Is it possible to add another style when the hover animation is completely finished?
With the default hover all styles get applied at the same time.
So changing from display: none to display: block will override any transformation because the element will just appear out of nowhere.
In the following example something like this would be helpful, because right now you can trigger the hover effect from outside of the actual "hover area".
.grid_content {
padding: 15px;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
background: salmon;
}
.grid_hover {
width: calc(100% - 30px);
height: calc(100% - 30px);
opacity: 0;
transition: all 0.5s;
transition-timing-function: cubic-bezier(1, 0.09, 0.37, 0.93);
position: absolute;
z-index: 5;
}
.bottom_left {
transform-origin: bottom left;
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
.text_overlay {
top: 50%;
width: 70%;
max-height: 80%;
margin: 0 15%;
text-align: center;
z-index: 4;
position: absolute;
}
.background_overlay {
background: #ffffff;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
bottom: 0;
opacity: 0.95;
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
}
.box_overlay {
border: 1.5px solid #000000;
width: calc(100% - 2vw);
height: calc(100% - 2vw);
margin: 1vw;
float: left;
z-index: 2;
position: relative;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.grid_content:hover > .grid_hover {
opacity: 1;
transform: rotate(0);
}
.hover_here {
position: absolute;
top: 350px;
}
<div class="grid_content">
<div class="grid_hover bottom_left">
<div class="text_overlay"> <p>Lorem Ipsum</p></div>
<div class="background_overlay"></div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="hover_here">
Hover somewhere around here to see the "bug"
</p>
I also tried to just set grid_hover to pointer-events: none; that worked, but I can't use it because inside that div will be a button that has to be clickable.
My idea or what I want to achieve is something like this:
.grid_hover is set to display: none at the beginning
hovering on .grid_content will set it to display: block and after that happened the animation should run
Is there a way to make this work in just css without javascript?
Related
I have the following JSFiddle, which positions an "X" to the left of a pop-out window: http://jsfiddle.net/XDaEk/601/
CSS:
.x {
display: none;
position: fixed;
top: 25%;
left:60px;
transition: transform .25s ease-in-out;
}
.x:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
display: block;
margin: auto;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 32px;
height: 0;
border-top: 3px solid black;
transform: rotate(45deg);
transform-origin: center;
}
.x:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
display: block;
margin: auto;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
width: 32px;
height: 0;
border-top: 3px solid black;
transform: rotate(-45deg);
transform-origin: center;
}
.alert-div {
display:none;
position: fixed;
top: 0%;
left: 0%;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
padding-left: 50px;
padding-bottom: 50px;
padding-right: 50px;
padding-top: 50px;
background-color: white;
color: white;
opacity:0.7;
overflow-y: auto;
}
HTML
<div class="alert-div2"> <div class="x"></div>Sed ut perspiciatis, unde omnis …</div>
If I copy this exact same CSS & HTML into my file on byethost.com, the "x" appears in the center of the screen. I surrounded the CSS with <style type="text/css"> </style> in the head. The HTML is in the body. I've tried copying this CSS & HTML into another JSFiddle and it works, so it seems to have something to do with Byethost.
There are no console errors related to this.
Here's the actual site. The button to show pop out is at the very bottom. It says "Post Message" http://carouseltest.byethost8.com/aplayground.php (Neither of the 2 errors on the console have to do with this code. They were there before I added this.)
Here's a photo of how it appears on Byethost: http://imgur.com/a/BSzER
Looks like position: fixed is being overridden (although it's difficult to be certain when it's not reproducible). Try updating to:
.x {
display: none;
/* add !important in case this is what's getting zapped and affecting layout */
position: fixed !important;
top: 25%;
left:60px;
transition: transform .25s ease-in-out;
}
I have a fixed top navbar with dropdowns. I want to slide the dropdown menus in on hover. I want that the menu is behind the navbar while sliding in. So I've simply tried to set the z-index of both elements which unfortunately did not work for me.
Here a simplified example (codepen)
html
<div class="fixed-top">
<span class="trigger">hover me</span>
<div class="menu"></div>
</div>
css
.fixed-top {
background: #3b5999;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
top: 0;
position: fixed;
z-index: 2;
}
.trigger {
z-index: 2;
font-size: 33px;
color: white;
margin-left: 50%;
}
.trigger:hover + .menu {
margin-top: 0;
}
.menu {
z-index: 1;
height: 300px;
background-color: #1c7754;
width: 400px;
margin: auto;
margin-top: -400px;
transition: all 0.75s ease-out;
}
In case it's not clear what I want to do here a simple mspaint sketch ;)
This is an extremely common error when beginning to work with stacking contexts in CSS. Basically, you just have to remember that a child cannot exist in a different stacking context from a parent.
