In the styles.css, I am using media queries, both of which use a variation of:
/*--[ Normal CSS styles ]----------------------------------*/
#media only screen and (max-width: 767px) {
/*--[ Mobile styles go here]---------------------------*/
}
The sites resize to the layout I want in a regular browser (Safari, Firefox) when I shrink the window, however, the mobile layout isn't shown at all on a phone. Instead, I just see the default CSS.
Can anyone point me in the right direction?
All three of these were helpful tips, but it looks like I needed to add a meta tag:
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" name="viewport" />
Now it seems to work in both Android (2.2) and iPhone all right...
Don't forget to have the standard css declarations above the media query or the query won't work either.
.edcar_letter{
font-size:180px;
}
#media screen and (max-width: 350px) {
.edcar_letter{
font-size:120px;
}
}
I suspect the keyword only may be the issue here. I have no issues using media queries like this:
#media screen and (max-width: 480px) { }
i used bootstrap in a press site but it does not worked on IE8, i used css3-mediaqueries.js javascript but still not working. if you want your media query to work with this javascript file add screen to your media query line in css
here is an example :
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width" />
<style>
#media screen and (max-width:900px) {}
#media screen and (min-width:900px) and (max-width:1200px) {}
#media screen and (min-width:1200px) {}
</style>
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="bootstrap.min.css">
<script type="text/javascript" src="css3-mediaqueries.js"></script>
css Link line as simple as above line.
Including a meta tag like below can cause the browser to handle the viewport zooming differently.
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" name="viewport" />
Today I had similar situation. Media query did not work. After a while I found that space after 'and' was missing.
Proper media query should look like this:
#media screen and (max-width: 1024px) {}
The sequential order of css code also matters, for example:
#media(max-width:600px){
.example-text{
color:red;
}
}
.example-text{
color:blue;
}
the above code will not work because of the execution order. Need to write as following：
.example-text{
color:blue;
}
#media(max-width:600px){
.example-text{
color:red;
}
}
Always mention max-width and min-width in some unit like px or rem. This figured it out for me. If I write it without the unit and only the number value, browser can't read the media queries. example:
this is wrong
#media only screen and (max-width:950)
and
this is right
#media only screen and (max-width:950px)
The OP's code snippet clearly uses the correct comment markup but CSS can break in a progressive way — so, if there's a syntax error, everything after that is likely to fail. A couple times I've relied on trustworthy sources that supplied incorrect comment markup that broke my style sheet. Since the OP provided just a small section of their code, I'd suggest the following:
Make sure all of your CSS comments use this markup /* ... */ -- which is the correct comment markup for css according to MDN
Validate your css with a linter or a secure online validator. Here's one by W3
More info:
I went to check the latest recommended media query breakpoints from bootstrap 4 and ended up copying the boiler plate straight from their docs. Almost every code block was labeled with javascript-style comments //, which broke my code — and gave me only cryptic compile errors with which to troubleshoot, which went over my head at the time and caused me sadness.
IntelliJ text editor allowed me to comment out specific lines of css in a LESS file using the ctrl+/ hotkey which was great except it inserts // by default on unrecognized file types. It isn't freeware and less is fairly mainstream so I trusted it and went with it. That broke my code. There's a preference menu for teaching it the correct comment markup for each filetype.
I encountered this issue recently too, and I later found out it was because I didn't put a space between and and (.
This was the error
#media screen and(max-width:768px){
}
Then I changed it to this to correct it
#media screen and (max-width:768px){
}
It may also happen if the browser zoom level is not correct. Your browser window zoom should be 100%. In Chrome use Ctrl + 0 to reset the zoom level.
Throwing another answer into the ring. If you're trying to use CSS variables, then it will quietly fail.
#media screen and (max-device-width: var(--breakpoint-small)) {}
CSS variables don't work in media queries (by design).
Weird reason I've never seen before: If you're using a "parent > child" selector outside of the media query (in Firefox 69) it could break the media query. I'm not sure why this happens, but for my scenario this did not work...
#media whatever {
#child { display: none; }
}
But adding the parent to match some other CSS further up the page, this works...
#parent > #child { display: none; }
Seems like specifying the parent should not matter, since an id is very specific and there should be no ambiguity. Maybe it's a bug in Firefox?
