scss continue name with interpolation and `#at-root` - css

I am trying to fully understand the ampersand (&) and interpolation operators in sass, while also following bem. For example, I have a table block declared like so:
.table {
width: 60%;
&__title {
// omit code
}
&__data {
display: grid;
width: 100%;
& > #{#at-root}__key + #{#at-root}__value > * { // <- ISSUE HERE
// give all direct, non text child nodes margin below
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
}
}
and used like:
<div class='table'>
<div class='table__title'>...</div>
<div class='table__data'>
<div class='table__key'>...</div>
<div class='table__value'>...</div>
</div>
</div>
See line 9 of the sass; here the expected compiled result would be
.table__data > .table__key + .table__value > * {
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
but of course #at-root is not a variable so an error is thrown
SassError: Invalid CSS after "#": expected expression (e.g. 1px, bold), was "#at-root}__key + #{"
Does anything like my attempt exist, can/should I somehow combine the #at-root element with classes I'm using?
Articles I've already tried:
Append the parent selector to the end with Sass
EDIT made the question clearer

What I do when I actually deem this necessary is to just create your reference from the root. It's kind of like the old days when you often had to declare that = this scenarios (well not really but you get the idea lol).
However, generally I avoid this kind of deep nesting unless it's genuinely required to avoid too many levels of specificity (habit from the old days when such noticeably things effected performance.
See example below, and a codepen to tinker
.table {
$root: &; // <-- create reference to root that allows interpolation.
width: 60%;
&__title {
// omit code
}
&__data {
display: grid;
width: 100%;
& > #{$root}__key + #{$root}__value > * { // <- ISSUE HERE
// give all direct, non text child nodes margin below
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}
}
}
...and the compiled output...
.table {
width: 60%;
}
.table__data {
display: grid;
width: 100%;
}
.table__data > .table__key + .table__value > * {
margin-bottom: 0.5em;
}

Related

LESS CSS prepend mixin reference with child selector

Is there any way I can use the immediate child selector without having to do it inside the mixin to get the desired result? The real mixin is actually large and I want to be able to reuse it also without having to pollute it with child selectors.
Desired Result
.wrapper > .col-xs-6 {
width: 50%;
}
Code I have
.wrapper {
> .mixintest(); //not allowed
}
.mixintest(){
.col-xs-6{
width: 50%;
}
}
move immediate child selector to mixin
.wrapper {
.mixintest();
}
.mixintest() {
> .col-xs-6 {
width: 50%;
}
}
That is the only way that will work according to
https://lesscss.org/features/#mixins-feature
more specifically this example in "Namespace" subsection
#outer > .inner(); // deprecated
#outer .inner(); // deprecated
#outer.inner(); // preferred

"Resting" & in Sass

I'm importing sass classes from another project and want to provide a wrapper to keep these styles localised.
My wrapper looks like this
.my-wrapper {
#include "framework-main"
}
I first looked fine but then I noticed that some tiles are missing. The problem is that the framework sass files use heavily reference to parent: &. This works fine for them but when I apply the wrapper it's get injected everywhere.
How can I make the wrapper a prefix only?
To illustrate:
SASS:
.wrapper {
// reset here somehow, I have no control over the nested code.
.parent {
&--child1 &--child2 {
width: 10%;
}
}
}
What I want:
.wrapper .parent--child1 .parent--child2 {
width: 10%;
}
What I get:
.wrapper .parent--child1 .wrapper .parent--child2 {
width: 10%;
}
Is this even possible?
Yes, it is possible, there is just small mistake in your code - you don't need . in front of &--child so it will not break selector construction:
.wrapper {
// reset here somehow
.parent {
&--child {
&--grand-child{
width: 10%;
}
}
}
}
gives
.wrapper .parent--child--grand-child {
width: 10%;
}

What is right BEM approach to global class inheritance?

