Closed. This question needs debugging details. It is not currently accepting answers.
Edit the question to include desired behavior, a specific problem or error, and the shortest code necessary to reproduce the problem. This will help others answer the question.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I try to create a new filter but it didn't work!
When I exclude my Ip Address. I can still view my tracing moves on page "Real-time".
I have a link with Google Tag Manager...
Should I set something else for exclude my Ip Address?
The IP exclusion filters in Google Analytics are notoriously faulty, and as another user said, can't catch scenarios in which dynamic IPs are in play.
The best workaround I've found for this is to install the Block Yourself from Analytics Chrome extension. Seems to work great.
This can happen either if you have a dynamic IP or because you are using the anonymizeIp which sets the last octet of the IP to 0, thus losing the correspondence between the IP and the value entered in the filter.
Related
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have set up DKIM key for signing email following this tutorial:
https://rtcamp.com/tutorials/mail/dkim-postfix-ubuntu/
DNS check with http://www.protodave.com/tools/dkim-key-checker/ is successful.
But when I check with check-auth2#verifier.port25.com if emails are signed, I get a softfail result
DomainKeys check - neutral (message not signed). According to doc "neutral" means:
The message was signed but the signature or signatures
contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
processed. This result SHOULD also be used for other
failures not covered elsewhere in this list.
I've spent hours searching for possible reasons but of no avail.
Details:
Summary of Results
SPF check: softfail
DomainKeys check: neutral
DKIM check: neutral
Sender-ID check: softfail
SpamAssassin check: ham
DomainKeys check details:
Result: neutral (message not signed)
It seems like you are confusing DKIM and DomainKeys which are two different systems:
DomainKeys: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys
DKIM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DomainKeys_Identified_Mail
Your summary does imply that neither of them is signing though.
Have you tried reading also other tutorials? Even if they are for a different platform, they may give you a better understanding of these systems.
Here is an Ansible automation script to set up Postfix with DKIM:
https://github.com/sakaal/service_platform_ansible/blob/master/roles/postfix_standalone/tasks/main.yml
Make sure that you have read and understand all the configuration files:
OpenDKIM documentation: http://www.opendkim.org/docs.html
I hope it helps!
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
Hello I am working on a web page in drupal. One of the content is about a scholarship and there are certain zipcodes that are eligible for that scholarship. I was wondering if there is to have a search box within that web page were the user types in there zip code and than tells you if they are eligible or not I was thinking some javascript, but I was wondering if there is any better ideas. Thanks!
Sure, you could use javascript on the client side or php (as Drupal is in php) on the server side. The tradeoff with the javascript approach is you'll have to send all the valid zip codes (or some rule that computes them) to the client every time your page is loaded. But the upside is then it'll be very fast for the client to try various zip codes (since no server communication will be needed). And this may be easier for you to code.
For your use, you'd probably get better overall performance doing this in php on the server. But then you'll need to be familiar with some form of client-server communication (ajax for instance) so that you can send the zip code back to the server and listen for a response.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
We have come across 2 ways to do cache breaking for our CSS files.
Cache breaker passed as a query parameter:
http://your1337site.com/styles/cool.css?v=123
Cache breaker as part of the name:
http://your1337site.com/styles/123.cool.css
Which way is better? And why?
I feel that the second way is more verbose, because the file matches the name on the folder structure. Where as the first way is good if you want to share "cool.css" on other parts of the site, which don't have access to the unique name you generate each time.
Steve Souder's article Revving Filenames: don’t use querystring makes a good argument for changing the filename as the better of the two.
...a co-worker, Jacob Hoffman-Andrews, mentioned that Squid, a popular proxy, doesn’t cache resources with a querystring. This hurts performance when multiple users behind a proxy cache request the same file – rather than using the cached version everybody would have to send a request to the origin server.
As an aside, Squid 2.7 and above does cache dynamic content with the default configuration
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 10 years ago.
Improve this question
I am working on sn AIX6.1 box, but my question probably applies to all Unix platforms. Unfortunately I haven't found any satisfactory answers on the web.
My question:
Whenever I log in to my AIX box (or, say, any Unix machine), I see a message like,
You have mail in /usr/spool/mail/root
Can anyone tell me a good explanation for this message, like what is its purpose, and on what events this message is displayed to user?
It's shell mail checking. If the file named by the shell variable MAIL - defaulting to something like /var/spool/mail/username - is larger than the last time it checked, then it echoes that message to let you know that well, new mail has arrived.
This is a remainder from old CLI-only Unix times. When there were no GUI email clients yet, and the user logged in to his account on a computer which had an associated mailbox (in our school we have these also), it came handy to notify the user of having unread emails.
Closed. This question is off-topic. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it's on-topic for Stack Overflow.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
i have a forum which sends out many automatic mails. i would like to gather the mails to have an overview. how can i add a bcc to all outgoing mails excluding some mail-subjects or early hours when especially many mails are sent?
There is an always_bcc parameter in Postfix you could set for that. Or modify the configuration of your forum to add yourself as a Bcc: for these mails. Be aware of the privacy issues of such configuration though (IANAL of course). Check the documentation on The Postfix site
If your forum always sends out mail as a specific sender, there is sender_bcc_maps.
sender_bcc_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/bcc_senders
bcc_senders contains
forum#example.com your_bcc_recipient#example.com
Then you can add filters on the recipient side to exclude the mail you want to ignore.
If you're FORUM software is running on a server that is either hosting with Postfix, or relaying it's mail messages through another host that you control (and is running Postfix) [presumptions made from the post being tagged with Postfix].
Two partial solutions have been specified for getting a blind carbon copy by Keltia use always_bcc and Devdas use sender_bcc_maps.
In the forum software, you could always modify the software to send an extra copy to your designated BCC email account.
To provide the filtering:
Blockquote
excluding some mail-subjects or early hours when especially many mails are sent
If your BCC destination is a unix account then you can use .forward to send the message to processing by another script. Procmail has some filtering capabilities that might be helpful here.
Update the forum software logic to specify when you want a BCC.