Set multiple threshold on a log based kusto query - azure-data-explorer

I have set up a log-based alert in Microsoft Azure. The deployment of the alerts done via ARM template.
Where you can input your query and set threshold like below.
"triggerThresholdOperator": {
"value": "GreaterThan"
},
"triggerThreshold": {
"value": 0
},
"frequencyInMinutes": {
"value":15
},
"timeWindowInMinutes": {
"value": 15
},
"severityLevel": {
"value": "0"
},
"appInsightsQuery": {
"value": "exceptions\r\n| where A_ != '2000' \r\n| where A_ != '4000' \r\n| where A_ != '3000' "
}
As far as I understand we can only set threshold once ON an entire query.
Questions: I have multiple statements in my query which I am excluding since it's just a noise. But now I want to set a threshold on value 3000 to 5 and also want to set a time-window to 30 in the same query. meaning only exclude 3000 when it occurs 5 times in the last 30 minutes(when query get run).
exceptions
| where A_ != '2000'
| where A_ != '4000'
| where A_ != '3000'
I am pretty sure that I can't set a threshold like this in the query and the only workaround is to create a new alert just for value 3000 and set a threshold in ARM template. I haven't found any heavy threshold/time filters in Aure. Is there any way I can set multiple thresholds and time filters in a single query? which is again getting checked by different threshold and time filetrs in the ARM template.
Thanks.

I don't fully understand your question.
But for your time window question you could do something like
exceptions
| summarize count() by A_, bin(TimeGenerated, 30m)
That way you will get a count of A_ in blocks of 30 minutes.
Another way would be to do:
let Materialized = materialize(
exceptions
| summarize Count=count(A_) by bin(TimeGenerated, 30m)
); 
Materialized | where Count == 10
But then again it all depends on what you would like to achieve

You can easily set that in the query and fire based on the aggregate result.
exceptions
| where timestamp > ago(30m)
| summarize count2000 = countif(A_ == '2000'), count3000 = countif(A_ == '3000'), count4000 = countif(A_ == '4000')
| where count2000 > 5 or count3000 > 3 or count4000 > 4
If the number of results is greater than one than the aggregate condition applies.

Related

How to summarize a dynamic object column?

Say I have an exceptions table which I know contains some data like the below, where details is a dynamic object
operation_id
details
1
{"cause": "sometext"}
1
{"other_info": 240}
1
{"message": "blabal" }
2
{"cause": "some other text"}
2
{"other_info": 88}
2
{"message": "blabal2" }
How can I query these results to be grouped by operation_id, but somehow aggregate everying in the details column, perhaps something like
operation_id
details_1
details_2
details_3
1
{"cause": "sometext"}
{"other_info": 240}
{"message": "blabal" }
2
{"cause": "some other text"}
{"other_info": 88}
{"message": "blabal2" }
or even just join all details into a single column
I tried doing it with summarize, but it just shows each entry on a separate line (since each details is unique):
exceptions
| where timestamp > now() - 10m
| summarize by operation_Id, dynamic_to_json(['details'])
Does anyone have any advice about this?
you can use the make_bag() aggregation function.
for example:
datatable(operation_id:int, details:dynamic)
[
1, dynamic({"cause": "sometext"}),
1, dynamic({"other_info": 240}),
1, dynamic({"message": "blabal" }),
2, dynamic({"cause": "some other text"}),
2, dynamic({"other_info": 88}),
2, dynamic({"message": "blabal2" }),
]
| summarize details = make_bag(details) by operation_id
operation_id
details
1
{ "cause": "sometext", "other_info": 240, "message": "blabal"}
2
{ "cause": "some other text", "other_info": 88, "message": "blabal2"}
I also got it working like this (using make_set())
exceptions
| project
operation_Id,
details
| summarize Details=make_set(details) by operation_Id
Although it returns details as an array of objects rather than a merged object

