Suppose we have
A = [1 2; 3 4]
In numpy, the following syntax will produce
A[[1,2],[1,2]] = [1,4]
But, in julia, the following produce a permutation which output
A[[1,2],[1,2]] = [1 2; 3 4]
Is there a concise way to achieve the same thing as numpy without using for loops?
To get what you want I would use CartesianIndex like this:
julia> A[CartesianIndex.([(1,1), (2,2)])]
2-element Vector{Int64}:
1
4
or
julia> A[[CartesianIndex(1,1), CartesianIndex(2,2)]]
2-element Vector{Int64}:
1
4
Like Bogumil said, you probably want to use CartesianIndex. But if you want to get your result from supplying the vectors of indices for each dimensions, as in your Python [1,2],[1,2] example, you need to zip these indices first:
julia> A[CartesianIndex.(zip([1,2], [1,2]))]
2-element Vector{Int64}:
1
4
How does this work? zip traverses both vectors of indices at the same time (like a zipper) and returns an iterator over the tuples of indices:
julia> zip([1,2],[1,2]) # is a lazy iterator
zip([1, 2], [1, 2])
julia> collect(zip([1,2],[1,2])) # collect to show all the tuples
2-element Vector{Tuple{Int64, Int64}}:
(1, 1)
(2, 2)
and then CartesianIndex turns them into cartesian indices, which can then be used to get the corresponding values in A:
julia> CartesianIndex.(zip([1,2],[1,2]))
2-element Vector{CartesianIndex{2}}:
CartesianIndex(1, 1)
CartesianIndex(2, 2)
Related
I have a list of vectors (vector of vectors) like the following:
A 2-element Vector{Vector{Int64}}: A= [347229118, 1954075737, 6542148346,347229123, 1954075753, 6542148341] [247492691, 247490813, -2796091443606465490, 247491615, 247492910, 247491620, -4267071114472318843, 747753505]
the goal is to have them all in just one vector. I did try collect, A[:], vec(A), flatten(A) but it still returns 2-element Vector{Vector{Int64}}
I don't know what command I should use. Is there anything
Assuming your input data is:
julia> x = [[1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6]]
3-element Vector{Vector{Int64}}:
[1, 2]
[3, 4]
[5, 6]
here are some natural options you have.
Option 1: use Iterators.flatten:
julia> collect(Iterators.flatten(x))
6-element Vector{Int64}:
1
2
3
4
5
6
You can omit collect in which case you get a lazy iterator over the source data which is more memory efficient.
Option 2: use vcat:
julia> reduce(vcat, x)
6-element Vector{Int64}:
1
2
3
4
5
6
You could also write:
julia> vcat(x...)
6-element Vector{Int64}:
1
2
3
4
5
6
but splatting might get problematic if your x vector is very long. In which case I recommend you to use the reduce function as shown above.
Say I have a matrix
X = [1 2 3 4; 1 4 3 2];
I would like to find the argmax of each row of this matrix, relative to that row and not the index of the entry within the entirety of X. Meaning that I want the output of argmax(X, dims = (2)) to be a vector,
[4, 2];
but the current output is an array of CartesianIndex
[CartesianIndex(1, 4), CartesianIndex(2, 2)];
Is there a way to specify this in the argmax function or to transform the output efficiently to my desired state?
You can use eachrow to iterate over rows of a matrix:
julia> argmax.(eachrow(X))
2-element Vector{Int64}:
4
2
What a hazzle...
I'm trying to create a vector of integers and missing values. This works fine:
b = [4, missing, missing, 3]
But I would actually like the vector to be longer with more missing values and therefore use repeat(), but this doesn't work
append!([1,2,3], repeat([missing], 1000))
and this also doesn't work
[1,2,3, repeat([missing], 1000)]
Please, help me out, here.
It is also worth to note that if you do not need to do an in-place operation with append! actually in such cases it is much easier to do vertical concatenation:
julia> [[1, 2, 3]; repeat([missing], 2); 4; 5] # note ; that denotes vcat
7-element Array{Union{Missing, Int64},1}:
1
2
3
missing
missing
4
5
julia> vcat([1,2,3], repeat([missing], 2), 4, 5) # this is the same but using a different syntax
7-element Array{Union{Missing, Int64},1}:
1
2
3
missing
missing
4
5
The benefit of vcat is that it automatically does the type promotion (as opposed to append! in which case you have to correctly specify the eltype of the target container before the operation).
