::before and ::after elements overlapping each other ruining the background transparancy - css

I have a simple div element that I wanna apply a background shape to it when the user hovers over it by using the ::before and ::after pseudo elements. I rotated these elements with rotateX(). How can I style it that the elements shouldn't overlap each other (or at least not ruin the background color) but it should look like a single shape?
Tried using % but didn't work.
Please help.
Thanks so much 🙏
div{
width:200px;
padding: 18px;
margin: 10px auto;
/* border: 1px solid black; */
text-align:center;
position: relative;
perspective: 100px;
z-index: 1;
}
div:hover{
color:#fff;
}
div:hover::before, div:hover::after{
content: "";
display: block;
background-color: #00000050;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
left: 0%;
z-index: -1;
}
div::before{
top:0;
transform: rotateX(-75deg);
}
div::after{
bottom:0;
transform: rotateX(75deg);
}
<div>Hello World</div>

If you make half of each pseudo element only have the color then when you rotate them the colors don't overlap.
A minor adjustment to the padding of the div was needed to get the two rotated 'halves' to meet correctly so this would have to be looked at if you ever went for a responsive rather than a fixed px unit solution.
This snippet removes the background-color from the pseudo elements, instead using a linear-gradient background-image going just half way up (or down) the pseudo element.
div {
width: 200px;
padding: 18px;
padding: 16px;
margin: 10px auto;
/* border: 1px solid black; */
text-align: center;
position: relative;
perspective: 100px;
z-index: 1;
}
div:hover {
color: #fff;
}
div:hover::before,
div:hover::after {
content: "";
display: block;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
position: absolute;
left: 0%;
z-index: -1;
}
div::before {
top: 0;
transform: rotateX(-75deg);
background-image: linear-gradient(#00000050 0 50%, transparent 50% 100%);
}
div:hover::after {
bottom: 0;
transform: rotateX(75deg);
background-color: transparent;
background-image: linear-gradient(to top, #00000050 0 50%, transparent 50% 100%);
}
<div>Hello World</div>

A Haworth's answer covers using linear gradient stops to hide the color of half of each pseudo element.
Another approach you could take is to use only one of the pseudo elements with a polygon clip path to make your shape.
.container { display: flex; }
.hoverable { position: relative; margin: auto; padding: 10px 100px; }
.hoverable:hover::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
/* top: 0; left: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; */
background-color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.25);
clip-path: polygon(0 0, 100% 0, 80% 50%, 100% 100%, 0 100%, 20% 50%);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="hoverable">Hello, World!</div>
</div>

Related

How to implement an pure-CSS flag-shape container?

My target is to implement a pure-CSS flag-shape container like this:
Requirements include:
background-color of parent container is unknown
works for different line-height and font-size settings
Option 1
Use clip-path, but check browser support for this property:
div {
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0%, 85% 50%, 100% 100%, 0% 100%);
background-color: #ff69b4;
/* styles for demo */
padding: 20px;
color: #fff;
}
<div>5 items</div>
Option 2
Use SVG:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<polygon points="0 0, 100 0, 85 50, 100 100, 0 100" fill="#ff69b4" />
</svg>
Option 3
Use absolutely positioned pseudoelements with gradients (to simulate triangles)
div {
background-color: #ff69b4;
margin-right: 50px;
position: relative;
/* styles for demo */
padding: 20px;
color: #fff;
}
/* pseudoelement to simulate triangles */
div:before,
div:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 100%;
width: 50px;
height: 50%;
background-image: linear-gradient(to left top, transparent 50%, #ff69b4 50%);
}
/* Flip triangle */
div:after {
top: 50%;
transform: scaleY(-1);
}
<div>5 items</div>
Another possible variant would be to use transformed pseudo elements.
Create 2 layers using ::before ad ::after pseudo elements.
Add background-color and place them with position: absolute having 50% height of the parent.
Apply CSS3 skew() transformations to get the flag shape.
Output Image:
Working Demo:
* {box-sizing: border-box;}
body {
background: linear-gradient(green, yellow) no-repeat;
min-height: 100vh;
padding: 10px;
margin: 0;
}
.flag {
padding: 5px 40px 5px 10px;
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
position: relative;
line-height: 40px;
overflow: hidden;
}
.flag:before,
.flag:after {
transform-origin: top right;
transform: skewX(-45deg);
position: absolute;
background: pink;
content: '';
left: -45px;
height: 50%;
z-index: -1;
right: 0;
top: 0;
}
.flag:after {
transform-origin: bottom right;
transform: skewX(45deg);
top: auto;
bottom: 0;
}
<div class="flag">5 Items</div>

