is there any better way to get multiple specific data from collection in firestore?
Let's say have this collection:
--Feeds (collection)
--feedA (doc)
--comments (collection)
--commentA (doc)
users_in_conversation: [abcdefg, hijklmn, ...] //Field contains list of all user in conversation
Then, I'll need to retrieve the user data (name and avatar) from the Users collection, currently, I did 1 query per user, but it will be slow when there are many people in conversation.
What's the best way to retrieve specific users?
Thanks!
Retrieving the additional names is actually a lot faster than most developers expect, as the requests can often be pipelined over a single HTTP/2 connection. But if you're noticing performance problems, edit your question to show the code you use, the data you have, and the performance you're getting.
A common way to reduce the need to load additional documents is by duplicating data. For example, if you store the name and avatar of the user in each comment document, you won't need to look up the user profile every time you read a comment.
If you come from a background in relational databases, this sort of data duplication may be very unexpected. But it's actually quite common in NoSQL databases.
You will of course then have to consider how to deal with updates to the user profile, for which I recommend reading: How to write denormalized data in Firebase While this is for Firebase's other database, the same concepts apply to Firebase. I also in general recommend watching Getting to know Cloud Firestore.
I have tried some solution, but I think this solution is the best for the case:
When a user posts a comment, write a field of array named discussions in the user document containing the feed/post id.
When user load on a feed/post, get all user data which have its id in the user discussions (using array-contains)
it’s efficient and costs fewer transaction processes.
Related
I have an app that helps store owners manage their inventory through a simple API-driven interface.
My app stores all data on Firestore. My simplified database looks like this:
-users
-name
-email
-uid
-products
-atts
...
-ownerId
-someOtherThing
-atts
...
-ownerId
The idea is that only documents with ownerId that matches the current user ID will be accessible to the user. User with ID=5 will only have access to items that match ownerId=5.
Is this a good way of storing this data? I am worried that I will eventually end up with thousands of documents in that collection and querying them by "ownerId" might not be the best way to tackle this. On the other hand, I might end up with hundreds of users too, which probably makes it bad design to introduce several new collections for each of them?
What would be a better approach design-wise?
While "a good way" is subjective and purely dependent on the use-cases of your app, what you're proposing is quite a common way to store data in Firestore.
Your concern about the number of users and other documents is unwarranted, as Firestore guarantees that the performance of returning the (say) products for a specific user depends solely on the number of products returns, not on the total number of products in the database.
So if you have 10 products that you're the ownerId for, then no matter how many other users/products there are, the amount of time it takes to retrieve your 10 products will always be the same.
I have some documents in firestore have some fields in it. like collection "details" looks like this
{
id: "",
fields1: "",
userFK: Reference to users collection
}
Now I need to resolve userFK on the fly means that I don't want first fetch all the documents then query to userFk userFK.get()
Is there any method, its like doing a $lookup whick is supported in mongodb
Even In some case I want to fetch documents from "details" collection based of some specific fields in users
There is no way to get documents of multiple types from Firestore with a single read operation. To get the user document referenced by userFK you will have to perform a separate read operation.
This is normal when using NoSQL databases like Cloud Firestore, as they typically don't support any server-side equivalent of a SQL JOIN statement. The performance of loading these additional details is not as bad as you may think though, so be sure to measure how long it takes for your use-case before writing it off as not feasible.
If this additional load is prohibitive for a scenario, an alternative is to duplicate the necessary data of the user into each details document. So instead of only storing the reference to their document, you'd for example also store the user name.
This puts more work on the write operation, but makes the read operations simpler and more scalable. This is the common trade-off of space vs time, where in NoSQL databases you'll often find yourself trading time for space: so storing duplicate data.
If you're new to NoSQL data modeling, I highly recommend:
NoSQL data modeling
Getting to know Cloud Firestore
I'm building an app using flutter and firebase and was wondering what the best firestore database structure.
I want the ability for users to post messages and then search by both the content of the post and the posters username.
Does it make sense to create one collection for users with each document storing username and other info and a separate collection for the posts with each document containing the post and the username of the poster?
In the unlikely event where the number of posts exceeds a million or more, is there an additional cost of querying this kind of massive collection?
Would it make more sense to store each user's posts as a sub-collection under their user document? I believe this would require additional read operations to access each document's sub-collection. Would this be cheaper or more expensive if I end up getting a lot of traffic?
is there an additional cost of querying this kind of massive collection?
The cost and performance of reading from Firestore are purely based on the amount of data (number of documents and their size) you retrieve, and not in any way on the number of documents in the collection.
But what is limited in Firestore is the number of writes you can do to data that is "close to each other". That intentionally vague definition means that it's typically better for write scalability to spread the data over separate subcollections, if the data naturally lends itself to that (such as in your case).
To get a great introduction to Firestore, and to data modeling trade-offs, watch Getting to know Cloud Firestore.
I have a Firestore data structure and a document where all my followers can see the recentPosts of mine by querying the collection of documents based on the users field of the document where querying users name is present just like below.
my question is how to share a post of others to my followers, currently i am duplicating the shared post to my recentPostsand my seperate Collection of posts documents, but what if a user deletes the post and the post was shared by million users? i have to delete all the shared posts, is there a better solution?
Given your choice in data model, having to delete the duplicated posts is pretty much the normal solution. I also don't see this as problematic, given that:
You've already written the duplicate post to all these followers to begin with, so the delete is just another write.
Deletes and other writes are relatively uncommon in most applications. If not, consider whether you should really be duplicating the data to all followers.
You could choose to implement this with a global list of deleted posts, that each client then reads. But at that point you're making the code that reads data more complex to prevent writes, which is typically not the best approach when using NoSQL databases.
I'm totally new to Firebase, and I'm trying to get my head round the best db model design for 'relational' data, both 1-1 and 1-many.
We are using the Firestore db (not the realtime db).
Say we have Projects which can contain many Users, and a User can be in multiple Projects
The UI needs to show a list of Users in a Project which shows things like email, firstname, lastname and department.
What is the best way to store the relationship?
An array of User ids in the Project document?
A map of Ids in the Project document?
Ive read the above approaches were recommended, but was that for realtime database? Firestore supports Sub Collections, which sound more appropriate...
A sub collection of Users in the Project document?
A separate collection mapping Project id to User id?
A Reference data type? I've read here https://firebase.google.com/docs/firestore/manage-data/data-types about Reference data type, which sounds like what I want, but I cant find any more on it!
If its just a map or array of Ids, how would you then retrieve the remaining data about the user? Would this have to sit in the application UI?
If its a sub collection of Users documents, is there any way to maintain data integrity? If a user changed their name, would the UI / a cloudFunction then have to update every entry of that users name in the Sub collections?
any help / pointers appreciated...
The approach for modeling many-to-many relationships in Firestore is pretty much the same as it was in Firebase's Realtime Database, which I've answered here: Many to Many relationship in Firebase. The only difference is indeed that you can store the lookup list in a sub-collection of each project/user.
Looking up the linked item is also the same as before, it indeed requires loading them individually from the client. Such a client-side join is not nearly as slow as you may initially expect, so test it before assuming it can't possibly be fast enough.
Ensuring data integrity can be accomplished by performing batched writes or using transactions. These either completely succeed or completely fail.