So if I have a non-static element (meaning an element with position: anything-but-static [fixed, relative, absolute]), and if that element has no non-static parent element, then it will be at stacking context level 1, no matter where it is in the DOM. Now if that element has a non-static child element, that child will be at stacking context level 2. It cannot be on the same level (level 1) as its parent element. z-index can only affect elements on the same stacking context level, it has nothing to do with elements on different stacking context levels.
The solution is to restructure your HTML, or just use a :before or :after pseudo-element, thus:
.fixed-top {
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
top: 0;
position: fixed; /* The parent: stacking context level 1 */
}
.fixed-top:before {
background: #3b5999;
content:'';
position: absolute; /* stacking context level 2 */
top: 0; right: 0; bottom: 0; left: 0;
z-index: 1;
}
.trigger {
color: white;
font-size: 33px;
margin-left: 50%;
position: relative; /* also stacking context level 2 */
z-index: 2;
}
.trigger:hover + .menu {
margin-top: 0;
}
.menu { /* bottom layer -- no stacking context necessary */
z-index: 0;
height: 300px;
background-color: #1c7754;
width: 400px;
margin: auto;
margin-top: -400px;
transition: all 0.75s ease-out;
}
Note the comments denoting the stacking context levels.
And here's a JSFiddle for an example.
Try running the Code Snippet.
.fixed-top {
background: #3b5999;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
top: 0;
position: fixed;
z-index: 2;
}
.trigger {
font-size: 33px;
color: white;
margin-left: 50%;
width: 100%;
height: 50px;
top: 0;
position: fixed;
z-index: 3;
}
.trigger:hover + .menu,
.menu:hover{
margin-top: 0;
}
.menu {
z-index: 1;
height: 300px;
background-color: #1c7754;
width: 400px;
margin: auto;
margin-top: -400px;
transition: all 0.75s ease-out;
}
<div class="fixed-top"></div>
<span class="trigger">hover me</span>
<div class="menu"></div>
i think this is what you want.
css code
.fixed-top {
background: #3b5999;
height: 50px;
width: 100%;
padding: 0;
top: 0;
position : fixed;
}
.trigger {
z-index: 500;
font-size: 33px;
color: white;
margin-left: 50%;
position : absolute;
}
.trigger:hover + .menu {
margin-top: 0;
}
.menu {
z-index: -9999;
position : relative;
height: 300px;
background-color: #1c7754;
width: 400px;
margin: auto;
margin-top: -400px;
transition: all 0.75s ease-out;
}
<div class="fixed-top">
<span class="trigger">hover me</span>
<div class="menu"></div>
</div>
here is the reference that you can check
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/09/the-z-index-css-property-a-comprehensive-look/
I wanted to do a smooth transition of a fullscreen lightbox, my actual code is
<a href="#_" class="lightbox" id="img1">
<img src="images/photo.jpg">
</a>
And my style:
.lightbox {
display: none;
position: fixed;
z-index: 999;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.8);
}
.lightbox img {
max-width: 90%;
max-height: 80%;
margin-top: 2%;
}
.lightbox:target {
outline: none;
display: block;
transition:all 1s;
}
It's really simple, but transition:all seems to don't work with display block/none... Any idea?
display block/none does not allow any transition to run.
You must use visibility and opacity(for cross browser support).
So your code would look like this:
.lightbox {
display: block;
visibility: hidden;
opacity: 0;
position: fixed;
z-index: 999;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.8);
transition:all 1s;
}
.lightbox img {
max-width: 90%;
max-height: 80%;
margin-top: 2%;
}
.lightbox:target {
outline: none;
visibility: visible;
opacity: 1;
}
If I recall correctly, transition doesn't work with display. It's not time to give up hope, however! There's opacity! Use opacity: 0 and opacity: 1 in combination with display: none and display: block. Also, your transition is on the .lightbox:target, not the .lightbox. When it's on .lightbox:target, it's too late to start the transition.
