Multiple IPs from ISP with DHCP. (OpenWRT or iproute2, macvlan???) - ip

Problem: I want 2 IPs so that I can run two servers on my LAN. Apparently my ISP doesn't allow static IPs and I need to use DHCP to obtain my second IP.
What I have learned so far:
In order to get two distinct IP addresses with DHCP, you need two different MACs (or client IDs?)
You can't have two MACs on a single interface, so you need to put your internet facing interface into promiscuous mode and somehow get that traffic to a virtual interface with its own MAC.
Once the traffic gets to my virtual interface, I can just assign it to WAN firewall zone (OpenWRT thingie, not so important) for ez profit.
But here is the hard part: In order to separate my LAN from WAN there is by default two different VLANs configured in OpenWRT. LAN VLAN is eth0.1 and WAN VLAN is eth 0.2.
The final question is: How do I configure my system? Do I put eth0 in promisc or eth0.2 or both? Or is my premise completely wrong? How do I create the said virtual interface? Below is my ip addr extract.
root#TopLevelRouter:~# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP qlen 1000
link/ether [REDACTED] brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 [REDACTED]/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
9: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether [REDACTED] brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 [REDACTED]/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
10: wlan1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether [REDACTED] brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 [REDACTED]/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
16: eth0.1#eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether [REDACTED] brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.1.1/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0.1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 [REDACTED]/60 scope global noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 [REDACTED]/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
17: eth0.2#eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP qlen 1000
link/ether [REDACTED] brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet [external IP 1]/24 brd [redacted].255 scope global eth0.2
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 [REDACTED]/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

I solved it, finally.
Full solution in my blog
And a web archive link in case my blog doesn't exist when you read this

Related

OpenStack metadata returned 404

OpenStack Xena
CentOS 8 Stream
On the controller, I'm trying to make a request, but I'm getting a 404 error. How can I fix this?
[root#os-controller-01 conf.d(keystone)]# ip netns exec qdhcp-2f730236-cc81-4e29-b5eb-e47126db582f curl http://169.254.169.254/openstack
<html>
<head>
<title>404 Not Found</title>
</head>
<body>
<h1>404 Not Found</h1>
The resource could not be found.<br /><br />
</body>
</html>
[root#os-controller-01 conf.d(keystone)]# ip netns exec qdhcp-2f730236-cc81-4e29-b5eb-e47126db582f ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: ns-3e21dd54-4b#if5: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether fa:16:3e:78:ca:4b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
inet 10.10.85.10/24 brd 10.10.85.255 scope global ns-3e21dd54-4b
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet 169.254.169.254/32 brd 169.254.169.254 scope global ns-3e21dd54-4b
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::a9fe:a9fe/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::f816:3eff:fe78:ca4b/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
My config metadata_agent.ini:
[root#os-controller-01 conf.d(keystone)]# cat /etc/neutron/metadata_agent.ini | egrep -v "(^#.*|^$)"
[DEFAULT]
nova_metadata_host = os-controller-01
metadata_proxy_shared_secret = mypass
debug = true
[cache]