Add Below tag in html's head section
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" name="viewport" />
I use a few methods depending.
In the same stylesheet i use: #media (max-width: 450px), or for separate make sure you have the link in the header correctly. I had a look at your fixmeup and you have a confusing array of links to css. It acts as you say also on HTC desire S.
#media all and (max-width:320px)and(min-width:0px) {
#container {
width: 100%;
}
sty {
height: 50%;
width: 100%;
text-align: center;
margin: 0;
}
}
.username {
margin-bottom: 20px;
margin-top: 10px;
}
due to only not typo mistake not work for me
#media screen and(max-width: 930px) require sopace between the (and) & opening bracket #media screen and (max-width: 930px)
The Only Fix You All Need Is :
Just Take All The Media Queries At The End Of A .CSS File
It Works, Try It
It is important that the #media screen must be at the end of the css
For me I had indicated max-height instead of max-width.
If that is you, go change it !
#media screen and (max-width: 350px) { // Not max-height
.letter{
font-size:20px;
}
}
For everyone having the same issue, make sure you actually wrote "120px" instead of only "120". This was my mistake and it drove me crazy.
Well, in my case, the px after the width value was missing ... Interestingly, the W3C validator did not even notice this error, just silently ignored the definition.
I was having this same problem and it turns out my media queries were in the wrong order. They should be defined from widest to smallest in the CSS
On mobile devices, my post's title and date are clashing and overwriting each other. This looks awful. Here is my site. http://defensionem.com/200-russian-soldiers-along-with-t-90-tanks-in-syria/
It is on Wordpress.
How do I fix this? There are no options in the Theme and I can use Custom CSS.
I tried to hide the date but it did not work.
.meta--items_fl{
display:none !important;
}
What you can do here is write media queries to hide specific elements or change their related css at certain screen lengths. For example,
#media only screen and (max-width: 700px) {
div.meta--items.fl {
display: none;
}
}
The above code would hide the date at a screen width of 700px and below. You can mess around with the width the breakpoint triggers to see what works best for you.
To learn more about media queries, you check this out. Hope that helps!
Got some weird stuff going on. Trying to fix up an old WordPress theme which was never designed for mobile and I found issues once I added media queries. They seem to be what I want overall on mobile devices but once I hit desktop, everything looks messed up as if it's adapting to the mobile media queries and I'm really confused as to why. Am I supposed to add something to the desktop styles to make this work overall? Here's my site in question: http://destinationbeershow.com/
If you have
<body class="mobile">
at your mobile version and you specify the .mobile in all your rules affecting only mobile, then I guess you will be out of the woods.
Actually, i just solved it. I had min-width for those elements when I meant to use max-width. Duh! I think I'm out of the woods.
You might want to clarify with at least one or two examples of the specific problems you're encountering, but just looking at one or two elements, remember some basic CSS rules.
When using media queries, any rules meeting the conditions will be triggered.
Rules overwrite each other top to bottom, which means whatever is listed last will be the property used.
If you're encountering problems when your rules look different, remember that whether CSS rules overwrite each other depends on a rule's specificity. (This is more of a side note, but important to remember. See this article on calculating CSS specificity if this is a problem you're encountering.)
For example:
#media (min-width: 768px) {
#content {
width: 656px;
}
}
#media (min-width: 480px) {
#content {
width: 100%;
}
}
Once the viewport (browser window size) is 480px your element with id="content" will be 100% width. Then, when your viewport is 768px, it will still be 100% width, because the second rule is overwriting the first one since both rules are true.
If you want rules to override the smaller media query rule, then you have to make sure your larger size media query comes after. For example:
#media (min-width: 480px) {
#content {
width: 100%;
}
}
#media (min-width: 768px) {
#content {
width: 656px;
}
}
Hope that makes sense.
