hoping someone has some insight into this issue I get pretty commonly.
I have an ASPX Web Application that is pre-compiled. I have this application running within another IIS application working flawlessly. The parent application has an "updatable=false" property within the PreCompiledapp.config.
Now I need to add more pages to my application, which I create the same way in visual studio, and publish them with the rest of the application. When I open these files to check them in notepad, I can see the "This is a marker file generated by the precompilation tool, and should not be deleted!" as well as the .compiled file that generates with it.
On a local machine and application instance, this works... but when I copy the same applicaiton build to a client (same application, same pages, same everything) it gives me the " xxx.aspx has not been pre-compiled and cannot be requested " error.
What could be some causes of this? The pages are pre-compiled so I'm wondering if this can be thrown for something else. Any help is appreciated thanks!
I think the cause may be the parent application is set with updatable=false but the ASPX Web Application which you published is allow update. So it may lead to this problem. The same error message and the cause are described in detail here.
To solve this problem is convert your application to web application(has its own AppDomain and configuration) or publish the root application as updatable as well.
Related
So I have an Asp.Net website that i'm responsible for. I'm having a build issue, that as far as I can tell, may be either MacAfee or some other random cause.
But thinking back, I want to say the problem started when I added a "Test.aspx" form to the site, did some testing, then removed the Test.aspx form from the site.
I'm using TFS 2010 as my source control as well. Which I don't know if it applies or not.
My question is, is there some hidden location where all files to be included in publishing a website is maintained?
Is there a Project file for a Web Site app and if so where is it?
I've built the site using MSBUILD and notice some metaprj project file in the output but I can't seem to find any such file.
Web Site apps aren't meant to be built into a dll file. There is a conversion wizard to make it a web project but it doesn't always work well. My advice would be to continue to work with it as a Web Site app. The code files are compiled at at runtime on first use. You can run from Visual Studio or setup a site in IIS. Nothing is hidden in a Web Site app and there is no project file. So, you shouldn't have a build issue because you shouldn't be building. Try to run the app as is and if you get an error let us know what the specific message is.
I've got a quick question about precompiled web apps:
I've recently took over a project done by someone else, which is a precompiled web app. This means that it has no App_Code folder, of course. Due to the nature of this project I would like to put my code on the server anyhow.
I can't just add the code, because I'll get an Exception stating that the App_Code folder isn't allowed because it's a precompiled web app. If I remove the file 'PrecompiledApp.config", then my application crashes.
So what are the correct steps in turning a precompiled web app to a compile-on-demand webapp?
Thanks for the help.
I can get this working in VS2010.
Go to your web app settings and select the Package / Publish Web tab. There's a drop down that's probably defaulted to 'Only files needed to run this application'. If I use this it just publishes the compiled DLLs to the server and the web files, but none of the code.
If I change this to 'All files in the project folder' then I get everything - all the C# code for my controllers, for example.
Of course whether you would want your production code on a server is a different question, and you also get all the VS solution files and stuff like that too so it looks quite messy.
I want to update a class library (a single DLL file) in a production web application. This web app is pre-compiled (published). I read an answer on StackOverflow (sorry, can't seem to find it anymore because the Search function does not work very well), that led me to believe that I could just paste the new DLL in the bin folder and it would be picked up without problems (this would cause the WP to recycle, which is fine with me because we do not use InProc session state).
However, when I tried this, my site blows up and gives a FileLoadException saying that the assembly manifest definition does not match the assembly reference. What in the world is this?! Updating the DLL in Visual Studio and re-deploying the entire site works just fine, but it is a huge pain in the rear. What is the point of having a separate DLL if you have to re-deploy the entire site to implement any changes?
Here's the question: How can I update a DLL on a production web site without breaking the app and without re-deploying all of the files?
The thing to remember is that there are web sites and web applications as far as Visual Studio and ASPNET is considered.
Web Sites typically have all of the aspx and vb files published to the live server and ASPNET Worker Process recompiles the app every time before presentation.
On the other end is the web application, where all of your code behind files get compiled down to a single DLL file and you simply deploy your aspx pages and you bin folder with the DLL file to production.
There is also a "hybrid" known as "Precompiled Web Sites" (see the link for the official MSDN overview) where you don't have the single DLL layout of a web application, but all the compile work of the website is done for you. There are several "modes" to this depending on your needs.
It seems to me that your error is caused because your site is set up as a web site with some kind of precompilation in place. Using the pre-compiled model is a little more "strict" in that is assumes certain files/signatures are in place. Having an updated version of the DLL file causes a break since the precompilation wants a name and a version of the file.
If possible, your best bet would be to convert to a web application, since you can add the additional DLLs into production without a problem. Otherwise, take a look at this matrix to see what form of precompilation you need for your application.
Look at this SO post, might be what you are referring to. The located assembly's manifest definition does not match the assembly reference
Have a look at your reference. Does it say "specific version = true" ? Set it to false, republish your app (you have to do it once, because now your app is still looking for an assembly with a specific manifest) and try it again.
I have C++ project that compiles as DLL Assembly in .NET 3.5 SP1
Project is used for Image rendering processing by using WPF (it loads 2 images from local folder, applies one image on another and saves the output file in the same folder).
I want to use that that project as a reference in ASP.NET project to the rendering on the website.
So I created simple Web Project in ASP.NET C# that uses C++ project as a Reference.
Everything works great in ASP.NET Web Development Server (built-in Web server in VS2008).
But once I publish this project to IIS on the same Machine or use IIS for debug instead of built-in Web server Image rendering it's not working anymore. I'm not getting any exceptions or error messages, it just output image is not processes as it supposed to be.
If anyone know what could cause that I would really appreciate your insight!
Do you have access to the Event Logs? You should check there for any errors. You should try to throw an exception from a C#-only code path and make sure that everything is OK and regular exceptions are being thrown. Is the C++ compiled to managed code, or is native code? You might find that ASP.NET does not have the appropriate code access security permissions and needs to be registered in the GAC of the server to accessed from C#.
You should also check whether the DLL is thread-safe. This has caused issues for other users in ASP.NET/IIS.
If you create an ASP.NET Web Site project and run it, you get a blank page. If you go into the default CodeBehind file, add into the Page_Load method throw new Exception();, save the file, and refresh it in the browser (without rebuilding), the server automatically rebuilds the project and the page will error.
I have a project that I am working on now where refreshing the page does not cause the project to be rebuilt (the new aspx files are used but the old DLLs are used with them). What causes this, and how do I correct it?
Is this new project a web application project by any chance? I believe you have to actually build that before changes will be seen.
Web Application Project is a separate type of project that requires all code behind to be build. The resulting dll is build under the bin folder. The code behind files are not used in execution, and is the preffered way of doing it if you don't want to expose your code at the installed web server, and to be sure execution is faster (never compiling in runtime).
When you creatied it as "ASP.NET Web Site", it is NOT a "Web Application Project".
Only code which is in App_Code will be automatically recompiled when it changes. If your code lives anywhere else, then it's part of the pre-built DLL you get when you hit "compile".
You are using the Website model. The pages will be compiled when you access them. Class Library projects in the same solution will not. Hence why you see this behaviour.
By default, the ASPX, code behind and App_Code source files get compiled. If you have a seperate project in the solution (a BLL or DAL perhaps), these will not be updated by simply refreshing the browser.
So to correct it you could do a proper build in Visual Studio, or you could move the class files you want to change into App_Code. Personally I'd stick with the former (actually I don't ever use the Website option- always Web application project).
OK. Have you got 'Edit and Continue' enabled?
MSDN