VM & host can't ping eachother over bridge

I have a host machine with Debian 10 & QEMU-KVM. I installed packages and rebooted:
sudo apt install qemu-kvm virt-manager
sudo reboot
So now I want to create a bridge that will enable my virtual servers to (a) connect to network and (b) to be seen to a host machine and other computers on the network.
I read dozen of tutorials on how to do this and failed miserably every time. I had some sucess setting up bridge with (a) package iproute2 and (b) package virt-manager (ran as super user).
Trying as a root:
By folowing archwiki I set up my bridge using these commands:
sudo ip link add virtual_bridge type bridge
sudo ip link set dev virtual_bridge up
I then reset the ethernet card and connect it to the bridge as it's slave:
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 down
sudo ip addr flush dev enx24f5a2f17b27
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 up
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 master virtual_bridge
And then I open the GUI application:
sudo virt-manager
I right click the QEMU/KVM session (qemu:///system) and I choose connect:
When session is connected I start creating a new virtual machine. During it's creation I come to a window asking to choose type of virtual network. There are two options. First one has suboptions while second one enables manual input of the device:
Host device enx24f5a2f17b27: macvtap
Bridge
VEPA
Private
Passthrough
Specify shared device name
I tried choosing suboptions offered by the first option, but when selected they, issue a warning:
In most configurations macvtap does not work for host to guest network communication
This is not an option for me because my virtual servers will need two-way communication. This is why I choose the second option and I manualy specify my bridge virtual_bridge:
Then I start the virtual machine which can browse the internet and also can the host machine. Both are assigned the IP in the same network. But when I try to ping them ping doesn't work in any direction. Host, can't ping virtual machine and vice versa.
I can't explain this, because archwiki states that bridge should be transparent like a switch and devices should therefore be able to ping eachother:
A bridge is a piece of software used to unite two or more network
segments. A bridge behaves like a virtual network switch, working
transparently (the other machines do not need to know or care about
its existence).
If I check internet settings on a host:
ziga#ziga-laptop:~$ ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether c4:85:08:3c:1a:59 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: enx24f5a2f17b27: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,DYNAMIC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virtual_bridge state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 24:f5:a2:f1:7b:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.64.100/24 brd 192.168.64.255 scope global enx24f5a2f17b27
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::26f5:a2ff:fef1:7b27/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
32: virtual_bridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 24:f5:a2:f1:7b:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::26f5:a2ff:fef1:7b27/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
34: vnet0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,DYNAMIC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virtual_bridge state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:54:00:c4:3e:62 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 169.254.82.75/16 brd 169.254.255.255 scope global vnet0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2c93:eff:fea5:c52b/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
From the above, I can confirm that my ethernet interface enx24f5a2f17b27 and vnet0 (which was automaticaly created by virtual machine) are both slaves to virtual_bridge *(note the keywords master virtual_bridge)*.
If I am honest I was expecting GUI application to also create TAP device as well but it only created vnet0... Is this actually a TAP device?
How can I make connection two-way?
Trying as a normal user (without bridge):
I deleted virtual_bridge and virtual_tap so that everything was back to normal.
ziga#ziga-laptop:~$ ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether c4:85:08:3c:1a:59 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: enx24f5a2f17b27: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,DYNAMIC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 24:f5:a2:f1:7b:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.64.100/24 brd 192.168.64.255 scope global enx24f5a2f17b27
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::26f5:a2ff:fef1:7b27/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
I noticed that if I start virt-manager with sudo and use qcow2 image that image will become owned by root and it will become part of group root. This was part of my problem why I avoided using virt-manager as a normal user. So I fixed this and started virt-manager as a normal user.
I created the identical virtual machine but when a network window pops up it had different (!) options:
Userspace networking
Specify shared device name
I was unable to specify my interface enx24f5a2f17b27 manualy with the second option so I chose a userspace networking.
Then I started the virtual machine which can browse the internet and also can the host machine. Both are assigned the IP which is totaly different. When I try to ping them ping doesn't work in any direction. Host, can't ping virtual machine and vice versa.
Trying as a normal user (with bridge)
So now I first set up my my bridge precisely like I did in my first attempt as a sudo user:
sudo ip link add virtual_bridge type bridge
sudo ip link set dev virtual_bridge up
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 down
sudo ip addr flush dev enx24f5a2f17b27
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 up
sudo ip link set dev enx24f5a2f17b27 master virtual_bridge
so that I have:
ziga#ziga-laptop:~$ ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: wlp3s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default qlen 1000
link/ether c4:85:08:3c:1a:59 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: enx24f5a2f17b27: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,DYNAMIC,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master virtual_bridge state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 24:f5:a2:f1:7b:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.64.100/24 brd 192.168.64.255 scope global enx24f5a2f17b27
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::26f5:a2ff:fef1:7b27/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
11: virtual_bridge: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 24:f5:a2:f1:7b:27 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::805f:cfff:feb6:ec91/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
I started the virt-manager as a normal user and created the identical virtual machine. When a network window pops up it has same options than before:
Userspace networking
Specify shared device name
I was unable to specify my bridge virtual_bridge manualy with the second option because Qemu reports an internal eror:

docker-swarm - ip address eth0 shows more than one address

I'm using docker 1.12.1 in swarm mode.
When I run the following command:
docker network create --driver overlay --subnet 10.0.9.0/24 --opt encrypted services
and then
docker service create --name nginx nginx
than exec the command ip address in the running container (on the correct node) the result is
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
234: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1424 qdisc noqueue state UP group default
link/ether 02:42:0a:00:09:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.9.3/24 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet 10.0.9.2/32 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::42:aff:fe00:903/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
236: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default
link/ether 02:42:ac:12:00:03 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.18.0.3/16 scope global eth1
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::42:acff:fe12:3/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Can please anyone explain, why eth0 has in that case two ip addresses 10.0.9.3/24 and 10.0.9.2/32?
This causes a problem, because when I run more instances, there are overlapping addresses which breaks my running service.
One is VIP, used for service.
Another is for node address, only for internal use. From perspective of APP, they should use service IP.

