I want to wrap this
inside
to achive a result similar to
(source: i.ibb.co)
it is to say, the t-shirt should be cropped inside the cloud, following its path.
I tried to use a CSS border mask, but I was not successful:
.wrapper {
background-image:url('https://svgshare.com/i/T9J.svg');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-size:200px;
background-position:50% 50%;
width:200px;
}
.svg-border-mask {
-webkit-mask-box-image: url('https://svgshare.com/i/T9J.svg');
mask-border: url('https://svgshare.com/i/T9J.svg');
}
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/2GKtb.png" alt="" class="svg-border-mask" />
</div>
How can I do it? I read about the clip-path way too, but I don't know how to draw this SVG path...
Use mask not mask-border and apply the same properties as the background to have a perfect matching:
.wrapper {
background-image:url('https://i.ibb.co/KjmqTs2/cloud.png');
background-repeat:no-repeat;
background-size:200px;
background-position:50% 50%;
-webkit-mask: url('https://i.ibb.co/KjmqTs2/cloud.png');
-webkit-mask-repeat:no-repeat;
-webkit-mask-size:200px;
-webkit-mask-position:50% 50%;
width:200px;
}
img {
max-width:100%;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/2GKtb.png" alt="" class="svg-border-mask" />
</div>
You can also simplify like below:
img {
--m:url('https://i.ibb.co/KjmqTs2/cloud.png') center/contain no-repeat;
background:var(--m);
-webkit-mask: var(--m);
width:200px;
padding:0 20px; /* some padding to control the shape */
}
<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/2GKtb.png" >
<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/2GKtb.png" style="width:100px;padding:0">
<img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/2GKtb.png" style="width:100px;padding:0 30px">
A good reference is https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3796025/fill-svg-path-element-with-a-background-image but as I was new to this too I have seen how it works by taking the cloud SVG image given in the question and combining it with the given tshirt image.
Look at the code in this snippet which defines an img and uses it instead of the fill color on the first path in the given SVG. I've put it all inline so it's possible to see what is going on.
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 342.33 210.05">
<defs>
<style>.cls-1{fill:#00ffff;}.cls-2{fill:#d1d1d1;}</style>
<pattern id="img1" patternUnits="userSpaceOnUse" width="342.33" height="210.05">
<image href="https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0520/4063/0437/products/img9_be295193-87ac-4d81-a55d-2353cbf5621d_250x.png" x="0" y="0" width="342.33" height="210.05" />
</pattern></defs>
<g id="Capa_2" data-name="Capa 2">
<g id="Capa_1-2" data-name="Capa 1">
<g id="Fill_24" data-name="Fill 24">
<path d="M337.32,112.06A56.17,56.17,0,0,1,320.21,152a50.61,50.61,0,0,1-58.44,9l-3-1.52-.6,3.3c-4.05,22.46-22.82,38.38-44.58,37.92-16.41-.37-31.29-10.12-38.84-25.47l-2.86-5.81-1.79,6.23C165,193.48,146.93,206.38,129,204.93c-19.83-1.65-37.72-17.08-43.53-37.59l-1.39-4.5-3,3.67a42.48,42.48,0,0,1-23.59,14.76A41.38,41.38,0,0,1,25.05,175a45.35,45.35,0,0,1-19-28.71A46.93,46.93,0,0,1,11.89,112C21.13,96.84,38,88.9,54.89,91.73l4.63.78-1.94-4.28A40,40,0,0,1,59.7,51,35.88,35.88,0,0,1,82.8,34.33a34.66,34.66,0,0,1,27,5.27,37.65,37.65,0,0,1,13.26,15.85l3.18,7.14,1.55-7.66C133.35,27.57,157.66,6.12,184.33,5c30.07-1.19,59.39,18.76,71.34,48.54.78,1.82,1.43,3.65,2.16,5.84l.92,2.76,2.59-1.33a50.69,50.69,0,0,1,24.07-5.54C314.53,56,337.82,81.42,337.32,112.06Z" fill="url(#img1)" />