I recently started using BEM methodology and I'm confused about class inheritance, or rather - when we talk about BEM - some use cases of modifiers.
Let's look at this example, I have a simple element with few children
.b-content { width: 100%; }
.b-content__image { display: block; }
.b-content__date { font-size: 14px; }
.b-content__title { font-size: 30px; }
.b-content__text { font-size: 16px; }
Now I want to reuse my .b-content block with slightly different styles, so I use modifier .m-compact and now I'm not sure what approach is the right one (in BEM).
Whether I should append modifier class to all elements (which I find more valid according to documentation):
.b-content.m-compact { width: 50%; }
.b-content__image.m-compact { display: none; }
.b-content__date.m-compact { font-size: 12px; }
.b-content__title.m-compact { font-size: 24px; }
.b-content__text.m-compact { font-size: 14px; }
or should I append modifier only to the parent element:
.b-content.m-compact { width: 50%; }
.b-content.m-compact .b-content__image { display: none; }
.b-content.m-compact .b-content__date { font-size: 12px; }
.b-content.m-compact .b-content__title { font-size: 24px; }
.b-content.m-compact .b-content__text { font-size: 14px; }
I find this second method more logical, you know, since I'm writing cascading styles and in real world if I want to write e-mail to 10 people, I would write one and just add more recipients, but on the other hand I realize BEM is practically non-cascading approach.
So what should I use and why?
As you point out in the last lines of your question, when doing BEM you should avoid cascading so, as a corollary to this, you don't have to repeat the modifier where it isn't needed.
For your Modifier I'd write something like this:
.b-content--m-compact {
width: 50%;
}
In your example the Block and the Modifier set only the width, so this is a limited use case. In general it comes handy to use some kind of CSS preprocess to ease the code writing, e.g. in SASS:
.my-block
width: 100%
color: red
&--modifier
#extend .my-block
border: 1px solid red
which will results in:
.my-block, .my-block--modifier {
width: 100%;
color: red;
}
.my-block--modifier {
border: 1px solid red;
}
Modifier in BEM looks like this: .block_modName_modValue
You can add additional class - but it's not BEM. And also modifiers have a name and value.
Block in BEM set namespace
So you set default styles for blocks and all unique(that can be changed) place in css with modifiers. This way your styles don't messed up.
To do this you need:
Place common styles in block styles(.portfolio)
Place unique style(with modifiers) like this.(portfolio_theme_list)
In css you don't need to separate this(preprocessor will be needed).
.portfolio {
/* common styles */
&_theme_list {
/* modifiers style */
}
}
In BEM project-stub(template engine) it would look like this:
If you add modifier to block. Then compile(bemjson) to html.
{
block : 'portfolio',
mods : { theme : 'list' },
}
You will see this code
<div class="portfolio portfolio_theme_list">
</div>
You write elements correctly and understand that they need to be separated(without inheritence).
So now you need just define styles for your block with modifier(portfolio_theme_list).
You have 2 options:
1) If you have 2 different blocks - you need separate common and
unique styles. Unique styles place in styles with modified blocks.
2) If you have only 1 different block & you already have styles on
this blocks. Then you can override and don't separate common
styles(but it can cause pain if you add another modifier/instance)

Less - How to insert an #variable into property (as opposed to the value)

In less.js, I'm able to replace values with variables with no problems.
#gutter: 20px;
margin-left:e(%("-%d"), #gutter);
When trying to replace properties with variables, I get errors. How would I perform the following in Less?
#gutter: 20px;
#direction: left;
e(%("margin-%d"), #direction):e(%("-%d"), #gutter);
Thanks to Alvivi for the solution and research (you get the reward for that). I decided to add the following as the actual answer since this is a real way to set it up instead of looking at .blah() pseudo code..
Here's a real strategy for setting it up:
#gutter: 20px;
#dir: left;
#dirOp: right;
then create mixins to enhance margin and padding like so:
.margin(left, #dist:#gutter) {
margin-left:#dist;
}
.margin(right, #dist:#gutter) {
margin-right:#dist;
}
.padding(left, #dist:#gutter) {
padding-left:#dist;
}
.padding(right, #dist:#gutter) {
padding-right:#dist;
}
.lr(left, #dist: 0) {
left: #dist;
}
.lr(right, #dist: 0) {
right: #dist;
}
.. then you can just
#selector {
.margin(#dir);
}
or
#selector {
.margin(#dirOp, 10px);
}
all together:
#selector {
.margin(#dir);
.margin(#dirOp, 50px);
.padding(#dir, 10px);
.padding(#dirOp);
float:#dir;
text-align:#dirOp;
position:absolute;
.lr(#dir);
}
Easy breezy LTR/RTL with LESS! Woot!
Escaping, as says the documentation, is used to create CSS values (not properties).
There is a discussion with some workarounds here. One would be using parametric mixins. For example:
.g () { /* Common properties */ }
.g (right) { margin-right: e(...) }
.g (left) { margin-left: e(...) }

Can you use if/else conditions in CSS?