Host IP is not visible by LXC guests. Open vSwitch bridge

In such way I have configured OVS bridge for LXC containers LXC with Open vSwitch
It is bridge configuration:
# ovs-vsctl show
1b236728-4637-42a5-8b81-53d4c93a6803
Bridge "switch0"
Port vethNSCEGY
Interface vethNSCEGY
Port "switch0"
Interface "switch0"
type: internal
Port "vethD6TFEB"
Interface "vethD6TFEB"
ovs_version: "2.3.2"
switch0 is interface on host and has IP 192.168.100.1/24
vethNSCEGY and vethD6TFEB are interfaces for LXC guests.
Eventually first LXC guest with IP 192.168.100.10/24 can ping second LXC guest 192.168.100.11/24 but cant ping host IP 192.168.100.1/24
Is it OK for OVS? Or do I need smth to enable?
PS. IPs on my interfaces:
# ip a
...
4: ovs-system: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
link/ether 52:9d:e1:60:1d:56 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
5: switch0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop state DOWN group default
link/ether 16:63:eb:47:13:41 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.100.1/24 scope global switch0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
35: vethNSCEGY: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master ovs-system state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:d1:06:81:69:ed brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcd1:6ff:fe81:69ed/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
37: vethD6TFEB: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast master ovs-system state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether fe:ca:e9:16:dd:81 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcca:e9ff:fe16:dd81/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft foreve
It was my bad again. switch0 was down. So turning up of interface helped me:
# ip link set dev switch0 up

No DNS inside lxc container [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have an LXC debian container which run on my archlinux host. I tried to setup a bridge (lxc-bridge-nat) using wlan0 but i can't ping the outside world from my container except if i ping using the ip instead of the domain name.
I can ping the container from the host and the host from the container.
Here some informations:
Host: ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0: <NO-CARRIER,BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state DOWN qlen 1000
link/ether d4:be:d9:70:bd:e5 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: wlan0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc mq state UP qlen 1000
link/ether c4:85:08:b4:5c:e9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.42.121/24 brd 192.168.42.255 scope global wlan0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::c685:8ff:feb4:5ce9/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: lxc-bridge-nat: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP
link/ether fe:b3:b7:a2:e1:31 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.50.1/24 brd 192.168.50.255 scope global lxc-bridge-nat
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::b0c8:d2ff:fe73:aa50/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
host: ip route
default via 192.168.42.1 dev wlan0 proto static
192.168.42.0/24 dev wlan0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.42.121 metric 9
192.168.50.0/24 dev lxc-bridge-nat proto kernel scope link src 192.168.50.1
Container: ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
10: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast state UP qlen 1000
link/ether 00:ff:aa:00:00:01 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.50.2/24 brd 192.168.50.255 scope global eth0
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 fe80::2ff:aaff:fe00:1/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
Container: ip route
default via 192.168.50.1 dev eth0
192.168.50.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.50.2
Container: /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 212.27.40.240
nameserver 212.27.40.241
Hostnames not resolving points immediately to the DNS servers, and posting the content of resolv.conf was useful here; they were the only part of this setup outside of your immediate control.
As you've found, simply pinging a remote server doesn't always help - running nslookup against them showed that they were the problem. (As a counterpoint, due to the way ping itself works a lack of response from a ping doesn't mean the server is down - pings are trivial to block at firewall level.)
To work around to your DNS issue, you can make use of other DNS servers, such as those hosted by Google. Simply alter your resolv.conf to:
nameserver 8.8.8.8
nameserver 8.8.4.4
Adding 8.8.8.8 in /etc/network/interfaces is not a good idea. You should leave the interfaces file unchanged (restore the old settings) and modify only /etc/resolv.conf file.
You have set the container IP to the same IP of one of the Google's DNS servers.
Sure, the ping will work, but when you try to resolve a DNS hostname your container will contact itself and generate an error.

Resources