SQL with Prisma under Electron - sqlite

My Main goal is to create an Electron App (Windows) that locally stores data in an SQLite Database. And because of type safety I choose to use the Prisma framework instead of other SQLite Frameworks.
I took this Electron Sample Project and now try to include Prisma. Depending on what I try different problems do arrise.
1. PrismaClient is unable to be run in the Browser
I executed npx prisma generate and then try to execute this function via a button:
import { PrismaClient } from '#prisma/client';
onSqlTestAction(): void {
const prisma = new PrismaClient();
const newTestObject = prisma.testTable.create(
{
data: {
value: "TestValue"
}
}
);
}
When executing this in Electron I get this:
core.js:6456 ERROR Error: PrismaClient is unable to be run in the browser.
In case this error is unexpected for you, please report it in https://github.com/prisma/prisma/issues
at new PrismaClient (index-browser.js:93)
at HomeComponent.onSqlTestAction (home.component.ts:19)
at HomeComponent_Template_button_click_7_listener (template.html:7)
at executeListenerWithErrorHandling (core.js:15281)
at wrapListenerIn_markDirtyAndPreventDefault (core.js:15319)
at HTMLButtonElement.<anonymous> (platform-browser.js:568)
at ZoneDelegate.invokeTask (zone.js:406)
at Object.onInvokeTask (core.js:28666)
at ZoneDelegate.invokeTask (zone.js:405)
at Zone.runTask (zone.js:178)
It somehow seems logical that Prisma cannot run in a browser. But I actually build a native app - with Electron that embeds a Browser. It seems to be a loophole.
2. BREAKING CHANGE: webpack < 5 used to include polyfills
So i found this Question: How to use Prisma with Electron
Seemed to be exactly what I looked for. But the error message is different (Debian binaries were not found).
The solution provided is to generate the prisma artifacts into the src folder instead of node_modules - and this leads to 19 polyfills errors. One for example:
./src/database/generated/index.js:20:11-26 - Error: Module not found: Error: Can't resolve 'path' in '[PATH_TO_MY_PROJECT]\src\database\generated'
BREAKING CHANGE: webpack < 5 used to include polyfills for node.js core modules by default.
This is no longer the case. Verify if you need this module and configure a polyfill for it.
If you want to include a polyfill, you need to:
- add a fallback 'resolve.fallback: { "path": require.resolve("path-browserify") }'
- install 'path-browserify'
If you don't want to include a polyfill, you can use an empty module like this:
resolve.fallback: { "path": false }
And this repeats with 18 other modules. Since the error message to begin with was different I also doubt that this is the way to go.

I finally figured this out. What I needed to understand was, that all Electron apps consist of 2 parts: The Frontend Webapp (running in embedded Chromium) and a Node backend server. Those 2 parts are called IPC Main and IPC Renderer and they can communicate with each other. And since Prisma can only run on the main process which is the backend I had to send my SQL actions to the Electron backend and execute them there.
My minimal example
In the frontend (I use Angular)
// This refers to the node_modules folder of the Electron Backend, the folder where the main.ts file is located.
// I just use this import so that I can use the prisma generated classes for type safety.
import { TestTable } from '../../../app/node_modules/.prisma/client';
// Button action
onSqlTestAction(): void {
this.electronService.ipcRenderer.invoke("prisma-channel", 'Test input').then((value) => {
const testObject: TestTable = JSON.parse(value);
console.log(testObject);
});
The sample project I used already had this service to provide the IPC Renderer:
#Injectable({
providedIn: 'root'
})
export class ElectronService {
ipcRenderer: typeof ipcRenderer;
webFrame: typeof webFrame;
remote: typeof remote;
childProcess: typeof childProcess;
fs: typeof fs;
get isElectron(): boolean {
return !!(window && window.process && window.process.type);
}
constructor() {
// Conditional imports
if (this.isElectron) {
this.ipcRenderer = window.require('electron').ipcRenderer;
this.webFrame = window.require('electron').webFrame;
this.childProcess = window.require('child_process');
this.fs = window.require('fs');
// If you want to use a NodeJS 3rd party deps in Renderer process (like #electron/remote),
// it must be declared in dependencies of both package.json (in root and app folders)
// If you want to use remote object in renderer process, please set enableRemoteModule to true in main.ts
this.remote = window.require('#electron/remote');
}
}
And then in the Electron backend I first added "#prisma/client": "^3.0.1" to the package.json (for the Electron backend not the frontend). Then I added to the main.ts this function to handle the requests from the renderer:
// main.ts
ipcMain.handle("prisma-channel", async (event, args) => {
const prisma = new PrismaClient();
await prisma.testTable.create(
{
data: {
value: args
}
}
);
const readValue = await prisma.testTable.findMany();
return JSON.stringify(readValue);
})
This way of simply adding the IPC Main handler in the main.ts file of course is a big code smell but usefull as minimal example. I think I will move on with the achitecture concept presented in this article.