<path class="cls-2" d="M285.52,50.32a55.83,55.83,0,0,0-23.87,4.84c-.42-1.17-.87-2.35-1.36-3.5C247.58,20,216.27-1.21,184.13.05c-26.82,1.08-51.42,21.11-59.63,47.59a42.77,42.77,0,0,0-11.91-12.18,39.6,39.6,0,0,0-30.85-6,40.87,40.87,0,0,0-26.31,19,45.08,45.08,0,0,0-4,37.9C34,85,17.15,93.76,7.62,109.36a52,52,0,0,0-6.47,38,50.21,50.21,0,0,0,21.08,31.82,46.34,46.34,0,0,0,36.46,7A47.49,47.49,0,0,0,82.1,173c7.49,20.28,26.05,35.21,46.53,36.92,1.09.08,2.18.13,3.27.13,17.51,0,34-11.27,41.12-27.78a49.24,49.24,0,0,0,40.47,23.34c23.2.57,43.32-15.65,48.94-38.85a56.69,56.69,0,0,0,21.07,4.67,55.84,55.84,0,0,0,40.18-15.88,61.15,61.15,0,0,0,18.64-43.41c0-.35,0-.69,0-1C342.33,78.18,317.05,51,285.52,50.32Zm-1.9,116.11a51.31,51.31,0,0,1-21.85-5.51l-3-1.52-.6,3.3c-4.05,22.46-22.82,38.38-44.58,37.92-16.41-.37-31.29-10.12-38.84-25.47l-2.86-5.81-1.79,6.23C165,193.48,146.93,206.38,129,204.93c-19.83-1.65-37.72-17.08-43.53-37.59l-1.39-4.5-3,3.67a42.48,42.48,0,0,1-23.59,14.76A41.38,41.38,0,0,1,25.05,175a45.35,45.35,0,0,1-19-28.71A46.93,46.93,0,0,1,11.89,112C21.13,96.84,38,88.9,54.89,91.73l4.63.78-1.94-4.28A40,40,0,0,1,59.7,51,35.88,35.88,0,0,1,82.8,34.33a34.66,34.66,0,0,1,27,5.27,37.65,37.65,0,0,1,13.26,15.85l3.18,7.14,1.55-7.66C133.35,27.57,157.66,6.12,184.33,5c30.07-1.19,59.39,18.76,71.34,48.54.78,1.82,1.43,3.65,2.16,5.84l.92,2.76,2.59-1.33a50.69,50.69,0,0,1,24.07-5.54c29.12.65,52.41,26.11,51.91,56.75A56.17,56.17,0,0,1,320.21,152,51,51,0,0,1,283.62,166.43Z"/>
</g>
</g>
</g>
</svg>
Animation of the problem (theirs vs mine). More context below:
I have gotten some code off of JSFiddle and it is as follows:
HTML:
<article id="main">
<div class="ocean">
<div class="wave"></div>
</div>
</article>
CSS:
.ocean {
height: 5%;
width:100%;
position:absolute;
bottom:0;
left:0;
background: #015871;
}
.wave {
background: url(https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/s.cdpn.io/85486/wave.svg) repeat-x;
position: absolute;
width: 6400px;
top:-198px;
height:198px;
animation: wave 2s linear infinite;
}
#keyframes wave {
100% {
margin-left: -1600px;
}
}
article{
width:100%;
height:100vh;
}
Now with me, I have the exact same code, but I changed out the source to an svg that I made by changing the 'background' attribute in the '.wave' class as follows:
background: url("...\my_svg.svg");
Then this is the code for that SVG:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1600 65">
<defs>
<style>.cls-1{stroke:#000;stroke-miterlimit:10;}</style>
</defs>
<title>bkg-side</title>
<g id="Layer_1" data-name="Layer 1">
<path class="cls-1" d="M1600.3,58.38c-64.8,0-177.4-9.65-400-28.94S866.52.5,800.4.5C735.6.5,623,10.15,400.45,29.44S66.62,58.38.5,58.38v6.89l1600,.23"/>
</g>
</svg>
Now as you'll see, there is a smooth transition for the svg that I am using and a not-so-smooth transition with the SVG that I made. Theirs will scroll infinitely to the side or at least look like it is while mine will 'reset' after the set amount of time for the animation (in this case, 5 seconds). The only difference in code is which SVG is being used and I have no idea why their SVG will scroll to the side infinitely and look like a smooth curve, while with mine, it resets and gets choppy every 5 seconds. Does it have something to do with the SVG code in of itself?
EDIT: the ends DO touch each other forming a consistent curve with both images, and I have put my image in the top left corner of Illustrator and hit 'Export Selection...'. The consistancy is there, but with this one, the wave goes on without resetting while mine DOES reset from the beginning.
It's because your wave is in the middle of a large SVG, with space all around it. Whereas theirs occupies the full width of the SVG.
When you repeat-x theirs, the left and right edges of each repeat meet up. Yours have large gaps on the left and right.
