Apple's explanation of the export compliance is rather difficult to understand and a complete mix of IT and Law-Knowledge making it difficult to connect to the correct people.
Our app uses:
Libsodium (using a flutter library, so not apple-default-encryption but open source)
Https/SSL/... which require no uploads to app store connect.
I couldn't find out if Libsodium is
- is accepted by international standard bodies (such as IEEE, IETF, or ITU)
Other Stackoverflow-Questions ("duplicates") do either not contain explicit Open-Source-Software or are missing helpful answers.
Related
I am new to biometrics. I bought a new Persona U are U 4500 Device and SDK from a vendor. The SDK has some samples (as expected). All of the samples run smoothly except the WebSample. it do not detects my device in addition it gives an error in the console.
Can anyone please help me how to fix this issue and guide me as why am i facing this problem? is it something related to my wss://localhost?
Update
By further diving into the program i found the specified url https://127.0.0.1:52181/get_connection in websdk.client.bundle.min.js when i opened the link it says
{
"code": -2147024894,
"message": "The system cannot find the file specified."
}
Am i missing some file?
I don't have it in front of me now, because I switched back to the U.are.U 2.2.3 SDK, which does not have this feature.
But it sounds like you possibly have not installed the Digital Persona Lite client component. This runs a separate WebSocket service on port 9001 (IIRC) through which the JavaScript client then communicates.
It is described here: https://hidglobal.github.io/digitalpersona-devices/tutorial.html
After installation, you will need to restart.
The call to https://127.0.0.1:52181/get_connection should then respond with details of the WebSocket service, to which the JavaScript client will connect.
NOTE: The WebSkd library requires DigitalPersona Agent running on a
client machine. This agent provides a secure communication channel
between a browser and a fingerprint or card device driver. The
DigitalPersona Agent is a part of a HID DigitalPersona Workstation. It
can be also installed with a DigitalPersona Lite Client. If you expect
your users do not use HID DigitalPersona Workstation, you may need to
provide your users with a link to the Lite Client download, which you
should show on a reader communication error:
A link is provided there to download the Lite client from here: https://www.crossmatch.com/AltusFiles/AltusLite/digitalPersonaClient.Setup64.exe
you just add a script call of the following code "crossorigin = '' ". "crossorigin=''". It will look like this:
<script src="scripts/websdk.client.bundle.min.js" crossorigin="*"></script>
<script src="scripts/fingerprint.sdk.min.js" crossorigin="*"></script>
Corda has specific configurations mentioned for every HSM that they support. I have tried finding a way to directly configure the node to use softhsm. But I havent been able to find any thing for Corda to work with softHSM.
Hyperledger Fabric has a config (https://hyperledger-fabric.readthedocs.io/en/release-2.0/hsm.html) that works with softHSM.
Any ideas on if Corda can support softHSM and if yes what are the configurations?
we currently do not support SoftHSM. We currently support:
Utimaco
Gemalto Luna
Futurex
Azure Key Vault
Securosys Primus X
nCipher nShield
Please refers to this list of supported HSM to use with.
https://docs.corda.net/docs/corda-enterprise/4.4/node/operating/cryptoservice-configuration.html#using-an-hsm-with-corda-enterprise
I am looking for the XSD to use to support a Decoding action in Logic Apps for the X12 830 00200. This was approved by ANSI in 1986 (pre-ASC), but is still widely used by Ford. I understand the same XSD would be used in a BizTalk Server solution. Does anyone have one to share?
I have tried the download item MicrosoftEdiXSDTemplates.zip as part of Microsoft Azure BizTalk Services SDK Setup:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=39087
However that only goes back to 00204, which I tried unsuccessfully adapting.
I would rather not do this as a Flat File Decode, as I want all X12 830 processing in my Logic Apps solution to have a consistent, Agreement-based configuration.
I have sample EDI, drawn from the real-world.
I will be using Ford's specs for the v002001FORD 830O to validate any schema I obtain or create: https://www.gsec.ford.com/GEC/edispecs/830.pdf
** UPDATE **
Thanks all for the help. It ends up that on the MS side, the Kusto log analytics trace of my run-time activity shows explicit duplicate schema references in my Agreement, while my run-time exception from Logic Apps does not clearly indicate a duplicate schema issue is present: 'The message has an unknown document type and did not resolve to any of the existing schemas configured in the agreement.' So, there was nothing wrong with my schema. I just had to tweak my Agreement configuration. I am reporting this to MS and hope the schema validation in the Agreement and/or the exception reporting will be improved.
