-blend: mode on .header-container - Text had to be changed to white and kept on difference blend even on a white backdrop.
I am building a website with WordPress. On my homepage I want a picture grid (10 x 3) of different products, and when you hover over each picture, a caption with the product name will pop up.
I have managed to do 3/4 of it but there's this massive white space below each row. :(
I am using the SiteOrigin editor widget to insert the image, and using HTML and CSS to code the hover effects. See below for the current coding.
HTML:
<div id="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Hassaku.png" />
<p class="text">Summer Mikan</p>
</div>
CSS:
.text {
color: #000000;
font-size: 16px;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
}
#pic .text {
position:relative;
bottom:80px;
left:0px;
visibility:hidden;
}
#pic:hover .text {
visibility:visible;
}
Here's the website so you can see what I've done: http://peacefruit.net
The top row has the captions, but also, the pesky gap. The bottom three rows are examples of how I want it to look (no borders or gaps between pics). All rows and individual widgets have no padding, margins or gutters and I've already adjusted the theme padding to 0 with CSS.
I'm sure it's a simple line of code I'm missing, but it's driving me crazy!
Please send help.
Try adding to your inline css for siteorigin-panels-stretch
overflow:hidden;
height:164.89px;
Hope this works.
Thanks!
In your case
the id should be unique.
So, it is better to change #pic to a class
Also, the <p> tag in your style contain padding-bottom and it will case the white space problem.
Change each pic to the following
HTML:
<div class="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp- content/uploads/2016/11/Hassaku.png">
<div class="text">Summer Mikan</div>
</div>
CSS:
.pic{
position: relative;
}
.pic .text{
position: absolute;
top: 80px;
width: 100%;
visibility: hidden;
}
then it should be work.
Stylesheets for WordPress themes can have a lot of CSS bloat, so you're on the right track creating a custom stylesheet, to tackle the styling nuances you desire.
Since this is a responsive theme, it's best to begin solving this from a mobile-first perspective.
The first thing to prune is the bottom-margin: 30px; for .panel-grid-cell, like this:
.home #main .panel-grid-cell {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
The next thing is to correct your HTML mark-up. The value of pic is given to multiple id attributes. An id attribute is used to denote a unique element. The class attribute denotes a non-unique element. pic should be assigned to class attributes instead, since many elements in your layout utilize this hook value. Like this:
<div class="pic">
I'm noticing that img.hover and p.text are getting wrapped in an unnecessary <p> tag. Make sure that this does not happen in the SiteOrigin editor.
You should then prune the bottom-margin: 1.5em for paragraphs inside of the .pic divs (note the designation of pic as a class hook .pic, rather than an id hook, which would have been #pic):
.pic p {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
To get even closer, relative positioning should be used on the .pic div to ensure that the subsequent styling suggestion (position: absolute;) will take effect:
.pic {
position: relative;
}
And then, for the text that appears when hovering an image:
p.text {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
}
The styles above will work for mobile, but your theme is responsive, and you might need to account for some styling variations with different screen sizes.
For tablets, you'd need a media query like this:
#media (min-width: 600px) {
.some-class {
some-property: some-value;
}
etc...
}
And finally, for desktop:
#media (min-width: 1000px) {
.some-class {
some-property: some-value;
}
etc....
}
Thanks everyone for your help :) After some fiddling around with the suggestions and a software update, there is no gap now!
I thought I'd post my final code in case anyone has a similar problem and it might be of some help. (Note: there are some minor style changes which differ from the original post but have no effect on how it works).
HTML:
<div class="pic">
<img class="hover" src="http://peacefruit.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Summer-Mikan.png"/>
<div class="text">Summer Mikan</div>
</div>
WIDGET CLASS:
fade
CSS:
.fade {
-webkit-opacity: 0.6;
-moz-opacity: 0.6;
opacity: 0.6;
}
.fade:hover {
-webkit-opacity: 1;
-moz-opacity: 1;
opacity: 1;
}
.pic {
position: relative;
}
.text {
color: #FFFFFF;
font-size: 22px;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
background: rgba(214, 187, 14, 0.85);
}
.pic .text {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
width: 100%;
visibility:hidden;
}
.pic:hover .text {
visibility:visible;
}
.pic p {
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
So glad it finally works, much appreciation to everyone!
I'm curious to the behaviour of using calc() in setting a CSS variable.
Example:
#test {
--halfWidth: calc(100% / 2);
}
Now, if the #test element, say a div, was 500px wide, I would like the --halfWidth variable to be set to 250px.
But, as far as I can tell the var(--halfWidth) code used elsewhere simply drops in the calc(100% / 2) string instead of 250px. Which means that I can't use the calculation of say element A and use it in element B later on, since it would simply set for example width: var(--halfWidth); as half the width of element B instead of half the width of element A, where the variable was defined.