You need to move your wave shape to the left edge of the SVG and trim the page size to match the width.
Based on Paul's comment, and by comparing the svg files, I found that THEIR svg didn't have a viewbox attribute and had a width attribute, while mine DID have a viewbox attribute and didn't have a width attribute. I set the with to be the value of the margin-left value in the #key-frames animation and presto!
My old svg:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 1600 65">
<defs>
<style>.cls-1{stroke:#000;stroke-miterlimit:10;}</style>
</defs>
<title>bkg-side</title>
<g id="Layer_1" data-name="Layer 1">
<path class="cls-1" d="M1600.3,58.38c-64.8,0-177.4-9.65-400-28.94S866.52.5,800.4.5C735.6.5,623,10.15,400.45,29.44S66.62,58.38.5,58.38v6.89l1600,.23"/>
</g>
</svg>
My new svg:
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="1600" height="66">
<defs>
<style>.cls-1{stroke:#000;stroke-miterlimit:10;}</style>
</defs>
<title>bkg-side</title>
<g id="Layer_1" data-name="Layer 1">
<path class="cls-1" d="M1600.3,58.38c-64.8,0-177.4-9.65-400-28.94S866.52.5,800.4.5C735.6.5,623,10.15,400.45,29.44S66.62,58.38.5,58.38v6.89l1600,.23"/>
</g>
</svg>
I have created a fairly simple shape using an SVG element which is then put into my CSS using clip-path. It should make the corners rounded for me but for some reason only 1 of the corners does the effect perfectly.
This is the shape:
<svg height="500" width="500">
<path fill="#555555" d="M50,0 L450,0 Q500,0 500,50 L500,400 Q500,450 450,450 L200,450 L175,500 L150,450 L50,450 Q0,450 0,400 L0,50 Q0,0 50,0z" />
</svg>
This is what happens when i use it as a clip-path
body {
background: #555;
}
img {
clip-path: url(#svgPath);
-webkit-clip-path: url(#svgPath);
}
<svg height="0" width="0">
<defs>
<clipPath id="svgPath">
<path fill="#FFFFFF" d="M50,0 L450,0 Q500,0 500,50 L500,400 Q500,450 450,450 L200,450 L175,500 L150,450 L50,450 Q0,450 0,400 L0,50 Q0,0 50,0z" />
</clipPath>
</defs>
</svg>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/500" />
It seems to work perfectly within FireFox but shows the corners aren't cut correctly in Chrome apart from the bottom right corner.
The default units for the clip-path is userSpaceOnUse and this seems to calculate the coordinates of the path with reference to the root element. This is the reason why the clip-path seems like it is producing an incorrect output. Nullifying the margin and padding on the root element or absolutely positioning the element (like in the below snippet) should solve the issue.
body {
background: #555;
}
img {
position: absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
clip-path: url(#svgPath);
-webkit-clip-path: url(#svgPath);
}
<svg height="0" width="0">
<defs>
<clipPath id="svgPath">
<path fill="#FFFFFF" d="M50,0 L450,0 Q500,0 500,50 L500,400 Q500,450 450,450 L200,450 L175,500 L150,450 L50,450 Q0,450 0,400 L0,50 Q0,0 50,0z" />
</clipPath>
</defs>
</svg>
<img src="http://lorempixel.com/500/500/" />
However, in a real life scenario the actual element that has to be clipped could be present anywhere within the body and hence I think it is a much better approach to use the objectBoundingBox as the units like in the below snippet:
body {
background: #555;
}
img {
clip-path: url(#svgPath);
-webkit-clip-path: url(#svgPath);
}
<svg height="0" width="0">
<defs>
<clipPath id="svgPath" clipPathUnits="objectBoundingBox">
<path fill="#FFFFFF" d="M0.1,0 L0.9,0 Q1,0 1,0.1 L1,0.8 Q1,0.9 0.9,0.9 L0.4,0.9 L0.35,1 L0.3,0.9 L0.1,0.9 Q0,0.9 0,0.8 L0,0.1 Q0,0 0.1,0z" />
</clipPath>
</defs>
</svg>
<img src="https://dummyimage.com/500" />
As mentioned in the question itself, this behavior is visible only in Chrome and not Firefox for reasons unknown to me. Firefox produces an output similar to the expected one even when (a) extra padding + margin is added to the body and (b) when the image itself is wrapped inside another container which also has padding + margin.
The only case where Firefox's output matches with Chrome is when a padding is added directly to the img tag itself. I believe this happens because padding is part of the element and thus affects the coordinates.