I would like to use conditions in my CSS.
The idea is that I have a variable that I replace when the site is run to generate the right style-sheet.
I want it so that according to this variable the style-sheet changes!
It looks like:
[if {var} eq 2 ]
background-position : 150px 8px;
[else]
background-position : 4px 8px;
Can this be done? How do you do this?
Not in the traditional sense, but you can use classes for this, if you have access to the HTML. Consider this:
<p class="normal">Text</p>
<p class="active">Text</p>
and in your CSS file:
p.normal {
background-position : 150px 8px;
}
p.active {
background-position : 4px 8px;
}
That's the CSS way to do it.
Then there are CSS preprocessors like Sass. You can use conditionals there, which'd look like this:
$type: monster;
p {
#if $type == ocean {
color: blue;
} #else if $type == matador {
color: red;
} #else if $type == monster {
color: green;
} #else {
color: black;
}
}
Disadvantages are, that you're bound to pre-process your stylesheets, and that the condition is evaluated at compile time, not run time.
A newer feature of CSS proper are custom properties (a.k.a. CSS variables). They are evaluated at run time (in browsers supporting them).
With them you could do something along the line:
:root {
--main-bg-color: brown;
}
.one {
background-color: var(--main-bg-color);
}
.two {
background-color: black;
}
Finally, you can preprocess your stylesheet with your favourite server-side language. If you're using PHP, serve a style.css.php file, that looks something like this:
p {
background-position: <?php echo (#$_GET['foo'] == 'bar')? "150" : "4"; ?>px 8px;
}
In this case, you will however have a performance impact, since caching such a stylesheet will be difficult.
I am surprised that nobody has mentioned CSS pseudo-classes, which are also a sort-of conditionals in CSS. You can do some pretty advanced things with this, without a single line of JavaScript.
Some pseudo-classes:
:active - Is the element being clicked?
:checked - Is the radio/checkbox/option checked? (This allows for conditional styling through the use of a checkbox!)
:empty - Is the element empty?
:fullscreen - Is the document in full-screen mode?
:focus - Does the element have keyboard focus?
:focus-within - Does the element, or any of its children, have keyboard focus?
:has([selector]) - Does the element contain a child that matches [selector]? (Sadly, not supported by any of the major browsers.)
:hover - Does the mouse hover over this element?
:in-range/:out-of-range - Is the input value between/outside min and max limits?
:invalid/:valid - Does the form element have invalid/valid contents?
:link - Is this an unvisited link?
:not() - Invert the selector.
:target - Is this element the target of the URL fragment?
:visited - Has the user visited this link before?
Example:
div { color: white; background: red }
input:checked + div { background: green }
<input type=checkbox>Click me!
<div>Red or green?</div>
Update:
I've written a article regarding the below unique method in CSS-Tricks which goes into futher detail
I've devised the below demo using a mix of tricks which allows simulating if/else scenarios for some properties. Any property which is numerical in its essence is easy target for this method, but properties with text values are.
This code has 3 if/else scenarios, for opacity, background color & width. All 3 are governed by two Boolean variables bool and its opposite notBool.
Those two Booleans are the key to this method, and to achieve a Boolean out of a none-boolean dynamic value, requires some math which luckily CSS allows using min & max functions.
Obviously those functions (min/max) are supported in recent browsers' versions which also supports CSS custom properties (variables).
var elm = document.querySelector('div')
setInterval(()=>{
elm.style.setProperty('--width', Math.round(Math.random()*80 + 20))
}, 1000)
:root{
--color1: lightgreen;
--color2: salmon;
--width: 70; /* starting value, randomly changed by javascript every 1 second */
}
div{
--widthThreshold: 50;
--is-width-above-limit: Min(1, Max(var(--width) - var(--widthThreshold), 0));
--is-width-below-limit: calc(1 - var(--is-width-above-limit));
--opacity-wide: .4; /* if width is ABOVE 50 */
--radius-narrow: 10px; /* if width is BELOW 50 */
--radius-wide: 60px; /* if width is ABOVE 50 */
--height-narrow: 80px; /* if width is ABOVE 50 */
--height-wide: 160px; /* if width is ABOVE 50 */
--radiusToggle: Max(var(--radius-narrow), var(--radius-wide) * var(--is-width-above-limit));
--opacityToggle: calc(calc(1 + var(--opacity-wide)) - var(--is-width-above-limit));
--colorsToggle: var(--color1) calc(100% * var(--is-width-above-limit)),
var(--color2) calc(100% * var(--is-width-above-limit)),
var(--color2) calc(100% * (1 - var(--is-width-above-limit)));