CSS: How to add slanted edge to right of div with complete browser cross-compatability?

I'm looking to achieve a slanted edge on my div. The problem I'm coming across is the simple code I found to accomplish this is not cross-browser compatible. In fact, it only shows in Chrome.
Can anyone advise on how to do the following so it works in ALL browsers:
clip-path:polygon(0 0, 70% 0, 100% 100%, 0 100%);
This effect would achieve:
Here's my entire CSS code:
.my-slanted-div {
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
left:0;
width:100px;
padding:10px 10px;
background-color:#eee;
font-size:20px;
clip-path:polygon(0 0, 70% 0, 100% 100%, 0 100%);
}
Can anyone help me out?
You can also skew pseudo-element, like this:
.my-slanted-div {
position:absolute;
bottom:40px;
left:0;
width:80px;
padding:10px 10px;
background-color:red;
font-size:20px;
}
.my-slanted-div:after {
width:50px;
background:red;
position:absolute;
height:100%;
content:' ';
right:-22px;
top:0;
transform: skew(45deg);
}
<div class="my-slanted-div">
TEXT
</div>
p.s. change angle, play with values...to get desired result...
Edit: Demo in context -> https://jsfiddle.net/Lbwj40mg/2/
This should do the trick using borders.
<div id="container">
<p id="text">Hello</p>
<div id="slanted"></div>
</div>
#container {
position: relative;
height: 200px;
width: 200px;
background:url(http://placehold.it/200x200);
}
#text {
position: absolute;
bottom: 15px;
left: 10px;
z-index: 1;
margin: 0;
}
#slanted {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
height: 0;
width: 0;
border-left: 75px solid #dedede;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 50px solid #dedede;
}
jsfiddle
I've made it work one way with :before and :after pseudos, you simply need to update the widths, heights and line-height to suit the size of tab you want; the rectangle must be the same height as the :before and :after bits for a clean look.
.box {
background: red;
width: 200px;
position: relative;
height: 100px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin-left: 50px;
color: white;
font-size: 21px;
font-family: arial, sans-serif;
}
.box:after {
position: absolute;
right: -50px;
content: '';
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 100px solid red;
}
.box:before {
position: absolute;
left: -50px;
content: '';
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-left: 50px solid transparent;
border-right: 50px solid transparent;
border-bottom: 100px solid red;
}
<div class="box">
Text in the box
</div>
Here's a way with transform: rotate just to add to the list. Quite annoying as you will have to play with pixels for alignment and make some entries into #media rules for different screen sizes. But it should be fairly cross browser friendly (but maybe not opera mini)
body {
background-color: #333;
}
.container {
position: absolute; /* needs a position, relative is fine. abolsute just for this example */
top: 50%; left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
background-color: #ccc;
overflow: hidden; /* required */
}
.salutations {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
padding: 0 10px 0 15px;
background-color: #fcfcfc;
height: 50px;
line-height: 50px; /* match height to vertically center text */
font-size: 30px;
}
.salutations::before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 21px; /* play with this for alignment */
right: -36px; /* play with this for alignment */
height: 40px; width: 70px; /* may need to adjust these depending on container size */
background-color: #fcfcfc;
transform: rotate(60deg); /* to adjust angle */
z-index: -1; /* puts the pseudo element ::before below .salutations */
}
<div class="container">
<div class="salutations">Hello</div>
</div>
P.S. May have to adjust a pixel or two, my eyes suck.
Browser Compatability
transform: rotate
pseudo elements (::before)
Fiddle
https://jsfiddle.net/Hastig/wy5bjxg3/
It is most likely it is an SVG scaled to always fit its text which is simple and quick way of doing it; if you must use CSS then you could always:
Set a gradient to the div from color to transparent so that it takes up most of the div and the transition of color is abrupt and not smooth like how a normal gradient looks.
create another div and using borders create a triangle to touch the other main rectangular div such as doing:
.triangle {
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 200px 200px 0 0;
border-color: #fff transparent transparent transparent;
}
Using css you can generate an element that takes the shape of a triangle.
Css tricks has a post on that.
By making the .slanted class position itself relative, we can position the generated content on the right side of the slanted div using absolute positioning.
It'll take some fiddling to get the perfect result you want, but here's an example.
.slanted{
background: #007bff;
color: #fff;
position: relative;
display:inline-block;
font-size: 20px;
height: 25px;
padding: 2px 4px;
}
.slanted::after {
content: " ";
display: block;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-width: 29px 0 0 20px;
border-color: transparent transparent transparent #007bff;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
right: -20px;
}
<div class="slanted">Hello</div>