Cassandra collection tombstones

I have created a table with a collection. Inserted a record and took sstabledump of it and seeing there is range tombstone for it in the sstable. Does this tombstone ever get removed? Also when I run sstablemetadata on the only sstable, it shows "Estimated droppable tombstones" as 0.5", Similarly it shows one record with epoch time as insert time for - "Estimated tombstone drop times: 1548384720: 1". Does it mean that when I do sstablemetadata on a table having collections, the estimated droppable tombstone ratio and drop times values are not true and dependable values due to collection/list range tombstones?
CREATE TABLE ks.nmtest (
reservation_id text,
order_id text,
c1 int,
order_details map<text, text>,
PRIMARY KEY (reservation_id, order_id)
) WITH CLUSTERING ORDER BY (order_id ASC)
user#cqlsh:ks> insert into nmtest (reservation_id , order_id , c1, order_details ) values('3','3',3,{'key':'value'});
user#cqlsh:ks> select * from nmtest ;
reservation_id | order_id | c1 | order_details
----------------+----------+----+------------------
3 | 3 | 3 | {'key': 'value'}
(1 rows)
[root#localhost nmtest-e1302500201d11e983bb693c02c04c62]# sstabledump mc-5-big-Data.db
WARN 02:52:19,596 memtable_cleanup_threshold has been deprecated and should be removed from cassandra.yaml
[
{
"partition" : {
"key" : [ "3" ],
"position" : 0
},
"rows" : [
{
"type" : "row",
"position" : 41,
"clustering" : [ "3" ],
"liveness_info" : { "tstamp" : "2019-01-25T02:51:13.574409Z" },
"cells" : [
{ "name" : "c1", "value" : 3 },
{ "name" : "order_details", "deletion_info" : { "marked_deleted" : "2019-01-25T02:51:13.574408Z", "local_delete_time" : "2019-01-25T02:51:13Z" } },
{ "name" : "order_details", "path" : [ "key" ], "value" : "value" }
]
}
]
}
SSTable: /data/data/ks/nmtest-e1302500201d11e983bb693c02c04c62/mc-5-big
Partitioner: org.apache.cassandra.dht.Murmur3Partitioner
Bloom Filter FP chance: 0.010000
Minimum timestamp: 1548384673574408
Maximum timestamp: 1548384673574409
SSTable min local deletion time: 1548384673
SSTable max local deletion time: 2147483647
Compressor: org.apache.cassandra.io.compress.LZ4Compressor
Compression ratio: 1.0714285714285714
TTL min: 0
TTL max: 0
First token: -155496620801056360 (key=3)
Last token: -155496620801056360 (key=3)
minClustringValues: [3]
maxClustringValues: [3]
Estimated droppable tombstones: 0.5
SSTable Level: 0
Repaired at: 0
Replay positions covered: {CommitLogPosition(segmentId=1548382769966, position=6243201)=CommitLogPosition(segmentId=1548382769966, position=6433666)}
totalColumnsSet: 2
totalRows: 1
Estimated tombstone drop times:
1548384720: 1
Another quuestion was on the nodetool tablestats output - what does slice refer to in cassandra?
Average live cells per slice (last five minutes): 1.0
Maximum live cells per slice (last five minutes): 1
Average tombstones per slice (last five minutes): 1.0
Maximum tombstones per slice (last five minutes): 1
Dropped Mutations: 0
sstablemetadata does not have the information about your table that is not held within the sstable as it is not guaranteed to be run on system that has Cassandra running, and even if it was its very complex to be able to know how to pull the schema information from it.
Since the gc_grace_seconds is a table parameter and not in the metadata it defaults to assuming a 0 gc grace so the droppable times listed in that histogram will be more a histogram of the tombstone creation times by default. If you know your gc grace you can add it as a -g parameter to your sstablemetadata call. like:
sstablemetadata -g 864000 mc-5-big-Data.db
see http://cassandra.apache.org/doc/latest/tools/sstable/sstablemetadata.html for information on the tools output.
With collections it's just normal range tombstone with all that it entails. They are used to prevent the requirement of a read-before-write when overwriting the value of a multicell collection.