I've scoured the web trying to find any documentation on the behaviour of this, but I have so far drawn a blank.
Ideally, setting a CSS variable using calc should be available in two variants:
One variant working just like this example, simply dropping in the string as-is, bar any in-string variable replacements.
A second variant where calc() would yield the result of the calculation instead of simply replacing the string.
How to achieve this? I'd rather leave the actual implementation to people suited to it, but one possibility would be an eval() kind of thing; like eval(calc(100% / 2)) would give the result 250px.
Anyway, if anyone have any real documentation on this behaviour or a solution to how to get the example above to yield the result instead, I'm all ears!
Edit: Just FYI, I have read the specs at https://drafts.csswg.org/css-variables/
This is kind of a tough question to answer cause the answer will not be:
Do it like this...then it will work
The problem you are facing is the normal behavior of CSS. It cascades the styles. If what you are trying to achieve would work it would get real messy after a short amount of time.
I mean how cool is it that you can define a variable like this
#test {
--halfWidth: calc(100% / 2);
}
where var(--halfWidth) should always be calc(100% / 2). Did you note that it will always be half the width of the parent element?
Imagine how strange it would be if a programmer in a few months reads your code and has box with a width of 1000px set with --halfWidth and now it is 250px wide ... I would think the internet is broken :) It should just be 500px wide.
To achieve what you want, you could/should define different vars defining the widths of the parent elements. And split it down to the children.
One approach to this is to dynamically add a line to the CSS Object Model (CSSOM) which explicitly declares the width of the .halfwidth class.
This width will then apply to all divs with the .halfwidth class.
In the example below, I have, additionally, made .element-a horizontally resizable, so that you can see more clearly that as you change the width of .element-a, the width of both .halfwidth divs changes proportionately, including the .halfwidth div which is a child of .element-b.
Working Example:
let myStylesheet = document.styleSheets[0];
const elementA = document.getElementsByClassName('element-a')[0];
let elementAWidth = window.getComputedStyle(elementA).getPropertyValue('width');
const calculateHalfWidth = (elementAWidth) => {
myStylesheet.insertRule('.halfWidth { width: ' + (parseInt(elementAWidth) / 2) + 'px; }', myStylesheet.cssRules.length);
}
calculateHalfWidth(elementAWidth);
// ================================================================================
// THE SCRIPT BELOW USES A ResizeObserver TO WATCH THE RESIZABLE .element-a DIV
// ================================================================================
const elementAObserver = new ResizeObserver(entries => {
for (let entry of entries) {
if (entry.contentRect.width !== elementAWidth) {
calculateHalfWidth(entry.contentRect.width);
}
}
});
elementAObserver.observe(elementA);
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
div.element {
float: left;
width: 200px;
height: 100px;
margin: 12px 3px;
text-align: center;
border: 1px solid rgb(0, 0, 0);
}
div.element h2 {
font-size: 18px;
}
div.element-a {
resize: horizontal;
overflow: auto;
}
div.element-b {
width: 300px;
}
div.halfWidth {
height: 40px;
margin: 0 auto;
border: 1px dashed rgb(255, 0, 0);
}
div.halfWidth h2 {
font-size: 14px;
}
<div class="element element-a">
<h2>Element A</h2>
<div class="halfWidth">
<h2>halfWidth</h2>
</div>
</div>
<div class="element element-b">
<h2>Element B</h2>
<div class="halfWidth">
<h2>halfWidth</h2>
</div>
</div>
On a number input it has a spinner which has several css properties but I can't seem to find a way to change the size of the spinner itself. I am talking about <input type='number'>. I tried finding something that would change the size but I haven't been able to find anything. The other issue I guess is that every browser on possibly every OS is going to have a potentially different implementation of the spinner itself. When I say spinner I am talking about the highlighted part of this image.
I cannot use the JQuery UI spinner because the large app I am developing uses JQuery UI 1.8 which did not include the spinner. Upgrading causes issues.
Not ideal, but try playing around with the CSS transform property:
For example,
input[type=number]
{
transform: scale(2);
}
This increases the size of the entire input, but maybe this (in conjunction with setting font-size, line-height, height, width) can produce a desired effect.