I am developing a website which will be responsive in that different CSS styles are applied depending on the width of the users' browser.
the method chosen was to use CSS media queries.
my problem is this: when I use the following code
#media screen
and (min-width: 200px)
and (max-width: 800px)
{
#example
{
background: purple;
}
}
this works when I resize the window on my PC, but is not recognised by my phone whose resolution is within the limits.
perhaps more perculiarly, when I use the following code
#media screen
and (min-device-width: 200px)
and (max-device-width: 800px)
{
#example
{
background: purple;
}
}
this has the inverse effect: displays on phone, but not on PC.
as far as I have read there is no scope for an "OR" operator for something along the lines of the following to be valid
#media screen
and (
((min-width: 200px) and (max-width: 800px))
| / || / OR
((min-device-width: 200px) and (max-device-width: 800px))
)
{
#example
{
background: purple;
}
}
so my question is this: is there a way test responsive CSS on both desktop and phone simultaneously?
I have tried so many combinations:
using #media only screen,
using Android, Firefox and Chrome browsers on the phone,
but to no avail, the result is always the same.
The only way I can think to do this at the moment is to create two separate stylesheets, one for desktop and one for phone, but this would mean updating two stylesheets every time I wanted to view changes in the browser, which is impractical and counters the idea of responsiveness.
I looked into using the orientation: landscape/portrait target, but as far as I can make out this would again involve writing two sets of CSS.
One last consideration is that the website is currently using pure CSS; so no javascript, user-agent determination nor server-side scripting at this point in time.
This must be possible so any insights will be appreciated. I'm sure someone will have had the same problem and enlighten me.
Try using a viewport meta tag:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width,initial-scale=1" />
Place that into the head section of your page.
I'm making a website which has 3 breakpoint 768px, 1024px and 1900 px. Which size of CSS is good to keep outside media query containers?
Adding example
All specific styling inside media queries and all common styling outside
h1 {color:red}
#media only screen and (min-width: 480px) {
h1 {font-size:18px}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 768px) {
h1 {font-size:22px}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024px) {
h1 {font-size:28px}
}
or
Most common used desktop first
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024x) {
h1 {font-size:28px; font-color:red}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 480px) {
h1 {font-size:18px}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 768px) {
h1 {font-size:22px; }
}
or
Mobile first
#media only screen and (min-width: 480px) {
h1 {font-size:18px; font-color:red}
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 1024x) {
h1 {font-size:28px; }
}
#media only screen and (min-width: 768px) {
h1 {font-size:22px; }
}
I believe you mean to ask what CSS should not be inside of the media query blocks, right?
If that is the case I recommend that any CSS that does not change be placed outside of the media query blocks. Any colors, font styling, etc. Any CSS that changes placement of elements, the padding, floats, inline or block display types, any structure-type CSS is what I would put in the media query blocks.
Update: To respond to the updated question, are you asking which order you should put the media blocks in? If that's the case as far as I know it doesn't really matter what order they go in. But to comment on the number of possible media queries, I would separate that CSS into different style sheets just to make it more maintainable. Your media queries would then be a part of the links to your style sheets in your HTML.
There are so many ways to approach this problem - and the decision may be different depending on the circumstances. For example, is there an existing site that you are reverse engineering to be responsive or are you starting from scratch?
STARTING FROM SCRATCH
If starting from scratch, one method is to create all of the basic styles OUTSIDE of any media query - so that these styles can be seen by any device (especially those devices that do not support media queries).
Basic styles could include just colors, and fonts etc - or it could be everything except layout.
Then, media queries are used to add the different layouts on top of the basic styles.
MIN or MIN AND MAX
The next question is how will you work your different media queries...
Will you allow them to be applied on top of one another - in which case you may start small and build up - using min-width only.
For example:
#media only screen and (min-width: 600px)
OR you may want to set them in a series of brackets - so that styes for one size do not interact with another size.
For example:
#media only screen and (min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 800px)
Again, there is no right or wrong - both have strengths and weaknesses. The first option allows you to use styles that flow through all widths. The second option allows you to fully control styles that appear in a specific width - without having to deal with the cascade.
DEALING WITH IE
There are a range of ways for dealing with older versions of IE including.
allow IE to see basic styles only
place media queries in separate CSS files and link to these files using media queries... then also link to a selection of these files (like wide screen CSS files only) via conditional comments.
Use some sort of JS solution like respond.js or others to force IE to understand the media queries.
HTH
I've read many articles recently that suggest starting with the smallest resolution first and working your way upwards using media queries. To me that also makes a lot of sense. The only problem is old browsers (IE) not understanding media queries. There are solutions to that problem though (if you Google).