--height: Max(var(--height-wide) * var(--is-width-above-limit), var(--height-narrow));
height: var(--height);
text-align: center;
line-height: var(--height);
width: calc(var(--width) * 1%);
opacity: var(--opacityToggle);
border-radius: var(--radiusToggle);
background: linear-gradient(var(--colorsToggle));
transition: .3s;
}
/* prints some variables */
div::before{
counter-reset: aa var(--width);
content: counter(aa)"%";
}
div::after{
counter-reset: bb var(--is-width-above-limit);
content: " is over 50% ? "counter(bb);
}
<div></div>
Another simple way using clamp:
label{ --width: 150 }
input:checked + div{ --width: 400 }
div{
--isWide: Clamp(0, (var(--width) - 150) * 99999, 1);
width: calc(var(--width) * 1px);
height: 150px;
border-radius: calc(var(--isWide) * 20px); /* if wide - add radius */
background: lightgreen;
}
<label>
<input type='checkbox' hidden>
<div>Click to toggle width</div>
</label>
Best so far:
I have come up with a totally unique method, which is even simpler!
This method is so cool because it is so easy to implement and also to understand. it is based on animation step() function.
Since bool can be easily calculated as either 0 or 1, this value can be used in the step! if only a single step is defined, then the if/else problem is solved.
Using the keyword forwards persist the changes.
var elm = document.querySelector('div')
setInterval(()=>{
elm.style.setProperty('--width', Math.round(Math.random()*80 + 20))
}, 1000)
:root{
--color1: salmon;
--color2: lightgreen;
}
#keyframes if-over-threshold--container{
to{
--height: 160px;
--radius: 30px;
--color: var(--color2);
opacity: .4; /* consider this as additional, never-before, style */
}
}
#keyframes if-over-threshold--after{
to{
content: "true";
color: green;
}
}
div{
--width: 70; /* must be unitless */
--height: 80px;
--radius: 10px;
--color: var(--color1);
--widthThreshold: 50;
--is-width-over-threshold: Min(1, Max(var(--width) - var(--widthThreshold), 0));
text-align: center;
white-space: nowrap;
transition: .3s;
/* if element is narrower than --widthThreshold */
width: calc(var(--width) * 1%);
height: var(--height);
line-height: var(--height);
border-radius: var(--radius);
background: var(--color);
/* else */
animation: if-over-threshold--container forwards steps(var(--is-width-over-threshold));
}
/* prints some variables */
div::before{
counter-reset: aa var(--width);
content: counter(aa)"% is over 50% width ? ";
}
div::after{
content: 'false';
font-weight: bold;
color: darkred;
/* if element is wider than --widthThreshold */
animation: if-over-threshold--after forwards steps(var(--is-width-over-threshold)) ;
}
<div></div>
I've found a Chrome bug which I have reported that can affect this method in some situations where specific type of calculations is necessary, but there's a way around it.
You can use calc() in combination with var() to sort of mimic conditionals:
:root {
--var-eq-two: 0;
}
.var-eq-two {
--var-eq-two: 1;
}
.block {
background-position: calc(
150px * var(--var-eq-two) +
4px * (1 - var(--var-eq-two))
) 8px;
}
concept
Below is my old answer which is still valid but I have a more opinionated approach today:
One of the reasons why CSS sucks so much is exactly that it doesn't have conditional syntax. CSS is per se completely unusable in the modern web stack. Use SASS for just a little while and you'll know why I say that. SASS has conditional syntax... and a LOT of other advantages over primitive CSS too.
Old answer (still valid):
It cannot be done in CSS in general!
You have the browser conditionals like:
/*[if IE]*/
body {height:100%;}
/*[endif]*/
But nobody keeps you from using Javascript to alter the DOM or assigning classes dynamically or even concatenating styles in your respective programming language.
I sometimes send css classes as strings to the view and echo them into the code like that (php):
<div id="myid" class="<?php echo $this->cssClass; ?>">content</div>
You could create two separate stylesheets and include one of them based on the comparison result
In one of the you can put
background-position : 150px 8px;
In the other one
background-position : 4px 8px;
I think that the only check you can perform in CSS is browser recognition:
Conditional-CSS
CSS is a nicely designed paradigm, and many of it's features are not much used.
If by a condition and variable you mean a mechanism to distribute a change of some value to the whole document, or under a scope of some element, then this is how to do it:
var myVar = 4;
document.body.className = (myVar == 5 ? "active" : "normal");
body.active .menuItem {
background-position : 150px 8px;
background-color: black;
}
body.normal .menuItem {
background-position : 4px 8px;
background-color: green;
}
<body>
<div class="menuItem"></div>
</body>
This way, you distribute the impact of the variable throughout the CSS styles.