How to: Run a user defined function for a range of (date) values

So let’s say I want to test a function that finds outliers over past data. I’d love to end up with a table that looks like this:
Time Outliers_At_Time
<somedate> 0
<somedate + interval> 1
The function looks like this:
let OutliersAt = (TheDate:datetime) {
<… outputs zero or a positive integer>
}
My instinct would be to do something like this:
let SomeDates = range AtTime from ago(10d) to now() step 10m;
SomeDates | extend NumOutliers = OutliersAt (AtTime)
… but that gives me this error message:
Error Semantic error: '' has the following semantic error: Unresolved
reference binding: 'AtTime'. clientRequestId:
KustoWebV2;1ea28ba0-12f1-4a52-95e7-975db3310f59
Suggestions?
If you are looking on finding outliers - there is a built-in function in Kusto to do it:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/series-outliersfunction
Example:
let _data =
range Timestamp from ago(7d) to now() step 1min
| extend Value=case(rand(1000)==10, 1200.0, rand(100));
//
_data
| make-series AvgValue=avg(Value) default=0 on Timestamp in range(ago(7d), now(), 5min)
| extend outliers=series_outliers(AvgValue)
| render timechart
If the question is about general way to provide parameters to user-defined functions,
see more info here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/kusto/query/functions/user-defined-functions
In particular, you can pass a serie into a user-defined-function (e.g. to get statistics):
let OutliersAt = (_serie:dynamic) {
let stats = series_stats_dynamic(_serie);
todouble(stats.max_idx) >= 0
};
let _data =
range Timestamp from ago(7d) to now() step 1min
| extend Value=case(rand(1000)==10, 1200.0, rand(100));
//
_data
| make-series AvgValue=avg(Value) default=0 on Timestamp in range(ago(7d), now(), 5min)
| extend outliers=series_outliers(AvgValue)
| project hasOutliers=OutliersAt(outliers)

Alert on error rate exceeding threshold using Azure Insights and/or Analytics

I'm sending customEvents to Azure Application Insights that look like this:
timestamp | name | customDimensions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017-06-22T14:10:07.391Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"3000","Id":"49315"}
2017-06-22T14:10:14.699Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"3000","Id":"49315"}
2017-06-22T14:10:15.716Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"2000","Id":"49315"}
2017-06-22T14:10:21.164Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"1000","Id":"41986"}
2017-06-22T14:10:24.994Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"3000","Id":"41986"}
2017-06-22T14:10:25.604Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"2000","Id":"41986"}
2017-06-22T14:10:29.964Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"3000","Id":"54234"}
2017-06-22T14:10:35.192Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"2000","Id":"54234"}
2017-06-22T14:10:35.809Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"3000","Id":"54234"}
2017-06-22T14:10:39.22Z | StatusChange | {"Status":"1000","Id":"74458"}
Assuming that status 3000 is an error status, I'd like to get an alert when a certain percentage of Ids end up in the error status during the past hour.
As far as I know, Insights cannot do this by default, so I would like to try the approach described here to write an Analytics query that could trigger the alert. This is the best I've been able to come up with:
customEvents
| where timestamp > ago(1h)
| extend isError = iff(toint(customDimensions.Status) == 3000, 1, 0)
| summarize failures = sum(isError), successes = sum(1 - isError) by timestamp bin = 1h
| extend ratio = todouble(failures) / todouble(failures+successes)
| extend failure_Percent = ratio * 100
| project iff(failure_Percent < 50, "PASSED", "FAILED")
However, for my alert to work properly, the query should:
Return "PASSED" even if there are no events within the hour (another alert will take care of the absence of events)
Only take into account the final status of each Id within the hour.
As the request is written, if there are no events, the query returns neither "PASSED" nor "FAILED".
It also takes into account any records with Status == 3000, which means that the example above would return "FAILED" (5 out of 10 records have Status 3000), while in reality only 1 out of 4 Ids ended up in error state.
Can someone help me figure out the correct query?
(And optional secondary questions: Has anyone setup a similar alert using Insights? Is this a correct approach?)
As mentioned, since you're only querying on a singe hour your don't need to bin the timestamp, or use it as part of your aggregation at all.
To answer your questions:
The way to overcome no data at all would be to inject a synthetic row into your table which will translate to a success result if no other result is found
If you want your pass/fail criteria to be based on the final status for each ID, then you need to use argmax in your summarize - it will return the status corresponding to maximal timestamp.
So to wrap it all up:
customEvents
| where timestamp > ago(1h)
| extend isError = iff(toint(customDimensions.Status) == 3000, 1, 0)
| summarize argmax(timestamp, isError) by tostring(customDimensions.Id)
| summarize failures = sum(max_timestamp_isError), successes = sum(1 - max_timestamp_isError)
| extend ratio = todouble(failures) / todouble(failures+successes)
| extend failure_Percent = ratio * 100
| project Result = iff(failure_Percent < 50, "PASSED", "FAILED"), IsSynthetic = 0
| union (datatable(Result:string, IsSynthetic:long) ["PASSED", 1])
| top 1 by IsSynthetic asc
| project Result
Regarding the bonus question - you can setup alerting based on Analytics queries using Flow. See here for a related question/answer
I'm presuming that the query returns no rows if you have no data in the hour, because the timestamp bin = 1h (aka bin(timestamp,1h)) doesn't return any bins?
but if you're only querying the last hour, i don't think you need the bin on timestamp at all?
without having your data it's hard to repro exactly but... you could try something like (beware syntax errors):
customEvents
| where timestamp > ago(1h)
| extend isError = iff(toint(customDimensions.Status) == 3000, 1, 0)
| summarize totalCount = count(), failures = countif(isError == 1), successes = countif(isError ==0)
| extend ratio = iff(totalCount == 0, 0, todouble(failures) / todouble(failures+successes))
| extend failure_Percent = ratio * 100
| project iff(failure_Percent < 50, "PASSED", "FAILED")
hypothetically, getting rid of the hour binning should just give you back a single row here of
totalCount = 0, failures = 0, successes = 0, so the math for failure percent should give you back 0 failure ratio, which should get you "PASSED".
without being to try it i'm not sure if that works or still returns you no row if there's no data?
for your second question, you could use something like
let maxTimestamp = toscalar(customEvents where timestamp > ago(1h)
| summarize max(timestamp));
customEvents | where timestamp == maxTimestamp ...
// ... more query here
to get just the row(s) that have that have a timestamp of the last event in the hour?