Related

Nextjs with Jest---No tests found, exiting with code 1 Run with `--passWithNoTests` to exit with code 0

import nextJest from 'next/jest'
const createJestConfig = nextJest({
dir: './',
})
// Add any custom config to be passed to Jest
const customJestConfig = {
setupFilesAfterEnv: ['<rootDir>/setupTests.js'],
moduleDirectories: ['node_modules', '<rootDir>/'],
testEnvironment: 'jest-environment-jsdom',
modulePathIgnorePatterns: ['./cypress'],
// testMatch: ['<rootDir>/**/*.test.js', '<rootDir>/**/*.test.jsx'],
}
module.exports = createJestConfig(customJestConfig)
In my project, we use Nextjs application with both Cypress and Jest. The latest jest.config.ts which is recommended is shown above.
If you are now owned this problem. you can maybe try to check your modulePathIgnorePatterns.
I added a ./ to ['cypress'], then it works well. So, I think maybe it just cann't recognize the path.

Runtime configs in nextjs

I'm trying to setup my nextjs app to use runtime configurations. Basically, I have an endpoint url that needs to be available trough docker env vars.
I configured following these docs but it isn't working. My app still using default values from .env file. Could anyone help to understand what I missed or did wrong?
Thanks!
docs:
https://nextjs.org/docs/api-reference/next.config.js/runtime-configuration
https://nextjs.org/docs/advanced-features/custom-app
steps:
1- added to my next.config.js
publicRuntimeConfig: {
NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_HOST: process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_HOST,
},
2- retrieved config in my pages
const { publicRuntimeConfig } = getConfig()
const baseURL = publicRuntimeConfig.NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_HOST
3- created a custom app to setup getInitialProps
Runtime configuration won't be available to any page (or component in a page) without getInitialProps.
import App from 'next/app'
function MyApp({ Component, pageProps }) {
return <Component {...pageProps} />
}
MyApp.getInitialProps = async (appContext) => {
const appProps = await App.getInitialProps(appContext);
return { ...appProps }
}
export default MyApp
Everything seems fine in your code, tested in a fresh project and everything worked correctly. Therefore I think the issue is that you don't actually have NEXT_PUBLIC_BACKEND_HOST env var set when you're running next start. Btw, you don't need to use the NEXT_PUBLIC prefix in this kind of usage. If you want build time args you can use NEXT_PUBLIC_ prefix to have the var be available both client and server side by just using process.env.NEXT_PUBLIC_ anywhere. Note that in that case the value will be inlined at build time, so the env var needs to be present during build.

Changing the state management system of existing quasar application from vuex to pinia

Tried this link and created my first store in Quasar using Pinia, I also needed to change the .quasar/app.js manually to add the Pinia store and to make Pinia functional.
import { Quasar } from 'quasar'
import { markRaw } from 'vue'
import RootComponent from 'app/src/App.vue'
import createStore from 'app/src/stores/index'
import createRouter from 'app/src/router/index'
export default async function (createAppFn, quasarUserOptions) {
// Create the app instance.
// Here we inject into it the Quasar UI, the router & possibly the store.
const app = createAppFn(RootComponent)
app.config.devtools = true
app.use(Quasar, quasarUserOptions)
const store = typeof createStore === 'function'
? await createStore({})
: createStore
app.use(store)
const router = markRaw(
typeof createRouter === 'function'
? await createRouter({store})
: createRouter
)
// make router instance available in store
store.use(({ store }) => { store.router = router })
// Expose the app, the router and the store.
// Note that we are not mounting the app here, since bootstrapping will be
// different depending on whether we are in a browser or on the server.
return {
app,
store,
router
}
}
But the problem is .quasar/app.js is re-written with default contents as soon as quasar dev is executed and again I don't have access to the Pinia stores anymore.
As I said this application was based on vuex formerly.
Make sure you have the index file for pinia.
In "src/stores/index.js"
import { store } from 'quasar/wrappers'
import { createPinia } from 'pinia'
/*
* If not building with SSR mode, you can
* directly export the Store instantiation;
*
* The function below can be async too; either use
* async/await or return a Promise which resolves
* with the Store instance.
*/
export default store((/* { ssrContext } */) => {
const pinia = createPinia()
// You can add Pinia plugins here
// pinia.use(SomePiniaPlugin)
return pinia
})
Try checking quasar info
quasar info
Notice #quasar/app-webpack and vuex.
If you are using #quasar/app, try to move to #quasar/app-webpack by upgrading quasar.
quasar upgrade -i
If you have vuex installed in your quasar info output, try to remove it.
npm uninstall vuex
In your package-lock.json, look for "node_modules/vuex" and delete the key and value.
Then delete your "node_modules" folder and run npm i
After that, run quasar clean.
You may try creating a Pinia store via quasar command to validate it.
quasar new store <store_name>
It should generate a pinia store instead of vuex store.
Problem is older version of #quasar/app-webpack package. It got support for Pinia since v3.4.0. Check release notes here. So basically upgrade this package.
Run quasar upgrade -i and then quasar new store <store_name> [--format ts]
It will create a stores/ directory with pinia.
In my case i didn't need to edit any special files, simply replace the index.js in the stores folder. To get quasar CLI to then use pinia when running quasar new store I had to use quasar clean and just like that I had fully transitioned.
My solution was to remove and reinstall node_modules