Creating a partial box shadow on a skewed div

I'm trying to create a partial shadow on a skewed div, as close as I can get to this creative.
Right now I've been trying to do this with pseudo elements (before specifically) but I found that those elements behave strangely whenever I skew the element they are applied to. The pseudo element keeps appearing on top of my div, even though the z-index is set to -1. No matter what I do with z-index, it will stay on top of it. I want it to be behind the div it's applied to, and in front of the div below, like in the creative.
Here's my ::before code and a link to the codepen
CSS
/*! Shadows */
#test-title {
position: relative;
}
#test-title:before {
z-index: -1;
position: absolute;
content: "";
bottom: 15px;
left: 10px;
width: 50%;
top: 80%;
max-width:300px;
box-shadow: 0 15px 10px #777;
-webkit-transform: rotate(-3deg);
-moz-transform: rotate(-3deg);
-o-transform: rotate(-3deg);
-ms-transform: rotate(-3deg);
transform: rotate(-3deg);
}
http://codepen.io/kathryncrawford/pen/WwWEma
Skew the parent then unskew the child at the same degree.
* {
box-sizing: border-box
}
body {
padding: 40px 0
}
section {
width: 60vw;
clear: both;
overflow: hidden;
min-height: 100px;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
background: #035076
}
section article {
width: 60%;
padding: 20px;
color: white;
margin: 0 auto
}
section:nth-child(even) {
transform: skew(-45deg) translate(5vw);
box-shadow: inset 0 0 2px 0 black;
}
section:nth-child(odd) {
transform: skew(45deg);
}
section:nth-child(even) article {
transform: skew(45deg) translate(5vw);
}
section:nth-child(odd) article {
transform: skew(-45deg);
}
section:before,
section:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
}
section:nth-child(even):before {
width: 100%;
height: 0;
bottom: 100%;
left: 0;
z-index: 6;
opacity: 1;
transform: rotate(-10deg) translateY(-30px);
box-shadow: 0px 0px 64px 30px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8);
}
section:nth-child(odd):not(:first-child):before {
width: 100%;
height: 0;
bottom: 100%;
right: 0;
z-index: 6;
opacity: 1;
transform: rotate(10deg) translateY(-30px);
box-shadow: 0px 0px 64px 30px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.8);
}
<section>
<article>What our clients say About Us</article>
</section>
<section>
<article>Read More!</article>
</section>
<section>
<article>Read More!</article>
</section>
<section>
<article>Read More!</article>
</section>
The easier approach would be to put the drop shadow at the top of each box after the first. This will solve all sorts of z-index issues, since each box sits 1 level higher than the box above it.. and it allows the shadow to sit inside the container instead of outside of it.
I've also changed your shadow styling to use a radial gradient* instead of a box shadow, as it is a bit easier to control in this situation, and is also closer to your design. I also did a bit of positioning to make it look a bit better too, and get the separate sides for skew1 and skew2
I've changed your last ruleset to this:
.test-info:before {
position: absolute;
content: "";
width: 100%;
left: 0;
top: 0;
height: 30px;
}
.test-info.skew1:before {
background: radial-gradient(ellipse farthest-side at 30% top, rgba(0,0,0,0.5) 0%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 100%);
}
.test-info.skew2:before {
background: radial-gradient(ellipse farthest-side at 70% top, rgba(0,0,0,0.5) 0%, rgba(0,0,0,0) 100%);
}
See Demo
* note: You may want to check/add additional browser support on the gradient that I put in before using it.
I have tried, it's not perfect, but, it is closer to desired look, imho:
<div id="test-title">
<h3>What our clients say about us</h3>
</div>
<div id="shadow1"></div>
So, i've added new html element(shadow), rather than using pseudo-elements... Now, i've set z-indexes and positions properly, to hide rotated shadow div behind first div, and added this css:
#shadow1 {
position:absolute;
width:50%;
height:150px;
background:black;
top:50px;
left:11%;
z-index:6;
opacity:1;
transform: rotate(-5deg);
box-shadow: 15px 56px 50px -12px rgba(0,0,0,0.80);
}
Demo: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/vGwNqY
You can play with rotation, box-shadow, position, height... but, this could be a good start (maybe). P.S. Similar logic could be applied to second div.
try to make box shadow for the second element using :before pseudo https://jsfiddle.net/0andpzsp/
.cont {
width: 1000px;
height: 500px;
}
div[class^="d"] {
width: 70%;
height: 50%;
position: relative;
margin-left: 40px;
margin-top: 50px;
}
.d0 {
background: linear-gradient(to right, #005f8a 0%,#00486c 50%,#003a59 100%);;
transform: skew(20deg)
}
.d1 {
background: linear-gradient(to right, #005f8a 0%,#00486c 50%,#003a59 100%);;
overflow: hidden;
top: -50px;
left: 20%;
transform: skewX(-20deg);
z-index: -1
}
.d1:before {
content: '';
border-radius: 30%;
position: absolute;
display: block;
width: 600px;
height: 70px;
z-index: 9999;
top: -100px;
left: -70px;
box-shadow: -50px 60px 90px 0px #000;
transform: rotate(-5deg)
}
<div class="cont">
<div class="d0"></div>
<div class="d1">
</div>
</div>