To me a broader issue is that the X12 schema provided are ASC-issued ones: 02000, 03000, 04000, etc.. The same ones prevented from being shared on Git due to copyright issues. The reason I believe I am running into older, ANSI-issued specs still in used despite their age by Ford, Toyota, etc. is that the same copyright issues tends continued usage by OEMs of these specs despite their age. For that reason, it would be a big help to the community if MS provided the XSDs for the ANSI-issued X12 specs as is done for the ASC-issued ones. For each ASC-issued spec, such as 04000, there are many documents: 830, 856, etc. This multiplies out to scores if not hundreds of handcrafted XSDs one may need to produce (as is our case) to implements broad X12 support in Logic Apps.
The process with outlier EDI Schemas is to find the closest one and modify it to support the version you need.
What do you mean by 'unsuccessfully adapting'? This is not an uncommon thing.
Since the spec is so old, one thing I would very much consider is bumping the interchanges up to a 'current' :) version, even just 00204. I'm not sure the specific value 00200 will work with BizTalk EDI.
You would use a custom Pipeline Component for the incoming and should be able to use the EDI.Override properties on outbound.
My place of business currently uses Reflection for Unix and OpenVMS to handle a database of customers. I access this database directly through the Reflection emulation. The only way to get data out of Reflection is to navigate to a single customer via keyboard input and print the information to a .txt.
Is there anyway I can access the VM other than through Reflection with the end goal of automating retrieval of customer information from a Java script executed outside of the Reflection environment? This is the information I can gather via the Reflection interface about what I am connecting to:
At the bottom of the Reflection interface - VT500-7 -- HOST_NAME via SECURE SHELL
Via the Connection Setup drop-down:
Host name: HOST_NAME
SSH config scheme: AutoKeyLogin
User name: username
Via the Security... button:
General tab:
Port number: 22
User Authentication: [x] Public Key
[x] Password
User Keys tab:
Use Name Type Location
[x] username1user DSA C:\Documents\PathToSSHKey\.ssh
Host Keys tab:
Host Type Fingerprint
HOST_NAME, 111.1.111.11, 22 DSA 39:14:f3:123:fds:restOfFingerprint
There is more information available if the solution is possible but I have just not provided enough to solve it, so please ask.
Given that I have the host name, port, .ssh, and host key, is it possible to connect to and read from the VM that I am otherwise connecting to normally via the Reflection emulator?
NO. Reflection (other example is PuTTY) is just a dumb-terminal emulator, here using the (secure) SSH protocol to connect to some Operating System. From the information provided we cannot even tell which OS. Maybe OpenVMS maybe some Unix. Most certainly not a 'VM', but a physical box. Maybe a Alpha, Integrity, Sun, IBM or Intel server.
IF, big if, it is OpenVMS you would possibly see something like this flash by on entry:
XXX - HP rx2600 (1.50GHz/6.0MB) OpenVMS IA64 V8.3-1H1
Last interactive login on Thursday, 7-DEC-2017 13:23:19.83
Last non-interactive login on Wednesday, 6-DEC-2017 12:35:45.80
Most likely username uses is set up to always start a (shell) script which starts a menu from which a program is activated, which knows how to access data record. IF is it OpenVMS then the actual data is likely stored in RMS (indexed) files, but it could in a proper (Oracle RDB or RDBMS) database.
If bulk access to the data is needed then you need to talk to the system/application manager for the system 'HOST_NAME' and ask them about the application and its database.
You may find that there is FTP, ODBC or JDBC or natice DB (OCI?) access to the data avaiable already, or that this can be requested. Likely tools in this space are ConnX, Attunity Connect, and such.
First you'll need to find out which OS/Platform/Version, which application (3rd party? home grown? 4GL? Cobol? Basic? and ultimately, which database/storage method.
That's not to say that some terminal emulator cannot be 'tricked' (google -
screen scraping) to be programmed to fetch a series of data on command, but that will always be error prone and laboriously for limited volumes.
You are better of trying to get proper data access.
Good luck! You'll need some.
Hein
Is there any way to get list of users/account registered on server?
Now I'm getting roster, but I would like to get not only roster but also every user jid registered to server.
- openfire server
- Qt
- qxmpp library
I haven't tried with qxmpp, but my openfire installation has a plugin for XEP-0055: Jabber Search. Using miranda IM, I can find all contancts in the server by searching for * (search service is search.my.xmpp.domain).
I don't know whether this plugin was part of the original installation or I had to install it separately.
Doing a quick search, qxmpp seems not to have an existing xep-0055 implementation, so you will either have to write one by yourself or maybe you can use the implementation linked in this post on Google Groups.