Getting TestCafe to recognize dotenv variables

I might be mixing up concepts, but I'd read that it's possible to get TestCafe to recognize variables of the form process.env.MY_COOL_VARIABLE. Also for my Vue.js frontend (built using Vue-CLI, which uses dotenv under the hood), I found I could make a file in .env.test for test values like so:
VUE_APP_MY_COOL_VARIABLE
which I would then access in my test code like so:
test('my fixture', async (t) => {
...
await t
.click(mySelector.find('.div').withText(process.env.VUE_APP_MY_COOL_VARIABLE));
...
}
However, I get the following error:
"text" argument is expected to be a string or a regular expression, but it was undefined.
Seems like my environment variables aren't getting picked up. I build my code like so: vue-cli-service build --mode test.
TestCafe doesn't provide support for .env files out of the box. You can create a test file that will require the dotenv module and load your configuration file:
// enable-dotenv.test.js
require('dotenv').config({ path: '.my.env' });
testcafe chrome enable-dotenv.test.js tests/
Here's how I solved my issue. When debugging, I did a console.log of process.env and noticed that the variable that vue recognizes wasn't visible during testcafe's run. From our package.json:
"test:ui:run": "VUE_APP_MY_COOL_VARIABLE=ui-test yarn build:test && testcafe -a ../ui-test-server.sh chrome",
Also this bit of javascript is run by both the test and mainline code, so I had to use a conditional.
import * as dotenv from 'dotenv';
if (process.env.npm_package_scripts_test_ui_run) { // are we running a testcafe script
dotenv.config({ path: '.env.test' });
}
Have you tried process.env[VUE_APP_MY_COOL_VARIABLE]? It's worth noting that everything in dotenv comes back as a string so you may need to do the casting yourself. For example:
function getEnvVariableValue(envVariable: string) {
// Cast to boolean
if (envVariableValue.toUpperCase() === "TRUE") {
return true;
} else if (envVariableValue.toUpperCase() === "FALSE") {
return false;
// Cast to number
} else if (!isNaN(Number(envVariableValue))) {
return Number(envVariableValue);
} else {
return envVariableValue;
}
}
You can also try creating a .env file in the root folder to see if it picks it that way. I use dotenv in my project directly by including it in the package.json as a dependency and it works this way.

How to connect to an existing Electron app using Spectron

Is it possible to connect to an existing Electron application using Spectron? I am not particularly sure on how to go about implementing this..
I'd like to be able to do something like:
import { Application } from 'spectron';
import electronPath from 'electron';
import path from 'path';
// but don't spawn new electron application
new Application({
path: electronPath,
args: [path.join(__dirname, '..', '..', 'app')],
});
There are some documentation out there for using debuggerAddress option in Spectron, but I'm not really sure on whether that is what I am looking for, since the arguments for debuggerAddress is url, like so: '127.0.0.1:1234'.
I struggled making this work for Electron 6, was able to in the end, here is a working repo (made changes on top of an older one)
https://github.com/florin05/electron-spectron-example
Please make sure that you have created Test Folder in the same directory and create spectron file in this file.
Json File Changes:
"scripts": {"test": "mocha"}
const app = new Application({path: electronPath,args:[path.join(__dirname,'..')],})
beforeEach(function () {return app.start()})
afterEach(function () {if (app && app.isRunning()) {return app.stop()}})

Resources