Two index with one value in a lua table

I am very new to lua and my plan is to create a table. This table (I call it test) has 200 entries - each entry has the same subentries (In this example the subentries money and age):
This is a sort of pseudocode:
table test = {
Entry 1: money=5 age=32
Entry 2: money=-5 age=14
...
Entry 200: money=999 age=72
}
How can I write this in lua ? Is there a possibility ? The other way would be, that I write each subentry as a single table:
table money = { }
table age = { }
But for me, this isn't a nice way, so maybe you can help me.
Edit:
This question Table inside a table is related, but I cannot write this 200x.
Try this syntax:
test = {
{ money = 5, age = 32 },
{ money = -5, age = 14 },
...
{ money = 999, age = 72 }
}
Examples of use:
-- money of the second entry:
print(test[2].money) -- prints "-5"
-- age of the last entry:
print(test[200].age) -- prints "72"
You can also turn the problem on it's side, and have 2 sequences in test: money and age where each entry has the same index in both arrays.
test = {
money ={1000,100,0,50},
age={40,30,20,25}
}
This will have better performance since you only have the overhead of 3 tables instead of n+1 tables, where n is the number of entries.
Anyway you have to enter your data one way or another. What you'd typically do is make use some easily parsed format like CSV, XML, ... and convert that to a table. Like this:
s=[[
1000 40
100 30
0 20
50 25]]
test ={ money={},age={}}
n=1
for balance,age in s:gmatch('([%d.]+)%s+([%d.]+)') do
test.money[n],test.age[n]=balance,age
n=n+1
end
You mean you do not want to write "money" and "age" 200x?
There are several solutions but you could write something like:
local test0 = {
5, 32,
-5, 14,
...
}
local test = {}
for i=1,#test0/2 do
test[i] = {money = test0[2*i-1], age = test0[2*i]}
end
Otherwise you could always use metatables and create a class that behaves exactly like you want.

Resources