Why is my right at position absolute not working? - css

I'm trying to position my arrow on the right side of the parent div with position relative, but so far I have not managed to do it.
This is my HTML:
<div class="button--collapse">
<h2 class="title" >Your selection</h2>
</div>
and the CSS:
.button--collapse {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: right;
position: relative;
}
.button--collapse:after {
position: absolute;
content: "›";
color: white;
right: 0;
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%) rotate(90deg);
margin-top: 0;
background-color: transparent;
transition: all 0.25s;
}
What am I doing wrong? Can somebody please help me?
Thank you.

You need to add a positive length to your right property and then give the parent a bit of padding as the position:absolute takes the element out of the documents normal flow.
.button--collapse {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: right;
position: relative;
border: 1px solid black;
padding-right: 2rem; /* padding right added to accommodate the after absolute element that si taken out of the normal flow */
}
.button--collapse:after {
position: absolute;
content: "›";
color: black;
right: 10px; /* add 10px to move over from right 10px */
top: 50%;
transform: translateY(-50%) rotate(90deg);
margin-top: 0;
background-color: transparent;
transition: all 0.25s;
}
<div class="button--collapse">
<h2 class="title" >Your selection</h2>
</div>

Related

CSS transition background color without a hover

I have a div called time-box. Sometimes I will also include an additional class called countdown. If countdown is added then I would like to use a CSS transition effect so the background changes to be red over the course of 60 seconds. In other words, each second that passes the red background gets a little wider until eventually all of the green background has gone.
I have found similar posts here but they all seem to relate to hover
Here is a fiddle
https://jsfiddle.net/e2vbheew/
I don't know a "simple" way to get what you want going from left to right, but there's a way you can create it using before and after pseudoelements. The key here is I'm going to create a :before pseudoelement that has the new background that transitions across, and an :after pseudoelement that replicates the content and puts it on top of the before, so it's still visible. This required putting the content in an attribute on the div so I could reference it in the 'content' of the pseudoelement. If you had more complex content inside, you could probably do away with the :after and simply give the internal content position and z-index to make sure it's visible. Here's the resulting CSS
.time-box {
height: 27px;
text-align: center;
background-color: #25E57B;
font-size:2rem;
padding:0px;
font-size:1.2rem;
text-transform:uppercase;
padding:3px 5px 3px 5px;;
font-weight:600;
height:auto;
position: relative;
}
.time-box:before {
background-color: red;
position: absolute;
left:0;
top: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 0;
content: " ";
transition: width 60s ease;
}
.countdown:after {
content: attr(data-content);
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: center;
z-index: 1;
}
.countdown:before {
width:100%;
}
And updated fiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/tunzwqd7/2/
Using CSS animation property...
.time-box {
height: 27px;
text-align: center;
background-color: #25E57B;
font-size: 2rem;
padding: 0px;
font-size: 1.2rem;
text-transform: uppercase;
padding: 3px 5px 3px 5px;
font-weight: 600;
height: auto;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
}
.time-box.countdown:before {
content: '';
width: 0;
height: 100%;
display: block;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
background: red;
animation: countdown 60s forwards;
z-index: -1;
}
#keyframes countdown {
0% {
width: 0;
}
100% {
width: 100%;
}
}
<div class="time-box">
12:00
</div>
<div class="time-box countdown">
<span>12:00</span>
</div>
You would need to add a maximum and a little more math to make the 100% divisible by 60, but this should get you on the right track. Currently this code updates every second and adds 1% to the progress bar width with each iteration.
var time = 0;
var bar = document.querySelector('.countdown .progress-bar');
window.setInterval(function(){
time++;
bar.style.width = time+"%";
}, 1000);
.time-box {
height: 27px;
text-align: center;
background-color: #25E57B;
font-size:2rem;
padding:0px;
font-size:1.2rem;
text-transform:uppercase;
padding:3px 5px 3px 5px;;
font-weight:600;
height:auto;
position: relative;
}
.progress-bar {
display: none;
}
.countdown .progress-bar {
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
background: red;
width: 0%;
z-index: 1;
transition: all 0.3s ease-out;
}
.countdown p {
z-index: 2;
position: relative;
}
<div class="time-box">
<p>12:00</p>
<div class="progress-bar"></div>
</div>
<div class="time-box countdown">
<p>12:00</p>
<div class="progress-bar"></div>
</div>