Semi-transparent slanted background

I want to create an html element, e.g. a div, which is styled as follows:
semi-transparent background-color
rounded borders on all edges
left side of the div draws a straight line
right side of the div draws a skewed line
I'd like to create this in CSS only and wonder if this is possible. So far I came up with two different approaches which have their own drawbacks and are not fully sufficient. You can have a look at those in this fiddle:
https://jsfiddle.net/n4tecna3/
.one-side-skew-1,
.one-side-skew-2 {
font-size: 20px;
padding: 2%;
background-color: rgba(220, 50, 255, 0.6);
position: relative;
display: block;
border-radius: 4px;
z-index: 2;
color: #ffffff;
margin-top: 30px;
}
.one-side-skew-2 {
border-top-right-radius: 0px;
}
.one-side-skew-1:after {
height: 100%;
width: 20%;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 85%;
display: inline-block;
content: "";
background-color: rgba(220, 50, 255, 0.6);
-moz-transform: skewX(-10deg);
-webkit-transform: skewX(-10deg);
-ms-transform: skewX(-10deg);
-o-transform: skewX(-10deg);
transform: skewX(-10deg);
z-index: -1;
border-radius: 4px;
}
.one-side-skew-2:after {
border-top: 1em solid rgba(220, 50, 255, 0.6);
border-left: 0.25em solid rgba(220, 50, 255, 0.6);
border-right: 0.25em solid transparent;
border-bottom: 1em solid transparent;
border-top-right-radius: 4px;
left: 100%;
display: inline-block;
position: absolute;
content: "";
top: 0;
}
.container {
width: 500px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="one-side-skew-1">
<span class="inner-text">One Side Skew With Pseudo Element Skewed</span>
</div>
<div class="one-side-skew-2">
<span class="inner-text">One Side Skew With Pseudo Element Border</span>
</div>
</div>
Approach 1 .one-side-skew-1 uses a div element with round borders and a skewed, round-bordered pseudo element to create a one-side skewed element in sum. This works great as long as the background-color is solid. For semi-transparent backgrounds you will see an ugly color overlap where the element and its pseudo-element meet.
Approach 2 .one-side-skew2 uses a div element with a pseudo behind it that consists of borders only. It's somewhat hacky but gets close to my desired result. Still, the right does not look nearly as smooth as in the first approach.
Does someone else have a good solution for this problem in CSS only? Or will I have to use a fallback solution with a semi-transparent background-image to solve this?
You can use a pseudo element for all the background and hide the overflowing parts with the overflow property on the element.
This will prevent element and pseudo element background overlapping and allow semi transparent backgrounds:
div {
position: relative;
width: 250px;
font-size: 20px;
border-radius: 4px;
overflow: hidden;
color: #fff;
padding: 1% 2%;
}
div:before {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 0; right: 0;
width: 100%; height: 100%;
background: rgba(220, 50, 255, 0.6);
-webkit-transform-origin:100% 0;
-ms-transform-origin:100% 0;
transform-origin: 100% 0;
-webkit-transform: skewX(-10deg);
-ms-transform: skewX(-10deg);
transform: skewX(-10deg);
border-radius: 4px 4px 6px;
z-index: -1;
}
/** FOR THE DEMO **/body {background: url('http://lorempixel.com/output/people-q-g-640-480-3.jpg');background-size: cover;}
<div>content</div>