This CSS seems to work in Chrome by replacing the spinners with a static image (of a spinner) and then control the size and position of the image within the element and making it invisible by default until the user hovers over it:
* Spin Buttons modified */
input[type="number"].mod::-webkit-outer-spin-button,
input[type="number"].mod::-webkit-inner-spin-button {
-webkit-appearance: none;
background: #0F0 url() no-repeat center center;
width: 3em;
border-left: 1px solid #0f0;
opacity: 0; /* shows Spin Buttons per default (Chrome >= 39) */
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
}
input[type="number"].mod::-webkit-inner-spin-button:hover,
input[type="number"].mod::-webkit-inner-spin-button:active{
box-shadow: 0 0 2px #0CF;
opacity: .7;
}
Plain ole HTML...
No library or images required.
HTML
<!-- Score Control Container -->
<div class = "Score-Control">
<div class = "Score-Value-Container">
<div id="RoundScore" class="Score-Value">
10
</div>
</div>
<div class = "Score-UpDown">
<div class = "Score-Button-Container">
<div class = "Score-Button " onclick="IncrementScore();">
▲
</div>
</div>
<div class = "Score-Button-Container">
<div class = "Score-Button " onclick="DecrementScore();">
▼
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
.Score-Control {
width: 200px;
}
.Score-Value-Container{
position:relative;
display: table;
overflow: hidden;
height:80px;
background-color:#aaa;
width:66%;
float:left;
font-size: 44px;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
.Score-Value {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
.Score-UpDown{
position:relative;
height:80px;
background-color: burlywood;
width:34%;
float:right;
}
.Score-Button-Container {
display: table;
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
background-color:green;
}
.Score-Button {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
font-size: 27px;
}
JavaScript
function IncrementScore() {
var RoundScore = document.getElementById("RoundScore").innerHTML;
if (RoundScore < 10) {
RoundScore++
document.getElementById("RoundScore").innerHTML = RoundScore;
}
}
function DecrementScore() {
var RoundScore = document.getElementById("RoundScore").innerHTML;
if (RoundScore > 1) {
RoundScore--
document.getElementById("RoundScore").innerHTML = RoundScore;
}
}
Code in JSFiddle
You could make an input field with two buttons for up and down and style them then the way you like.
<input type="text" name="something">
<span class="goUp"></span>
<span class="goDown"></span>
js:
var inputField = $('input[name="something"]');
$('.goUp').click(function() {
inputField.val(inputField.val() + 1);
});
$('.goDown').click(function() {
inputField.val(inputField.val() - 1);
});
you then should also check, that the input has only numbers inside, so that your +/- 1 really works.
The “size of the spinner” is a vague concept, but the <input type=number> element seems to obey at least width, height, and font property settings. Example:
<input type=number value=42 min=0 max=99
style="font: 24pt Courier; width: 3ch; height: 3em">
Whether such settings are useful and whether they should work is a different issue. It can be argued that the implementation of such elements is expected to be a browser-dependent nice, useable widget suitable for the browsing conditions, rather than something that authors should mess around with. But in practice, the widget is largely affected by CSS settings, and this might be a good thing in practice, e.g. because the input box tends to be too wide by default. (We could expect browsers to set it according to min and max values, but this just doesn’t happen at present.) The risk is that by setting the width, you might conflict with the implementation. The code above expects the up and down arrows to take a width of one character at most, but this guess might some day be wrong.
I have the following HTML:
<div class="float-left inline orderby">
<div class="arrow up" style="margin-bottom: 2px; margin-left: 2px"></div>
<div class="arrow down" style="margin-left: 2px;"></div>
<input type="checkbox" data-ng-model="inverse" style="margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 10px;">
</div>
I'm trying to use the less pre-processor to create my CSS.
How can I use less to create CSS to remove the styles from this example. In particular I am not sure how to handle the difference between the 1st and 2nd DIV
You mean you want to remove the inline styles?
.orderby .arrow, .orderby input {
margin: 0;
&.up {
/* styles for first div */
}
&.down {
/* styles for second div */
}
}
It's a little unclear exactly what your question is. I can read it two ways:
(1) You cannot remove css set with style with LESS
If you actually have a style property on your html elements, then that cannot be directly affected by LESS at all (so it cannot be "removed" by LESS). Additionally, the only way to overcome those styles with LESS is by using the exact same solution you would have available with CSS, the !important attribute (which I despise, but the facts are the facts when it comes to what is available for CSS styling). So this would remove the margins imposed by the style for all direct children in your div (as your example has):
.orderby > * {
margin: 0 !important;
}
But perhaps you want to know how...
(2) You can move the code from the style to the LESS
In which case, it is something like this:
LESS
.orderby {
.arrow {
margin-left: 2px;
&:first-child { /* or could use &.up */
margin-top: 2px;
}
}
input {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 10px;
}
}
CSS Output
.orderby {
.arrow {
margin-left: 2px
&:first-child { /* or could use &.up */
margin-top: 2px;
}
}
input {
margin-left: 0;
margin-right: 10px;
}
}