Burger menu clickable area too small

https://codepen.io/everybodysfeelingwonderland/full/OjyRpM/
For the mobile size of my website my burger icon for the menu has a way too small clickable area, it is only those thin lines.
I also have this problem with other anchors that I'd like to have with a bigger clickable area, but don't want the element itself to become bigger on my page.
<div id="burger-container">
<div id="burger">
<span> </span>
<span> </span>
<span> </span>
</div>
</div>
CSS
#burger-container{
margin: 25px 0 0 0;
width: 50px;
float: right;
padding-right: 70px;
}
#burger{
cursor: pointer;
display: block;
}
#burger span{
background: black;
display: block;
width: 50px;
height: 3px;
margin-bottom: 10px;
position: relative;
top: 0;
transition: all ease-in-out 0.4s;
}
#burger-container.open span:nth-child(2){
width: 0;
opacity: 0;
}
#burger-container.open span:nth-child(3){
transform: rotate(45deg);
top: -13px;
}
#burger-container.open span:nth-child(1){
transform: rotate(-45deg);
top: 13px;
}
}
try adding fixed width and height
#burger {
cursor: pointer;
display: block;
height: 30px;
width: 50px;
}
You can change the CSS like so:
#burger{
display: none;
padding: 23px 15px 10px;
}
#media all and (max-width: 580px){
#burger-container{
float: right;
}
#burger{
cursor: pointer;
display: block;
}
}
This way you are only displaying the burger menu when the screen-width is 580px or less and the padding gives you a larger click area.
See this codepen for example.
This is a better practice in my opinion because you don't have to mess with setting a specific width and height, just play around with the padding.

CSS use transform-origin to position a rotated element

I can't work out how to rotate an element so that it sits underneath another one. The image below should illustrate the intended result.
Here is what I have tried so far:
.div1 {
height: 120px;
width: 120px;
float: left;
margin: 20px;
border: solid 1px #000;
overflow: hidden;
}
.div1 button {
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
border: 0;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.div2 {
background-color: #999;
height: 48px;
line-height: 48px;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.originFromLeft .div2 {
transform: rotate(90deg);
transform-origin: 24px 24px;
padding-left: 12px;
text-align: left;
}
.div1.originFromRight {
overflow: visible;
}
.originFromRight .div2 {
padding-right: 12px;
text-align: right;
transform: rotate(-90deg);
transform-origin: right top;
}
<div class="div1">
<button>></button>
<div class="div2">HELLO</div>
</div>
<div class="div1 originFromLeft">
<button>></button>
<div class="div2">HELLO</div>
</div>
<div class="div1 originFromRight">
<button>></button>
<div class="div2">HELLO</div>
</div>
The second example basically does what I want but the text is orientated the wrong way.
The closest I can get is example 3 but I need to pull this back to the left. I've tried translate but I can't get it to work, I've tried a negative right margin of 100% which almost works but basically doesn't.
One method to achieve the expected output would be to do the following:
Put the button within div2 and position it at the right edge.
Absolutely position the div2 at the bottom of the parent container.
Rotate the div2 in counter clockwise direction (-90deg) with the transform origin at left bottom.
After rotation, the div2 would entirely go outside of the container and hence we need to add an extra translateY(100%) to the transform stack.
The text is aligned to the right and an extra padding-right (greater than the width of the button) is added to keep the text away from the button.
The button would also get rotated by -90 degree because it is a child of div2 and to counter that (that is to make the button text get displayed properly), we need to apply counter rotation.
Now, in this approach the only drawback is that if the text length increases beyond what can be fit in a single line then it would wrap around to the next line (have a look at the second sample in snippet).
.div1 {
position: relative;
height: 120px;
width: 120px;
float: left;
margin: 20px;
border: solid 1px #000;
overflow: hidden;
}
button {
position: absolute;
display: inline-block;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
border: 0;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
transform: rotate(90deg);
}
.div2 {
position: absolute;
box-sizing: border-box;
bottom: 0px;
height: 48px;
width: 100%;
padding-right: 60px;
line-height: 48px;
background-color: #999;
text-align: right;
transform: rotate(-90deg) translateY(100%);
transform-origin: left bottom;
}
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">HELLO
<button>></button>
</div>
</div>
<div class="div1">
<div class="div2">HELLO WORLD!!!!!
<button>></button>
</div>
</div>
I have taken your second example and rotated the element the other way round.
And then fixed the position with an extra translateX
.div1 {
height: 120px;
width: 120px;
float: left;
margin: 20px;
border: solid 1px #000;
overflow: hidden;
}
.div1 button {
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
border: 0;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.div2 {
background-color: #999;
height: 48px;
line-height: 48px;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.originFromLeft .div2 {
transform: rotate(-90deg) translateX(-100%);
transform-origin: top left;
padding-left: 12px;
text-align: right;
}
<div class="div1 originFromLeft">
<button>></button>
<div class="div2">HELLO</div>
</div>