Responsive CSS triangle with percents width

The code below will create an arrow right below an <a> element:
JSFiddle
.btn {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
text-align: center;
color: white;
background: gray;
line-height: 50px;
text-decoration: none;
}
.btn:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
bottom: -10px;
left: 0;
width: 0;
height: 0;
border-width: 10px 50px 0 50px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: gray transparent transparent transparent;
}
Hello!
The problem is that we have to indicate the link width to get an arrow of a proper size because we cannot indicate the border width in pixels.
How to make a responsive triangle percent based?
You could use a skewed and rotated pseudo element to create a responsive triangle under the link :
DEMO (resize the result window to see how it reacts)
The triangle maintains it's aspect ratio with the padding-bottom property.
If you want the shape to adapt it's size according to it's content, you can remove the width on the .btn class
.btn {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
height: 50px; width: 50%;
text-align: center;
color: white;
background: gray;
line-height: 50px;
text-decoration: none;
padding-bottom: 15%;
background-clip: content-box;
overflow: hidden;
}
.btn:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top:50px; left: 0;
background-color: inherit;
padding-bottom: 50%;
width: 57.7%;
z-index: -1;
transform-origin: 0 0;
transform: rotate(-30deg) skewX(30deg);
}
/** FOR THE DEMO **/
body {
background: url('http://i.imgur.com/qi5FGET.jpg');
background-size: cover;
}
Hello!
For more info on responsive triangles and how to make them, you can have a look at
Triangles with transform rotate (simple and fancy responsive triangles)
Another solution to this would be to use a CSS clip-path to clip a triangle out of a coloured block. No IE support however, but could be used for internal tools etc.
DEMO
Written with SCSS for ease.
.outer {
background: orange;
width: 25%;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
padding: 1em;
p {
margin: 0;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
}
&:after {
content: '';
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
right: 0;
padding-bottom: 10%;
background: orange;
-webkit-clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0%, 50% 100%);
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0%, 50% 100%);
}
}
I found solution that works with any width/height. You can use two pseudo-elements with linear-gradient background, like this, (fiddle):
.btn {
position: relative;
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 50px;
text-align: center;
color: white;
background: gray;
line-height: 50px;
text-decoration: none;
}
.btn:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
right: 0;
width: 50%;
height: 10px;
background: linear-gradient(to right bottom, gray 50%, transparent 50%)
}
.btn:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
width: 50%;
height: 10px;
background: linear-gradient(to left bottom, gray 50%, transparent 50%)
}
A modified version of the below code can help you to achieve this
HTML
<div class="triangle-down"></div>
CSS
.triangle-down {
width: 10%;
height: 0;
padding-left:10%;
padding-top: 10%;