Note that because vcat does automatic type promotion in corner cases you might get a different eltype of the result of the operation:
julia> x = [1, 2, 3]
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
1
2
3
julia> append!(x, [1.0, 2.0]) # conversion from Float64 to Int happens here
5-element Array{Int64,1}:
1
2
3
1
2
julia> [[1, 2, 3]; [1.0, 2.0]] # promotion of Int to Float64 happens in this case
5-element Array{Float64,1}:
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.0
2.0
See also https://docs.julialang.org/en/v1/manual/arrays/#man-array-literals.
This will work:
append!(Union{Int,Missing}[1,2,3], repeat([missing], 1000))
[1,2,3] creates just a Vector{Int} and since Julia is strongly typed the Vector{Int} cannot accept values of non-Int type. Hence, when defining a structure, that you plan to hold more data types within, you need to explicitly state it - here we have defined Vector{Union{Int,Missing}}.
I'd like to be able to splat an array of tuples into a function in a vectorized fashion. For example, if I have the following function,
function foo(x, y)
x + y
end
and the following array of tuples,
args_array = [(1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6)]
then I could use a list comprehension to obtain the desired result:
julia> [foo(args...) for args in args_array]
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
However, I would like to be able to use the dot vectorization notation for this operation:
julia> foo.(args_array...)
ERROR: MethodError: no method matching foo(::Int64, ::Int64, ::Int64)
But as you can see, that particular syntax doesn't work. Is there a vectorized way to do this?
foo.(args_array...) doesn't work because it's doing:
foo.((1, 2), (3, 4), (5, 6))
# which is roughly equivalent to
[foo(1,3,5), foo(2,4,6)]
In other words, it's taking each element of args_array as a separate argument and then broadcasting foo over those arguments. You want to broadcast foo over the elements directly. The trouble is that running:
foo.(args_array)
# is roughly equivalent to:
[foo((1,2)), foo((3,4)), foo((5,6))]
In other words, the broadcast syntax is just passing each tuple as a single argument to foo. We can fix that with a simple intermediate function:
julia> bar(args) = foo(args...);
julia> bar.(args_array)
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
Now that's doing what you want! You don't even need to construct the second argument if you don't want to. This is exactly equivalent:
julia> (args->foo(args...)).(args_array)
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
And in fact you can generalize this quite easily:
julia> splat(f) = args -> f(args...);
julia> (splat(foo)).(args_array)
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
You could zip the args_array, which effectively transposes the array of tuples:
julia> collect(zip(args_array...))
2-element Array{Tuple{Int64,Int64,Int64},1}:
(1, 3, 5)
(2, 4, 6)
Then you can broadcast foo over the transposed array (actually an iterator) of tuples:
julia> foo.(zip(args_array...)...)
(3, 7, 11)
However, this returns a tuple instead of an array. If you need the return value to be an array, you could use any of the following somewhat cryptic solutions:
julia> foo.(collect.(zip(args_array...))...)
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
julia> collect(foo.(zip(args_array...)...))
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
julia> [foo.(zip(args_array...)...)...]
3-element Array{Int64,1}:
3
7
11
How about
[foo(x,y) for (x,y) in args_array]
I am trying to construct all possible combinations of four vectors (parameters in a model) that would give me a big nx4 matrix and I could then run simulation on each set (row) of parameters. In R I would achieve this by using expand.grid in Mathematica style, I could use something like outer product with vcat and reduce the output using hcat.
Is there some function analog of expand.grid from R or outer map function?
Toy example:
A = [1 2]
B = [3 4]
some magic
output = [1 3, 1 4, 2 3, 2 4]
Using the Iterators package, it might look like this:
using Iterators
for p in product([1,2], [3,4])
println(p)
end
where you would replace println with your algorithm. You can also use collect if it's important to get the set of all combinations.
Not the exact notation you show, but a comprehension might be useful.
julia> a=[1, 2];
julia> b=[3, 4];
julia> [[i, j] for j in b, i in a]
2x2 Array{Any,2}:
[1,3] [2,3]
[1,4] [2,4]
julia> [[i, j] for j in b, i in a][:]
4-element Array{Any,1}:
[1,3]
[1,4]
[2,3]
[2,4]