Clip child to parent element with border-radius

How do I force clip a child to a parent element that has rounded corners.
<div class="item" >
<div class="top">
<h1>Tile</h1>
<h2>Click me</h2>
</div>
<div class="behind">
<h3>Details</h3>
</div>
</div>
When animating the child, its ignores the border-radius of the parent element. Is there a way to fix the two corners on the top?
.item{
text-align: center;
cursor: pointer;
overflow: hidden;
height: 280px;
width: 280px;
float: left;
border-radius: 5px;
background: white;
margin: 10px;
position: absolute;
}
.top{
z-index: 1;
position: absolute;
height: 280px;
width: 280px;
background: #ed844b;
transition: 0.3s;
border-radius: 5px;
}
.behind{
z-index: 0;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
top: 136px;
height: 138px;
padding: 10px 16px;
background: #DDDDDD;
box-sizing: border-box;
border-radius: 5px;
}
.slide-up{
transform: translate3d(0, -136px, 0);
border-radius: 0px;
}
Here is a little demo:
http://codepen.io/Koopa/pen/xbaMez
Thanks
Koopa
When you add a css 3d transform to the child, you kinda move it to the separate GPU layer. You can move parent element to GPU layer instead adding null-transform hack transform: translateZ(0) to .item. Or you can replace translate with translateY (In this case child is clipped only when not being animated).

Solving a div positioning issue

I have a test site here:
http://www.hugoproject.com/test.html
I'm trying to put a second row of the book icons beneath the first, but whatever I try doesn't work. To clarify the situation, the following code makes a single book icon appear:
<div class="project">
Arrow<span></span>
</div>
When I have two sets of the code, two icons appear, when there are three sets of the code three icons appear. But if I have four or more sets of the code only three icons appear! I want for the extra sets of code to make icons beneath the first three.
Also at the moment when you resize the browser window this makes the top row of icons resize dynamically. I'd like to keep this feature and make both rows of icons fit on the one page such that there is no scroll bar.
Any ideas?
HTML
<div id="content">
<div id="home-projects-wrapper">
<h1 class="home">Hello! My name is Brandon</h1>
<div id="home-projects">
<div id="projects" class="circle">
<div class="project-group">
<div class="project">
Arrow<span></span>
</div>
<div class="project">
Arrow<span></span>
</div>
<div class="project">
Arrow<span></span>
</div>
<div class="project">
Arrow<span></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
#container {
transition: left .3s;
-moz-transition: left .3s;
-webkit-transition: left .3s;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
left: 0;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
#container.open {
left: 270px;
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
transition: left .3s;
-moz-transition: left .3s;
-webkit-transition: left .3s;
overflow-x: hidden;
}
#content {
width: 80%;
max-width: 1170px;
margin: 7% auto;
position: relative;
font-size: 14px;
line-height: 22px;
color: #777777;
}
.page-template-page-templateshome-php #content {
width: auto;
margin: 0 auto;
position: static;
}
.single-post #content {
width: 60%;
}
#home-projects {
text-align: center;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative;
}
#projects {
width: 100%;
}
.project-group {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
}
.project {
float: left;
text-align: center;
width: 33.3%;
height:100%;
}
.project-link {
background-size: cover;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center;
background-color: #adadad;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
display: inline-block;
width: 80%;
}
.circle .project-link, .circle .project-link .hover {
border-radius: 100%;
-moz-border-radius: 100%;
-webkit-border-radius: 100%;
}
.project-link .hexagon-top {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-bottom-color: transparent;
border-left-color: #dfdfdf;
border-right-color: #dfdfdf;
width: 0;
height: 0;
z-index: 2;
}
.project-link .hexagon-bottom {
content: '';
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
border-style: solid;
border-top-color: transparent;
border-left-color: #dfdfdf;
border-right-color: #dfdfdf;
width: 0;
height: 0;
z-index: 2;
}
.project-link .hover {
position: absolute;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
font-size: 14px;
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
background: #ec6136;
text-decoration: none;
text-transform: uppercase;
display: block;
opacity: 0;
transition: all .3s;
-moz-transition: all .3s;
-webkit-transitin: all .3s;
}
.project-link .hover-text {
display: block;
margin-top: 45%;
}
.project-link .hover-text:after {
content: '>';
font-family: 'icon';
font-size: 12px;
margin-left: 15px;
}
.project-link:hover > .hover {
opacity: .9;
}
If you want to continue with what you have now, just remove position:absolute from .project-group
You need to define a height for your blocks, i.e.
.project {
float: left;
text-align: center;
width: 33.3%;
height: 290px;
}
.HS {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
text-indent: -9999px;
width: 100%;
height: 290px;
background-image: url("http://www.hugoproject.com/ftp1/images/icons.png");
background-position: 0px 0px;
background-size: 800%;
}
That will not completely solve your issue though. Maybe you want to use images inside the boxes instead of a background image/icon. You can also always calculate new dimensions with JavaScript/jQuery.
I would set up a div container for the books with a set width equal to the width of the books + margins.
Then set the book divs to "float: left;" and it should put 3 books per line.
If you want to keep the auto scaling you should do all this with percentages like you are currently doing.

Resources