overflow: hidden;
}
.triangle-down:after {
content: "";
display: block;
width: 0;
height: 0;
margin-left:-500px;
margin-top:-500px;
border-left: 500px solid transparent;
border-right: 500px solid transparent;
border-top: 500px solid #4679BD;
}
For further reading on responsive triangles: CSS triangles made responsive
(archived link)
I tried the other answers and found them to be either too complex and/or unwieldy to manipulate the shape of the triangle. I decided instead to create a simple triangle shape as an svg.
The triangle height can be set to an absolute value, or as a percentage of the rectangle so it can be responsive in both directions if necessary.
html, body{
height:100%;
width:100%;
}
.outer{
width:20%;
height:25%;
background:red;
position:relative;
}
.inner{
height:100%;
width:100%;
background-color:red;
}
.triangle-down{
height:25%;
width:100%;
position:relative;
}
.triangle-down svg{
height:100%;
width:100%;
position:absolute;
top:0;
}
svg .triangle-path{
fill:red;
}
<div class="outer">
<div class="inner"></div>
<div class="triangle-down">
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" preserveAspectRatio="none" viewBox="0 0 2 1">
<g>
<path class="triangle-path" d="M0,0 l2,0 l-1,1 z" />
</g>
</svg>
</div>
Tested FF, Chrome, IE, Edge, mob Safari and mob Chrome
Another option would be to use background liner gradients, and flex positioning to make sure that the triangle always scales to its parent container. No matter how wide or narrow you make that container, the triangle always scales with it. Here is the fiddle:
https://jsfiddle.net/29k4ngzr/
<div class="triangle-wrapper-100">
<div class="triangle-left"></div>
<div class="triangle-right"></div>
</div>
.triangle-wrapper-100 {
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
display:flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.triangle-right {
right: 0px;
background: linear-gradient(to right bottom, #6940B5 50%, transparent 50%);
width: 50%;
height: 100px;
}
.triangle-left {
left: 0px;
background: linear-gradient(to right bottom, #6940B5 50%, transparent 50%);
width: 50%;
height: 100px;
transform: scaleX(-1);
}
I took #Probocop's answer and come up with the following:
<style>
.btn {
background-color: orange;
color: white;
margin-bottom: 50px;
padding: 15px;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
text-decoration: none;
}
.btn:after {
background-color: inherit;
clip-path: url('data:image/svg+xml;utf8,%3Csvg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"%3E%3Cdefs%3E%3CclipPath id="p" clipPathUnits="objectBoundingBox"%3E%3Cpolygon points="0 0, 1 0, 0.5 1" /%3E%3C/clipPath%3E%3C/defs%3E%3C/svg%3E#p'); /* fix for firefox (tested in version 52) */
clip-path: polygon(0% 0%, 100% 0%, 50% 100%);
content: '';
height: 50px;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
right: 0;
top: 100%;
}
</style>
Hello!
This works in Chrome and I've added a fix for Firefox. It doesn't work in Edge, however if you decrease the height of the down arrow then it doesn't look so bad.
Please note that if you are using bootstrap you will need to either change the name or override some of the styles it applies. If you decide to rename it then you also need to add the following to the .btn style:
box-sizing: content-box;

Resources