Corrected CSS:
.lightbox {
display: none;
opacity: 1;
position: fixed;
z-index: 999;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.8);
transition: opacity 1s;
}
.lightbox img {
max-width: 90%;
max-height: 80%;
margin-top: 2%;
}
.lightbox:target {
outline: none;
display: block;
opacity: 1;
}
you can't transition display since it has no interim values, it is either displayed or hidden (of course there are many different ways of display)
It can't be 25% displayed
in order to create fade in transition with css only, you'll need to use the opacity attribute
function toggle(){
var element = document.getElementById("element");
if(element.className==""){
element.className = "out";
} else {
element.className = "";
}
}
#element{
transition: all 1s;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,0.5);
opacity: 1;
}
#element.out{
opacity:0
}
button{z-index: 2; position: relative}
<div id="element">Element</div>
<br />
<button onclick="toggle()">click to fade in/out</button>
I am creating a responsive website. I want to create below shape in CSS3. using ul li.
you could use a pseudo element, and have overflow:hidden set on the parent container.
html {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background: #222;
}
.wrap {
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 200px;
background: #222;
overflow: hidden;
}
.wrap div {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
height: 100%;
width: 22%;
margin-left: 2%;
background: lightblue;
transition: all 0.6s;
line-height:200px;
text-align:center;
}
.wrap:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
bottom: -25%;
left: 0;
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
border-radius: 50%;
background: #222;
z-index: 8;
}
div.withImage {
background: url(http://placekitten.com/g/300/300);
background-size: 100% 100%;
}
.wrap div:hover:before {
opacity: 1;
}
.wrap div:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background: blue;
opacity: 0;
transition: all 0.6s;
}
<div class="wrap">
<div>ONE</div>
<div>TWO</div>
<div>THREE</div>
<div class="withImage">FOUR</div>
</div>
NOTE
This has been done using Divs. I have left it as an exercise for the OP to alter this code for ul li.
This can also be altered to include Dynamically added elements: JSFIDDLE
I have a DIV on top of another DIV.
What I want to achieve is hide the DIV on top to be able to access the DIV below.
I've tried opacity, but since the top DIV is still there, just transparent, It won't allow me to interact with the content of the DIV below.
I've also tried display:none;, visibility: hidden; and z-index. None of those would work.
How do I achieve this with CSS3, so I can also use a transition?
HTML:
<li class="panel-box">
<div class="front box-style"> </div>
<div class="back"> </div>
</div> </li>
CSS:
.panel-box {
margin: 5px;
padding: 0;
display: inline-block;
clear: none;
float: left;
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
}
.box-style {
background-color: red;
}
.front {
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 5;
opacity: 0;
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.front:hover {
opacity: 0;
display: none;
}
.back {
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
background-color: rgba(57, 54, 55, 0.95);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 0;
}
Thanks a bunch.
I've put together a bit of a workaround that seems to do some of this, but it will likely fail miserably on IE.
Tested and works reasonably on Chrome… YMMV :)
It uses a combination of z-index and sibling selectors to allow the front/back divs to swap places in the stacking context.
I had to swap places with front/back to use the CSS sibling selectors. I don't claim this is a perfect example, but perhaps it'll get the ideas flowing.
Basically what is happening here is:
As the mouse enters - trigger .front:hover
front z-index goes to -1 triggering .back:hover
back z-index immediately goes to 100 keeping it on top of the stack
sibling selector back:hover + front keeps the front opacity at 0
When the mouse transitions out, this all reverses
The reverse transition is not very smooth - haven't quite figured out if that can be fixed yet.
Demo
CSS
.panel-box {
margin: 5px;
padding: 0;
display: inline-block;
clear: none;
float: left;
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
position: relative;
}
.front {
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
padding: 10px;
z-index: 5;
opacity: 1;
display: block;
position: absolute;
background-color: red;
top: 0;
left: 0;
-webkit-transition: opacity .5s ease;
}
.front:hover {
opacity: 0;
z-index: -1;
}
.back {
width: 310px;
height: 200px;
padding: 10px;
color: white;
background-color: rgba(57, 54, 55, 0.95);
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
z-index: 0;
opacity: 0;
-webkit-transition: opacity .5s ease;
}
.back:hover + .front {
opacity: 0;
}
.back:hover {
z-index: 100;
opacity: 1;
}
HTML
<li class="panel-box">
<div class="back">content goes here</div>
<div class="front box-style"></div>
</li>