This is similar to what #amichai and #SeReGa propose, but more versatile.
Another such trick is to distribute the ID of some active item throughout the document, e.g. again when highlighting a menu: (Freemarker syntax used)
var chosenCategory = 15;
document.body.className = "category" + chosenCategory;
<#list categories as cat >
body.category${cat.id} .menuItem { font-weight: bold; }
</#list>
<body>
<div class="menuItem"></div>
</body>
Sure,this is only practical with a limited set of items, like categories or states, and not unlimited sets like e-shop goods, otherwise the generated CSS would be too big. But it is especially convenient when generating static offline documents.
One more trick to do "conditions" with CSS in combination with the generating platform is this:
.myList {
/* Default list formatting */
}
.myList.count0 {
/* Hide the list when there is no item. */
display: none;
}
.myList.count1 {
/* Special treatment if there is just 1 item */
color: gray;
}
<ul class="myList count${items.size()}">
<!-- Iterate list's items here -->
<li>Something...</div>
</ul>
You can use not instead of if like
.Container *:not(a)
{
color: #fff;
}
Set the server up to parse css files as PHP and then define the variable variable with a simple PHP statement.
Of course this assumes you are using PHP...
This is a little extra info to the Boldewyn answer above.
Add some php code to do the if/else
if($x==1){
print "<p class=\"normal\">Text</p>\n";
} else {
print "<p class=\"active\">Text</p>\n";
}
CSS has a feature: Conditional Rules. This feature of CSS is applied based on a specific condition. Conditional Rules are:
#supports
#media
#document
Syntax:
#supports ("condition") {
/* your css style */
}
Example code snippet:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>Supports Rule</title>
<style>
#supports (display: block) {
section h1 {
background-color: pink;
color: white;
}
section h2 {
background-color: pink;
color: black;
}
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<section>
<h1>Stackoverflow</h1>
<h2>Stackoverflow</h2>
</section>
</body>
</html>
As far as i know, there is no if/then/else in css. Alternatively, you can use javascript function to alter the background-position property of an element.
Yet another option (based on whether you want that if statement to be dynamically evaluated or not) is to use the C preprocessor, as described here.
You can use javascript for this purpose, this way:
first you set the CSS for the 'normal' class and for the 'active' class
then you give to your element the id 'MyElement'
and now you make your condition in JavaScript, something like the example below... (you can run it, change the value of myVar to 5 and you will see how it works)
var myVar = 4;
if(myVar == 5){
document.getElementById("MyElement").className = "active";
}
else{
document.getElementById("MyElement").className = "normal";
}
.active{
background-position : 150px 8px;
background-color: black;
}
.normal{
background-position : 4px 8px;
background-color: green;
}
div{
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
<div id="MyElement">
</div>
You can add container div for all your condition scope.
Add the condition value as a class to the container div. (you can set it by server side programming - php/asp...)
<!--container div-->
<div class="true-value">
<!-- your content -->
<p>my content</p>
<p>my content</p>
<p>my content</p>
</div>
Now you can use the container class as a global variable for all elements in the div using a nested selector, without adding the class to each element.
.true-value p{
background-color:green;
}
.false-value p{
background-color:red;
}
Besides the answers above, soon another way to directly use if/else -like conditions, and even more closely aligned with other scripting languages, would be via #when / #else conditionals. These conditionals would be implemented to exercise easily recognizable logic chain, for example:
#when supports(display: flex) {
.container {
display: flex
}
} #else media and (min-width: 768px) {
.container {
min-width: 768px
}
} #else {
.container {
width: 100%
}
}
As of February 2022 there is no browser support. Please see this W3C module for more info.
(Yes, old thread. But it turned up on top of a Google-search so others might be interested as well)
I guess the if/else-logic could be done with javascript, which in turn can dynamically load/unload stylesheets. I haven't tested this across browsers etc. but it should work. This will get you started:
http://www.javascriptkit.com/javatutors/loadjavascriptcss.shtml
If you're open to using jquery, you can set conditional statements using javascript within the html:
$('.class').css("color",((Variable > 0) ? "#009933":"#000"));
This will change the text color of .class to green if the value of Variable is greater than 0.

Resources